richardboydenreport

Home » Jews

Category Archives: Jews

THE NORMALIZATION OF DEVIANCE AND DEPRAVITY

WARNING! GRAPHIC EXPLICIT INFORMATION

 

THE NORMALIZATION OF DEVIANCE AND DEPRAVITY

Published first on Veterans Today

Is there a covert campaign to deprave and corrupt the masses?
If so, who are the Architects of Evil behind this psyop? [1]

POSTER ON A CLASSROOM WALL Why are they doing this to our children?
POSTER ON A CLASSROOM WALL
Do our children need this?

A recent pamphlet published by the German government contains these chilling words:

“Fathers do not devote enough attention to the clitoris and vagina of their daughters. The child touches all parts of their father’s body, sometimes arousing him. The father should do the same.” [2]

Toddlers are encouraged to indulge in “unlimited masturbation.” Their parents are expected to offer practical demonstrations if need be — the better to produce sexual precocity in their offspring. “Children should learn there is no such thing as shameful parts of the body,” the booklet advises. “The body is a home you should be proud of.”

Children, it is suggested, should be taught the movements of copulation as soon as they reach the age of four, giving them what virtually amounts to a crash course in the Kama Sutra as soon as they have learned to walk.

Depravity, it seems, cannot be taught too early.

In Holland, things have gone further. Here a political party, set up by convicted pedophiles, clamors for the legalization of child pornography and intergenerational sex between children of twelve and adults old enough to be their grandparents. I forgot to mention bestiality. They want to legalize that too. [3]

Who is to blame for the sex addictions we see suppurating all round us? This licentiousness, growing by the day, thanks to the internet and the mass media, is far deadlier and more destructive than it was half a century ago, before the sexual revolution.

Those who are responsible for this sickening depravity are clearly the people who started the sexual revolution. They are the people, moreover, who control the mass media.

Who controls the media?

Who determines the imagery and attitudes drip-feeding steadily into the minds of the public? Who runs Hollywood? Who contaminates mass consciousness? Who defiles the collective mind? Who pulls the puppet strings of marionette man? Who are the Bad Shepherds leading the sheeple astray?

Who are to blame, in short, for letting the world go to hell in a handcart?

I won’t bother to answer these questions. More to the point, I dare not. If you don’t know who owns the media — lock, stock and barrel — you’re wasting your time reading this article.

Art and Sexual Subversion: The Vaginocentric Female Artist

Let me resume here my discussion of sexual depravity which formed the basis of my recent article Secret Sex Life of the Jews; and let me begin by saying a few words on art, a subject I know something about.[4] And then let me proceed to the subject of pornography and consider its deployment in the systematic demoralization of the masses. [5]

First, ask yourself this question: is there anything intrinsically admirable or aesthetically pleasing about British painter Tracey Emin’s attention-seeking leg-and-vagina paintings? When other artists offer us self-portraits, they usually show us their faces. Not Ms Emin. Her idea of a “self-portrait” is to show us her uterus. [6]

Feminist icon Tracey Emin: "I've got it all"
Feminist icon Tracey Emin: “I’ve got it all”

Consider only these titles by the outrageously untalented Emin and draw your own conclusions about the decadent crap being rammed down the throat of the public by the Jews who control the art world [7]: 

Everyone I Have Ever Slept With,Fucking Down An Ally (sic), Asleep Alone With Legs Open (several large-scale canvases of her splayed legs and vagina), I’ve Got It All (legs splayed again, clutching banknotes to her crotch), Weird Sex, CV Cunt Vernacular,Is Anal Sex Legal, Masturbating, Get Ready For the Fuck Of Your Life. [8]

With titles like these, Tracey Emin could hardly fail. Her rich Jewish patron, advertising mogul Charles Saatchi, knew he was on to a good thing when he decided to promote the career of this pretentious confidence trickster masquerading as an artist. [9]

As the Gadarene swine hurtle over the cliff top, Tracey Emin and her kind lead the pack on their way down into the bottomless abyss. These are the dupes of organized Jewry. By doing exactly what appeals to art patrons (almost all Jewish; see below), these infinitely corrupt and untalented opportunists know they will become rich and famous.

The sad truth is that so many female “artists” — almost all of them rabid feminists and sexual exhibitionists — have nothing to sell but vaginas. [10]

Here are ten other vagina-obsessed females, apart from Tracey Emin and the notorious Annie Sprinkle, who use sex — especially a focus on their own vaginas — to sell their “art”:  Karen Finley, Hannah Wilke, Carolee Schneeman, Andrea Fraser, Sarah Lucas, Marlene McCarty, Vanessa Beecroft,  Malerie Marder, Katy Grannan, and Kembra Pfahler. [11]

Jewish artist Carolee Schneemann, drawing a paper coil from her vagina and calling it "art". "I saw the vagina," she gushes, "as a spiralled coil ringed with desire." the vagina..."a spiralled coil ringed with desire."
Jewish artist Carolee Schneemann, drawing a paper snake from her vagina and calling it “art”.

Being unable to paint properly or produce objects of lasting value, these exhibitionists like to display their vaginas to the world and call it “art”. Here is one such exhibitionist, Jewish performance artist Carolee Schneeman [12], pulling a paper snake out of her vagina:

I saw the vagina as a translucent chamber,” she says, “of which the serpent was an outward model: enlivened by it’s (sic) passage from the visible to the invisible, a spiralled coil ringed with the shape of desire and generative mysteries.” [13]

Someone who had no idea what a vagina looked like would have a pretty tough time trying to figure out its appearance from Ms Schneemann’s deathless prose.

Who helps to promote this kind of pretentious claptrap? You don’t need three guesses to answer that question.

In 2001, ARTnews listed the world’s Top Ten Art Collectors. Eight of them were Jews. Ponder these staggering statistics: A people who constitute 0.2% of the world’s population make up 80% of the world’s richest art collectors.

Out of every thousand people in the world, roughly two are Jews. To be precise, one in every 457 people are Jews. [14] Yet go to a conference at which 1000 of the world’s wealthiest art collectors have gathered and you will find, to your amazement, that 800 of them are Jewish.

Phenomenal, isn’t it? [15]

Some of the vaginocentric exhibitionists mentioned above, like lesbian “performance artist” Annie Sprinkle, maintain websites blocked by porn filters. The aptly named Sprinkle—a nom de porn in honor of urolagnia [16] —  is the lady who douched her vagina onstage in 1991, before lying down and opening her legs so that members of the audience, mostly male, could inspect her cervix with the help of a flashlight and speculum.

Annie Sprinkle, Jewish feminist and pornographer, flashing her vagina as an "art form".
Annie Sprinkle, Jewish feminist and pornographer, practicing indecent exposure in a public venue and pretending it’s an “art form”.

Performance artist, prostitute, porn actress, feminist icon, and lesbian diva of depravity, Ms Sprinkle would like us to believe that it is a form of  “art” to masturbate onstage with sex toys, her legs wide open, and invite members of a predominantly male audience to peer up her vagina with torchlight and speculum. (See picture)

She was recently invited by academic officials to show her vagina off at the University of Illinois, a hotbed of Zionist propaganda and power; here she was encouraged to give students an “orgasm workshop” — all this ostensibly in pursuit of “higher education”.  [17]

To make matters worse, Sprinkle’s pathetic “look-at-my-pussy” acts were funded by the National Endowment for the Arts, a mini-empire controlled by the hidden hand of organized Jewry. [18]

If Annie Sprinkle was to acquire fame and fortune by letting dirty old men take a peep between her legs, Hannah Wilke and Karen Finley sought variations in which the vulva was again put to good use.

The Jewish Wilke, being sadly deficient in originality, molded bits of chewing gum into vulvas and stuck them all over her body, calling it “art”.  [19]

Not to be outdone, Karen Finley decided to smear her naked torso with chocolate syrup [20] and performed public acts — using a yam — which I won’t describe in detail in case nuns are reading this article. Rape, flatulence and menstruation formed the least offensive items in Finley’s repertoire. [21]

Like Sprinkle, Wilke and Schneemann, Finley is also Jewish, given that her mother is of Jewish ancestry. [22].

So that’s four Jewish “artists”, all playing with their pussies in front of the world and being paid to do it by a Jewish-controlled government organization called the National Endowment for the Arts.

One begins to discern a subtle pattern here; or maybe it isn’t so subtle.

Performance artist Andrea Fraser [23] — amazingly, she isn’t Jewish! — deserves first prize for sheer chutzpah. She is perhaps an illustration of the truth that however low a slutty Jewess  can sink, a slutty shiksa can sink a bit lower.

This raunchy non-Jewish performance artist, who nevertheless finds it necessary to move in Jewish circles like Madonna and so many other gentile sycophants,  arranged to meet a man at the Royalton Hotel in Manhattan, owned by Jewish hotelier Ian Shrager.

Above the bed, an overhead camera played Peeping Tom. The man was persuaded to part with $20,000 in cash for the privilege of helping to create a “work of art” with the frisky Fraser, the said work of art being a pornographic video filming the two participants copulating on a Queen-size bed. This sex video, now available for posterity, is pretentiously called “Untitled”.  [24]

It’s not “art” we’re dealing with here, of course; it’s pornography pure and simple.

The Jewish Affinity for Porn 

Jews are famously known to dominate [25] the world’s $100 billion a year porn industry, roughly 90 percent of which is generated within the United States. As many as 260 new porn sites go online daily, more than 10 sites an hour. [26]

Since Jews are known to dominate the porn industry and comprise only 2% of America’s population, it is reasonable to suppose that most of the new sites being started up every hour are being started up by Jews.

"CHRIST SUCKS!" — Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein
“CHRIST SUCKS!”
— Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein

It is even more alarming to note how sex is now deployed by many American Jews as a weapon against Christianity with its socially cohesive and family-friendly values.

Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein’s infamous words — “The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks” — surely tell us all we need to know about the bitter hatred felt by so many Jews for the Western countries that have harbored them and given them hospitality for so long. [27]

Jewish hatred for Christianity is legendary, spanning the Jewish political spectrum, from the far left [28] to the neoconservative right [29].

It can hardly be doubted, as the ugly picture of the Jewish pornographer (above) makes only too clear.

The arrogance and sense of entitlement of so many Jews, whose values Al Goldstein seems to have imbibed with his mother’s milk, never cease to astonish me.

“The difference between a Jewish soul and the soul of non-Jews,” Rabbi Kook assures us, “is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the soul of cattle.” [30]

Given that Rabbi Kook would be the first to agree that rabbis form the intellectual and spiritual backbone of Jewry, one is tempted to ask what makes a man become a rabbi in the first place. Is it the thirst for God? Is it the wish to save one’s soul and help others along the path to salvation?

Here is Jewish actor Richard Pacheco who couldn’t quite make up his mind whether to become a rabbi or a porn star:

Five years before I got my first part in an adult film … I went to an audition for an X-rated film with my hair down to my ass, a copy of Wilhelm Reich’s Sexual Revolution under my arm and yelling about work, love and sex, which were Reich’s three principles. These things have got to be in balance or your life is going to be fucked. [31]

Note that Pacheco had signed on to the radical left-Freudian views of Wilhelm Reich — the wackiest and most extreme of the subversive sexual ideologies that emerged from psychoanalysis.

