richardboydenreport

Home » Posts tagged 'Jews'

Tag Archives: Jews

Kike Owner of Team of ‘Niggers’ and Their Kike Attorney Like Ruling On “Redskins” Trademark!

Image may contain: 1 person, tree and outdoor
Personal Intro: Just to let everyone reading this blog, I am going out of my way to make sure it is shared with any and all “KIKE” media, Synagogue of Satan synagogues, the SPLC and the ADL…not to mention any and all “KIKE” owned and operated law offices and as well as the “KIKE” sodomites and pedophiles in Congress like Chuckie Schumer who took donations from KikePedo Jeffery Epstein and who are involved in the world wide child porn SNUFF network And add to that cess pool the “KIKE ” sexual predator and bowel movement sex freak Barney Frank among others in the know..right? 🙂 And it will…in due time :).
A little of my background in the “light” of what I am sharing so that I won’t be “profiled” 🙂 I lived in Israel in 1972…Kibbutz Mishmar Hasharon near Netanya. And I had a personal letter posted on “Bibi’s” web page warning of him of that Jew Hating raping murdering pedophile and drug dealer William Jefferson Clinton who took trips with KIKE Dershowitz to Epsteins Island where girls were raped. I also put the only “Jewish” radio program on air in KC Missouri…KCXL 1140 Liberty MO where I was a talk show host for 4 years…AND…my real last name is Zickler…became a “Boyden” through my father being adopted by a “Boyden” who married my Grandmother! 🙂
IF you “google” my name…you will find another sodomite who is hired by the FEDS to slander me with lies like I never “served” etc etc etc…his handle is Bill Bunting…rape promoter spawned into a family of convicted child molesters. He calls the Lakota Dakota and all other Native American’s “Prairie Niggers” and stated that Native women DESERVE to be raped!

Image result for Greg Peterman, Federal U.S. Attorney

It is important for you to know that Kike “Snyagogue Of The Hills” Greg Peterman, Federal U.S. Attorney…is in collusion with the FBI who is in collusion with the CARTELS to make sure METH and HEROIN is safely and freely distributed on Reservations in SD just like in Montana working with the FBI working with CARTELS there! You can call this the continuation of the KIKE  “small pox blankets” template.

Image result for perry ray robinson jr.

This same FBI has diligently covered up the murder of at least 11 men and women…including a famous Black Man…Perry Ray Robinson Jr. at Wounded Knee in 1973 at the hands of the Fed Bred American Indian Movement. They are still buried there and PETERMAN knows that and where along with the other “KIKES” involved in the cover-up of like Bruce Ellison and others! This is Robinson’s FB page .

Related image

The KIKES and FBI also orchestrated with John Trudell and AIM leadership the rape and murder of First Nations women Annie Mae Aquash .  Former Senator James Abourezk was the primary “order giver” of her murder. He also was Obama’s advisor and the reason why Robinson’s story has been ignored and snuffed. The two convicted of murdering Aquash are now “FREE” running around  Pine Ridge and elsewhere! And KIKE Peterman knows all of this TOO!

Image result

KIKE /Closet Jew and now in hell William Janklow  raped his Native American “babysitter” Jancita Eagle Deer on the Rosebud Sioux Tribe Reservation. He was protected by the FBI. Two weeks before she was to testify…Janklow had her murdered. Right after that her mother Daphine was found dead! I call this incognito Jewdocide” which IS the history of South Dakota’s Jews and Free Masons protecting murderers and rapists of Lakota Dakota Nakota peoples.
My connection with “Indian Country”…I have lived among the OYATE on Pine RIdge and have been embedded their on and off for 23 years which included operating a Charity that delivered 500 tons of food, wood burning stoves, clothes and appliances…which Charity the “KIKE” media in KC refused to cover.
I also worked among the youth in the area of suicide on 4 Reservations…spoke at jails and detention centers etc. I know the truth about the reality of what goes on in Indian Country and who is responsible. This is why I am going after those who continue to treat the Great Sioux Nation and others as “Redskins”…those who call themselves Jews and are NOT Jews…but belong to the Synagogue of Satan who’s father obviously IS the Devil!

Now to the “Meat” of what this blog is about!

Image result for Arnold & Porter Kaye ScholerLook everyone! The below KIKE Jewess and “REDSKIN” hater works for this firm of pond scum! Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP has lots of “Kikes” working with and for Kike Organizations…like the “Washington Niggerskins” for example! 🙂

Hail their fellow Jew Columbus who murdered and raped “Redskins” and loved it!

Image result for Lisa Blatt: Redskins trademark defense

Lisa Blatt: The KIKE legal mind behind the REDKSINS ‘Take Yo Panties Off’ trademark defense. (She takes her panties off for NIGGERS 🙂 )

 

Image result for rare wounded knee photos

Image result for Lisa Blatt: Redskins trademark defense

KIKE owner of the Washington “Niggerskins” Dan Snyder!

Image result for washington redskins mascots black man

This racist mascot “nigger” is DEAD!

In September of 1868 the Buffalo Soldiers killed 25 Apaches and were allowed after the battle to collect scalps and souvenirs by Lieutenant Cusack. Upon their return to Fort Davis, Texas, they were observed “rigged out’ in “full Indian costume with the most fantastic head-dresses” and their “faces painted in a comical style”.

Image result for photos dead american indians

 

Image result for indigenous american genocide by jews

Foreword: There is always two sides to a story…and a “name”…and a “racial slur” and the people targeted by “outsiders” for extermination by the same from the beginning of the arrival of the Jew Columbus. Lots of photos and links for those who want to “read and learn”. If not…stay stupid because after one reads this blog…your days of “ignorance” are over!

So let’s play the “racism game” OK? No double standard here. Just facts pointing to the documented hypocrisy as found in the history of Indigenous Native American people and their experiences with Jews and African’s…who by the way…were brought here by the Jews! Blacks should know better but they don’t and never will as evidenced by their support of the use of the word NIGGER…whoops…I mean REDSKIN!

Yes…the word REDSKIN is the same as the word NIGGER…no matter what any KIKE or NIGGER says! And the Washington KIKE Post “poll”…was not taken from “Real Indians” but “wannabes”… 🙂 The below “history” has been snuffed and ignored by Kikes, Niggers, Christians and of course New Age and Free Masonic Luciferian’s and androgynous “he/she’s”.

Game time is OVER! 🙂

Related image

Let it first be known that the Jew of all Jews connected to Kikes and “Redskin” haters like Dan Snyder and the Genocide of 100,000,000 Indigenous was Christopher Columbus. His real name was Salvador Fernando Zarco

http://www.ramsheadpress.com/messiah/ch16.htm

Columbus’ mother was Susanna [Shoshana in Hebrew, hnvwv], (a Jewish name)….” He (Garcia) also found: “…in the archives of Pontevedra, a record setting forth that in the fifteenth century, there lived in that city, a family by the name of Colon, ‘several members of which bore the same forenames as are to be found among the Colombos of Genoa, the kinsmen of Christopher Columbus. In 1434 and 1437, there was at Pontevedra a Domingo Colon; in 1438 a Bartolomé Colon; in 1496 a Cristobo Colon; in 1434 a Blanca Colon. As we shall see, Domenico was the name of Columbus’ father; Bartolomeo that of his younger brother; and Bianchinetta was the name of Columbus’ sister.” He also notes: “…the devoted friends of Columbus, Juan Cabrero, Luis de Santangel, Gabriel Sanchez, and Alfonso de la Caballeria, [were] all men of Jewish extraction.”

Christopher Columbus was in fact a Marrano Jew. The Marranos, sometimes called converses (the converts) were the Spanish Jews, who lived and prospered under the Arab rule in Spain, and later after the Christian recapture of Spain, pretended to convert to Christianity to escape the Spanish Inquisition of 1350 initiated by the Catholic Church to assert Christianity throughout all Europe. Cecil Roth, the British Jewish historian stated: “It was not difficult for insincere, temporizing Jews to become insincere temporizing Christians.”  (Cecil Roth’s “History of the Marranos”, Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1932)

Many Jewish historians such as Cecil Roth (“Personalities and Events In Jewish History”; Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1953) and Tina Levitan (“Jews in American Life”, New York: Hebrew Publishing 1969) asserted that there are strong evidence that Columbus was a Jew.  Levitan found a reference to Columbus’ Jewishness in a diplomatic document written by the French Ambassador to Spain, who referred to Columbus as “the Jew”.  Columbus’ original name was Cristobol Colon; the son of Domingo Colon and Susanna Fontanarossa, the daughter of Jew Jacob Abraham. According to Levitan: “No Spanish Jew could ever have expected aid from the king and queen of Spain, so the explorer (Columbus) claimed to be an Italian Catholic.”

Both Jewish Historians; George Cohen in his book “Jews in the Making of America”; The Stratford Co. Boston, MA 1924, and Dr. M. Kayserling in his book “Christopher Columbus and the Participation of the Jews in the Spanish and Portuguese Discoveries”; New York: Hermon Press, 1894, proclaimed that wealthy Marrano Jews such as Luis de Santangelo, Gabriel Sanchez, Juan Cabrero and others, not Queen Isabella had financed Columbus’ expeditions. Santangelo and Cabrero invested 17,000 ducats (more than $100,000) while other Jews such as Abraham Ben Samuel Zacuto provided astronomy and navigation equipment.

Image result for indigenous murdered by columbus

In his first expedition Columbus discovered the Island of Hispaniola (present day Haiti and the Dominican Republic), where he established a small colony of thirty nine of his crew. On his return to Spain he claimed that he discovered a new land. He called it the New Promised Land in order to encourage Jews to finance and to join him in more expeditions. His second expedition consisted of an invasion force of seventeen large ships and 1.5 million new colonists to Hispaniola. On his arrival he discovered that the natives, known as Taino, had slaughtered the tyrannical 39 men he left there. So in order to re-establish his authority and to colonize the Island for his mostly Jewish new colonists Columbus instituted hard policies of slavery and extermination against the native Taino population.

“By the time he finally left the island in 1504, the Taino had been reduced from eight million down to 100,000, making Columbus the JEW the most prolific serial killer in history.”He and his men committed some of the cruelest atrocities against another race ever recorded. Columbus used any pretext as an excuse to kill and torture.

Those poor souls who could not pay tribute to him had their hands cut off and were left to bleed to death. Columbus was documented by the chronicles of Las Casas, know as Brev’sima relaci-n, to have partaken in mass hangings, roasting people on spits, burnings at the stake, and hacking young children to death as punishment for the most minor of crimes. He and his men massacred the natives, sometimes hundreds at a time for sport, making bets on who could split a man in two, or cut a head off in one blow.”

Christopher Columbus and the Genocide of the Taino Nation October 12th, 2013
Categories: Past News 

Link: http://socyberty.com/history/christopher-columbus-and-the-genocide-of-the-taino-nation/

Related image

 The JEW/KIKE Franco and his men committed some of the cruelest atrocities against another race ever recorded. Columbus used any pretext as an excuse to kill and torture. Those poor souls who could not pay tribute to him had their hands cut off and were left to bleed to death. He was documented by the chronicles of Las Casas, know as Brev’sima relaci-n, to have partaken in mass hangings, roasting people on spits, burnings at the stake, and hacking young children to death as punishment for the most minor of crimes. He and his men massacred the natives, sometimes hundreds at a time for sport, making bets on who could split a man in two, or cut a head off in one blow. By 1542 there were only 200 Taino remaining on the island and soon afterwords they were considered extinct http://www.thepeoplesvoice.org/TPV3/Past-News.php/2013/10/12/christopher-columbus-and-the-genocide-of-1

“Spanish scholars Jose Erugo, Otero Sanchez and Nicholas Dias Perez have concluded that Columbus was, in fact, a secret Jew whose voyage to the Indies had another altogether different objective than he claimed.

The content of Columbus’ personal letters and diary entries prove most revealing. One telling difference between Columbus’ personal writings and those of his contemporaries was the language it was written in, namely one unrecognizable to most native Spaniards. Linguistics professor Estelle Irizarry, after analyzing the language of hundreds of similar letters concluded that it was written in Castilan Spanish or Ladino, a Jewish version of the Spanish language, analogous to what the Yiddish language is to German.

Another revelation is in the mysterious monogram found on his the letters, written right to left. To quote Semitic linguist Maurice David, who discovered the meaning of the symbols, “On all of these… intimate letters the attentive reader can plainly see at the left top corner a little monogram which is… in fact, nothing more…. than an old Hebrew greeting….frequently used among religious Jews all over the world even to this day”. The symbol he was referring to were the Hebrew letters bet and heh, which we know to stand for b’ezrat Hashem, or with God’s help. Not surprisingly, Columbus’ letter to the King and Queen was the only one of his 13 letters studied that did not contain this symbol.

Three of the wishes in Columbus’ will and testament also lend a number of telling clues to his identity. One request in his will was that one-tenth of his income be given as charity to provide dowry for poor girls, a commonly practiced Jewish custom that stretches far back. He also requested to have money given to a certain Jew who lived near the Jewish quarter of Lisbon.

Another particularly tell tale note in his will seemed to be somewhat of a hidden signature, a triangular form of dots and letters that resembled inscriptions found on gravestones of Jewish cemeteries in Spain. Columbus even instructed his children to maintain this mysterious symbol for perpetuity. The hidden signature, when translated, was actually a prayer in lieu of the standard Hebrew kaddish, which was forbidden in Spain. This ploy allowed Columbus to covertly instruct his children to recite the kaddish prayer for him.” http://jewishvoiceny.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=17204:christopher-columbus-secret-jew&catid=121&Itemid=776

 

Image result for Jewish Pioneers of the Black Hills Gold Rush

Jews established “Manifest Destiny Of The Genocide Of Indians Free Masonic Lodges” in the US. http://www.shamash.org/lists/scj-faq/HTML/faq/16-03.html They represent their god who they call “Lucifer”.

Related image

The first whiskey distilleries started in America were established in Newport by a Jew named Nicholas Lowe. Whiskey was a “Jewish tool” to take advantage of Indians in “commerce”. (They do the same now through a Nebraska State town called White Clay!)

The Iroquois also traded for alcohol, which the Europeans introduced. Eventually, this would have a very negative influence on their society, as they suffered a high rate of alcoholism. By 1753 Scarrooyady, a chief, petitioned the Governor of Pennsylvania to intervene in trade:

“Your Traders now bring scarce anything but Rum and Flour; they bring little powder and lead, or other valuable goods . . . and get all the skins that should go to pay the debts we have contracted for goods bought of the Fair Traders; by this means we not only ruin ourselves but them too. These wicked Whiskey Sellers, when they have once got the Indians in liquor, make them sell their very clothes from their backs.

“Genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation. It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves. The objectives of such a plan would be disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of personal security, liberty, health, dignity, and even the lives of the individuals belonging to such groups.”

Buffalo_galloping

 

Related image

 

Related image

 

Image result for dan snyder redskins jew

 

Image result for jew dan snyder washington niggerskins

 

Image result for dan snyder redskins jew

Jews and Small Pox Blankets Given Out by Kike Snyder’s Progeny

KIKE Andrew Levy participated in the extermination plot against the Indians by providing them with blankets laced with smallpox.

He is listed as a resident of Lancaster, Pennsylvania with “two female slaves and one house.” Levy once had a slave “who preferred freedom with the Indians to servitude under Levy. The slave ran off with a local tribe.”