Jewish devotees of psychoanalysis typically saw it, first and foremost, as a blow against Christian sexual mores; hence, as a sneak attack on Christianity itself.

For Jews, psychoanalysis  placed Western culture on the couch. It was an assertion of Jewish  contempt for Christian culture: the culture of the outgroup now destined for the dustbin of history. [32]

Pacheco didn’t get the job, but he kept on auditioning, since all he really wanted was to screw gorgeous blonde shiksas — doubtless an atavistic expression of Jewish hatred for the goyim, every act of sex being an act of revenge.

Five years later I auditioned for another X-rated film. That very day, I also interviewed at Hebrew Union Seminary to do rabbinical study. I made the choice that the kind of rabbi I would be, if I became one, was one that could have been performing in sex films as part of his experience. [33]

Mindboggling, isn’t it?

This dupe of the sexual revolution couldn’t make up his mind whether to sing hymns to God or kiss the devil’s ass!

In the end, it’s the devil who won out.

Pacheco decided to build a career in pornography — with the full blessings, incidentally, of ADL chairman Abe Foxman who said that porn offered American Jews a valid and worthy way “to pursue the American dream.” [34]

Porn star Richard Pacheco: He also wanted to be a rabbi and star in porn movies at the same time.
Porn star Richard Pacheco:
he also wanted to be a rabbi.

Richard Pacheco (born 1948) was the scion of an orthodox Jewish family from Pittsburg [35] From an early age, bizarrely, he was attracted to the rabbinate and to pornography in equal proportions.

He had wrestled for years with the decision whether to become a rabbi or a porn actor, praying in the morning for guidance and masturbating in the evening for fun, when it occurred to him one day that he could up his number of orgasms per day if he chucked all the spiritual stuff and concentrated on raw sex.

So he did. And a  porn star was born.

Featuring in over 100  X-rated films and winner of countless awards for his sexual prowess in front of the cameras, Pacheco was lucky to receive the loyal support of his wife Ashley.

Managing somehow to juggle  a career in porn with a commitment to family life, Pacheco later had sex with with his wife — so we are told in Wikipedia — “considerably less often after they had children and AIDS became a threat, but he credits his pornography career for giving him the opportunity to continue sexual encounters for a time without endangering his home life.” [36]

Here is Pacheco being interviewed after his retirement from porn. If you are a nun or under eighteen, I would advise you to skip the next bit:

As a young husband, I had no idea how to ask my beloved wife to be my “fuck-your-ass whore”.

Yeah, I wanted some of that kind of sex, some very, very selfish lust with a sex kitten. A “fuck-me-fuck-me” woman. There’d be corsets and leathers, high-heeled boots laced up to crotchless panties, breasts spilling out of nippleless bras in lush bordello bedrooms filled up with sex toys. Like blindfolds and vibrators, handcuffs and paddles. 

Yeah, and there’d be me with a genuine tarted up won’t-say-no-woman. All the best drugs and oils in the world and plenty of time. And there’d be no “I love you” in any of it! 

I would meet this X-rated woman at the hotel where they were holding the auditions…and I would have sex with her right there in the hotel elevator! And then I would go gome to my wife.” [37]

Richard Pacheco, a recent photo. (Ain't he cute?)
Richard Pacheco, a recent photo.
(Ain’t he cute?)

Asked if he still watched adult movies now that he was a Senior Citizen, the former rabbinical student replied: “Not much. Occasionally I’ll toss one on for masturbation if my wife ain’t around.” [38]

One has to hand it to Pacheco. His neo-Marxist mentor, Wilhelm Reich, would have been proud of him. Because he managed to turn shamelessness into a virtue. Still, it couldn’t have been much fun for his poor wife having a guy like this prowling round the house.

In 1984, Pacheco won the Best Couples Sex Scene (video) with porn star Nina Hartley. [39] In 1999, he was inducted into the AVN Hall of Fame   with feminist porn diva Annie Sprinkle. [40] In 2000, along with Sprinkle, he was given a Lifetime Achievement Award by the Free Speech Coalition [41], an organization that had given Nina Hartley an award only a few months earlier. [42]

Note that these three luminaries of lust — Pacheco, Sprinkle and Hartley — are all Jewish pornographers and that the impressively named “Free Speech Coalition” is in fact a trade association set up in 1991 to safeguard the interests of “adult entertainers” — pornographers who for the most part are Jewish and are based largely in the Jewish enclaves around Hollywood.

So make no mistake: this sleazy industry, built on a foundation of onanistic lust and sexual libertinism, is Jewish through and through.

The “Free Speech Coalition” naturally rejects all claims that pornography is addictive, given that they themselves are directly responsible for nurturing that addiction and making money out of it. It also refuses to consider the possibility that serial killers and rapists could in any way be influenced by inflammatory erotica, though the evidence for this is enough to convince anyone except those engaged in the peddling of the same poisons.

For compelling evidence that  pornography plays a significant role in the crimes of serial killers, see my earlier essay on this subject, “Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance”. [43]

AMERICA, 2050
AMERICA, 2050

In an important court case in 2002, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, the US Supreme Court decided in the Coalition’s favor, thereby making it easier for pornographers to demoralize Americans, corrupt their children, and promote a general debasement of values — all this in accordance, incidentally, with the Frankfurt School agenda [44] of producing a “culture of pessimism” designed to foster anarchy and promote impotent anger and despair.  [45]

Our new elite is clearly engaged in the business of mind manipulation and mass demoralization, nor will it rest until it has rebuilt the world in the image of a new Sodom and Gomorrah — a dystopic nightmare.

Conclusion

I have said before in an earlier article, and I will say it again:

A great storm is brewing and only a military coup or revolution can now save America. Save it from what?  From the spiritual cancer that is consuming it from within, and from the foreign wars into which it is being lured — Afghanistan, Iraq, and soon perhaps Iran — on behalf of another nation and its indefatigable agents in America.

Unless a miracle soon occurs and some charismatic leader comes to our rescue, an unimaginably bleak future surely awaits us: a future in which the only consolations left to us will be mindless entertainment, drugs, alcohol, sexual intoxication — and suicide. [46]

Depravity appears to have no limits, as those who have surfed the internet have often discovered to their cost. The most appalling sexual addictions now render even children helpless. Many a marriage is blighted and ends in ruins amid these terrifying toxins.

And yet we are only at the beginning. We have many a slime-green step to go before we reach rock bottom. Abyss yawns below bottomless abyss and even to peer into these black moral chasms is to make us giddy with vertigo.

There is indeed no end to man’s depravity or the deadly machinations of the Architects of Evil.

THE CITY OF DREADFUL NIGHT
THE  BECKONING  DARKNESS

“If a Jew is tempted to do evil,
he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.”

— The Talmud, Moed Kattan, 171  [47]

A completely revised and updated version of an article originally published here

_____________________________________________________

Endnotes

1.  For an answer to these questions, see also: (1) The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt, by Timothy Matthews. [2] Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance, by Lasha Darkmoon. [3] Child Pornography in the Classroom (presented by Noor al Haqiqa, Snippits and Snappits).

An academic corespondent writes: “Though one ethnic group, the Jews, is demonstrably to blame more than any other for the sexual demoralization of the masses in Western countries, it would be disingenuous to pretend that they are solely responsible. The primary corruptors could never have succeeded so spectacularly but for the enthusiastic collaboration of degenerates within the corrupted societies.”

2.  John-Henry Westen, German Government Publication Promotes Incestuous Pedophilia as Healthy Sex Ed.

3.  Ibid.

4.  See Lasha Darkmoon, [1] The Plot Against Art (Parts 1 and 2)  and Spitting Mad Jews and Angry Artists (Parts 1 and 2).

5.  I have tackled the subject of mass demoralization through pornography — a planned psyop of the New World Order —  in greater detail elsewhere, particularly in Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance.

6.  See Tracey Emin: Self-portraits. Don’t worry, you are unlikely to be shocked by these crude, cave-wall sketches of Ms Emin’s nether regions!

7.  Lasha Darkmoon, The Plot Against Art.

8.  Tracey Emin, typical titles.

9.  The Talmudic Blog: CHARLES SAATCHI, the bad taste art collector and Jew, plans to display painting of the Nazi Himmler.

10.  Jerry Salz, Pudenda Agenda, The Shaved Vagina Monologues.

11.  Ibid.

12.  Carolee Schneemann.

13.  The full Schneemann quote describing the vagina may be read here.

14.  World Jewish population figures.

15.  Lasha Darkmoon, The Plot Against Art, Part 2.

16.  Urolagnia: a sexual perversion  in which sexual excitement is associated with urine. Its basis lies in sadomasochism and usually involves a woman urinating on a man, his pleasure consisting in the humiliation of being “pissed on” by a domineering woman — as in this 19th century illustration of a woman urinating into a man’s mouth.

17.  See University of Illinois invites porn star to teach orgasm.

18.  Jeff Jacoby,  How the NEA pollutes American culture (The Boston Globe, January 24, 1995).

19.  Hanna Wilke, Wikipedia. Here you can see a picture of the bare-breasted Jewess  covered with blobs of vulva-shaped chewing gum.

20.  Karen Finley, Wikipedia.

21.  Echoes and Reverberations: Karen Finley and the Delicate Art of Disgust

22.  Karen Finley … “her mother of Jewish ancestry.”

23.  Andrea Fraser, Wikipedia.

24.  Jerry Saltz, Critiqueus Interruptus. (Broken Angel Artnet Magazine).

25.  The locus classicus for the “canard” — no longer a canard today — that Jews control the porn industry is this jaw-breakingly entitled article, “Triple-exthnics“, by Jewish academic Dr Nathan Abrams. This was published in the winter 2004 edition of the prestigious Jewish Quarterly. What the title means is anyone’s guess. Suffice to say that Dr Abrams tactlessly let the cat out of the bag in this article, much to the embarrassment of organized Jewry. As a result, no one can be in doubt any longer as to who controls the world’s porn industry. We now know it is the usual suspects: the Jews.

See also Jewish Dominance in the Porn Industry.

26.  For the figure $100 billion as being the total revenues per annum from world porn,  see Family Safe Media’s  “Pornography Statistics.” (The figure mentioned here is $97 billion, but that is a 2006 figure. Since then, the figure has topped the $100 billion mark.) For the other figures cited in the paragraph, see Michael Arrington’s Internet Pornography Stats.

27. Dr E. Michael Jones, Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos

28.  Kevin MacDonald, Memories Of Madison—My Life In The New Left.

29.  Link lost.

30.  Israel Shahak on Jewish Fundamentalism and Militarism

31.  Quoted in Dr E. Michael Jones, Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos

32.   See Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Chapter 4, Jewish Involvement in the Psychoanalytic Movement.

33.  Quoted in Dr E. Michael Jones, Rabbi Dresner’s Dilemma: Torah v. Ethnos

34.  Jewish Dominance in the Porn Industry.

35.  Richard Pacheco, Wikipedia

36.  Richard Pacheco . . . “the opportunity to continue sexual encounters for a time without endangering his home life.”

37.  Richard Pacheco . . . “and then I would go home to my wife.”

38.   Rishard Pacheco . . . “Occasionally I’ll toss one on for masturbation if my wife ain’t around.”  (See here)

39.  Nina Hartley, Wikipedia

40.   Richard Pacheco, Pornography Career (Wiki)

41.  Free Speech Coalition (Wiki)

42.  Richard Pacheco, Wikipedia

43.  Lasha Darkmoon, Masters of Porn: The Systematic Promotion of Sexual Deviance. Scroll down to the section entitled “The link between pornography and sex crime”; for further confirmation, scroll down to the section entitled “The Cases of Ted Bundy and Gary Bishop, Serial Killers” in Dr Victor Kline’s classic academic paper “Pornography’s Effects on Adults and Children. See also Pornography and Sexual Crime and Pornography and sex: Ted Bundy’s fatal addiction.

44.  Frankfurt School agenda. This is hugely important subject and there is a vast amount of material available to the internet reader. Those who wish to know more about the philosophical milieu of modernity — i.e., the cultural swamp of sexual bolshevism in which the benighted masses are forced to flounder today — are advised to make a careful study of the following eight core articles:

(1)   Arnaud de Lassus’s The Frankfurt School: Cultural Revolution
(2)  Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Chapter 5
(3)  William S. Lind, What is Cultural Marxism?
(4)  William S. Lind, Who Stole our Culture?
(5)  Timothy Matthews, The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt. 
(Or my own shorter adaption of this with extended commentary, Satan’s Secret Agents: The Frankfurt School and its Evil Agenda.)
(6)  Michael Minnicino, The Frankfurt School and ‘Political Correctness’
(7) Cultural Marxism: (Metapedia).
(8) Sexual Bolshevism: (Metapedia).

45.  See Lasha Darkmoon’s The Plot Against Art (Part 1) and Goodbye America (Part 2).

46.  Lasha Darkmoon, Secret Sex Life of the Jews.

47.  Quoted in Michael A. Hoffman, The Truth about the Talmud

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

LASHA DARKMOON

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website, Darkmoon.me, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

77 thoughts on “SEX PLAGUE: THE NORMALIZATION OF DEVIANCE AND DEPRAVITY”

  1. Lasha Darkmoon never disappoints in her eye-opening, superb articles. This most accurate, hard-hitting expose will some day be considered a classic.

    It rips open the world zionist “dirty ‘em up” psychological war to debase western Christian and Deist based culture. The Noahide Talmudists blame all goyim for their supposed “holocaust” which, whatever it was, was done by their own leaders to create a paranoid racial delusion, allowing the formation of Israel and its use as the main cutout and agent for the zio City of London Central Banksters.

    The real mystery seems to be the these zios constant lust themselves for depravity and perversion, believing it is fun and enlightening as well as their hidden agenda to destroy western culture with it. It is just the opposite and is nothing but a death cult. And the bolshevik revolution expressed this world zionist hatred of God and Man in its purest form.

    Remember DHS and TSA are run by these same world zionist entities who want to destroy America and mass murder all Americas when they get enough power, just like in Bolshevik Russia and Maoist China.

    More articles as revealing as this in the future please.

    1. Interesting article and I appreciate the thorough referencing.

      So I checked the original article and responses from 2010:

      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2010/10/sex-plague/

      May I ask what happened to your direct response to Sophia’s comment?

      Darkmoon: “I have devoted an article to this comment. See here:

      http://www.darkmoon.me/2011/too-much-sex-is-bad-for-you/”

      …. which is no longer to be found.

      I did find this however from 2011:

      http://www.henrymakow.com/darkmoon.html

      Given the similarity of the quotes may I also ask why Sophia was transformed into the transsexual Lola?

      1. @ turtle

        Lasha is too ill right now to reply to you personally. Suffice to say that Sophia was not “transformed” into the transsexual Lola. They are in fact the same person.

        So Lasha informs me.

        Sophia, who was always transsexual from the beginning and was undergoing a sex change from male to female at the time, had entered into some correspondence with Lasha. Sophia indicated that she did not wish all the details about her to be revealed to the public. Lasha later wrote about her, with many facts withheld, under the name “Lola”.

        Lasha tells me that “Sophia” now has her own libertarian website which is open only to selected club members, i.e., you need to have a password to enter the website and read content.

        Even more bizarre, Sophia/Lola revealed to Lasha that one of the reasons she wanted to switch from the male to the female gender was not — as you might suppose — in order to enjoy sex with men as a new woman, but in order to enjoy lesbian relationships with women.

        “Sophia/Lola”, originally a man with a fully developed penis, felt that he was basically a lesbian woman trapped in a man’s body.

        A stranger story than this I have not yet heard.

      2. Thx. I am sure lol-a will appreciate you sharing this with everyone and as you know so much about it, maybe you can tell me where LSD’s response article: “Too much sex is bad for you” can be found or why it was removed.

      3. The article “Too Much Sex Is Bad For You” was originally published on this site and ran to 2,500-3,000 words, i.e., it was a full-length article twice the length of the similar article you read on the Henry Makow site.

        The article dealt methodically with each point Sophia had raised in the original email to Lasha and which you read posted in the Comments section of the Occidental Observer (article “Sex Plague”).

        It remained online for about 6 months and was then deleted, along with several other articles, poems and translations written by Lasha Darkmoon. This was at Lasha’s request.

        The article had contained material which I think may have have been offensive to the sensitive Sophia, and it was in order to spare her feelings that we decided to delete the article.

  2. As an old but silent appreciator of LASHA DARKMOON, I say thanks and bravo on exposing the elephant in the living room ….

    Yup, SEX is used widely these days as a motivator and incentive in this Evil Scheme of Affairs and works well, as censuses indicate widespread perversion in the related power structure …

  3. We have an enemy within working 24/7 on destroying our society and culture and our lives. We must respond and weaken them. Stop buying all of their products and services and they will be ruined in months, that everybody can do.

  4. The more I read about the Jews, the more I am led to think why would anyone be so upset with the Germans and their efforts to eradicate them. Then I read here on VT (and other websites like this) that there never was a holocaust, and I am left in the dark about that history.

    How can such a small number of people like the Jews take control and operate unchallenged in this world where so many hold dominance of them? How can this be?

    Lasha, your offering here is sickening! It needs to be said though — and I am glad you did. How informative and enlightening, but at the same time how sickening to know my government allows these deranged people to intimidate, manipulate and mentally fornicate decent Americans who are unaware of their sociopathic behavior.

    Obviously they are SICK SICK SICK, and in need of being stopped in their quest to tarnish and poison the minds of our youth. They are devious. They are an incendiary and vile group of people with hideous intent to destroy common decency in the world.

    1. Lasha: Considering the text of your article, the point got across in a big way. It is sickening with or without the graphics. Thanks for the blatant truth.

      I cannot imagine anyone doing what these people are doing. And to think they are taking over America. Our children are going to have a helluva of life unless we step up before Christ returns with His vengeance.

    2. There is little doubt that the jews (along with many other religious,racial and social groups) were victimised in Nazi Germany (and many other countries)… just like many other religious,racial and social groups throughout history .

      Placing potential “enemies of the state” (religious,racial or social) in internment or concentration camps is standard modus operandi for any country at war.

      Why such an event in so far as it applied to the jews needed to be given the special name “Burning of the whole” (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust), I will leave for the psycho-historians to answer. The single word is highly emotive and means different things to different people depending on their degree of “education”.
      I deny that the word “holocaust” means the same thing to everyone and therefore I claim that is an inappropriate generalisation for describing an event of such complexity.

      I doubt we will ever know the truth or be permitted to understand the reasons for what happened as like any narrative to maintain its purposeful impact it needs to be embellished with each (and every) retelling.

  5. Please note: some of the comments above have been reposted from Veterans Today where this article premiered a few days ago.

  6. This is one of those Darkmoon articles which sets her apart from the maddening crowd. Good work!

    Many of us who were coming along in the seventies (I was in college from 1977 to 1981) can remember the onslaught of porn. The place I went to school was known as a VERY TRADITIONAL, small, private, liberal arts college. All-male, with five surrounding girl’s colleges within fifty miles. My biggest surprise, there, was to find that something called ‘The Student Activities Board’ showed Friday night porn films (remember Marilyn Chambers – the Ivory Snow girl?) at a campus auditorium. Most of us, I think (including myself), had NEVER seen a porn flick – so, you know….. (My sweet little girlfriend begged me to take her to see one – but, at that time in my life, I was STILL of the notion that ‘Nice girls don’t go to things like that!’)lol 🙂

    Anyhow, most guys raised around that time can almost recount the stages of decline in
    (American) society from then until now. It was about the time that the ‘hippy
    movement’ was winding down, but the idea of ‘Free Love’ had taken hold. For young, good-looking guys with money, there was ‘PLENTY of pussy’ to be had. Now, I suppose, that stage has led young people to more liberal license in sexual orientation.

    The proof is in the pudding.

  7. not to forget the pussy riot, a shiksa porn troupe owned and run by whipcracking slaveowner rabinovich who in his youth was booted out of komsomol (youth communist league) in ussr, presently an israeli citizen, who while siccing his trained beasts on non-jewish symbols of authority and respect (putin, patriarch kiril – “kill kiril!”, ordhodox and catholic churches, public crucifixes, mosques) expressly forbids the goy putas any show of disrespect toward anything jewish, including the israeli embassies.

    waiting for someone to bring in the obligatory mention of 3.1 “good jews”.

  8. Just for your information: in my country Holland (The Netherlands) there have been initiatives for a pedophiles party in the past, but the pedophyles society is forbidden by law now (let alone a political party). Sex with children below the age of 16 is forbidden by law (before 2003 below age 12). Bastiality is forbidden by law in our country sine March 2010. As you can see, laws in our country have become more strict. Acceptance of pedophylia in our country is minimal.

  9. Great article, Lasha. Very pointedly informative. But you seem to not understand who you are actually dealing with when you discuss the Jews. This comment of yours proves the point: “This dupe of the sexual revolution couldn’t make up his mind whether to sing hymns to God or kiss the devil’s ass! In the end, it’s the devil who won out.” By this, you are assuming that the Jews actually choose between singing hymns to God or kissing the devil’s ass. This is incorrect because the god of the Jews is actually the Devil, himself. It has never, ever been God — as their actions and teachings prove — and as Jesus pointed out.

    With their Jewish circumcised penis fetish as a basis, the Jews are the world’s leaders in masturbation, homosexuality, pederasty and all other perversions of Nature. Simply because these sick perverts believe that their demon-god approves of anything that they do, all of the sickness of Society that you have observed comes from the Jews trying to make society into a proper sewer for accepting Jews and Judaism. All of Jewish depravity is hard-wired into the rabbinical teachings of the Babylonian Talmud, so one really doesn’t need to be slandered by the Jews as a “bigot” or one who has a “prejudiced opinion of Jews” because the proof of my statements are found in the rabbis’ own writings.