British General Jeffrey Amherst’s pathological hatred for the Indian knew no limits – co-existence was not an option. In a postscript of a 1763 letter to Col. Henry Bouquet, Amherst wrote: “Could it not be contrived to send the smallpox among these disaffected tribes of Indians? We must on this occasion use every stratagem in our power to reduce them.”

Rabbi Sharfman explains the events that followed and the involvement of the Jewish Indian traders: “Captain Ecuyer then called upon Levy Andrew [Levy] at his trading post. He told how he tricked the chief into accepting the deadly gifts and placed an order to replace the blankets and handkerchiefs. This grim invoice accompanied the new goods, receipt of which was duly acknowledged by Ecuyer: Debtor: The Crown to Levy, Trent & Co., for sundries had by order of Captain Simeon Ecuyer, Commandant…to sundries, got to replace in kind those which were taken from the people in the hospital to convey the smallpox to the Indians, viz., 2 blankets @ 2.00. 1 silk handkerchief @ .10. 1 linen do. 3.6 Total: 2.13.6 Fort Pitt, August 15, 1763 I do hereby certify that the above articles…were had for the uses above-mentioned. S. Ecuyer, Captain, Commandant” Seventy Shawnee, Mingo, and Delaware, fell before the unseen enemy, smallpox. Many more undoubtably died, for the Indians had no resistance to the white man’s diseases.

http://www.businessinsider.com/diseases-columbus-brought-to-americas-2015-10

The disregard for the humanity of the Red man and woman is demonstrated in the scholarship of the foremost Jewish historian, Jacob Rader Marcus, who describes the mockery of an Indian by Hyam Myer’s “Wild West” show, and further calls it “the spirit of enterprise”: “Like many of his fellow merchants in the Canadian fur trade, Myers had suffered reverses during the French and Indian War and presumably in the Indian uprising that followed it. To recoup his fortunes, he had his friend Sampson Simson intercede with Sir William Johnson for formal permission to exhibit some Mohawks in Europe. Myers sailed with the Indians before the proper certificate was forthcoming from the Indian Commissioner, and had already begun to parade them in Holland and in the taverns of London when the Lords of Trade urged Lieutenant-Governor Cadwallader Colden in New York to have Johnson put an end to the undertaking. From all indications Myers made no money on his grand European tour, for he ended up owing the Indians money – or refusing to pay them. Then, as now, there was ‘no business like show business!’”

 The Little Jew Was There…Sigmund Shlesinger!

Shlesinger, in September 1868, when a lad of nineteen years old, entered the contest against the red men. 

Monday, September I868 “Scalpt 3 Indians which were found about 15 Feet from my hole consealt in Grass.” 

Related image

“The way the bounties worked, generally speaking, was that you’d be paid a certain rate for the scalp of an adult male Indian, half that rate for the scalp of an adult female, and half that for the scalp of a child of either sex. A child was usually defined as an Indian under 10 years of age, including fetuses.

Around 1700, Massachusetts Colony was paying £100 Sterling for the scalp of an adult male, and that was four times the annual income of an average farmer. So you end up with farmers shooting random Indians whenever they happen to pass by. And you also end up with a whole milieu of professional scalp hunters.

The record is absolutely riddled with this sort of thing: John Sullivan’s troops returning from their 1779 campaign against the Senecas wearing Indian-skin leggings.

Image result for buffalo soldiers rape indians

 

Image result for buffalo soldiers Apache scalps

 

Image result for buffalo soldiers wounded knee medals of honor

Image result for Jewish Pioneers of the Black Hills Gold Rush

Related image


Photo – Invasion forces of the Great Sioux Nation: 10th Cavalry H troop K company
at Pine Ridge, South Dakota 1890-91.

HISTORY HIDDEN! The 10th Coulored Calvary was wiped out by the Oglala on Pine Ridge! 🙂

Image may contain: one or more people, sky and outdoor

Murdering racist Nigger Buffalo Soldiers who raped and murdered Lakota, Dakota and Nakota women and girls! Just like they did to any and all “Redskins” they had contact with being the feral black beasts there were then as “field niggers” for their Masters!

(Stationed at Pine Ridge Agency: Brigadier General John R. Brooke and Companies F, I and K of the 9th (Coloured) Cavalry and 1 Hotchkiss breech loading 2 pounder cannon (which fired like a Gatling gun.

Stationed at Rosebud Agency: Lieutenant Colonel A. T. Smith Companies A and G of the 9th (Coloured) Cavalry, 1 Hotchkiss breech loading 2 pounder cannon. Troopers from the 9th and 7th Cavalry dispatched to retrieve Chief Big Foot and his people.

The Hotchkiss Gun was a five barrel revolving cannon. It was manufactured in 37mm; 40mm; 47mm and 57mm versions. It used explosive shells and had a rate of fire of 80 rounds per minute. The Hotchkiss Guns used at Wounded Knee were the: Hotchkiss Breech-loading Steel Mountain Rifle, caliber 1.65 inches {40mm}; length of bore, 24.72 calibers; weight of tube, 116.6 pounds; weight of carriage, 220 pounds; weight of exploding cartridge, 2 pounds 10 ounces; effective range, 4,200 yards. Personally, I feel the reason why only 150 some slaughtered Lakota children, women, and men were buried at Wounded Knee is because of the fact ONLY that many bodies were intact enough TO BURY!)

Image result for photos dead american indians

The United States Military profiled American Indians found in this statement made by a member of wrote, ” every redskin must be killed from off the fact of the plains before we can be free from their molestations. They are of no earthly good and the sooner they are swept from the land the better for civilization. I do not think they can be turned aside and made good law abiding citizens any more then coyotes can be used for shepherd dogs” Quote from Major John Vance Lauderdale, US Army surgeon attending physician at the Wounded Knee Massacre.

Image result for 10th colored cavalry wounded knee

https://i0.wp.com/sites.austincc.edu/caddis/wp-content/uploads/sites/106/2015/08/Woundedknee1891.jpg

The below song was written by African Buffalo NIGGER Soldier who glorified the Mass Murder of over 300 innocent Lakota/Dakota men, women, and children at Wounded Knee on December 29th 1890 who they called “REDSKINS”!.

This was right after Mr. Wizard Of Oz L. Frank Baum called for the extermination of the “Redskins”! Jews all over the world LOVE the Wizard of Oz!

A GHOST-DANCE BALLAD

THE INDIAN GHOST DANCE AND WAR

The Red Skins left their Agency, the Soldiers left their Post,
All on the strength of an Indian tale about Messiah’s ghost
Got up by savage chieftains to lead their tribes astray;
But Uncle Sam wouldn’t have it so, for he ain’t built that way.
They swore that this Messiah came to them in visions sleep,
And promised to restore their game and Buffalos a heap,
So they must start a big ghost dance, then all would join their band,
And may be so we lead the way into the great Bad Land.

Chorus:

They claimed the shirt Messiah gave, no bullet could go through,
But when the Soldiers fired at them they saw this was not true.
The Medicine man supplied them with their great Messiah’s grace,
And he, too, pulled his freight and swore the 7th hard to fnce.

About their tents the Soldiers stood, awaiting one and all,
That they might hear the trumpet clear when sounding General call
Or Boots and Saddles in a rush, that each and every man
Might mount in haste, ride soon and fast to stop this devilish band
But Generals great like Miles and Brooke don’t do things up that way,
For they know an Indian like a book, and let him have his sway
Until they think him far enough and then to John they’ll say,
“You had better stop your fooling or we’ll bring our guns to play.”

Chorus: They claimed the shirt, etc.

The 9th marched out with splendid cheer the Bad Lands to explo’e–
With Col. Henry at their head they never fear the foe;
So on they rode from Xmas eve ’till dawn of Xmas day ;
The Red Skins heard the 9th was near and fled in great dismay;
The 7th is of courage bold both officers and men,
But bad luck seems to follow them and twice has took them in;
They came in contact with Big Foot’s warriors in their fierce might
This chief made sure he had a chance of vantage in the fight.

Chorus: They claimed the shirt, etc.

A fight took place, ’twas hand to hand, unwarned by trumpet
While the Sioux were dropping man by man–the 7th killed them all,
And to that regiment be said “Ye noble braves, well done,
Although you lost some gallant men a glorious fight you’ve won.”
The 8th was there, the sixth rode miles to swell that great command
And waited orders night and day to round up Short Bull’s band.
The Infantry marched up in mass the Cavalry’s support,
And while the latter rounded up, the former held the fort.

Chorus: They claimed the shirt, etc.

E battery of the 1st stood by and did their duty well,
For every time the Hotchkiss barked they say a hostile fell.
Some Indian soldiers chipped in too and helped to quell the fray,
And now the campaign’s ended and the soldiers marched away.
So all have done their share, you see, whether it was thick or thin,
And all helped break the ghost dance up and drive the hostiles in.
The settlers in that region now can breathe with better grace;
They only ask and pray to God to make John hold his base.

Chorus: They claimed the shirt, etc.

(W. H. Prather, I, 9th Cavalry).

 

Related image

 

Image result for wounded knee massacre

 

Image result for tecumseh skinned leggings

William Henry Harrison’s men skinning Tecumseh to make “souvenirs” after they killed him at Tippecanoe in 1811.

Image result for andrew jackson redskins genocide

President Andrew Jackson commissioned United States troops “…to root out from their ‘dens’ and kill Indian women and their ‘whelps’” (Stannard, p. 240).

Jackson was so effective at rooting women and “whelps” from their “dens,” he adopted the habit of cutting off his victims’ noses as trophies to commemorate his exploits. He earned the name “Sharp Knife” from Creek Indians for his penchant for skinning victims and using the cured and braided tissue as reins for his ponies (Takaki, 1994).

Andrew Jackson’s cutting off the noses of the dead at Horseshoe Bend. https://indiancountrymedianetwork.com/history/people/indian-killer-andrew-jackson-deserves-top-spot-on-list-of-worst-us-presidents/

Image result for buffalo soldiers Apache scalps

A Freemason raping murdering killing and mutilating “REDSKINS”!

“As he aimed his howitzers on an encampment of unarmed Indians at Sand Creek, Colorado, in 1864, an army colonel named John Chivington, who had once said that thelives of Indian children should not be spared because “nits make lice,” told his officers: “I have come to kill Indians, and believe it is right and honorable to use any means under God’s heaven to kill Indians.” Hundreds of Indian women, children, and old men were slaughtered in the Sand Creek massacre.

One officer who was present said later, “Women and children were killed and scalped, children shot at their mother’s breasts, and all the bodies mutilated in the most horrible manner. The dead bodies of females were profaned in such a manner that the recital is sickening.

The troopers cut off the vulvas of Indian women, stretched them over their saddle horns, then decorated their hatbands with them; some used the skin of brave’s scrotums and the breasts of Indian women as tobacco pouches, then showed off these trophies, together with the noses and ears of some of the Indians they had massacred, at the Denver Opera House.

Chivington’s volunteers returning to Denver from Sand Creek with female genitalia stretched over their hats in 1864.  The bounty on Indian scalps in Minnesota was $200 in 1863.167 In Texas, a bounty was first offered by the Spanish, then continued by Mexico, then continued by first the Republic, then the State of Texas, and not discontinued until the 1880s, when the legislature determined that there were no longer enough Indians left to warrant its continuation. In California, private citizens continued the bounty even after the state legislature repealed it.”

http://sdonline.org/33/an-american-holocaust-the-structure-of-denial/

Image result for wizard of oz baum redskins

Jews love the Wizard Of Oz!!!!!

L. Frank Baum called for the extermination of the “Redskins”. His “Kaballa  theism” was directly connected to Madam Blavatsky who stated “Lucifer is god” along with her “cousins” the Freemasons in in particular Albert Pike. http://www.lermanet.com/rainbow-swaztika/naI.htm

His “spiritualism” also included the understanding of Jews “advocated a “Final Goal” of “cleaning out the Jews once and for all”. https://philologos.org/__eb-trs/naF.htm

This is Baum’s occult Jewish Cabala roots as found in the “Wizard of Oz” https://vigilantcitizen.com/moviesandtv/the-occult-roots-of-the-wizard-of-oz/2/

From his Sitting Bull editorial:

The proud spirit of the original owners of these vast prairies inherited through centuries of fierce and bloody wars for their possession, lingered last in the bosom of Sitting Bull. With his fall the nobility of the Redskin is extinguished, and what few are left are a pack of whining curs who lick the hand that smites them. The Whites, by law of conquest, by justice of civilization, are masters of the American continent, and the best safety of the frontier settlements will be secured by the total annihilation of the few remaining Indians. Why not annihilation? Their glory has fled, their spirit broken, their manhood effaced; better that they die than live the miserable wretches that they are.

On January 3, 1891 (after the Wounded Knee massacre) “The Aberdeen Saturday Pioneer” published another editorial:

“The peculiar policy of the government in employing so weak and vacillating a person as General Miles to look after the uneasy Indians, has resulted in a terrible loss of blood to our soldiers, and a battle which, at best, is a disgrace to the war department. There has been plenty of time for prompt and decisive measures, the employment of which would have prevented this disaster.”The PIONEER has before declared that our only safety depends upon the total extermination [sic] of the Indians. Having wronged them for centuries we had better, in order to protect our civilization, follow it up by one more wrong and wipe these untamed and untamable creatures from the face of the earth. In this lies safety for our settlers and the soldiers who are under incompetent commands. Otherwise, we may expect future years to be as full of trouble with the redskins as those have been in the past

 

Image result for apaches massacred buffalo soldiers

Perhaps the most notable encounter between the Apaches and their pursuers occurred in Hudspeth County on October 28, 1880, just two weeks after Victorio’s death, when the Apaches killed seven “Buffalo Soldiers,” members of the famous black Tenth United States Cavalry.

Image result for Buffalo Soldiers killed 25 Apaches

Geronimo and his people removed to a concentration camp in Florida. His skull was stolen by Prescott Bush and is a part of the “Skull and Bones” ceremony at Yale!

 

Image result for Charles Haid jewish buffalo soldiers

This Propaganda Movie hiding the truth about the Buffalo “Nigger” Soldiers starring the NIGGER Danny Glover was directed by Kike Charles Haid https://www.opensubtitles.org/en/search/sublanguageid-all/idmovie-44041

Native American Genocide

FORCED REMOVAL

The “Indian Removal” policy was implemented to “clear” land for white settlers. Removal was more than another assault on American Indians’ land titles. Insatiable greed for land remained a primary consideration, but many people now believed that the removal was the only way of saving American Indians from extermination. As long as the American Indians lived in close proximity to non-Native American communities, they would be decimated by disease, alcohol, and poverty. The Indian Removal Act began in 1830. Forced marches at bayonet-point to relocation settlements resulted in high mortality rates. The infamous removal of the Five Civilized Tribes — the Choctaws, Creeks, Chickasaws, Cherokees, and Seminoles — is a dismal page in United States history. By the 1820’s the Cherokees, who had established a written constitution modeled after the United States Constitution, a newspaper, schools, and industries in their settlements, resisted removal. In 1938 the federal troops evicted the Cherokees. Approximately four thousand Cherokees died during the removal process because of poor planning by the United States Government. This exodus to Indian Territory is known as the Trail of Tears. More than one hundred thousand American Indians eventually crossed the Mississippi River under the authority of the Indian Removal Act.

Jews were the first to run to the Paha Sapa…BLACK HILLS to partake of the THEFT OF THE GOLD! This was land that was the home of the Great Sioux Nation per 1868 Ft. Laramie Treaty… but the JEWS did what they do best…steal and lie!