    Your essay is very true. Your observations are accurate. You know that they are bad, but I don’t think you truly understand how very evil the Jews really are. Jesus and Hitler Told the Truth about the Jews: the Jews are Devils. Real ones!

    1. Exactly! They are not God’s chosen people but Satan’s chosen people, but for that they have to be demons themselves.

      Here is a revealing quote by such a demon :

      “We Jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want a world of our own.”

      Quote nr. 379 from : 1001 Quotes by and about Jews.

      1. “In the U.S. Cotton states, after the war … the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negroes’ share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.

        The Jew is being legislated out of Russia. The reason is not concealed. The movement was instituted because the Christian peasant stood no chance against his commercial abilities. The Jew was always ready to lend on a crop. When settlement day came, he owned the crop; the next year he owned the farm.

        In the England of John’s time everybody got into debt to the Jew. He gathered all lucrative enterprises into his hands. He was the King of Commerce. He had to be banished from the realm. For like reasons, Spain had to banish him 400 years ago, and Austria a couple of centuries later.

        In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, but not for the other nine.

        Protestants have persecuted Catholics–but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants–but they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event…

        I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy. —Mark Twain (S. L. Clemens), 19th c. American writer. (“Concerning the Jews,” Harper’s Monthly Magazine, September 1899)

        Twain’s opinion on the Jews is probably the best-kept secret in American literary history. Immediately after his death, his eccentric daughter Clara married-or was married by-the Jewish piano player, Ossip Gabrilowitsch. Twain’s publishers were given speedy instructions to delete “Concerning the Jews” from the collected works, where it had appeared in the book “The Man That Corrupted Hadleybutg & Other Stories.”

        Since Jews provided most of the agitators and orators who pushed forward the Abolition campaign that culminated in the Civil War (which Jewish bankers largely financed, on both sides), it seems a legitimate question whether there was any pre-planning for the wholesale–and retail–economic looting done by mainly Jewish carpetbaggers after the war.

    2. Jews exposing the lies and deceptions:

      Miko Peled: The General’s Son
      http://goo.gl/wpKP8Q

      Norman Finkelstein: Palestinian Fear of Expulsion & Dispossession
      http://bit.ly/1lCrsS3

      Israel Shahak: Jewish History, Jewish Religion
      http://bit.ly/1tyqVBU

      Jews Exposing Zionist Grip On America
      http://bit.ly/1nmGB9C

      Michael Hoffman: Judaism is a secret Satanic cult
      http://bit.ly/QvEcfn

      Alan Sabrosky: 9/11 – an Israeli Mossad Job
      http://bit.ly/1i6G4pn

      Rabbi Dovid Weiss: Zionism has created ‘rivers of blood’
      http://bit.ly/1jwznt9

      Will Newman: Is Lucifer the God of Judaism?
      http://bit.ly/1kY62fo

      The Jews’ God by Eddie Kadach
      http://goo.gl/IaUo1E

      Brother Nathanael Kapner: The Takeover of America
      http://bit.ly/1jFXB5q

      Henry Makow: Zionism — A Conspiracy Against Jews
      http://bit.ly/Prk9xg

      Israel’s Palestinians speak out
      http://bit.ly/1poFCrB

  10. Isn’t Al Goldstein wearing a jacket made of snake skin in that picture? A fitting dress for such a creature!

    As for Pacheco, the expression on his face in that recent photo of his is purely demonic. I’m more and more inclined to believe that Jews are in fact a group of demonic souls incarnated among us with the special intent to destroy us. Nothing of their behavior can be explained as an understandable reaction to persecution. They behave in the most destructive way where they are not persecuted at all : in America.

    They are entirely different from us human beings, and they themselves say so. They are not human, they are anti-human demons.

  11. Excellent article!! If not for Lasha Darkmoon I wouldn’t know about this part of society because I don’t attend any art openings and don’t read the right media. But I reached a similar conclusion that there is a definite phallic worship aspect to Judaism which is obsessed ( I mean it comes up with the regularity of the Holocaust which seems to be on everyone’s mind 24/7) with the penis and circumcision. Imagine a family occasion where everyone is sitting around the table at Chanukah and there is a new baby girl in the family which despite the cutsie cooing going on there is disappointment too because a boy provides so much excitement around “you know what.” So is it any wonder that Jewish women want to make such a big deal of their vagina that has led to so much disappointment. They are going to be darn sure that everyone appreciates it with equal adoration.

    Phallic worship apparently was popular in the ancient world in cultic form. There are these amulets of the cults throughout ancient artifacts. This might be the first time, though, that this cult has become the dominant culture. It arrived not through the normal circuits but through stealth because this aspect of Judaism is denied vigorously. The 12th and 13th Century cabalists apparently created a whole symbolic language to hide what they were really talking about in the theurgic ceremonies ( I named them theurgic), and not surprisingly the Frankists who were the founding fathers of Reform Judaism (probably also vigorously denied) were famous for sexual deviance. None of this is ever really acknowledged although I did read a book on the Kabbalah that deciphers the code…never read any actual works of Kabbalah, which apparently are unreadable.

    Although I don’t think it’s good that these perverts dominate our culture, I also see their perverted ways as part of the spectrum of human experience. You could also call war human and murder human and rape human, bestiality, etc as part of human experience too. We are a weird species. Depravity has always been there but in the past these appetites were repressed for the sake of the practice of virtue and the elevation of the human to be a greater reflection of the divine. We may be a race of demons in need of salvation. The ancients knew the path to choose goes upward, not downward. Control of base appetities not indulging them.

  12. I want to add that in Catholicism the iconic image is one of the mother adoring her child. This is what is in the consciousness of young women raised in the Christian world–that God has a special destiny for women conveyed in secret. I always had this feeling that I had a divine purpose in the world, and for me it didn’t necessarily relate to motherhood although motherhood was beautiful and important. In the Jewish world motherhood has no real position except as the “Jewish mother” who is a very negative character, and no wonder she is negative given the negativity thrust on women in Judaism. Women are expected to do all the cooking, cleaning, and still have to work while the men often don’t work but study the Talmud and Torah, at least traditionally. And traditionally women have no place in the religion except to keep kosher. The attachment between the mother and her child is ruptured early on(mother being absent at work) leading to all sorts of problems that need to be identified, and analyzed like “attachment theory.” And maybe the first real connection a Jewish man has with a woman might be through sex, not through the mother. So many Jewish men loathe their mothers and can hardly wait to find some sweet non-Jewish woman to nurture them in a way they never got as infants in their home culture. Yet they also are attached, too attached, to Jewish culture which is kind of like a mother, or the closest they had to a mother because they belonged somewhere. And if they reject that then they will be utterly lost.

    1. The attachment between the mother and her child is ruptured early on, at time of genital mutilation (mom, where were you when they cut up my dick live and the rabbi ate the bloody foreskin – i was enjoying the show son, is that the same rabbi that abused you in shul? how sweet)

      anyway, apart from thinking prowess kapoore, your written skills are just as thoroughly impeccable, on par with lasha’s and montecristo’s.

  13. The whole consept of the Jews beeing behind free love,outside wedlock is totally insain.
    Everybody who have at least a little education in theology knows,that it is in fact the Jewish laws from Torah that have brought all the hysterical sexuality tabu the world have suffer from,since the jewish-christians influenced the faith of the early christian church.
    So all these connections in this article have no foundation in reality and is just a good example of how some peopel decide how things are supposed to be and then becomes happy to find things they think can support what the decide is the truth.
    Seldom have i,as a old Bishop,seen so much totally insain suggestions.
    The author of this rubbish have prooven to be totally ignorant in what the jewish religion have done or not done.
    Jews have certainly not introduced the world to promiscuity.
    Their sexuality ideas is absolutely the reverse.
    I have copyed this incredible article and noone yet of my collegues have said nothing else than it is 100% insanity and a total contradiction to history and reality.

    Satans best trick is lies.
    Here Satan have been working himself sweatty.
    No doubt about that!

    1. These Jews engaged in pornography are all secular of course, but if you think religious Jews are any better I would advise you to google “orthodox Jews paedophilia”. For starters read Rev. Ted Pike’s article “Pedophilia ‘rampant’ in orthodox Judaism”. Incest is also practised among Jews, whether religious or not.

    2. There is something wrong here. What would a bishop know about pornography and paedophilia…

      oh, sorry.

      1. Maybe so, but I was kinda annoyed with the little jewtalian, pretending to be a catholic, for following me around the block so to speak.

        He probably just doesn’t like my name. 🙂

  14. The jews have us chasing ghosts. If you have a child your distraction will be to prevent them from watching jew-made porn? If you own property your distraction will be how are you going to pay those taxes? If you file income tax your distraction will be how am I going reduce my income tax rate next year? If you own and drive a automobile your distraction will be to stay away from the jew-thug cops? If your child is chained to pubic school your distraction will be how to keep them off drugs and alcohol with the school jew drug education awareness? If you have a teenager your distraction will be how can I keep her from watching jew porn and becoming pregnant? If you watch jew TV your distraction will be the jew news they want to feed you so you can worry about the lies instead of directing your anger at the source of the world’s problems. If your neigbhor is a christian (especially a s0-called christian farmer) your distraction will be how can I prevent he/she from raping me and my family? If you watch sports your distraction during the fall and early winter will be will my team win the national championship? If you bow to the de facto jew corporate government your distraction will be is the democrats or the republicans? If you own a gun your distraction will be how many guns and how much ammunition do I need against the thug cops and mossad when they come to my door @ four in the morning? If I you have cash your distraction will be how to shelter it from the jews taking more or all? If you have silver and gold your distraction will be where do I store it so the jews won’t take it away? If you use a cellphone your distraction will be what should I say or shouldn’t say in case of the jew NSA? If I you contract a jew manufactured disease your distraction will be die from the chemo or take your chances on LSD?

  15. The jews have us chasing ghosts. If you have a child your distraction will be to prevent them from watching jew-made porn? If you own property your distraction will be how are you going to pay those jew created taxes? If you file income tax your distraction will be how are you going to reduce your income tax rate next year? If you own and drive an automobile your distraction will be to stay away from the jew-thug cops? If your child is chained to pubic school your distraction will be how to keep them off drugs and alcohol with the school jew drug education awareness? If you have a teenager your distraction will be how can I keep her from watching jew porn and becoming pregnant? If you watch jew TV your distraction will be the jew news they want to feed you so you can worry about the lies instead of directing your anger at the source of the world’s problems. If your neigbhor is a christian (especially a s0-called christian farmer) your distraction will be how can I prevent he/she from raping me and my family? If you watch sports your distraction during the fall and early winter will be will my team win the national championship? If you bow to the de facto jew corporate government your distraction will be is the democrats or the republicans? If you own a gun your distraction will be how many guns and how much ammunition do I need against the thug cops and mossad when they come to my door @ four in the morning? If I you have cash your distraction will be how to shelter it from the jews taking more or all? If you have silver and gold your distraction will be where do I store it so the jews won’t take it away? If you use a cellphone your distraction will be what should I say or shouldn’t say in case of the jew NSA? If I you contract a jew manufactured disease your distraction will be die from the chemo or take your chances on LSD?

    1. Well stated Kevin. I have been saying it for years, Jews have something for everybody. I you want to place the blame for all social ills eating away the nation like slow-acting, caustic acid, there is the Illuminati, the Masons, big business or Alien Grays, take your pick of anyone or everything – but the Jews. These are strategically placed to distract one form seeing and admitting the obvious. G.L. Rockwell stated it regarding their various methods of propaganda.

      From Ivory Tower To Privy Wall: On The Art Of Propaganda

      by George Lincoln Rockwell (circa 1966)

      If each of the men in the fable about the blind men and the elephant were required to construct a model of an elephant, there would be three very different models. The blind man who felt only the tail would build a model as he described an elephant in the fable — as “a sort of rope.” The blind man who felt the leg and said an elephant was like a tree would produce a tree-like “elephant,” while the man who felt only the trunk would construct his “elephant” like a snake.
      Most men I have met in politics consider themselves automatically experts in the field of propaganda. But almost all of them make the same type of basic error in their propaganda as did the blind men in describing and reconstructing an elephant; both suffer from insufficient experience with the subject. A right-wing businessman, when he gets sick, doesn’t try to doctor himself, nor does he try to practice law himself, nor does he even try to do his own advertising. He hires professional experts to do these highly technical jobs for him. But when that same right-wing businessman wants to move the people of a whole nation to an understanding of our national peril, he doesn’t hesitate to spend relatively huge sums trying to write and produce his own amateur propaganda. In almost every case he produces propaganda which he likes, completely forgetting in his political excitement that the art of propaganda (and advertising) is not in producing that which one likes and admires one’s self, but that which will produce the effect desired — sales in the case of advertising and political conviction in the case of propaganda. Because he is able to think, he presumes that his audience is also able to think – a completely unwarranted assumption. Because he himself is repelled by crudeness and exaggeration, he makes his pitch factual, logical, and usually subtle. In addition to this foolishness, he also forgets that the average man in the street is emotionally assaulted during all his waking hours by advertising brilliantly designed by experts to capture attention through the most powerful kind of psychological impact. The average right wing piece, crowded onto a page, verbose, and dull, is not only not able to win the attention of the average man amid all this competition, but positively repels him.
      Even worse propaganda mistakes are made by both those at the top and those at the bottom of the right-wing intellectual spectrum. Because they can’t read and understand “them big words,” the Klan types are “agin’” anything other than the crudest and most brutal of approaches. “Hit ’em ‘longside the haid with a two-by-four,” is the motto of these boys, and any attempt to produce anything else is likely to get you called a “Communist-Jew spy,” or get you hit “‘longside the haid” yourself. This type loves the American Nazi Party’s “Boat Ticket to Africa” and the Stormtrooper, for instance, but rages that the Rockwell Report is too “long” and “dull.”
      At the other extreme is the Ph.D. right-winger who hurriedly claps his hand over his mouth and gulps in nausea when one shows him something like our all-time most popular propaganda piece, our “Boat Ticket to Africa,” full of expressions such as “nigger-armpit stench” and the like. Because this refined gentleman prefers to read Spengler or Gobineau, he can’t imagine that the ideas of these men might be gotten across to a semi- literate farmer better with a “boat ticket” than with a volume of Houston Stewart Chamberlain.
      In the middle group are the Birch-type blind men who produce millions and millions of dollars worth of wasted propaganda; wasted because it is not designed to do the job they really want and need done, but is instead what they like to hear. These people have never yet stopped to reflect that in order to win they need not just the thinkers — the right-wingers, the bourgeois, rich folks, and the rest of the elite minority – but the vast masses of the people who support demagogues like Johnson, FDR, and Kennedy. Goldwater’s catastrophe was the result of producing propaganda and campaigns designed to win thinkers instead of masses. The result was that twenty-seven million Goldwater thinkers were swamped at the polls by some forty-three million Johnson wishers and hopers, who can never, never, never be reached by “conservative” logic, facts, and boring, sissy tea parties.
      The worst waste of money I have ever seen in the whole field of propaganda was the special Sunday supplement the Birch Society put out not so long ago in newspapers all over America. It cost as much as a quarter of a million dollars in some cities. Had it been designed to appeal to the mass, the “average man,” the man who votes with his heart instead of his head, it could have been worth the millions it took to publish. But it was foolishly aimed at a relatively tiny minority. On the front cover, in full color, it showed a typical Birch Society meeting, in the home of a man obviously wealthy – in the kind of living room which would make the average, working-class, overalled American uncomfortable. The Birchers were sitting around sipping tea with their pinkies daintily extended, and the whole atmosphere was foreign, ridiculous, and even painful to the man in overalls — to America’s millions of “ordinary Joes.” There might have been some sense in printing that piece in Fortune. But to spend money to put that advertisement (which could reach only the rich and the sophisticated) in a mass medium, at the cost of a mass medium, was the kind of thoughtlessness which keeps the right wing powerless, eternally defeated, and discouraged.
      Does this mean that the Birch Society’s high-level appeal is a total waste? Should all their propaganda be like that of the Klan? An elephant is neither all leg nor all tail nor all trunk. A complete, whole elephant needs all of these parts to live. The Jews, masters of the art of propaganda that they are (unlike the right wing), have understood this fundamental truth and have organized their “pitch” to appeal to all levels.
      For the kids and the primitives — for the “masses” — the Jews produce comic books and comic strips; crude, apparently “obvious” television programs, movies, and radio presentations; and the sort of printed material one can find in True Confessions and similar magazines – or on privy walls.
      For the lower-middle classes, they provide pseudo-“objective” and thoughtful television “documentaries,” which flatter the unthinking bourgeois into imagining that they are participating in a scholarly and high-level “study” of a controversial subject, while actually the Jews are pumping into their smug, ego-blinded minds massive doses of raw lies and hatred. They also provide this kind of “intellectual” pap in Look, Life, and other mass-circulation periodicals.
      For the upper-middle classes — the college graduates, professionals, and business executives — the Jews produce their Harper’s Magazine and Atlantic Monthly “think-pieces,” which are genuinely intellectual but nevertheless so subtly poisoned by false basic assumptions and misdirections that all the thinking in the world is bound to lead only to error. This is the sort of thing one finds among the sincere race-mixers and liberals, who have been taught, as religious dogmata, that anything other than democracy is unthinkable, that black men are only white men with dark skins, and that all opponents of liberalism are “fascists” who seek to murder almost everybody and who have no ideas other than bloodshed and tyranny. Starting with these as unquestionable premises, the most sincere and well-intentioned “thinking” in the world can produce nothing but the race-mixers, liberals, beatniks, rebels, and lost souls who are swarming like maggots in every intellectual center of our civilization.
      Finally, there is the devilishly clever, ivory-tower propaganda designed for the truly intellectual and highly sophisticated academic community, which actually does examine even basic premises. For this latter, elite class, even though it is tiny, the Jews spare no effort or money. For were the intellectual leaders of a nation to see through all the propaganda on the lower levels, it would sooner or later be disastrous to the Jews, when the elite had warned the masses. For this minute, top group, the Jews actually produce manufactured “facts” of the most basic nature.
      To give an example of this incredible process, let me cite the method they have used to make it a dogmatic “fact” that there are no measurable, scientific differences between races and, therefore, no races at all! The Jews first got a few of their boys into top university spots (Columbia University being an outstanding, but by no means unique, example) with the express purpose of giving academic respectability to their “there-is-no-such-thing-as-race” lie. One of the first and most important of these was Franz Boas, a Jew heavily involved in communist causes, who sent congratulations to Stalin on his birthdays {Jewish Voice, January, 1942} and whose red record cannot be doubted by any objective observer. This communistic Jew began teaching anthropology at Columbia University in 1896 and dominated the anthropology department there until his death in 1942. Meanwhile he produced one book after another “proving” that there were no such things as racial differences among men {Kultur und Rasse (Leipzig, 1914); Anthropology and Modern Life (New York, 1928); Aryans and non-Aryans (New York, 1934); General Anthropology (Boston, 1938), The Question of Race: Aryans and non-Aryans. Are They Distinctive Types? (New York. 1940); Race, Language, and Culture (New York, 1940): Race and Democratic Society, a post-mortem collection of his writings (New York, 1945), to name but a few.} The whole of Jewry pitched in to boost their boy. Boas was praised in every Jewish-owned newspaper and periodical and given every academic prize they could promote. Little by little, Boas gained such “stature” by this Jewish mutual-admiration society technique that he became an “acknowledged authority” in social anthropology and ethnology. His students and colleagues at Columbia — Herskovits, Klineberg, Ashley Montagu, Weltfish — as unsavory a collection of left-wing Jews as one might hope for — spread his doctrines far and wide, deliberately poisoning the minds of two generations of American students at many of our largest universities {Carleton Putnam, Race and Reason (Washington, 1961), pp. 18, 47}.
      Meanwhile, honest race researchers were given the opposite treatment, full use being made of economic boycott and unlimited intellectual smear. Honest anthropologists couldn’t get their books published or, if published, distributed {Ibid., pp. 19, 49}. As just one instance, at the time when Boas was at the height of his destructive activity, Madison Grant, president of the New York Zoological Society and a trustee of the American Museum of Natural History, wrote a study of the racial situation in America, entitled The Conquest of a Continent, or the Expansion of Races in America (New York, 1933). The book was flatly contradictory to the Boas-Jewish racial propaganda and sounded a clear warning of the impending danger of serious racial degeneration in the United States. Whereupon the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith issued a circular letter to publishers, dated December 13, 1933, in which they blatantly stated that Grant’s book was “antagonistic to Jewish interests” and demanded that it be “stifled” – as it has been! Copies of this book — and any honest book about race — are very hard to find. They are almost nonexistent in the university community — in such places as college bookstores and all but a few of the largest university libraries.
      This whole intellectual fraud would never work if our side had sense enough to understand it and courage enough to stand up to it. But our side can never understand, let alone fight, this vicious Jewish perversion of our people and their minds as long as our side, like the aforementioned blind men, remains utterly mulish in its insistence on amateur and one-level propaganda efforts. The left wing has its organizations and its propaganda at all levels. And the whole left aims the same way — right at your heart! They have their Dean Achesons, their Harvard professors, their White House presidential aides. But they also have their brutal goon squads in the streets of the steel towns, ready to crack the legs of their opponents over a curbstone, as is their quaint custom. In between, they have their “soldiers” at all levels, and they are all part of the same army of hate against the white man and Western civilization.
      Let one of my supercilious, intellectual critics just spend an evening watching television or reading a teenage magazine — not for pleasure, but to analyze the masterful methods of the Jewish brainwashers, and he will see that they do not use intellectual propaganda exclusively to do their devilish work, but also the most stupid, obvious, and brutal anti-intellectual stuff imaginable. At the same time, let him examine the explosion of scatology on any big newsstand and see just what primitive, rough propaganda the Jew produces for the mass mind. Even the pornographic, illegal “comic books” smuggled from kid to kid and man to man are loaded with propaganda for race-mixing and degeneracy. And there is nothing subtle about the disgusting magazines openly sold for queers.
      The Jews do not confine their attack on us only to gutter propaganda or only to goon squads; God knows, they certainly have flooded America with their filthy and degenerate “literature,” “art,” and “poetry,” with their “comedians,” their warped stage plays, and their savage, jungle “music,” while there are still plenty of communist muscle squads to break your head open if they can’t pervert it. In short the enemy has brought about a “black miracle” of subversion of our people with his multi-level propaganda, while the reply of the leaders of our people has been almost entirely an attempt to “prove,” with facts and arguments, that all this is “wrong.” Right and wrong in propaganda have no meaning. There are only effective and ineffective. Jewish propaganda couldn’t be more wrong, objectively speaking, but it is almost always right, psychologically. It is carefully aimed; it is designed for a specific audience; it is not concerned with what the producers think and feel, but with what the audience thinks and feels; and it is uniformly excellent and successful in doing the job for which it is intended.
      Right-wing propaganda, to choose a contrary example, is almost always wrong. It is invariable, single-level material — usually aimed at the upper middle class. It is utterly disdainful of the audience and endlessly insists that “the truth will make us free,” if we just get out enough “literature” (almost none of which is read by prospective converts). Almost all right-wing literature is read by other right-wingers who do not need it. It is basically reactionary, concerned almost wholly with money, taxes, and protection of wealth and vested interests (masked, of course, with “deep concern” for the Constitution, “our American way of life,” and the like). It is incredibly snobbish and contemptuous toward the kind of horny-handed, working, hard-pressed “ordinary Joe” who, in his millions, makes up the masses which have kept FDR, Truman, Ike, JFK, and now LBJ in office.
      Surely we need the truth and facts and arguments — but only to win over the officers and noncoms of our counter-revolutionary forces and then to educate and train them for intellectual combat with the well-trained forces of the enemy, not to convert the masses. To try to use the “facts and arguments” method with the masses of the people is the eternal stumbling block of the right wing. By insisting on only this method, in its pure (and dull) form, not only the right wing, but any movement of national regeneration, insures that its material is read only by itself and the few Jews whose professional job it is to study and neutralize its material.
      Hitler’s National Socialist movement not only did not make that stupid mistake, but brilliantly exploited every field of propaganda with inspired material, scientifically designed not only to appeal to a few stuffy professors — but to move people, to move millions of people in the direction desired. Hitler had Julius Streicher’s Der Stuermer, full of the wildest and wooliest sensationalism, designed to smash its way into the consciousness of the masses, as it did. He also had the regular party press, designed to reach and convince the great middle class. And, for the university community, he had the esoteric material of Alfred Rosenberg, Gottfried Feder, et al.
      Again I stress that, whereas the academic scholar is most powerfully influenced by a logical, heavily footnoted dissertation at the highest intellectual level, the simple farmer or worker is utterly perplexed and repelled by “them big words” and is moved most effectively by a brutal and earthy presentation of a thoroughly subjective, grossly exaggerated picture of any situation. Only the latter class of propaganda can yield the sheer weight of numbers of persuaded people needed to sweep into legal political office. The major propaganda of a mass movement, therefore, must be of the elementary, direct, and emotional kind which alone can win honest hearts (and empty heads) — “boat tickets” and the Stormtrooper.
      When I began, I purposely made my propaganda as brutal and shockingly rough as I could, simply to force attention. And I have kept everlastingly at the business of building a simple and direct image of all-out hostility to “Jews and niggers” in the minds of millions of Americans, regardless of the costs in other respects. (And when I have the rare opportunity to use some mass medium, as was recently the case when I gave a long interview to Playboy, I am forced to walk a careful line between what I should like to say and what the enemy would like to hear me say. Unless I deliberately sound at least halfway like a raving illiterate with three loose screws, such an interview would never be printed. This is another thing that most people fail to understand about my “Nazi” technique.) After I had become known to most Americans, I published the Rockwell Report at a somewhat higher level than my previous material to begin to recruit some of the brains and funds we needed to proceed. When this had begun to bear fruit, I used the talents obtained with the Rockwell Report to get back down to the people’s level and produce a publication designed for the masses, for the “average” man, the comic book reader, kids: the Stormtrooper. As planned, this is now our most popular and largest-circulation publication. And were it not for the Jewish ownership of the news distribution business, we could sell Stormtroopers literally by the millions.
      My Ph.D. critics regularly berate me for the vulgar and brutal material in the Stormtrooper. Because these gentlemen don’t like to see the word “nigger” in print, or crude drawings of Jews, they often insist that I am a damned fool, a hoodlum, or an agent provocateur, trying to ruin the whole movement by printing such rough stuff. These sincere but pitifully blind men are going to have to understand that one can’t win elections with Ph.D. votes. As Goldwater proved, one can’t win elections even with all the upper classes. It is the vast masses of the lower classes, the beer-and-dirty-joke-loving workers, on whom we must depend finally for survival. The Stormtrooper with its pages full of cartoons, violence, insults, jokes, and general hell is exciting and readable to men who would never, in a million years, pick up and read a right-wing tract.
      With a base of operations established and with successful publications directed at both the lowest and the middle-class levels, the movement is finally in a position to afford the relative luxury of a publication directed exclusively at the academic intellectual-professional class. The National Socialist World, now in your hands, is designed not only to reach but to move people in that category. Perhaps our material is not what you, personally, enjoy most. But our aim, and the aim of the World Union of National Socialists, is not to produce material to please our friends — but to win over millions of those who are now our enemies or who are oblivious to both sides. The years of success with the Stormtrooper and the Rockwell Report give me confidence that the new National Socialist World will also do what it has been carefully designed to do — that National Socialist World will beat its way into the highest intellectual circles just as the Stormtrooper smashed its way into the minds of the juveniles and working folks.
      Finally, if you’ll permit me, I’d like to drive my principal point home with one more analogy. If you own a grocery store, and a man comes in from a painter’s truck in overalls to buy groceries, you don’t try to sell him a one-ounce jar of Russian caviar at two bucks a throw. You offer him beef, potatoes, and bread. If a French diplomat comes in, you don’t offer him hawg jowl; you might try the caviar. It is the same with propaganda. If you wish to win the “trade” of all potential “customers,” as we must do if we are to survive, you must have in stock a complete line of goods, especially the kind of goods most desired by the majority of your potential customers — and that means bread, potatoes, and beef, not caviar and truffles. If you can open a special store to peddle only caviar and truffles, do it in the silk-stocking district. Conversely, if you want to open another branch to sell only chitterlings, hawg jowls, and the like, then do it in the “nigger” section of town. And if you want a mass grocery business, in the name of sanity, stock up on something besides caviar and truffles. We intend to win enough “customers” to become masters of the grocery business, against the competition of the greatest and most complete “chain” operation the world has ever seen: “The Sheeney Supermarket,” which stocks something for everybody. To do it, we have designed some great products to appeal to specific customers: the “hawg-jowl” Stormtrooper, the “Delmonico steak” Rockwell Report — and now the “Cherries Jubilee” which you hold in your hand – National Socialist World.