Franklin and Baer were foremost among businessmen, many of them Jewish, who during four decades transformed Deadwood from a rowdy and dangerous frontier outpost into a modern American city.  In his book, “Deadwood:  The Gold Years,” author Watson Parker observed:  “If the gold brought money, the merchants brought stability….The miners brought in money, and spent it, and called for goods and culture;  the merchants and businessmen mined the miners, and seem to have made the better thing of it.”

Jewish Pioneers of the Black Hills Gold Rush

The setting is the lawless Dakota Territory of 1876 at the start of the Black Hills gold rush, a stampede for the golden pay dirt. One would hardly expect to find a Jewish pioneer grocer named Jacob Goldberg in this scene, yet Deadwood’s story is incomplete without Goldberg. And Goldberg’s story is incomplete without either Calamity Jane or Wild Bill. Not just Goldberg, but Finkelstein (also known as Franklin), Stern (also known as Star), Jacobs, Schwarzwald, Colman, Hattenbach, and many other Jews joined the throngs. The Jews provided much more than overalls, chamberpots, and the chambers in which to put them. They also became the mayors, legislators, and civic leaders who helped bring sense and stability to this unruly expanse.

Now you know just a small part of the “Rest of the Story”…and Dan Snyder is a race hating bastard on his way to HELL! 🙂

CNN “Schmuck” In A Jewess Body Jessica Ravitz Does The “Redskin” Spin On Standing Rock!

FOREWORD: These Facebook Links are from Indigenous Lakota Dakota and other Nations “News Reports” revealing what Nazi’s in “Jewish Clothing” like Jessica Ravitz and her Jewish controlled media “4th Reich of the Rich” are making sure the world does not see. This is no more or less then the continuation of the historical genocide of “Redskins” by White/Jew/Free Masonic/Christian elements throughout the history of this country to this day. Steal the land and the “natural resources” at all costs…say 60,000,000 from the Jew Columbus AKA Columbo’s to the Black Hills to Standing Rock!

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=307865669597067&id=100011209089401&fs=1

https://m.facebook.com/christopher.francisco.545?fref=nf&pn_ref=story

 

Image result for jews that were nazi's

Yes everyone…there was and still is a Nazi-Zionist connection to racial eugenics and “Indian Country” genocide and Ravitz is ‘Fait accompli” proof of that!

Click HERE and HERE to read what a real Jew wrote about the CNN Bronfman-Ravitz  Talmudic Jew “progeny” and their “Nazi” connection etc. which goes right up to Standing Rock in “Indian Country”!

Below we will share about Ravitz’s “Jewish Family” genocidal history with Indigenous peoples starting with the Jew Columbus!

 

Image result for jessica ravitz jew cnn

Howdy Jessica! Guess ya didn’t make to the protest site huh? Did you have a nice “spin the story” meeting with your Talmudic hate “Indigenous Goi” boss? Did you happen to discuss that latest article you wrote about “lying may be your brains fault”? How to hide and snuff the violence, beatings, attack dogs, shootings, jailing and by JackBootNaziThugs in their treatment of Lakota/Dakota Oyate…men, women and children, their Tribal brothers and sisters and supporters?

“When we lie for personal gain, our amygdala produces a negative feeling that limits the extent to which we are prepared to lie,” said Tali Sharot,  an associate professor of cognitive neuroscience at University College London. “However, this response fades as we continue to lie, and the more it (fades) the bigger our lies become.” (Now go look in the mirror Jessica 🙂 )

You know Jessica…the title to your article should have been “lying may be a Jews fault” when it comes to Indian Country and Standing Rock especially!

“You know very well, and the stupid Americans know equally well, that we control their government, irrespective of who sits in the White House. You see, I know it and you know it that no American president can be in a position to challenge us even if we do the unthinkable. What can they (Americans) do to us? We control congress, we control the media, we control show biz, and we control everything in America. In America you can criticize God, but you can’t criticize Israel…” Israeli spokeswoman, Tzipora Menache

Your “spin” is a plagerization of the Jew owned media’s spin on the racist  Washington “Redskin” team…owned by a KIKE with majority of players NIGGERS by asking “PreTendians” who are NOT “Tribal Members”…who do NOT have anything more then “Cherokee Princes blood” or did they live on one of the poorest Reservations in the country (thanks to Talmudic Jews) like Pine Ridge or Standing Rock for instance…”hint hint” about how the MAJORITY feel about one of the most hateful exterminating words targeting a specific race of people in history starting with one of your own...Columbus!

You are good Jessica but guess what? I am better 🙂 Have you read this yet about the American Holocaust written by…”one of yours”?

Image result for avatar "smiles"

Let’s start with the Bronfman connection to who you work for …CNN ok? How does it feel to work for this family  of Jessica?

To help “reconstruct” if possible your brain…we we need to have a short course in “Follow The Jewish Dots Connection To The Oil Pipeline On Standing Rock” for DUMMIES 101″ OK? Ya ready Jessica? I know your readers will love this!

Lets start with the Kelcy Warren Rick Perry  connection because of $6 million from Kelcy Warren when Perry was running for POUS. Next…there is the Rick Perry connection to…cough cough…Israeli Oil Interests!

“CBS11 devoted more than  7 minutes last night to this Bennett Cunningham report on Rick Perry’s family excursion to Jerusalem, paid for by Texas Israeli oil interests who have scored big in Texas”. Warren is in bed with Israel and Israel works direct with the Jew owned media to hide the truth about all things Indigenous when it comes to Jewish interests…like Standing Rock!

So Jessica, me thinks you need to ‘rewire” your lying brain…ya think?

By the way for you lovers of John Trudell…one of his BEST music buddies works for Warren… 🙂 who owns Music Road Records, a roots label that operates recording studios in Austin and Cherokee, Texas.

Warren’s musical model is singer-songwriter Jackson Browne, who this week put out a statement opposing the Dakota Access Pipeline and announcing that he’ll donate all proceeds from a tribute album of his songs released by Music Road Records to tribes fighting the pipeline:

I did not know anything about Kelcy Warren’s other business as the production of this album went forward. Although as a music publisher there is no legal way to deny permission to a record company to cover a song that has been previously published, I could have dissuaded the artists from appearing on this record had I known. I routinely vet the companies who ask me to perform for them. I do not play for oil interests. I do not play for companies who defile nature, or companies who attack demonstrators with trained attack dogs and pepper spray. The list of companies I have denied the use of my music is long. I certainly would not have allowed my songs to be recorded by a record company whose owner’s other business does what Energy Transfer Partners is allegedly doing — threatening the water supply and the sacred sites of indigenous people”

A liar just like his best buddy and murdering American Indian Movement chairman John Trudell!

Remember it is not good to lie Jessica but then again…we have to remember the tradition of Goi Hating Talmudic Jews like you and those you work for…especially when it comes to Indigenous Peoples…right?

Hey….how did you like that term “Schmuckette” Jessica? 🙂

Image result for l. frank baum exterminate redskins

I have a trivia question for you and Jews like you Jessica . When was the last time you went to see a play that JEWS LIKE YOU LOVE that was written by a man that called for the EXTERMINATION OF REDSKINS?

Yikes..I forgot I wrote this and it went “syndicated” a LONG time ago. Gulp…hoping it still applies to “you and yours”…yep…it does!

Happy Hanuka Jessica!

My gift to you and yours is this truth that before the Jew Columbus ever hit the beaches…the Messiah of the Red Man who gave them this their land came among them with the promise that His land will be cleansed from the likes of any and all who have listened to the devil to murder His Oyate even as “you and yours” have always done and are doing today at Standing Rock and in spite of a “Trinket Sell Out PreTendian” Carl Bruce and a few others you probably paid to say what they did and who’s relatives more then likely worked with the White/Jew assassination of Sitting Bull!!

Just know that you and yours and CNN and all other Jew owned “snuff the truth” owned MSM have the BLOOD of these innocent Oyate on your head and will stand before Hashem to be judged and condemned to HELL! I promise you that!

Guess that “Washington Redskins” owned by a Kike spin on your story didn’t work after all huh? 🙂

 

 

Hillary “KKK” Clinton And Whoremonger Hubby Rip Off Black Americans In Hundreds of Millions!

Wake up STUPID BLACK FOLK! You actually think this daughter of Satan has ANY interest in your quality of life and freedoms? Has your “House Nigger” representatives ever question why Bill the Pedophile / Whoremonger move 80% of US manufacturing jobs overseas and got PAID for it?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-white/bill-clintons-true-legacy_b_1852887.html

Did they ever question this “Androgynous” couple about the COCAINE they were complicit with Bush and North coming into YOUR COMMUNITIES?

http://www.democracynow.org/2014/10/6/inside_the_dark_alliance_gary_webb

And have you or will you EVER realize that these demons in the flesh are pimps for the Synagogue of Satan JEWS who worked with the ISLAMIC SLAVE TRADERS to bring you here and that these PreTendJEWS are the reason why YOUR COMMUNITIES are the way they are?

http://originalpeople.org/the-arab-muslim-slave-trade-of-africans-the-untold-story/

SO read and learn about why you SHOULD NOT VOTE FOR THIS WHAT NAZI WITCH PAGAN KKK RACE HATER OF YOUR RACE DAUGHTER OF SATAN!

 

June 9, 2016

Hillary Clinton Crimes Reach New Low With Mass Theft From Poor American Blacks  

By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers

An absolutely stunning Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) report circulating in the Kremlin today is alleging that American presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is behind the rollout to US police departments of a new computer scanning device that allows police officers to immediately seize all the money from the bank debit cards of millions of poor American blacks and keep it for themselves unless these victims can prove they have a legitimate reason to have their own money—but will not affect the wealthiest people in the US who use credit cards.

 

 

According to this report, SVR criminal analysts deciphering the Panama Papers discovered this massive crime against America’s poorest citizens by tracking the multiple links between some of the world’s most notorious criminals, Bill and Hillary Clinton, and the Clinton Foundation—and described as the illegal money raising apparatus for the Clinton’s that goes under various names including the Clinton Foundation, Clinton Global Initiative, Clinton Health Access Initiative and the William J. Clinton Foundation.

As of 2015, this report continues, the Clinton’s through their many foundations have gained for themselves a staggering $3 billion, and that even today one of the leading independent groups that track charities – Charity Navigator – has been unable to determine where these billions of dollars went and says it has “determined that this charity’s atypical business model cannot be accurately captured in our current rating methodology.”

 

 

In spite of Hillary Clinton having already amassed billions in wealth, however, this report notes, in 2011 she began her latest criminal scheme to steal from the black peoples of America when she was Secretary of State and had forwarded to her illegal private email server a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) document titled Mobile Payments and the Global Remittance of Funds written by one of America’s most secretive computer experts named T. Jack Williams. [Note: Virtually unknown to the America people, Russia retains in its possession all of Hillary Clinton’s emails the SVR obtained from her private server.]

T. Jack Williams, this report explains, is credited with creating and implementing the world’s first electronic gift card program, as well as the launch of the successful Blockbuster Visa co-branded credit card, and the 50 million members Universal Membership Loyalty Card and is the president of Paymentcard Services, Inc. that was established in 2009 and incorporated in Texas and “employs a staff of approximately 1”.

 

T. Jack Williams, partner with Hillary Clinton in ERAD Group, Inc.

 

After reading T. Jack William’s report to ICE, though, this report continues, and as the Panama Papers document, Secretary Clinton, in 2012, through her Clinton Foundation, enabled him to create a company called  ERAD Group, Inc. that was immediately awarded a prime development contract to provide the US Department of Homeland Security, Advanced Technology Directorate, with a prepaid access card reader solution to process prepaid debit cards at time of arrest.

And even though the US Department of Homeland Security paid T. Jack William’s and Hillary Clinton’s new EARD Group company to develope this access card reader, this report notes, this year they, instead, began licensing it to local American police departments—and as evidenced by the contract T. Jack William personally signed with the State of Oklahoma on 3 April 2016.

Most insidious about this T. Jack Williams-Hillary Clinton contract signed with the State of Oklahoma, this report explains, is that aside from the State having to pay the ERAD Group $5,000 for the software and scanners, they then have to pay the ERAD Group 7.7 percent of all the cash their police forces seize from the poorest Americans bank debit cards—the majority of whom are black—and which the Washington Post commented on by saying: “Sorry, but that sort of arrangement is shady. As we’ve seen with traffic cameras, private probation and other areas of criminal justice, giving a private company a cut of seized assets is an arrangement rife with bad incentives and ripe for corruption.”

 

 

SVR analysts in this report concur with the Washington Post’s assessment of this corrupt scheme allowing T. Jack Williams and Hillary Clinton to steal from the poorest citizens of America and further note that the America Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has, likewise condemned this practice by stating: “Police abuse of civil asset forfeiture laws has shaken our nation’s conscience. Civil forfeiture allows police to seize — and then keep or sell — any property they allege is involved in a crime. Owners need not ever be arrested or convicted of a crime for their cash, cars, or even real estate to be taken away permanently by the government.”

And in, perhaps, her greatest show of arrogance and contempt of America’s poor black people she is now profiting from by stealing their money with her partner in crime T. Jack Williams, this report concludes, Hillary Clinton has now been shown wearing a $12,495 Giorgio Armani coat during a speech she gave recently while addressing the topic of income inequality—which is, by definition, the most racist thing any American politician has done in modern times.

 

Champion of the poor Hillary Clinton wearing $12,495 Giorgio Armani coat during speech on the topic of income inequality

 

June 9, 2016 © EU and US all rights reserved.  Permission to use this report in its entirety is granted under the condition it is linked back to its original source at WhatDoesItMean.Com. Freebase content licensed under CC-BY and GFDL.

[Note: Many governments and their intelligence services actively campaign against the information found in these reports so as not to alarm their citizens about the many catastrophic Earth changes and events to come, a stance that the Sisters of Sorcha Faal strongly disagree with in believing that it is every human beings right to know the truth.  Due to our missions conflicts with that of those governments, the responses of their ‘agents’ has been a longstanding misinformation/misdirection campaign designed to discredit us, and others like us, that is exampled in numerous places, including HERE.]

Memorial Day In America Takes Last Gasp, Then Dies

 

Banned by Zuckerberg’s Facebook For Exposing American Indian Movement Murders

Mark Zuckerberg and his Facebook is a Synagogue of Satan Jew (“Your father is the devil”-Jeshua to Zuckerberg’s spiritual forefathers) and race hater of American Indians business.

I was banned for posting this…

“So as long as YOU INDIANS and your “White New Age Witches/ Pagans/ Wannabes” ignore, deny, and justify the murderous crimes of the American Indian Movement…do NOT talk about about the WHITE MAN! Your hypocrisy desecrates the name of those who if alive now, would of taken care of these diabolical spirits in “Red Skin” in short order! Rapists were put to death! Murderers of their own were put to death! But not so with these FBI protected killers and rapists. Crazy Horses name was defiled in the use of by Trudell. Does anyone think Crazy Horse in the spirit world…did not SEE what was done to Annie Mae and the others. The rape of women by Russell Means and “brothers”…who I can assure you is in hell for what he did. And TRUDELL honored this gang raping PreTendian on his page. Leonard Peltier…rapist, pedophile, and murderer. So tell me ANYONE…just how do you think Crazy Horse viewed these Fake Indians in the realms of time? And in the “spirit world”? I am waiting? ANYONE!?”