  16. One can only wonder what Anne Frank was doing with with that ball-point pen when she was alone in the attic.

  17. I brought this up previously but probably no one read it.

    There can be no doubt that Yahweh is Devil and the proof is straightforward.

    Show me one monotheistic system where God preselects subjects for preferential treatment, totally independent of earned merit, ie, God that openly institutionalizes injustice. And it is the Universal God, once again, for clarity. He does not reward good nor punishes evil, it is all predestined by “pudenda conceptio”.

    As far as I am concerned, this closes the discussion, I need no more proof of Yahweh’s diabolical nature and thus the intent of his favored creation, the Unclean tribe, I can rest my case.

    But there is so much more, Yahweh’s insistence on deceit and lying (Kol Nidre), theft (the wholesale ripoff of Egyptians), uncompromising slaughter of everything that breathes (the Amalek, the stark punishment meted out to the king that spared the Amalek virgins and the king for later sacrificial entertainment, the Canaanites, the Philistines, the Persians, the Christians, the Russians, Germans, Ukrainians, the Africans, the gentiles), the promotion of slavery, of human sacrifice, mindless, unquestioning cruelty … the list goes on.

    God? No, Devil, of that can be no doubt. And in today’s world, the only enforced law is obedience to Devil, otherwise, by perfidiously twisted humor, you are guilty of hate crime. All other crimes against the man, nature, society, esthetics and decency are encouraged and enforced.

    Maybe in the End, the Real God will intervene, step in and save us.

    But why, do we deserve it through our cowardice? Why shouldn’t He ask, and where have you been, why didn’t you resist, knowing full well the score?

    1. Well said.
      Work to expose evil.
      Trust in your own good
      and the good in others
      and let karma work its magic.

  18. The basis of human life is a want for freedom, since freddom is what human beings are destined to.

    Animals are not destined to freedom, they are destined to obedience to their instincts, and thereby they are not free. Of course they, the animals, are free from having to make choises, and thereby in a way free in a way that human beings never can be, but they are at the same time not free to be disobetiant to their instints.

    Now this is the fundamental difference between animals and human beings, which is the difficult thing to handle.

    Many human beings do not want to have to make choises of different kinds.

    They prefer to be – slaves – . Freedom, and responsibility is for them scaring. They prefer that others make choises for them. They prefer to obey.

    Freedom is thereby not something attractive to all people.

    But the human being is forced, either willing or not, to accept his human condition, which is to have to make choise between good or bad, or between right or wrong, between upward or downward, healthy or unhealthy, life or death and so on and so forth…

    To be an human being or to be an animal…..

  19. A clear distinction ought to be made
    between porn and erotica.
    They had a topless dancer in at least
    one UFA/3d Reich film, when in the
    Jew/hypocrite-run Hollywood this
    would have been strictly verboten.
    Women who married soldiers were
    paid a wage, so they didn’t need to
    resort to prostitution — and could
    actually afford to be married.
    Pregnant women and mothers
    were paid ‘Mutterhilfe’ — Mother’s
    Help, when in most other parts of
    the ‘civilized world’ they would have
    been fired from about any job —
    and ever so kindly allowed to die
    in the gutter.

  20. Don’t blame Zionist Jews alone for corrupting the Christian world with pornography, open sex and LGBT. They could not have done it without the blessing from the Christian religious and political leaders.

    In October 2013, when Pope Francis was asked to do something to save Christianity from this Jewish onslaught, he simply replied: ““I am a sinner. This is the most accurate definition. It is not a figure of speech, a literary genre. I am a sinner“.

    Contrary to that, when former dancer, singer, actress and model, Mary Habiba Davidson (a Christian) converting to Islam, left her successful “modern life-style”. She said: “There are certain thing that I would not do because of my religion now. I would not want to wear a bikini in one of my videos or sing something meaningless. My religion has not stopped me what I can do. It has helped pave my career. It has inspired me in my singing and the messages I want to spread about peace and love”. Her private company has been so successful that she was nominated for the “Business Personality of the Year 2009 Award”.

    http://rehmat1.com/2013/10/25/pope-francis-i-am-a-sinner/

    1. Ha-Ha! :). About a month ago, a (Jewish) couple from Roanoke, Virginia, made-the-papers after having been conned into parting with 4.3 million dollars for a ‘fake’ Jackson Pollack. (You might ask: How could anyone perceive counterfeit out of anything which was never more than shit, anyway???)

      The couple, named ‘Taubmann’, were actually not the only ones some enterprising Chinaman made fools of by throwing around paint in his Long Island garage, paid by some fashionable ‘art’ dealer in Manhattan, to be displayed in her posh gallery to lure in the nouveau elite suckers who thought they were buying what pseudo-sophisticates call ‘Art’.

      Wonder how much this soy puke will fetch (Oh, excuse me…. ‘art’)??

      1. the good thing about pukeart is that they are impossible to forge due to dna evidence.

        another reason why i highly recommend stocking up on them (hold your breath) is that you can always scrape up some material and clone your own jewish puke artist, chain him in the garage to work 8 hours a day – arbeit macht frei.
        you could be a garage art sales oligarch.

        oy gevalt, make sure the puke is kosher, full of pickled carp and matzos.

      2. I like that word ‘pukeart’, lobro! You are right-on-point! I was riding around, feeding cattle, this afternoon – and looking at all the cowshit in the fields reminded me! 🙂 (My John Deere SQUASHED a lot of it!)

        These people are nuts!

  21. Gorillas have nightmares about leopards.
    Rich people have nightmares about poor people.
    Devas have nightmares about demons.
    Hetero/homo/trans/bi/ etc. sexuals have nightmares about (gasp!) celibates.

    Celibates will, when needed, become the neo-idolators.

    1. if one person caught onto this simple formula, then my writing effort is well spent.

      the Devil is real and with us.

  22. Our closest primate relative is the Pygmy Chimpanzee – the Bonobo. Sexual depravity in Bonobos is rather normal. HIV probably evolved from an SIV contaminated culture of Pygmy Chimpanzee cells used to attenuate the polio virus used to produce the first live Polio vaccine in a 1950s Vaccination experiment in Africa.

    Mankind culturally evolved religion to prevent such promiscuity. Ironically, it is the very religion – Judaism – which gave us our sexual moral codes – which has stripped them away. This is due to the unfortunate transformation of the ancient procedure of branding slaves with genital mutilation – euphemistically referred to as “circumcision” – as a contract between the Jewish people and their God. Circumcision does not take away the sexual desire. It only makes natural sex between a man and a woman impossible. Jews (and the gentiles which Jews have duped into thinking that genital mutilation has some health benefit) whether they admit it or not are sexually dysfunctional.

    “The experience of the ages has shown that babies thrive best in a trusting atmosphere of love, gentleness, respect, acceptance, nurturing, and intimacy. Cutting off a baby’s foreskin shatters this trust. Circumcision wounds and harms the baby
    and the person the baby will become. ”


    The Foreskin Is Necessary

    “Several strands of findings presented by researchers at the weekend conference
    pointed to the same conclusion: brutality and cruelty to children can leave a clear
    mark on the chemistry of the brain. ”


    Early Violence Leaves Its Mark on the Brain:

  23. I have known jews all my life in every sector of society except the military – where these raptiles were rarely seen in my basic training companies in the early sixties when I trained young warriors to DEFEND this land – NOT – To become the judized socipoathic putrid mercenary scum I see today who consider the military as a an excuse to murder civilians and vent their racist hatred against defenseless women and children.

    So where were all these jews when I was serving my country? They were of course doing what they do best. At home safe and sound – bedding down and seducing our wives sisters and sweethearts and I am relating from FIRST HAND EXPERINCES.

    I went back to the university to complete my studies after my military obligations were completed. My first roommate at ‘jew U’ – as the university of Miami was popularly known – was a jew draftdodger. His main object in life – like all of his putrid tribe – was to see how many gentile ‘shiskas’ he could bed down.

    He preyed upon virgins specificly because the idea of taking the virginity from a young Christian girl actually enhanced his already sick twisted libedo. After a few weeks of his insufferable arrogance and filthy lifestyle – I kicked his sorry jew ass OUT!

    I have also lived with jews in IsraHELL – the armpit of the universe underworld. here you can experience the uttermost demonic ( Read John 8-44) filth that humanity has spawned. For example Tel Aviv has more whore houses per square mile than any city on earth! The creature there are the absolute scum of the earth – devoid of any goodness character or decency.

    The jew is a demon born of Satan. How do I know this to be a FACT ( aside from a lifetime of experience)? Once again – see what Christ had to say about these reprobate degenerate sub human scum in the Gospel of John 8-44.

    Jews are degenerate filthy animals without souls. Their capacity for cruelty sadism and destruction of entire nations morally and economicly are without peer. Jews have casued more misery death destruction debasement of innocents greed corruption pedophilia homosexual perversions and general criminal activity than all the rest of humanity combined.

    Jews are the harbingers of death – parasites and vampires who live off the blood of their victims and masters of deceit. Their children are taught to hate cheat and swindle us goyem Gentiles fromthe day the pop outof their demon mother’s womb!

    There is NOTHING so cruel and monsterously vicious as a jew child. I witnessed cruelty by these miniature demons against other defensless innocent children that would defy your wildest nightmares.

    As the father and first President of our country lamented – over two centuries ago: “The jews work more efficiently against us than the enemie’s armies! They are hunded more times more dangerous to our liberties and the great cause we are engaged in….. It is much to be lamented that each state – long ago has not hunted them down as pests to society, and the GREATEST ENEMIES we have to the happiness of America”

    These filthy scum do NOT belong here as they can NEVER EVER be loyal Americans and will ALWAYS be treasonous to our nation in their conduct. We MUST kick their demonic wicked carcasses our of our blessed land once and for all – lest we also become victims to their abysmal demonic filth and endless lust for evil and wickedness.

    Not ONE of these demons has EVER honestly repented for their endless crimes against humanity – and they never will. The proof of what I say is in Scripture as they were damned by the Lord Christ. And YES – I WILL say it again.

    READ THE DAMNATION BY JESUS – of these demons from hell – as you will NEVER hear this profound truth spoken from the pulpits of our false churches by cowardly false ‘pastors’ who have long since sold their collective souls to the demonic jews whom they are loyal instead of Christ – whose word they are ashamed of – lest they embarrass Satan.

    Otherwise how could it be possible that in the past 2 decades of questioning hundreds of so-called Christians – not even ONE of these fools had even heard of what Christ said about these lying demons from hell from their pastors or priests.

    READ IT !! FROM THE GOSPEL OF JOHN – 8-44 and learn the TRUTH!

    Dare you even have the moral courage to even ASK these false ‘religious leaders’ as to WHY they have NEVER spoken His words on this matter to their ‘flock’?

    1. Well said, Joe! Your eloquence and outspokenness never cease to surprise me. Keep up the good work!

    2. Your right about Christians not knowing what Jesus said about the jews … I’ve asked a few and not one has ever known anything about john 8:44 or the sons of satan . Makes you want to wear a ” who is the sons of satan t-shirt to some churches .

  24. “Children, it is suggested, should be taught the movements of copulation as soon as they reach the age of four,”
    …..
    Great idea —–perhaps before that age instead of those “penguin stories” etc. etc
    …….
    That Puritanical Religious die-hards have spread their “plague” of darkness over sexual activity” for over 2,000 years is sickening in the extreme ….
    ……
    Only bringing a “Supreme being” into the equation makes it more sickening….
    ….
    The Virgin Mary , the asexual Jesus —& Catholic pedophiles — give me a break —
    …..
    Barbaric European colonizers used Christianity to conquer & “control” the world.
    ….
    We should have pity for poor luckless “Christian Pacific Islanders, Catholic Filipinos, Vietnamese, Eskimos, Australian & African ,American natives etc etc , who were/are brainwashed into believing the Jewish/Christian attitudes to “sex in the dark” & the
    sexual attitudes directed by the Church of pedophilia who got it direct from “GOD”.

    Please note in the “New World” the stockade (fort) walls were there to keep the “puritan white folk” from escaping to join those beautiful free natives in their more harmonious relationship with “mother earth” …..
    http://www.thegoyslife.com/Documents/Books/A%20People%27s%20History%20of%20the%20United%20States-%20Howard%20Zinn.pdf
    ….
    So many literary greats like James Joyce , D.H.Lawrence , Oscar Wild etc etc & even some regular folks had/have to exile themselves from the dark Christian world to even mention the subject of sex & human relationships …..

    Sadly the Christian Sexual Inquisition continues with Lasha Darkmoon ?

  25. Ever wondered why the Jewish lobby groups in the United States, Canada and Australia are against Snowden and his Jewish confident Glenn Greenwald? The Jewish-controlled media hate to mention that both Snowden and Greenwald have committed an unforgiveable crime by exposing Israeli links to the US National Security Agency ‘s (NSA) spying on foreign leaders and local Muslim and Latin-American communities which are not considered pro-Israel.

    These two guys have been slandered with all kind of evil names, but none may be quite as antisemitic as the response from Canada’s Israeli poodle Stephen Harper’s official. On Thursday night the Canadian Crown Corporation, Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) released a report quoting British journalist Glenn Greenwald that Ottawa have been spying on passengers, especially Muslims, via Israeli Wi-Fi services at a Canadian airport.

    On Friday, Paul Calandra, prime minister Stephen Harper’s parliamentary secretary, blasted both the CBC and Greenwald for lying. He crossed all House of Common’s rules of decency in debating, and called Greenwald, a Porn Spy.

    http://rehmat1.com/2014/02/02/harpers-boy-glenn-greenwald-is-a-porn-spy/

  26. my opinion – the thing driving all this sexual exploitation is only money, the most dependable driver of all forms of exploitation. sure the jews are involved. it’s because of the profits, not because they’re all natural born soulless shitheads every one. capital exploits everything possible sooner or later. where the situation has become exploitative it is one more example of the gradual decline under the capitalist methodology. sex sells products. and pornography sells itself. who’s worse, the jewish person selling or the waspy person buying? the sexual conduct of consenting adults is really nobody else’s business. that should be about all there is to it. one person’s morays may be different from another’s. not everyone thinks prostitution and homosexuality are evil and degenerate. but being illegal makes it look that way. one thing for certain – it’s not the state’s place to dictate sexual morality.

    1. “the sexual conduct of consenting adults is really nobody else’s business”

      Unless of course the general populace is overburdened with their unwanted and uncivilized offspring by the millions. Then it most certainly is our business.
      In various ways, most of them bad.