I have on this blog documented the murders and crimes of the American Indian Movement in intimate detail and which fellow Jews like ZUCKERBERG and his FACEBOOK PROTECT and by “BANNING” any and all who expose these murderers.

So we have this JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s most infamous forefather was the Jew Columbus who prepared the way for the genocide of 30-60 million Indigenous/Native Americans in Central, South, and North America and who’s spiritual “peers” brought AFRICAN SLAVES to America and were the principles in the SLAVE TRADE!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s spiritual forefathers were the first to make and distribute the major killer of Indian people…say whiskey to American Indians. Most all makers of alcoholic drinks such as beer and wine that kill American Indians on reservations to this day are JEW owned companies.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s spiritual forefathers established the most diabolical Satan controlled evil organization on this earth right on this land. Say the first Free Masonic Lodges which “spiritually spawned” the murderous Indian Hating individuals who formed the United States Government and it’s presidents.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s spiritual forefather’s were first in the sacred Black Hills to get to the GOLD stolen from the Lakota via Custer and the Free Masonic “Manifest Destiny” Lucifer worshiping United States Government!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s forefathers have done nothing but work to destroy any and all things Native American when it comes to JUSTICE and the honoring of treaties made while allowing for any and all JEW OWNED companies to come and exploit natural resources on Indian land here and all over the America’s.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s present day “peers” promoted the MASS STERILIZATION of close to 30,000 Native American women as a part of the race hate of non-Jew genocide as well as putting in place Native American MURDER conclaves called Planned Destroy Indian Parenthood families and lives.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” have implemented a vaccination “pogrom” in Indian Country that has enabled the development AUTISM and DIABETES among other lethal diseases in Indian Country.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” have enabled mass suicides through the giving out of “anti-depressants” like candy…one example is the Standing Rock Reservation where there were 280 attempts in one year because of the “candy” PROZAC!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s present day “peers” promote the most vile and filthy of sin using the Government and “JEWLYWOOD” namely SODOMY which is condemned by G-d in the Torah.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s present day “peers” owns most all of the pornographic companies WORLD WIDE including CHILD PORN!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who is along with his present day “peers” are race haters of Whites, Christians, Muslims, Blacks, and any and all people that are not JEWS as seen by how “Synagogue of Satan” JEWS like ZUCKERBERG use the JEW CONTROLLED MEDIA to perpetuate  RACE HATE!

We have JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s Hollywood and music “peers” promote vile murdering, raping, drug promoting gang movies and music that is designed to DESTROY’ the “spirituality” of Native American youth as seen in their adopting this “deathstyle”.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” have promoted the kidnapping of Native Children through the Foster Care genocide “pogrom” targeting Native families and children.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “Free Masonic” peers have socially and economically engineered “Reservations” to destroy families, allow for drugs to be distributed to youth, and to exploit the poor using the JUSTICE SYSTEM to make money off those Natives (as well as other races of COLOR) incarcerated in ZUCKERBERG’S “peers” owned prison systems! (Same with ALL people of color!)

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” control the justice and prison system to recycle Native Americans who’s crime are socially and psychologically engineered spawn crimes using the “concentration camp” Indian Reorganization Act RESERVATION where JEWS like ZUCKERBERG feed off the grass roots poor who continue conditions of suffering because of IRA corruption. Example is the Jew owned Sioux Nations Foods on Pine Ridge. Cohen…Jew owner…HIGH PRICES!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s Hollywood JEW forefather’s promoted as directors and producers the most denigrating and racist stereotypes of American Indians to this day in movies where Indians were caste as “savages” (by WHITES mostly!) and worthy of “extermination”!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s fellow “Synagogue of JEW” peers idolize the movie/play WIZARD OF OZ written by a NEW AGE OCCULTIST (same as a Synagogue of Satan JEW) who promoted the EXTERMINATION OF “REDSKINS” referring to the people of Sitting Bull. This man being L. Frank Baum. JEWS like ZUCKERBERG show this play in JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS all over the world!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s Indian Hating peer and JEW Dan Snyder call’s his team the REDSKINS… read my blog about “Washington Niggers” lost again and WHY!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” own the liberal media outlet Public Broadcasting System which systematically and deliberately hide the American Indian Movement’s MURDERS OF INNOCENT Native American and Indigenous women such as ANNIE MAE AQUASH and 12 other buried at WOUNDED KNEE.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who upholds and supports the FACT that Perry Ray Robinson was called a NIGGER before being murdered in cold blood which makes ZUCKERBERG a racist and “NIGGER HATER” like Perry’s killers…the American Indian Movement.

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” in Hollywood cast a documented gang rapist and pedophile in the American Indian Movement member in a movie. His name? Russell Means in the movie “Last of the Mohican’s”!

We have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” in Hollywood made a customized movie designed to protect the truth about the rape and murder of Annie Mae Aquash using the Chairman of the American Indian Movement as one of the “consultants/stars”….John Trudell. Movie? Say “Thunderheart”!

We have JEWS like ZUCKERBERG who have gone out of their way to PROTECT SODOM OBAMA’S direct connection through Brandon Johnson to the calling off of the investigation of the rapes and murders at Wounded Knee and after…especially of Annie Mae Aquash because OBAMA’S “adviser on Middle Easter Affairs is a Muslim Brotherhood hater of REAL JEWS and CHRISTIANS former Senator James Abourezk who’s son Charles Abourezek was at Bill Means house on the Rosebud Reservation when Annie Mae was brought there after she was brutally beaten and raped…when the ORDER was given from senior Abourezk to Banks, Trudell, and the Bellecourts to murder her (while Charles did NOTHING) which makes OBAMA complicit in the COVER-UP of her murder and ALL AIM MURDERS including that of Black Man Perry Ray Robinson!.

We  have a JEW named ZUCKERBERG who’s “peers” in the media target all things of G-d found in the TORAH as related to family and marriage as seen in the condemnation of any and all things that have to do with Hashem’s teachings of and about the family and non-Jews.

Below are quotes about JEWS like Zuckerberg and how they view non-JEWS including of course… Native American’s as well as their plan for America and the WORLD OF NON-JEWS!

SATANIC VERSES OF THE JEWISH TALMUD AND JEWS LIKE ZUCKERBERG AS THEY APPLY TO NON-JEWS INCLUDING NATIVE AMERICANS AND INDIGENOUS PEOPLES!

“Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.” (Soferim 15) “The ‘goyim’ are not humans. They are beasts.”  (Baba Mezia 114b)

“All children of the –  ‘goyim’ – (Gentiles),   are animals.” (Yebamoth 98a) Yashu’ (derogatory for Jesus’) is in Hell being boiled in hot excrement.” (Gittin 57a)

“She who was the descendant of princes and governors (the virgin Mary) played the harlot with carpenters.” (Sanhedrin 106a) “Christians who reject the Talmud will go to hell and be punished there for all generations.” (Rosh Hashanah 17a)

“Girls born of the ‘goyim’ are in a state of ‘niddah’ (menstrual uncleanness!) from birth.”(Abodah Zarah 36b) “Yashu  (Jesus) was cut off from the jewish people for his wickedness and refused to repent.”  (Sotah 47a)

“If a Jew finds an object lost by a  ‘goy’  it does not have to be returned.” (Baba Mezia 24a)’Yashu’ is an acronym for the jewish curse, ‘May his (Jesus) name be wiped out forevermore.’

“Sexual intercourse between the ‘goyim’ is like intercourse between animals.” (Sanhedrin 74b)

“Miriam the hairdresser had sex with many men.”(Shabbath 104b, Hebrew Edition only) “If you eat with a ‘goy’ it is the same as eating with a dog.” (Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b)

“When it comes to a Gentile in peace times – one may harm him indirectly – for instance, by removing a ladder after he had fallen into a crevice.”

 Jesus was sexually immoral and worshipped a brick.” (Sanhedrin 107b) “If a Jew murders a ‘goy’ there will be no death penalty.” (Sanhedrin 57a) “Jews may use subterfuges to circumvent a ‘goy.’”  (Baba Kamma 113a)

“If a ‘goy’ (Gentile) hits a Jew he must be killed.” (Sanhedrin 58b) What a Jew steals from a ‘goy’ he may keep.” (Sanhedrin 57a)

Now apply THIS to the history of the American Indian Movement and their Synagogue of Satan Jewish and Muslim Brotherhood Handlers like Obama in how Indian Country has been treated to THIS DAY!

“We are intruders. We are destroyers. We are revolutionaries.
We have taken your natural world in possession, your ideals, your destiny
and have driven fast and loose with it.”  
Marcus Eli Ravage, Century Magazine, A Real Case Against the Jews

“We apply everyone, even the dirtiest trick against the Christians, (Indigenous)
one can possibly imagine. Each handle is allowed. The worse the better.
Lying, cheating … everything!” 
Sefton Delmer in “The Germans and I”

“We dont want to make any connections with other races,
but we will prevail and triumph over them.” 
Goldwin Smith, Oxford University, October 1981

“There is no event in modern world history, which could not be attributed to Jewish influence. We Jews are the seducer, destroyer and arsonists.”  
The Jewish writer Oscar Levy in “The World Significance of the Russian Revolution”

“The basis of empirical research”
The Jews & Samadhi – Legion of Damnation
We are the only ones with the semidivine qualities of this planet.
We are as different to the inferior races, as they are to insects
Menachem Begin

Our race is the Master race” … !

Menachem Begin
Former Israeli Prime Minister

“No rabbi can ever go to hell” …Talmud: Gittin 57a

“The Christians sing constantly about blood. Let’s give them enough of it.
Let’s cut their necks and we grind them on their altars. We drown them in their own blood.I dream that one day the last priest will hung with the guts of another.”  
The Jew Gus Hall, a board member of the Communist Party of America, 1920

“Wars are the crops of the Jews. For these crops, we must destroy the Christians (INDIGENOUS)
and take their gold (INDIGENOUS GOLD) to us.
We already destroyed 100 million (INDIGENOUS)
And that is far from the end!” 
(Chief Rabbi Reich Horn, France 1859)

Mark Zuckerberg is acting on an ancient biological tradition of the Jewish race. 

That specific Jewish custom being torturing and murdering defenceless and innocent birds. It is a documented fact, admitted by Jewish sources.

There are images showing Zuckerberg the Facebook tycoon laughing with friends, playing with a little dog and about to kill a chicken. The chicken was about to be used in some kind of sacrificial rite where Zuckerberg would cut the head off and then he and Satan would take it in turns to spray the blood directly into each other’s mouths.
Mark Zuckerberg practices torture and sacrifices using jewish satanic rituals

 

THE RESIDENCE OF SATAN IN ISRAEL – THE COURT OF JERUSALEM

… is TOP SECRET and is full of symbols of Freemasonry and Satanism.

The representative of Lucifer on earth, his second, David Rockefeller, who long ago formed a Corporation “Lucifer’s Trust” (later changed to the name “Lucy’s Trust”), and 12 other bankers, are part of this family of psychopaths and murderers, obsessed with power, to want to establish a “World Government” …!?

For them, there is no morality, dignity and justice, for them there is only Lie – Fraud – Murder.
They have no creed or religion and exploit even the jews, in order to achieve their goal: 

Jew Anton LaVey
founded the Church of Satan

The Rothschild’s and the Rockefellers, as also all other bankers belong not to the (so called) jewish religion, their origin is Khazarian, Mongolian people who was repeatedly beaten and was finally expelled from their land, and then they was scattered throughout Europe by acquiring the jewish religion. Since then, they didn’t use this religion because they were really jewish … but simply to exploit it.

Those, who today consider to manage the resources of the earth, declare themselves as jewish … but they are not! The jewish people is still unaware, that soon they shall disappear … The Khazars want the Israeli people to be totally exterminated.

Jerusalem was chosen as the capital of the new world government, and then there will be no place for those, who are against Satan. These people have no emotion and cause a massacre, genocide against its own jewish population in order to extinguish it and then blame it on Iran. Their plan is to destroy the entire world economy  …..

“We will have a new world order and government,
whether they like it or not. With their agreement or not.
The only question is, if this form of government
must be achieved voluntarily or by force.”

The Jewish banker Paul Warburg,
US Senate, 17.02.1950

Yahweh (GOD) created the non-Jew,
so that Jews do not have to be served by animals.
The non-Jew is therefore an animal in human form,
will serve forever to the Jews. 
NIDRATSCH TALPIOTH  S.225

Click>>>to read  what the Synagogue of Satan JEW Zuckerberg states about allowing murdering raping MUSLIMS using FACEBOOK! And for sure I am not one of them any more then I am a member of the American Indian Movement of MURDERERS…

Wait…are they NOT THE SAME and PROTECTED BY THE SAME while those who expose them are BANNED?

There ya go folks…now you know the “REST OF THE STORY” about why I was BANNED BY ZUCKERBERG’S Synagogue of Satan pimps!

A short abridged “history” found on the below link by a REAL JEW NO LESS!

http://rense.com/general86/talmd.htm

 

Sodomites And Pederasts Have Been Mass Murderers Of Millions!

First off Obama…to set the record straight right up front…this treasonous sodomite and betrayer of the the Constitution and defiler of all things Holy is NOT my “President”. He does not morally or spiritually represent my G-d in any way shape or form.

I am going to share a very short history of how his “spiritual genetics” are connected to and revealed in the mass murders of hundreds of millions who represent the “Liar and Murderer From The Beginning” who is Satan and who accepted and embraced sodomy as “natural” so that the Law Abiding and G-dly Citizens of this country can understand Obama’s diabolical “gun control” agenda of disarming their citizens before mass murdering them for what it really is and is not.

Starting with the Nazis who were documented Sodomites and Pedophile by sharing links documenting the mass murdering history of sodomites..

HITLER AND THE NAZI’S: These links document the murderous spirit found in Hitlers Sodomite Pederast Controlled Nazi Party.

http://www.thepinkswastika.com/5201.html

Occultism, the Nazi Party, and Sodomy

http://www.kotipetripaavola.com/nazioccultism.html

Numbers of human beings “mass murdered” by the Nazi Sodomites including Jews…was well over 20 million.

https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NAZIS.CHAP1.HTM

KARL MARX AND COMMUNISM: Sodomites and promoters of the homosexual movement.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/03/28/marxist-origin-of-the-homosexual-movement/

The numbers of human beings murdered by Marxist/Communists is in the hundreds of millions!

http://www.scottmanning.com/content/communist-body-count/

After hearing Obama’s town hall remarks…I decided to share these few historical tidbits to expose what the goal of gun control is.   Enjoy!

Bill Cosby Is A Serial Rapist Of Women And Should Be Put To Death

Feral Black Beast and Serial Rapist needs to be hung by the neck until DEAD! Spirit murdering of women animal that deserves no mercy in the realms of time and for sure…will burn in the LAKE upon arrival which is not soon enough for this sub human!

richardboydenreport

some_cosby_rape_victims

BILL COSBY WAS for decades the poster boy for racial equality and harmony. Wise, funny, clever, and with good family values, he was the nation’s funny man whose humor crossed those terrible “racial lines.” He was the charming, harmless “Jello man.” He was the exponent of maturity and morality as the eminent Black physician and down-to-earth father on the “Cosby Show.” He was the suave, stylish, and sexy secret agent in TV’s “I Spy.” Especially endearing to Whites and the better class of American Blacks, he was a public critic of Black ignorance and bad behavior. He was promoted in the controlled media as “America’s Dad.”