  27. Kudos Lasha, and those eloquent commentators above! I will attempt to throw in my $.02:

    When I was a young lad at summer camp in Maine, aged 11, I was amazed at the clear bifurcation of “cabin chat”. We Christian zonks talked of upcoming wilderness or ocean trips; the Jewish kids (all 10 or 11 in this particular cabin) talked incessantly of the camp’s kitchen staff—–mostly college girls and some of them, to be honest, almost paralyzing to us young boys, what with their beauty and latent sexuality. All the Jews talked about was trying to get sexual favors off these gals. In our cabin BS sessions, they talked about “licking p___y, getting b___ -j__s, and talking the hot gals into (any form of sexual depravity). I was amazed to see how well beyond puberty these Jews were. They masturbated at night and some of my peers did, indeed, see their erections, etc. Several of the more religious amongst us (not I), tried to complain to the counsellors assigned to our cabins about this vile, suggestive and lurid chatter and depravity. They did what they could, but the end result was the Jewish kids simply took it to other areas of the camp. Part of it, we all knew, was to boast, lie and otherwise put us goys down. But part of it was an accurate revelation of how Jews were so different from the rest of us.

    I just went back to my 45th at Hanoi-on-the-Charles. I remember, upon graduation from a prep school, south of Boston, on the day of “thick or thin” envelopes, the utter screeching outrage of one of my Jewish classmates. He was waitlisted, but he had better grades than I and many others. He and his vile dwarfish, communist parents were screaming “Quotas! It’s the goddmaned quotas!!!” (Google up the RIP on Martin Slate, or his youger brother, my class-mate, Jeremy)…..Well, it may well have been quotas. If Harvard admitted only on the bases of intellect, scholarly achievement, etc. it would be half Jewish and half oriental! Additionally, Harvard may have been reacting to the Mark Rudd style of politics Martin had brought to the campus.

    So, 50 years later, at my college class’ 45th, I encountered many of my classmates, half of them Jews. Almost ALL the goys, such as myself, were veterans of the military. NONE of the Jews had served. All got 2-S’s for grad schools, 1Y’s, 4-F’s or even more condemnatory classifications. I had joined the Navy my Junior year (1967) and heard endless stories from the Jews about how I was an idiot and how their doctor-uncles were going to get their deferrments. Hoo boy!

    One of my Jewish classmates, a doctor, is lobbying hard in the Massachusetts General Court (largely an adjuct of Comintern) for a license for growing and selling medical marijuana. Interesting. It’s destined to be hugely profitable for him and his associates, and recent revelations about the medical and mental impacts of the weed be damned…

  28. The dope profiteer is Dr. Jim KURNICK. At best, I can say that he scoffed at the perils of marijuana—-and he is a doctor, after all. I may wait a bit on partaking of it as a pain-killer.

  29. If you look up the Hebrew definition for the word – RA – it means bad , wicked … dysfunctional – stuff along those lines .

    If you look up the Hebrew definition for the word – EL – it translates to God

    The look at the word Israel .

    Is – Ra – El … Is bad/wicked god , it’s kinda spelled out .

    Also so if you think of “is” in hieroglyphic form the S could represent a snake … So it would say – I snake .

Comments are closed.

Satan Spiritually Spawned First Hitler And Now Obama!

FOREWORD: It is important to include in the below…that both Hitler and Obama were and are SODOMITES and promoted the same including pedophilia/pederasty which is the same Satanic spirituality that was embedded in Egyptian, Greek, and Roman cultures and history and the reason they were destroyed. So it will be with this country!  Richard Boyden

Obama’s Copy of Hitler’s Throne of Satan (Pergamon Altar) on Stage at Obama Inauguration

Folks – you can do whatever you want this information. I am not suggesting Obama is the anti-Christ, although I would not doubt it for one second. I am also not pushing any crazy conspiracies. This is purely factual information for you to make conclusions on your own.

All I ask is that you pay attention to the monuments to Satan that Obama copied from the ones Hitler used. He used miniature, yet identical versions on stage with him when he was first elected. I’d heard all this years ago… and forgotten where to go for much of it. Last night a friend sent me a picture that reminded me.  Even when Obama gave his famous 2008 Berlin speech, it was on the alter Hitler used to speak from.

There is a subsequent post coming out within the hour – that almost compares line by line the acceptance speeches of both Hitler and Obama. Again, I offer no conspiracy theory. I merely present the information to you, and you can look for yourself to see if in fact Obama used replicas of these monuments to Satan. Know ahead of time, they don’t “resemble” the originals. They are DUPLICATES!

Years ago I also heard a podcast from someone with alleged first hand knowledge of how much time Obama spent praying at a miniature version of the alter to Satan. A friend sent this picture this picture last night – it’s a picture of Obama in awe – just as I heard he was, at the Third Reich. The person I heard speak said Obama spent an obscene amount of time with Third Reich relics and artifacts while in Germany. Here he is pictured:

Obama’s stage at the 2008 Democratic convention was designed in the style of the Pergamon Altar, a Greek Temple, which is mentioned in the book of Revelation as the “Seat of Satan” or the “Throne of Satan,” depending on the translation. The biblical reference is not just to the altar, but to Pergamos as a regional center of the all powerful Roman state as well as a center of occult/pagan worship and persecution of the early Christians.

The state cult was religion, in which the roman emperor was worshiped at Pergamos as a god. The black nationalist doctrine of Obama’s Trinity church in Chicago also teaches that the black man is the manifestation of God on earth and one can self-exalt himself to god status. That man can become a higher being or God and the self-worship of man is a tenet of satanism/Luciferianism. Click the images below for more info.

A temple is a place of worship. So, it seems that this bizarre stage design is alluding to the worship of Obama and the dedication of his campaign to Luciferian principles, much like Saul Alinsky dedicated his book, “Rules for Radicals” to Lucifer.

Many have speculated that Obama is a pathological Narcissist, also popularly called an “egomaniac” or “megalomaniac.” Extreme Narcissists, often believe they are a divine being, a prophet, mouthpiece of God or actually God, himself. Extreme Narcissists are drawn to cult leadership, because it suites the mentality of their psychological disorder. See this clip for more info about Narcissism.

Documentary on Narcissism (Video)

Obama may do these things in part as a form of provocation. In this case, though, it also provides an indication of occult religious belief. It should not be necessary to point out that it is very dangerous to have a president, who is unprincipled enough to use such tactics and unstable enough to exhibit obvious signs of such bizarre religious belief.

Obama appears to consider such national and international events, in general, as an opportunity for provocation and ritual. There have been several other such unusual occurrences, such as his saying once that he is God during a creepy episode at the 2011 9/11 memorial, the photo of the Soviet warships during the 2012 DNC event honoring US veterans, his first foreign speech in Cairo, which is of special significance to Black Nationalists, etc.

Occultists and agitators often try to provoke the opposition into a hysteria. Obama hopes we will overreact and can be marginalized and made an object of ridicule. In that way he can animate his cult-like following.

Pergamon Altar – ‘Satan’s Throne’ in the Book of Revelation

Below is the quotation from the Bible.

Revelation 2:12 And to the angel of the church in Pergamos write; These things saith he which hath the sharp sword with two edges;
Revelation 2:13 I know thy works, and where thou dwellest, even where Satan’s seat is: and thou holdest fast my name, and hast not denied my faith, even in those days wherein Antipas was my faithful martyr, who was slain among you, where Satan dwelleth.

The significance of this temple for a presidential candidate is quite disturbing. Antipas, an early Christian martyr, was roasted alive inside a hollow bronze bull on the altar, because he refused to renounce his Christian faith and worship Augustus Caesar, the Roman dictator, and the other idols. The bull was designed so that the screams of the victim as he was burned to death would make the bull appear to come to life during the sacrifice.

The Black Liberation Theology of Wright’s pseudo-Christian sect in Chicago is also a would-be state religion, holding that the black race is divine and that the black messiah will arise from the black race with a divine mission to destroy America, as we know it, and create a black-ruled utopia, a millennial kingdom, which, in concept is similar to the 1000-year Reich. Reich means “kingdom” in German and millennial, of course, means “1000-year”.

Hitler’s architect, Albert Speer, also modeled the Tribune at the Zeppelin field in Nuremberg, Germany after the Pergamon Altar. The Zeppelin field was the site of the Nazi Party’s annual national rally (Reichstag) and where Hitler was worshiped by the faithful like a god. (See the documentary film “The Architecture of Doom” by Peter Cohen, in which is it mentioned that Hitler’s Tribune design is based on that of the Pergamon Altar.)

Pagan religion is generally about self-worship of man and tribal leaders. The Gnostic occult is a combination of paganism, Neo-Platonic Greek philosophy and the apocalyptic end times theology of the Zoroastrians. Worship of man and his works (the state) is also a central concept of the occult and Satanism/Luciferianism. Satanists frequently admire Hitler for his spiritual power and satanic will, whether they agree with his racism and methods, or not.

Tribune at the Zeppelin Field in Nuremberg (Click for more info)

Below is an image of one of the rallies in Nuremberg at the Zeppelin field in front of the tribune modeled after Satan’s Altar of Pergamos. Most Germans probably did not realize that they were heiling Hitler, while he addressed them from a perverse replica of Satan’s Throne of Revelation, or maybe they just did not care. It was an omen of the apocalypse to come. An early Christian martyr was burned at Pergomos as a sacrifice. Hitler used the altar as his tribune and slaughtered 10 million Christians and Jews as his “sacrifice.” Now, Obama has used a similarly designed temple as his own tribune in his nomination convention.

Reichsparteitag – Hitler speaks from Satan’s Throne

Next is Obama’s stage as the democratic convention in 2008 in Denver. The resemblance to a smaller version of Hitler’s Tribune in Nuremberg is obvious and the design is even more like that of the Pergamon altar than is Hitler’s Tribune in Nuremberg. There have been many references to Obama being a messiah or god by Obama’s supporters and in the media. The Founder (~1920) of the black nationalist mass movement, Marcus Garvey, recommended that black groups emulate white supremacist groups, because he thought supremacist ideology and religion was the secret of the success of the white race. Garvey, known as the prophet of black nationalism, stated that some day the black race would produce their own Hitler.

The Faithful worship at Obama’s own Throne of Satan

These Americans also do not realize that they are hailing Obama in this sick spectacle, while he is perched upon a stage modeled after the biblical Satan’s Throne and Hitler’s Tribune. Black Liberation Theology holds that the black race is divine and will produce a messiah, or messiahs (plural) who will lead the destruction of America and white society. The racial concept is similar (in reverse) to the racial concepts of Nazism and also to the racist, apocalyptic identity version of Christianity that the Nazis forced on the German churches. History repeats itself, the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce, at least we must hope that it is only a farce. The Nazi movement was an exception among occult messianic movements in the impact that it had.

Obama speaks at the Nazi-revered Victory Column in Berlin

Black Liberation Theology can be considered