But, in a behavioral and psychological parallel to genetic “regression to the mean,” Bill Cosby was a rapist — according to no fewer than 15 women who have come forward, many of whom have nothing to gain by the accusation. Based on the preponderance…

View original post 3,064 more words

The American Holocaust Versus The Jewish Holocaust

The American Holocaust Versus The Jewish Holocaust

“The American Holocaust” Of Indigenous People

Dare to Compare: Americanizing the Holocaust by LILLIAN FREEBERG

“For several centuries now, men of the White and JEWISH race have everywhere destroyed the past, stupidly, blindly, and deliberately both at home and abroad. The past once destroyed never returns. The destruction of the past is perhaps the greatest of all crimes. Today the preservation of what little of it remains ought to become almost an obsession. We must put an end to the terrible uprootedness which European colonial methods always produce, even uder their least cruel aspects. We must abstain, once victory ours, from punishing the conquered enemy by uprooting him still further: seeing that it is neither possible nor desirable to exterminate him.”
Simone Weil, The Need for Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind
The Dynamics of Denial: Uncle Sam’s Willing Executioners

German-speaking Jewish writers have long felt comfortable expropriating images and analogies from the site of Native American identity in their literary imagination. 1 Today, a growing sentiment of sympathy for the “vanishing American” in Germany has upped the ante in the identity-appropriations game, and German-speaking Jewish writers now appropriate Native American identity in the attempt to inflect their own historiography with an added degree of moral currency on the landscape of a contemporary Germany still caught in the throes of denial concerning its own genocidal past.

In German-speaking literary circles, the examples of Else Lasker-Schüler, who stylized herself as an American Indian, and Franz Kafka’s wish to be a “Red Indian” are well known. George Tabori’s 1990 stage production of the Jewish Western Weisman und Rotgesicht wittily pitted [Jewish] white man against [partly Jewish] red man in a verbal duel in which the protagonists exchange a hilarious blow-for-blow account of injuries and insults suffered by the victimized [End Page 353] populations they represent. But the phenomenon of conflating Jewish and “Indian” identity is not unique to foreign-language publications. As Seth Wolitz points out, in his discussion of Weisman und Rotgesicht, this “tradition of spoofing Jewish-Indian interrelations . . . reaches back to a Yiddish playlet, Tsvishn Indianer.” 2 This 1895 play, “Among the Indians, or The Country Peddler,” as its translator states, “is not an anomaly, but rather a pathbreaker in a well-defined line of Jewish-American entertainment that leads to the films of Mel Brooks and others.” 3 The American leg of this lineage includes Eddie Cantor’s redface minstrelsy in Whoopie! (1930) and Woody Allen’s Zelig (1983). Fanny Brice sang herself to stardom with “I’m an Indian,” and Bernard Malamud’s The People provides a classic example of the phenomenon.

Most recently perhaps, Raphael Seligmann has gone on record stating that the Jews are “the Indians of Germany.” 4 That this statement begs the question of identifying “Uncle Sam’s willing executioners” seems, however, of minimal concern to the Jewish community in America and abroad. In fact, when the time comes to put the Shoah on the other foot and parallels are drawn between atrocities experienced by the American Indian population over a five-hundred-year period and those experienced by the Jewish population of Europe in the twelve-year reign of Nazi terror, the knowledge of self-described “Jewish Indians” recedes into the recesses of repressed memory. In a seditious reversal of national identity politics, Lucy Dawidowicz charges those who would dare to compare with “a vicious anti-Americanism.” 5 Rabbi Irving Greenberg, founder of the Holocaust Resource Center and first director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Commission, has described the comparison of the Nazi Holocaust with other acts of genocide as “blasphemous.” 6 In The Holocaust in American Life, Jewish historian Peter Novik describes the way in which any attempt to compare is dismissed as a “felonious assault” on truth and memory. 7

In the pathological dynamic of genocidal histories, the perpetrator culture invariably turns its gaze to the horrors registered in the archives and accounts of the “other guys.” 8 This is why Holocaust studies in the United States focus almost exclusively on the atrocity of Auschwitz, not of Wounded Knee or Sand Creek. Norman Finkelstein, in his discussion of the way images of the Holocaust have been manufactured to reap moral and economic benefits for members of the Jewish elite, states that the presence of the Holocaust Museum in Washington is “particularly incongruous in the absence of a museum commemorating crimes in the course of American history” and makes specific reference to the slave trade and genocide against the American Indians. 9 Peter Novik suggests that the Holocaust has become a sort of “civil religion” for American Jews who have lost touch with their own ethnic and religious identity, and asserts that “in the United States the Holocaust is explicitly used for the purpose of national self-congratulation: the Americanization of the Holocaust [End Page 354] has involved using it to demonstrate the difference between the Old World and the New, and to celebrate, by showing its negation, the American way of life.” 10

The Historikerstreit or “Historians’ Debate” in Germany during the mid-1980s disrupted the traditional historiographical narrative, which placed three groups of actors at the scene of the Nazi crime–perpetrators, bystanders, and victims. Saul Friedländer summarizes the controversy as “a debate about the shape of the past in terms of public memory and national identity.” 11 Conservative historians, in their efforts to “historicize” the Nazi period and thus suture the wound of discontinuity presented by a “past that refused to go away,” attempted to relativize the crimes of the Nazi period by situating them in the context of a narrative that included an amalgamated fourth character in the plot: the Soviet and American forces who forced Germans into a victim position from which only further victimization could ensue. These abnegationist attempts at historical revision were staunchly contested by left-wing social philosopher Jürgen Habermas in a series of essays that have since been collected and published in German and in English. 12

The Historians’ Debate directed international attention to the issue of historical liability as it relates to public memory and national identity in territories known to have been host to genocidal campaigns. However, what got lost in translation when the debate migrated to America was the very real opportunity this controversy might have presented for an authentic “working through” or “mastery” of this country’s traumatic genocidal past. Instead, the dispute conveniently constructed a site of transference upon which the melancholic drama of “manifest manners” could be acted out. 13 American intellectuals, confronted with the quandary of whether to see or not to see, chose to look the other way. George Tabori, in “Hamlet in Blue,” provides an apt metaphor for this dynamic of denial: “the old Hamletian ploy of dodging action by mind-fucking.” 14 As Henryk Broder points out in “Die Germanisierung des Holocaust,” today one speaks of the “Americanization of the Holocaust” as though the Jews were slaughtered on American soil. 15 This, in turn, cultivates fertile breeding ground for absolutionist scholarship and public discourse on both sides of the Atlantic. In the end, only the interests of the respective aggressor cultures are served.

The same kinds of arguments attempting to “historicize” America’s past in the interest of “normalizing” its present from the perspective of the perpetrator population do not unleash the same scandalous international controversy as do similar efforts on the part of historians negotiating a revision of German history. The genocide against the Jews is considered an ugly chapter in Germany’s past and acknowledged internationally as one of the gravest crimes against humanity in the twentieth century. But while the whole fabric of German culture remains “under the shadow of Hitler,” the genocide against indigenous [End Page 355] populations in North America is still today denied or dismissed as the inevitable prelude to the rise of the greatest nation on Earth.

Reactionary historian James Axtell, in his 1992 study, Beyond 1492: Encounters in Colonial North America, writes:
We make a hash of our historical judgments because we continue to feel guilty about the real or imagined sins of our fathers and forefathers . . . [We] can stop flogging ourselves with our “imperialistic” origins and tarring ourselves with the broad brush of “genocide.” As a huge nation of law and order and increasingly refined sensibility, we are not guilty of murdering Indian women and babies, of branding slaves on the forehead, or of claiming any real estate in the world we happen to fancy. 16

Statements like this, when proffered in defense of Germany’s genocidal history, elicit vehement opposition from the academic and intellectual community, yet, with regard to America’s tragic past, go virtually unchallenged and are integrated into the canon of acceptable discourse.

As the success of Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s indictment of the German people in Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust illustrates, public flogging of the German people for their willing participation in the melee represents an acceptable and indeed lucrative form of public and academic discourse. The 1996 publication of Goldhagen’s Ph.D. dissertation thrust the previously little-known Harvard professor into the international limelight. His thesis, that widespread “eliminationist anti-Semitism” among the ordinary men and women of Germany, not the ruthless racial policies of the Nazi regime, was the sole cause of the extermination of the Jews, has been contested by Holocaust scholars and historians the world over. But the book, translated into thirteen languages, became an international bestseller and secured for Goldhagen the prestigious German Democracy Prize in 1997. It also unleashed an international debate that has been dubbed “The Goldhagen Wars,” not to mention a series of highly paid speaking engagements for its author throughout the world. Goldhagen’s staunchest opponent has been Norman Finkelstein, the Jewish scholar whose rebuttal of “the Goldhagen thesis” first appeared in The New Left Review (July/August 1997) under the title “Daniel Goldhagen’s ‘Crazy’ Thesis.” 17 In a statement printed by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on 21 April 1998, Goldhagen proudly asserts: “My book has sold more copies in Germany than anywhere else. It’s been embraced by the German people.” It is interesting to note, in this context, that Native American scholar Ward Churchill’s stellar and seminal piece of scholarship on Holocaust and denial in the Americas, A Little Matter of Genocide, did not meet with the same degree of public success. [End Page 356]

Taking the American people to task in the little matter of genocide against indigenous populations of North America remains a terrible taboo registered in the “Don’t you Dare” category of “Academic Do’s and Don’ts.” Like any taboo, this act of transgression does not derive from a vacuum but rather emanates from a specific social consciousness–or lack thereof. As journalist William Greider notes in One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism:

German social consciousness was anchored in the country’s tragic knowledge of guilt and defeat, a humbling encounter with self-doubt that Americans have so far evaded in their national history. . . . American history did provide ample basis for humility and social introspection: slavery and the enduring wounds of race, “winning” the West by armed conquest, Hiroshima and the nuclear potential for mass destruction, the bloody failure of the neocolonialist war in Vietnam. . . . The social meaning of these experiences was usually deflected, however, and repackaged by the optimistic American culture as stories of triumph. . . . Thus, Americans generally managed to evade any national sense of guilt or defeat. Critical reflection on the national character was discouraged, ridiculed as “un-American.” 18

Dominick LaCapra has established a clear relationship between the implications of the Historians’ Debate for American scholars and objections raised by German scholars on the left-wing side of the skirmish. He states that liberal historians may have had strategic as well as more deep-seated philosophical reasons for not placing too much emphasis on the ambivalence of Western traditions and the possibly dubious role of a critique of revisionism in lessening awareness of the implication of other Western countries in massively destructive or even genocidal processes. Given the history of the United States, this danger is clear and present for an American, and identification with Habermas’s position may be facilitated by the narcissistic and self-justificatory gains it brings. 19

But even before the Historians’ Debate, the relative singularity of the Nazi Holocaust had long been the center of international debate. Uniqueness proponents such as Deborah Lipstadt, Steven Katz, Saul Friedländer, Michael Marrus, Yehuda Bauer, Lucy Dawidowicz, and others share an insistence on the exclusivity of the Nazi Holocaust as an unparalleled event in the history of the twentieth century. This view has been challenged by survivors and scholars, among them a number of Jewish intellectuals such as Hannah Arendt, Irving Louis Horowitz, Israel Charny, Helen Fein, Simon Wiesenthal, Norman Finkelstein, Peter Novik, and others. Increasingly, Native American scholars and their allies have entered the conversation, pointing out that the historical [End Page 357] archive of the American Holocaust has been compiled, collated, and indeed constructed to a large degree by perpetrators, their descendants, and beneficiaries writing from a subject position inflected with a vested interest in maintaining the illusion of innocence concerning the “facts of the case.”

The exclusivists’ most compelling argument against the comparability of the two acts of genocide has been that the decimation of the American Indian population, unlike the extermination of the Jews, was unintentional–“caused by microbes, not militia . . . that is, this depopulation happened unwittingly rather than by design.” 20 Preeminent uniqueness proponent Steven Katz, in The Holocaust in Historical Context, while documenting the fact that the American Holocaust far exceeded the Nazi Holocaust in scope, at the same time reduces the American travesty to a mere case of “depopulation.” 21

These conclusions are drawn from comparisons not of a simple corpse count but rather of the rate of extermination experienced by each group. Recent studies demonstrate that precontact population estimates generated by historians and demographers from the subject position of the perpetrators have been egregiously low. It is today commonly assumed that precontact populations were far and above the one-million figure that has acted as a standard of measure for centuries. More recent and more honest studies estimate the precontact civilization to have been between nine and eighteen million. This standard of measure puts the rate of attrition of indigenous populations at between 98 and 99 percent–that is, near total extermination. The rate of attrition of Jewish populations in Europe is commonly calculated at between 60 and 65 percent. Put in terms of survival rates, this means that two-thirds of the global Jewish population and about one third of the European Jewish population survived the Nazi Holocaust, whereas a mere remnant population of 1 to 2 percent survived the American Holocaust. This seriously calls into question any notion of “unparalleled” or “total extermination” of the Jews in the Nazi Holocaust.

Katz argues that the Nazi Holocaust is “phenomenologically” unique based on the “merciless, exceptionless, biocentric intentionality of Hitler’s ‘war against the Jews.’” 22 Katz’s argument centers on documented intentionality and governmental policy in the Nazi period. What Katz does not take into account is that a twelve-year period in a twentieth-century industrialized society lends itself more readily to documentation than a five-hundred-year period, most of which is historically and geographically situated in the midst of a pre-industrial “virgin wasteland,” nor does he significantly engage the discourse generated by Native American scholars in recent years. It does not, however, take a paragon of intellectual prowess to deduce an implied intent to “destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group,” from the events that transpired in the process of “depopulating” the New World–a slaughter that Katz patently refuses to define as “genocide” even though it conforms precisely to [End Page 358] the definition of the phenomenon as outlined by Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term in his 1944 Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. 23 The murder of 96 percent of any given population does not occur “inadvertently,” especially when members of that group are viewed by their assassins as belonging to a separate (and inferior) national, ethnic, racial and religious order.

Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the introduction of diseases to the Native populations of North America was anything but an incidental by-product of “westward expansion.” In what is likely the world’s first documented case of genocide accomplished by bacterial means, Lord Jeffrey Amherst suggested that smallpox-infected blankets be distributed to the Ottawa and Lenape peoples, stating in a 1763 letter to his subordinate, Colonel Henry Bouquet, “You will do well to [infect] the Indians by means of blankets as well as to try every other method that can serve to extirpate this [execrable] race.” 24

This statement indicates that the annihilation of the Indian population by way of disease was neither arbitrary nor incidental to the aims of the European settler population and its government. Even as early as 1763, the settler population and its sovereign representatives acted in full cognizance of the impact their introduction of disease would have on the Native populations. Stannard points out, with regard to the “enemy microbe” argument, that by focusing almost entirely on disease, by displacing responsibility for the mass killing onto an army of invading microbes, contemporary authors increasingly have created the impression that the eradication of those tens of millions of people was inadvertent–a sad, but both inevitable and “unintended consequence” of human migration and progress. This is a modern version of what Alexander Saxton recently has described as the “soft side of anti-Indian racism” that emerged in America in the nineteenth century and that incorporated “expressions of regret over the fate of the Indians into narratives that traced the inevitability of their extinction. Ideologically,” Saxton adds, “the effect was to exonerate individuals, parties, nations, of any moral blame for what history had decreed.” In fact, however, the near-total destruction of the Western Hemisphere’s Native people was neither inadvertent nor inevitable. 25

Survivor testimony and statistical records from the Nazi death camps reveal that the uncontrolled spread of disease among inmates was also a major factor contributing to the death toll during the Nazi Holocaust, but that argument has never been forwarded in favor of exonerating the perpetrators–at least not in serious scholarship on the subject.

If, as Yehuda Bauer contends, “[t]here was no governmental intention to exterminate the victim population” in the Americas, how else are we to understand the now well-known statement attributed to General Philip Henry Sheridan at [End Page 359] Fort Cobb in January of 1889: “The only good Indian is a dead Indian?” 26 While Bauer concedes that “important figures in the U.S. administration expressed genocidal hopes and intentions,” he still insists that “there was no clear governmental policy of total murder.” 27 It would seem redundant, in this context, to point to the innumerable studies that have been conducted since 1945 in the attempt to ascertain whether or not Adolf Hitler himself had issued the order for the Final Solution.

The introduction of diseases to indigenous populations was accompanied by a systematic destruction of “the indigenous agricultural base [in order to] impose starvation conditions upon entire peoples, dramatically lowering their resistance to disease and increasing their susceptibility to epidemics.” 28 What is more, the ideology of Manifest Destiny is itself founded on an implied intent to kill–it is the “central constituent ideology translated into action” that Bauer posits as the defining characteristic that sets the Nazi Holocaust apart from all other genocidal campaigns in the history of humanity.

Fortunately, pseudo-scholarly revisionists who would deny the Nazi atrocities have been properly (and legally) excluded from legitimate academic and public discourse in many countries–Germany, Austria, France and Canada among them. But, As Ward Churchill has argued in A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492–Present: “the ugly enterprise of Holocaust denial has a flip side–indeed, a mirror image–which is equally objectionable but which has been anything but marginalized by the academy, popular media, or the public at large.” 29 According to Churchill, exclusivists insisting on the uniqueness of the Nazi Holocaust succeed in “outstripping the neo-nazis” in terms of denial:

Whereas the latter content themselves with denying the authenticity of a single genocidal process, exclusivists deny, categorically and out of hand, the validity of myriad genocides. Yet, unlike the neonazis, those holding to the postulates of Jewish exclusivism are not only treated as being academically credible, but are accorded a distinctly preferential treatment among the arbiters of scholarly integrity. 30

Manifest Destiny: My Brothers’ Killer

Cogent arguments have been made to suggest that the same notion of creating space for the “master race” is as germane to the ideological framework of Hitler’s Lebensraumpolitik as it is to the U.S. government’s doctrine of Manifest Destiny: In each instance, the extermination of “inferior races” is justified in the interest of making way for a “superior race” of peoples. 31 According to [End Page 360] Hitler biographer John Toland, the Führer is known to have “expressed admiration for the ‘efficiency’ of the American genocide campaign against the Indians, viewing it as a forerunner for his own plans and programs.” 32 Even Steven Katz concedes that the “depopulation of the New World” was a “salient precursor” to the Nazi Holocaust. 33 Thus, the American Holocaust might be viewed as the prototype for the extermination of the Jews in Europe. At the very least, the event must be seen as a predecessor to the Nazi Holocaust.

While Hitler’s policy of Lebensraumpolitik has been vilified and condemned for the toll it took in terms of human lives–even in the Historians’ Debate, the essential criminality and moral reprehensibility of the Nazi regime was not challenged–heroes are made of men in America whose words were inspired by the same kind of thinking and whose actions resulted in the murder of millions of human beings considered to be members of “inferior” civilizations. Theodore Roosevelt, in The Strenuous Life, writes, in 1901:

Of course our whole national history has been one of expansion . . . That the barbarians recede or are conquered, with the attendant fact that peace follows their retrogression or conquest is due solely to the power of the mighty civilized races which have not lost the fighting instinct, and which by their expansion are gradually bringing peace to the red wastes where the barbarian peoples of this world hold sway. 34

Hannah Arendt, in the Origins of Totalitarianism, identifies metaphysical Jew-hatred as one element in the “subterranean stream of Western history” that subsequently translated into the political anti-Semitic consciousness in Europe and constituted the defining principle of Hitler’s Nazi regime. 35 Similarly, Richard Drinnon argues that the “national metaphysics of Indian-hating was central to the formation of national identity and political policy in the United States.” 36

The crucial issue at stake here is that, according to Drinnon’s analysis, this national metaphysics of Indian-hating rested on the “collective refusal to conceive of Native Americans as persons.” 37 Had the people of Europe–Jews and Gentiles alike–recognized these “barbarians” to be human entities and embraced them as siblings in the “family of man,” they might well have foreseen the fate that would befall civilized populations in Europe just a few short years later because, as Richard Drinnon points out in Facing West: The Metaphysics of Indian-Hating and Empire Building:

The sober truth was that the white man’s burden of Winning the West was crushing global folly. The West was quite literally nowhere–or everywhere, which was to say the same thing. For Homer’s Greeks and North American tribal peoples alike, the West was the land beyond, Spiritland, the land of [End Page 361] mystery, of death and of life eternal. It was not a Dark and bloody Ground to be “won.” But for Anglo-Americans it was exactly that, the latest conquest. Yet how could they conclusively “win” it? If the West was at bottom a form of society [as James Turner contended in “The Problem of the West”] then on our round earth, Winning the West amounted to no less than winning the world. It could be finally and decisively “won” only by rationalizing (Americanizing, Westernizing, modernizing) the world, and that meant conquering the land beyond, banishing mystery, and negating or extirpating other peoples, so the world would be subject to the regimented reason of one settlement culture with its professedly self-evident middle-class values. 38

Hitler’s Lebensraumpolitik was not without precedent or parallel. Four centuries after Columbus, the ideology of a master race had firmly established itself on American soil. A “color line” had been drawn, and it was clear that, in the national consciousness as in public policy, “Native Americans were natives and not Americans . . . the irreducible prerequisite of being an American, was to be of European stock.” 39 The color line drawn between the

Children of Light, the light of the Gospel, of Enlightenment institutions, law and order, progress, philanthropy, freedom, Americanization, modernization, forced urbanization . . . and the Children of Darkness, “savages” who stood in the way of the redemption and the rationalization of the world . . . unmistakably shaped national patterns of violence by establishing whom one could kill under propitious circumstances and thereby represented a prime source of the American way of inflicting death. 40

The hidden narratives of the master race and Manifest Destiny governing our understanding of American history distort perceptions of our own historiography. The ideology of Manifest Destiny–the fantasy and the fancy of the master race–is transferred from one generation to another so that there is no need for the kind of propaganda machinery required to make “willing executioners” of “ordinary men” and women in Germany. Americans, in their drive to forge “one Nation under God,” fought with “God on their side.” 41 Stannard, in this regard, explains that the Eurocentric racial contempt for the indigenous peoples . . . reflected in scholarly writings of this sort is now so complete and second nature to most Americans that it has passed into popular lore and common knowledge of the “every schoolboy knows” variety. No intent to distort the truth is any longer necessary. All that is required, once the model is established, is the recitation of rote learning as it passes from one uncritical generation to the next. 42 [End Page 362]

Giorgio Agamben has argued against the use of the term Holocaust as a descriptor for the Nazi extermination of the Jews because “Jews were exterminated not in a mad and giant holocaust but exactly as Hitler had announced, ‘as lice,’ which is to say as bare life.” 43 The notorious California Indian-killer H. L. Hall justified the murder of Native infants based on the argument that “a nit would make a louse.” John Chivington, commanding colonel in the infamous Sand Creek Massacre, reformulated the sentiment to justify similar actions with the statement “Nits make lice.” 44 Perplexing in this context is that Hitler’s perception of the Jews as “life unworthy of living,” that is, as “lice” or “bare life,” is received with moral outrage in the scholarly community and in public consciousness in the U.S. and elsewhere. But when Indians are placed on the same level of the “evolutionary scale” and assigned the same status in the biopolitical order, it becomes a justifiable sacrifice made in the name of “progress.”

Hitler’s willing executioners and the ordinary men and women of Germany had to be convinced that the Jewish population was not human; they had, after all, for centuries prior, lived and worked side by side with these people who were systematically exterminated as “like lice.”

Before the Final Solution could be implemented, the Jewish population of Europe had to be reduced to the level of “bare life.” But for the American settlers, the notion that the life form to be clear-cut from the vast, “unpopulated” wilderness in order to make way for their American way of life was somehow not human ranked among those truths held to be self-evident; the “execrable race” of red men and women was viewed from the very onset as existing at the level of “bare life.”

And yet, from a perspective that acknowledges the essential humanity of indigenous populations and the sophistication of the established forms of social organization, governance, and religious ritual prevailing among the indigenous populations at the time of contact, it becomes clear that, while the Nazi Holocaust was indeed unique in scope and in kind to the twentieth century, the American Holocaust was, as Stannard has stated, “far and away, the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world.” 45

Fortunately, Hitler was stopped before he could consummate the Final Solution. But some contend that Uncle Sam’s willing executioners are still today engaged in the effort to eradicate what remains of the indigenous population in North America. For others, the loss of Native lives and lifeways cannot be acknowledged as homicidal, genocidal, or suicidal because the “savage” is not–however ostentatiously liberal-minded individuals and institutions in this country may contend otherwise–considered fully human: “we” are not related. While a revisionist narrative of the West would attempt to suffuse its world-view with a politically correct moral underpinning by making superficial [End Page 363] linguistic concessions, no longer applying such terms as “savage” and “primitive” to indigenous peoples, contemporary scholarship still draws its insights and impulses from the same body of research and the same doctrine of universal superiority it now seeks to disavow and revile. The appearance of euphemisms such as “ethnocide” and “depopulation” applied to the genocide committed against Native populations is just one index of the continued resistance to the notion that this devastation involves a human tragedy.

Nominally, indigenous peoples have been grudgingly adopted into the “family of man” in the prevailing paradigms of Western thought. Phenomenologically, they are still today perceived not as human others, but in fact as a separate (and inferior) “species.” Depending on one’s interpretation of the Latin siluaticus (of the wood; belonging to a wood), from which the term “savage” is derived, one might suspect that, in the Western biopolitical order, the “savage life” acquires the status of one less than bare life or Homo sacer. If that is the case, then what occurred in this country must be viewed as a gigantic bonfire in which neither mice, lice, nor men, women or children were sacrificed and burned for the sake of clear-cutting a space for the master race–what was sacrificed here were merely logs. Driftwood. Dead weight. Useless waste. In the world of the uniqueness proponents, the “depopulation” of the New World is on a par with “deforestation.”

What is perhaps “unique” about the Nazi Holocaust is that it represents the first incidence in history of genocidal assault directed at an assimilated, “civilized” (and therefore human) population in central Europe. 46 Katz refers to the phenomenon as one of “Judeocide.” It might, however, more accurately be termed fratricide–brothers killing brothers–squabbling sons of the same God in a serial rerun of Cain and Abel. This is not to imply that fratricide is any less grievous a crime against humanity than genocide, merely to clarify the relationship of spiritual kinship existing between perpetrators and victims in the Nazi Holocaust and the way this works to influence our perception of the event’s primacy. It could in fact be argued that fratricide is indeed the more heinous crime since it involves the extermination of life that is clearly defined as “human” in the Judeo-Christian paradigm. Brothers killing brothers is classified as a mortal sin by the religious doctrines governing moral standards in both religions, but brothers killing savages is apparently sanctioned by the moral dictates of both these dominant world religions. If the ideology of Manifest Destiny is, on the other hand, subsumed under the mandate to “be fruitful and multiply,” then the extermination of indigenous populations is indeed ordained by the supreme deity common to the Christian and the Judaic faiths. From this perspective, mass murder is the implied mandate of Manifest Destiny.

Churchill speaks in terms of the need for a “denazification . . . a fundamental alteration in the consciousness of this country.” 47 I would suggest that “de-manifestation” [End Page 364] is a more apt designation for the paradigmatic shift requisite for decentering the hegemonistic reign of the “master narratives” of Manifest Destiny and the master race that govern our understanding of history as it relates to national identity in the United States. Thinking in terms of “de-manifestation” has the advantage of disaggregating the specific modalities of similar, but not identical, historical phenomena and of dislocating–geographically and intellectually–the source of the “problem” from the site of European history to that of American history. What follows is an attendant shift in temporal focus that allows us to properly place the postulates of Manifest Destiny and the master race in historically correct chronological order with relation to the subsequent emergence of theories of Lebensraumpolitik and the assumed superiority of the Aryan race on the European continent. Whereas “de-nazification” clearly connotes a “thing of the past,” “de-manifestation” implies a present, “manifest” reality. From this vantage point, the German Sonderweg is rerouted and an already trammeled trail of rampant plundering, pillage, and mass murder is revealed to have been blazed in the forward wake of the historical caesura that the Nazi Holocaust represents.

Holocaust in Contemporary Context: Collective Suicide

Most importantly, perhaps, what distinguishes the American Holocaust from the Nazi Holocaust is what is at stake today. The Nazi Holocaust represents a historical event that threatened the entire Jewish population of Europe. Relegating this event to the archive of oblivion would involve a fatal miscalculation resulting in wholesale moral bankruptcy for the entire Western world. But the worldwide Jewish population can hardly be said to be at risk of extermination today–certainly not in the United States. American Jews stepped up their efforts to direct attention to the Nazi Holocaust at a time when they were by far the wealthiest, best-educated, most influential, in-every-way-most-successful group in American society–a group that, compared to most other identifiable minority groups, suffered no measurable discrimination and no disadvantages on account of that minority status. 48

Norman Finkelstein cites the Jewish income in the United States at double that of non-Jews and points out that sixteen of the forty wealthiest Americans are Jews, as are 40 percent of Nobel prizewinners in science and economics, 20 percent of professors at major universities and 40 percent of partners in law firms in New York and Washington. 49

Native Americans, by contrast, have long been subject to the most extreme poverty of any sector in the present North American population, and still have the highest rate of suicide of any other ethnic group on the continent. 50 High-school [End Page 365] dropout rates are as high as 70 percent in some communities. As Anishinabeg activist and Harvard-educated scholar Winona LaDuke notes with regard to the Lakota population in South Dakota: “Alcoholism, unemployment, suicide, accidental death and homicide rates are still well above the national average.” 51 Alcoholism, intergenerational posttraumatic stress, and a spate of social and economic ills continue to plague these communities in the aftermath of the American Holocaust.

As Peter Novik has made abundantly clear in his study of the way the Holocaust functions as a sort of “civil religion” and signifier of identity for American Jews, much of the commemoration rhetoric and practice propagated in this country centers on maintaining a consensual symbol of unity for American Jews who thus experience the Holocaust “vicariously.” As Novik states, while most American Jews (and Gentiles) may be saddened, dismayed, or shocked by the Nazi Holocaust, there is little evidence to suggest that they have actually been traumatized by it. 52

The Americanization of the Holocaust, according to Novik’s analysis, serves a symbolic function for American Jews, ascribing victim status to a community that demonstrates little sign of actual victimization in a culture where the victim is victor. Norman Finkelstein, the vociferous Goldhagen critic who lost most of his family in the death camps and ghettoes of Nazi-occupied Europe, has expressed similar views. His forthcoming publication asserts that the “Holocaust industry” was born with the Six-Day War in June of 1967. Before that, there was little mention of the Holocaust in American life. He argues that the development of the “Holocaust industry” in the United States is part of a strategic campaign to justify American political interests in Israel. 53

This is not to deny or diminish the clear and present danger in the ominous resurgence of anti-Semitic sentiments reflected in isolated incidences of racial violence against Jews and Jewish institutions both here and abroad. However, the material realities confronting the Native American population remain, in many instances, comparable to those prevailing in Third World countries. The Native American experience of persecution is not a vicarious one. For substantial portions of this population, it is a lived reality.

What is more, an unrelenting sentiment of Indian-hating persists in this country:

There is a peculiar kind of hatred in the northwoods, a hatred born of the guilt of privilege, a hatred born of living with three generations of complicity in the theft of lives and lands. What is worse is that each day, those who hold this position of privilege must come face to face with those whom they have dispossessed. To others who rightfully should share in the complicity and the guilt, Indians are far away and long ago. But in reservation border towns, Indians [End Page 366] are ever present. . . . The poverty of dispossession is almost overwhelming. So is the poverty of complicity and guilt. In America, poverty is relative, but it still causes shame. That shame, combined with guilt and a feeling of powerlessness, creates an atmosphere in which hatred buds, blossoms, and flourishes. The hatred passes from father to son and from mother to daughter. Each generation feels the hatred and it penetrates deeper to justify a myth. 54

Attempts on the part of American Indians to transcend chronic, intergenerational maladies introduced by the settler population (for example, in the highly contested Casino industry, in the ongoing battles over tribal sovereignty, and so on) are challenged tooth and nail by the U.S. government and its “ordinary” people. Flexibility in transcending these conditions has been greatly curtailed by federal policies that have “legally” supplanted our traditional forms of governance, outlawed our languages and spirituality, manipulated our numbers and identity, usurped our cultural integrity, viciously repressed the leaders of our efforts to regain self-determination, and systematically miseducated the bulk of our youth to believe that this is, if not just, at least inevitable.” 55 Today’s state of affairs in America, both with regard to public memory and national identity, represents a flawless mirror image of the situation in Germany vis-à-vis Jews and other non-Aryan victims of the Nazi regime. 56

Collective indifference to these conditions on the part of both white and black America is a poor reflection on the nation’s character. This collective refusal to acknowledge the genocide further exacerbates the aftermath in Native communities and hinders the recovery process. This, too, sets the American situation apart from the German-Jewish situation: Holocaust denial is seen by most of the world as an affront to the victims of the Nazi regime. In America, the situation is the reverse: victims seeking recovery are seen as assaulting American ideals.

But what is at stake today, at the dawn of a new millennium, is not the culture, tradition, and survival of one population on one continent on either side of the Atlantic. What is at stake is the very future of the human species. LaDuke, in her most recent work, contextualizes the issues from a contemporary perspective:

Our experience of survival and resistance is shared with many others. But it is not only about Native people. . . . In the final analysis, the survival of Native America is fundamentally about the collective survival of all human beings. The question of who gets to determine the destiny of the land, and of the people who live on it–those with the money or those who pray on the land–is a question that is alive throughout society. 57 [End Page 367]

“There is,” as LaDuke reminds us, “a direct relationship between the loss of cultural diversity and the loss of biodiversity. Wherever Indigenous peoples still remain, there is also a corresponding enclave of biodiversity.” 58 But, she continues,

The last 150 years have seen a great holocaust. There have been more species lost in the past 150 years than since the Ice Age. (During the same time, Indigenous peoples have been disappearing from the face of the earth. Over 2,000 nations of Indigenous peoples have gone extinct in the western hemisphere and one nation disappears from the Amazon rainforest every year.) 59

It is not about “us” as indigenous peoples–it is about “us” as a human species. We are all related. At issue is no longer the “Jewish question” or the “Indian problem.” We must speak today in terms of the “human problem.” And it is this “problem” for which not a “final,” but a sustainable, viable solution must be found–because it is no longer a matter of “serial genocide,” it has become one of collective suicide. As Terrence Des Pres put it, in The Survivor: “At the heart of our problems is that nihilism which was all along the destiny of Western culture: a nihilism either unacknowledged even as the bombs fell or else, as with Hitler or Stalin, demonically proclaimed as the new salvation.” 60

All of us must now begin thinking and acting in the dimension and in the interest of the human species–an intellectual domain of vita activa that indigenous people have inhabited since time immemorial. It is this modality of thought as a process of reflection that the “civilized” nations must learn from the “savage” ones. Vine Deloria, in “Native American Spirituality,” has attempted to clarify this distinction:

American Indians look backwards in time to the creation of the world and view reality from the perspective of the one species that has the capability to reflect on the meaning of things. This attitude is generally misunderstood by non-Indians who act as if reflection and logical thought were synonymous. But reflection is a special art and requires maturity of personality, certainty of identity, and feelings of equality with the other life forms of the world. It consists, more precisely, of allowing wisdom to approach rather than seeking answers to self-generated questions. Such an attitude, then, stands in a polarized position to the manner in which society today conducts itself. 61

It is not a matter of moral bookkeeping or of winners and losers in the battle of the most martyred minority. It is not a matter of comparative victimology, but one of collective survival. The insistence on incomparability and “uniqueness” of the Nazi Holocaust is precisely what prohibits our collective comprehension of genocide as a phenomenon of Western “civilization,” not as a reiterative series of historical events, each in its own way “unique.” It is what [End Page 368] inhibits our ability to name causes, anticipate outcomes, and, above all to engage in preemptive political and intellectual action in the face of contemporary exigencies.

In Tabori’s 1990 production Weisman and Rotgesicht, the “calculus of calamity” is taken to hilarious heights to reveal the grave truth of the matter. In his 1994 discussion of “The Contemporary German Fascination for Things Jewish,” Jack Zipes states of Weisman und Rotgesicht:

The resolution that Tabori offers, though hilarious, is meant to be taken seriously: a verbal duel so that both sides can expose themselves and realize how ridiculous it is to quarrel with one another. Hilarity becomes a nomadic means of questioning majority culture and of reversing identities so that understanding between different groups can be generated. 62

Ultimately, fostering a “solidarity of memory” that might fundamentally challenge majority culture must be the aim of any comparison of “minority” situations, but the conclusion Zipes draws from this particular conflation of identities in conflict is flawed by a misapprehension of the play’s historically and culturally specific geographic setting in the Western wilderness and its relationship to indigenous peoples. As I have argued elsewhere, while Tabori does not specify the site of the duel in the desert, the play could be interpreted to be set in what is now the state of Colorado. 63 This is the site of the Sand Creek Massacre–a historical event with culturally specific meaning to the Native American people. It is at once a site of sanctity, of sacrifice, and of sacrilege. It represents the rampant desecration that has devastated an entire civilization and its way of life. But according to Jack Zipes’s analysis: “There are many parallels that one can draw with the conflict in this play: Jews and blacks in the States, or blacks and Koreans; Jews and Turks in Germany; Jews and Arabs in the Middle East.” 64 Clearly, other subaltern Others share similar relationships to other, more distant desert lands and wilderness landscapes, but Zipes’s analogies are flawed on several counts.

In the case of the conflicts between the first two groups cited, the element of violent conquest and the dispossession of lands at the heart of the American Indian-European immigrant “dispute” is absent: Jews and blacks, like Jews and Koreans, are engaged in a struggle for cultural, racial, economic, and social equity in territories to which they have been introduced as Others–either as slaves, immigrants, or refugees. In the German-Turkish situation, the “minority” group is the “alien element” or, as the German euphemism would have it, “guest workers.” None of these struggles involves legal agreements between sovereign nations–that is to say treaties between sovereign political entities–the terms of which have not been upheld by an outlaw state whose legitimacy as a “world power” is nevertheless recognized by the international community [End Page 369] .

As Seth Wolitz has stated in this regard, “the text can also be read allegorically as a version of the Israeli-Palestinian encounter between two subalterns squabbling over land which the ‘Gewittergoi’, the imperialist powers, can always regain and control.” 65 The problem with this allegory, though, is that the North American territories that function as the setting and backdrop for the territories at issue in the Indian-immigrant conflict have yet to be manumitted from colonialist bondage. The lands remain in control of the “imperialist power.”

Precisely this is central to understanding the double-edged ironies and conflicts addressed in Weisman und Rotgesicht. The setting involves a geographical site that is readily associated with the actual site of a massacre and, as such, the site itself is ambiguous: it signifies both a site of (ongoing) sanctity and one of (ongoing) desecration. If the parallel is to be drawn between the Jewish and American Indian subaltern situations, the course of history as well as the present state of affairs must be taken into account: the fact is that Hitler lost the war and the State of Israel was formed as partial reparation for the losses sustained by the Jewish population as a result. However, the United States government, even as it sought to help absorb the losses sustained by the Jewish population in Europe not only through its support of Israel, but by offering refuge to Jewish immigrants in territories seized from the indigenous populations, won its war against the Indians. 66 The crucial difference between a regime whose demise was rooted in genocide and one for whom genocide was its foundational principle and the prerequisite to its existence is elided by this analogy.

Moreover, at the level of sheer abstraction, the solidarity between subaltern groups that the Jewish-American tradition of “spoofing” Jewish-Indian relations seeks to evoke is marred by its unilateral initiative–emanating from the Jewish perspective in the context of a Judeo-Christian framework that demonstrates little regard for or knowledge of the cultural and religious world-views of Native Americans, either as a collective entity or as heterogeneous individual nations–each with its own relationship to specific geographic sites within the boundaries of occupied territories now defined as the United States.

The land, “the Wilderness” or “the Desert” which has come to signify a “wasteland” in the symbolic and spiritual orders of other peoples, has never been associated with anything but abundance and eternal sustenance for indigenous peoples because revelation is rooted in the life of reflection on and with the land, not in catastrophic upheaval or divine intervention. Vine Deloria explains the “problem” of misconstrued understandings of this relationship in this way:

Almost every tribal religion was based on land. . . . Some of the old chiefs felt that, because generations of their ancestors had been buried on the lands and because the sacred events of their religion had taken place on the lands, they [End Page 370] were obligated to maintain the tribal lands against new kinds of exploitation. . . . Especially among the Pueblos, Hopi, and Navajo, the lands of the creation and emergence traditions are easily identified and are regarded as places of utmost significance. . . . Government officials have ruthlessly disregarded the Indians’ pleas for the restoration of their most sacred lands, and the constant dispute between Indians and whites centers around this subject. 67

If anything sets the American Indian apart from other victims of genocide or oppression in this country, it is this:

Native Americans are not, in the strictest sense of the word, a “diasporic” people. 68 While the policies of Indian Removal certainly served to disperse, displace, disparage, and dislocate Native cultures and identities from coast to coast, imposing upon Native North American peoples conditions of existence that might be described as “diasporic” in a Judeo-Christian or postcolonialist context, I would caution against the appropriation of the diasporic metaphor with regard to the state of Native North America. The traditional Deuteronomic narrative of the Diaspora implies divine punishment in response to a breach of covenant. In order for a “diasporic” situation to prevail, the peoples of the diaspora must have entered into a contract with the divinely intervening deity. But indigenous peoples of this country stood in no such relationship to the Judeo-Christian God and his sovereign representatives on Earth. The notion of a “Native Diaspora” in the United States presupposes an adherence to the doctrine of Manifest Destiny as divine intervention on the part of the Judeo-Christian God in His effort to create “living space” or Lebensraum for His children–“chosen” and “unchosen” alike. Even if we were to accept the contemporary permutations of the concept in the postcolonialist attempt to subvert and decenter traditional narratives of nationalism and imperialism as these relate to identity formation and the location of culture, the diasporic metaphor is inapplicable because the peoples and lands at issue here have yet to be manumitted from neo-colonialist bondage.

Uprootedness, homelessness, exile–these are maladies forced upon Native North American populations by the invading Europeans. What Simone Weil has written about this affliction in reference to Euro-African relations in Africa applies equally to the situation on Turtle Island.

[T]he white man carries [uprootedness] about with him wherever he goes. The disease has even penetrated the heart of the African continent, which had for thousands of years, nevertheless, been made up of villages. These black people at any rate, when nobody came to massacre them, torture them, or reduce them to slavery, knew how to live happily on their land. Contact with us is making them lose the art. That ought to make us wonder whether even the [End Page 371] black man, although the most primitive of all colonized peoples, hadn’t after all more to teach us than to learn from us. 69

Native Americans have been “extirpated” as “savages” and as “barbarians” on their own soil. That soil has been contaminated by pestilence, poisons, toxins, oil spills, nuclear waste dumps and all the other deadly by-products Western “civilization” inevitably leaves as its legacy. Sacred sites have been effaced; graves have been robbed. Synagogues and churches can be rebuilt, but Mount Rushmore is not likely to be restored to its original glory by geological cosmetic surgery. Taken literally, James Young’s figurative language in “America’s Holocaust: Memory and the Politics of Identity,” is laced with mordant irony:

By themselves monuments are of little value, mere stones in the landscape. But as part of a nation’s rites or the objects of a people’s national pilgrimage, they are imbued with national soul and memory. For traditionally the state-sponsored memory of a national past aims to affirm the righteousness of a nation’s birth, even its divine election. The matrix of a nation’s monuments emplots the story of ennobling events, of triumphs over barbarism, and recalls the martyrdom of those who gave their lives in the struggle for national existence–who in the martyrological refrain, died so that a nation might live. In assuming the idealized forms and meanings assigned this era by the state, memorials tend to concretize particular historical interpretations. They suggest themselves in indigenous, even geological outcroppings in a national landscape; in time, such idealized memory grows as natural to the eye as the landscape in which it stands.” 70 [emphasis mine]

The irony of his statements is certainly not lost on Young, who concludes his discussion with a section titled “Against a Culture of Competing Catastrophes,” and states: “In the end we must recognize that memory cannot be divorced from the actions taken in its behalf, and that memory without consequences may even contain the seeds of its own destruction.” 71 The “national monument” at Mount Rushmore represents the geographic and symbolic site in which the principles of Manifest Destiny and the master race are literally set in stone. 72

Only when the sanctity in the hearts and minds of the indigenous population of this “vast, untamed wilderness” itself has been duly acknowledged–when the dominant culture finally comes to grips with the fact that the ground they walk upon is not like a temple to the American Indian–it is the temple–then, and only then, will the nature of the devastation and desecration be driven home to them.

Once that has been established, the essentially suicidal nature of Western intellectual endeavor will also become apparent. The savage–an entity reduced in the Western scheme of things to the level of “bare (and hence [End Page 372] disposable) life” on a par with the plant–reveals himself, in the Native American world-view, to be precisely that: nothing more and nothing less than the tree itself–equals in a covenant and an evolutionary chain that does not shackle or bind, but merely bonds. To the Native American sense and sensibility, the tree represents life itself, and there is no split between the life of the tree and the life of the human. They are holistically, historically, and happily related in the nexus of mutually sustainable symbiosis.

If, following Agamben, “homo sacer is life that may be killed but not sacrificed . . . life that may be killed by anyone without committing homicide,” then no crime has been committed in the American Holocaust, nor is the dearth of “academic moves,” “scholarly turns,” and “paradigmatic shifts” toward a fundamental rethinking and reshaping of American national identity of any consequence in global, local, or national terms. 73 There has been no “human” sacrifice in the conquest of the West. Nothing but the forest has been lost to the victor culture. But, if Native theorists, religious leaders, and activists who have survived the holocausts are correct in asserting, as they do, that the fate of the forest will be that of man, then the master race is, in fact, engaged in the specter of committing collective suicide–exercising the authority of the sovereign over life and death on all our behalf.

If we are to divert the disaster, Mount Rushmore must be placed on a par with burning synagogues, whose fires can never be extinguished, and with black churches in the South subjected to racially motivated acts of arson. If the “Jews are the Indians of Germany,” then Mount Rushmore is Bitburg, writ large and indelible, engraved not only in our collective memory, but spat on the very floor of the temple–a civic memorial to a people and a way of life sacrificed to someone else’s “God.” 74 But it is also here that the master race, ex altera terra, has signed and sealed its own fate on this continent as that of homo sacer:

A life that, excepting itself in double exclusion from the real context of both the profane and the religious forms of life, is defined solely by virtue of having entered into an intimate symbiosis with death without, nevertheless, belonging to the world of the deceased. 75

The stones speak volumes that continue to fall on the deaf ears of an American public more German than the Germans in its persistent refusal to come to terms with a “little matter of genocide,” choosing instead to adopt as its own the foundling stone of a historical marker–that coveted historical caesura everyone wants to have, but no one wants to own in the “Americanization of the Holocaust.” 76 But in the canyons of deep memory, the song of the stones still echoes and rings true for the three million survivors of the American Holocaust.

Lilian Friedberg is a bilingual published author and political activist with a master’s degree in the humanities from the University of Chicago and is currently a doctoral candidate in Germanic Studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Notes

1. The reader of this paper is instructed to note that the linguistic and literary intent of the writer includes a deliberate transgression of traditional boundaries in scholarship. This paper thus combines and at the same time challenges elements of various genres: from personal narrative, to scholarly discourse, to critical analysis and creative writing in a parodic idiom that, at times, borders on the “sacrilegious.” It is written from the subject position of a German-Jewish-Native-American-(Anishinabe)-Female and, as a “cross-genred” literary experiment, seeks to reflect the cultural hybridity of its author.

2. Seth Wolitz, “From Parody to Redemption: George Tabori’s Weisman und Rotgesicht,” in Verkörperte Geschichtsentwürfe: George Taboris Theaterarbeit, ed. Peter Höyng (Tübingen: Francke Verlag, 1998) 151-76, 163.

3. Mark Slobin, “From Vilna to Vaudeville: Minikes and Among the Indians,” The Drama Review 24, no. 3 (September 1980): 18.

4. Raphael Seligmann, Mit beschränkter Hoffnung: Juden, Deutsche und Israelis (Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe, 1991), 97-8; cited in Sander L. Gilman, Jews in Today’s German Culture (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995), 19.

5. Lucy Dawidowicz, The Holocaust and the Historians (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981), 17. In Dawidowicz’s earlier work The War against the Jews 1933-1945 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975), her discussion of the Madagascar Plan speaks in terms of the “Madagascar reservation . . . a reservation for Jews that would become truly their final destination” (150-66) [emphasis mine].

6. Cited in Peter Novik, The Holocaust in American Life (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1999), 200.

7. Novik, The Holocaust in American Life, 198.

8. See also Henry R. Huttenbach, “The Psychology and Politics of Genocide Denial: A Comparison of Four Case Studies,” in Studies in Comparative Genocide, eds. Levon Chorbajian and George Shirinian (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), 216: “Denial has become an integral part of genocide; not to take this aspect into consideration is to fail to comprehend a major component of the dynamics of extermination.”

9. At the time of this writing, Finkelstein’s most recent work The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering was scheduled for publication by Verso in July 2000. Citations here are from an 11 June 2000 review by Bryan Appleyard published in the online version of The Sunday Times (http://www.Sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/06/11/stirevnws02006.html).

10. Novik, The Holocaust in American Life, 13.

11. Saul Friedländer, Memory, History, and the Extermination of the Jews of Europe (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993), 23.

12. Ernst Reinhard Piper, ed., Historikerstreit: Die Dokumentation der Konstervers um die Einzigartigkeit der national-sozialistischen Judenvernichtung (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1987); in English, James Knowlton and Truett Cates, trans., Forever in the Shadow of Hitler? Original Documents of the Historikerstreit, the Controversy Concerning the Singularity of the Holocaust (Atlantic Highlands nj: Humanities Press, 1993).

13. Gerald Vizenor, Manifest Manners: Narrative on Postindian Survivance (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1994), 4.

14. George Tabori, “Hamlet in Blue,” Theatre Quarterly 20 (1975): 117-32.

15. Henryk Broder, “Die Germanisierung des Holocaust,” in Volk und Wahn (Munich: Goldman Verlag, 1996), 214. English-language translations of “The Germanization of the Holocaust” and other essays by the same author are forthcoming in Lilian M. Friedberg and Sander L. Gilman, eds., To Each His Own: Selected Essays by German-Jewish Essayist Henryk Broder. Indeed, as Broder’s essay implies, a veritable cottage industry has developed around the Holocaust. Titles like Edward Alexander’s “Stealing the Holocaust,” (Midstream [November 1980]) reflect the lunatic proportions that characterize the debates. See also Norman Finkelstein at note 9 above.

16. James Axtell, Beyond 1492: Encounters in Colonial North America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 262-63.

17. Finkelstein’s article was subsequently reprinted–together with an equally scathing critique of Goldhagen’s thesis and methodology by Ruth Bettina Birn, a recognized authority on the archives Goldhagen cites as sources for his research–in A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth (New York: Henry Holt, 1998).

18. William Greider, One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997), 368.

19. Dominick LaCapra, Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996), 57.

20. Steven Katz, “The Uniqueness of the Holocaust: The Historical Dimension,” in Is the Holocaust Unique?: Perspectives on Comparative Genocide, ed. Alan Rosenbaum (Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1996), 21.

21. See Katz’s chapter on “The Depopulation of the New World in the Sixteenth Century” in The Holocaust in Historical Context: Volume I: The Holocaust and Mass Death before the Modern Age (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 87-91.

22. Katz, The Holocaust in Historical Context, 59.

23. Raphael Lemkin, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1944), cited in Katz, Holocaust in Historical Context, 125. Lemkin’s definition has been reprinted in most standard works on genocide. For the reader who may be unfamiliar with the text of Article 2 of the UN Convention on Genocide adopted by the General Assembly in November 1948, which was based on Lemkin’s original delineation of the term and the crime’s parameters, I reprint it here: “In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group.

2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group.

3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.

5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. (cited in Katz, Holocaust in Historical Context, 125)

Ward Churchill’s A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492-Present (San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1997) firmly establishes, point by point, the manner and degree to which policies and actions on the part of the U.S. government and its people conform to the definition of genocide as outlined by Lemkin and by the UN convention.

24. Lord Jeffrey Amherst, cited in Churchill, Matter of Genocide, 154.

25. David E. Stannard, American Holocaust (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), xii.

26. While sources may disagree on the exact wording of Sheridan’s now infamous statement, the sentiment, regardless of wording, is always the same. My source here is The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955), 499. The examples cited here reflect but the tip of the iceberg in a documented litany of official and unofficial statements issued by governmental authorities and representatives of the people of the United States, which express clear and unequivocal intent to exterminate the entire indigenous population of North America.

27. Yehuda Bauer, “Comparison of Genocides” in Chorbajian and Shirinian, Studies in Comparative Genocide, 38.

28. Lenore A. Stiffarm with Phil Lane, “The Demography of Native North America,” in The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance, ed. Annette Jaimes (Boston: South End Press, 1992), 33.

29. Churchill, Matter of Genocide, 63.

30. Ibid., 64.

31. Ibid., 147. See also Reginal Horsman, Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981); Frank Parella, “Lebensraum and Manifest Destiny: A Comparative Study in the Justification of Expansion” (master’s thesis, Georgetown University, 1950); Albert K. Weinberg, Manifest Destiny: A Study of Nationalist Expansion in American History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1935); Frederick Merk, Manifest Destiny and Mission in American History: A Reinterpretation (New York: Knopf, 1963).

32. John Toland, paraphrased in Stannard, American Holocaust, 153.

33. Katz, Holocaust in Historical Context, 97.

34. Cited in Richard Drinnon, Facing West: The Metaphysics of Indian-Hating and Empire Building (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980), 232.

35. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1973), ix. Arendt also identifies the doctrine of the master race as an element of the same “subterranean stream,” but her American exceptionalism renders her comments in this regard of little use to an analysis of the notion of “one nation under God” as a euphemistic veil for the concept of a master race. See Arendt, Origins, 152, 206.

36. Drinnon, Facing West, 463.

37. Ibid., 463.

38. Ibid., 465.

39. Ibid., 462.

40. Ibid., 463.

41. A discussion of the role Christian ideals played in the genocide of both the Jews and the indigenous populations of the Americas oversteps the scope of this study. Elie Wiesel, unaware perhaps of his own profundity in this matter, sums up the gist of the argument quite well when he states: “All the killers were Christian. . . . The Nazi system was the consequence of a movement of ideas and followed a strict logic; it did not arise in a void but had its roots deep in a tradition that prophesied it, prepared for it, and brought it to maturity. That tradition was inseparable from the past of Christian, civilized Europe” (in Irving Abrahamson, ed., Against Silence: The Voice and Vision of Elie Wiesel [New York: Holocaust Library, 1985], 33).

42. Stannard, American Holocaust, 13.

43. Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1998), 114.

44. Churchill, Matter of Genocide, 229.

45. Stannard, American Holocaust, x.

46. See also Terrence Des Pres’s (The Survivor: An Anatomy of Life in the Death Camps [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976], 207) assertion that “[the survivor] is the first of civilized men to live beyond the compulsions of culture” [emphasis mine].

47. Ward Churchill, “A Summary of Arguments Against the Naming of a University Residence Hall After Clinton M. Tyler” (report prepared at the request of the assistant vice chancellor for academic services, University of Colorado at Boulder, July 1981, cited in Annette Jaimes, ed., The State of Native America, 5).

48. Novik, Holocaust in American Life, 9.

49. See note 9 above.

50. Eduardo and Bonnie Duran, Native American Postcolonial Psychology (New York: SUNY Press, 1995), 40.

51. Winona LaDuke, All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life (Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1999), 148.

52. Novik, Holocaust in American Life, 9.

53. See note 9 above.

54. Winona LaDuke, Last Standing Woman (Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Press, 1997), 127. LaDuke’s reference here is to the state of Minnesota. Her discussion centers on the particularly virulent strain of metaphysical Indian-hating that permeates those areas in direct proximity to reservations.

55. Annette Jaimes, “Sand Creek–The Morning After,” in Jaimes, The State of Native America, 8. A detailed discussion of the “legal” means employed by the U.S. government in outlawing and criminalizing various elements of native culture far exceeds the scope of this study. Churchill states, in this regard,

It may seem curious that American Indians, who had mandatorily become U.S. citizens by 1924, should “need a special statute passed in the late 1970’s [The American Indian Religious Freedom Act, 1978] to be able to utilize the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution.” A number of statutes and regulations promulgated during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, however, effectively criminalized a range of indigenous spiritual practices extending from the Lakota sun dance to the potlatch ceremonies of the nations of the Pacific Northwest. Further, given that many native traditions embody a concept of sacred geography, loss of lands had by the late twentieth century seriously curtailed site-specific practices of Indian spirituality (Ward Churchill, cited in Jaimes, The State of Native North America, 17).

Native and non-Native scholars have conducted a substantial amount of research on these issues.

56. The “New Age” spiritual movement’s fascination and appropriation of things Indian also presents a mirror image of the “contemporary fascination for things Jewish in Germany.” See article of the same title by Jack Zipes, in Sander Gilman and Karen Remmler, eds., Reemerging Jewish Culture in Germany: Life and Literature since 1989 (New York: New York University Press, 1994), 15-45; cf. Wendy Rose, “The Great Pretenders: Further Reflections on Whiteshamanism,” in Jaimes, The State of Native North America, 403-21.

57. LaDuke, All Our Relations, 5.

58. Ibid., 1.

59. Ibid., 1.

60. Des Pres, The Survivor, 207.

61. Vine Deloria, For this Land: Writings on Religion in America (New York: Routledge, 1999), 130.

62. Jack Zipes, “Contemporary Fascination,” 36.

63. Lilian Friedberg, “Mule Minus Forty Million Acres: Topographies of Geographic Disorientation and Redface Minstrelsy in George Tabori’s Weisman und Rotgesicht” (master’s thesis, University of Chicago, May 2000).

64. Zipes, “Contemporary Fascination,” 36.

65. Wolitz, “From Parody to Redemption,” 166.

66. Ward Churchill, speaking at the University of Chicago on 21 January 2000 made this point in his lecture on “A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492-Present.”

67. Deloria, For this Land, 127.

68. Any significant discussion of indigenous peoples and their relationship to the lands currently inhabited by other diasporic peoples is glaringly absent, for example, in Michael Galchnisky’s discussion of diasporism with regard to multicultural identity in the United States. See “Scattered Seeds: A Dialogue of Diasporas,” in Insider/Outsider: American Jews and Multiculturalism, eds. David Biale, Michael Galchinsky, and Susan Heschel (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 185-212.

69. Weil, The Need for Roots, 77.

70. James E. Young, “America’s Holocaust: Memory and the Politics of Identity,” in The Americanization of the Holocaust, ed. Helene Flanzbaum (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), 69.

71. Ibid., 82.

72. While opinions in Native communities are divided with regard to the “Rushmore alternative”–the “Crazy Horse Monument”–it is the view of many that this monumental undertaking, initiated by European immigrants, constitutes an equally atrocious assault on the land, which only adds insult to injury, especially since Crazy Horse, throughout his life, had insisted that no graphic representations of his person be made.

73. Agamben, Homo Sacer, 101-3.

74. This is a reference to the international scandal surrounding then President Ronald Reagan’s conduct at the cemetery in Bitburg, Germany, where former SS soldiers are buried and were commemorated in 1986. For a more detailed discussion of the event and its meaning, see also David Singer, ed, Bitburg in Moral and Political Perspective (Bloomington: University Press of Indiana, 1986) and Ilya Levkov, ed., Bitburg and Beyond: Encounters in American, German, and Jewish History (New York: Shapolsky, 1987).

75. Agamben, Homo Sacer, 100.

76. Russel Means, 12 October 1992, American Indian Movement:

“All my life, I’ve had to listen to rhetoric about the United States being a model of freedom and democracy, the most uniquely enlightened and humanitarian country in history, a ‘nation of laws’ which, unlike others, has never pursued policies of conquest and aggression. I’m sure you’ve heard it before. It’s official ‘truth’ in the United States. It’s what is taught to schoolchildren and it’s the line peddled to the general public. Well, I’ve got a hot news flash for everybody here. It’s a lie. The whole thing’s a lie, and it always has been. Leaving aside the obvious points which could be raised to disprove it by blacks and Chicanos and Asian immigrants right here in North America–not to mention the Mexicans, the Nicaraguans, the Guatemalans, the Puerto Ricans, the Hawaiians, the Filipinos, the Samoans, the Tamarros of Guam, the Marshall Islanders, the Koreans, the Vietnamese, the Cubans, the Dominicans, the Granadans, the Libyans, the Panamanians, the Iraqis, and a few dozen other peoples out there who’ve suffered American invasions and occupations first hand–there’s a little matter of genocide that’s got to be taken into account right here at home. I’m talking about the genocide which has been perpetrated against American Indians, a genocide that began the instant the first of Europe’s boat people washed up on the beach of Turtle Island, a genocide that’s continuing right now, at this moment. Against Indians, there’s not a law the United States hasn’t broken, not a Crime Against Humanity it hasn’t committed, and it’s still going on” (cited in Churchill, Matter of Genocide, frontispiece).

%d bloggers like this: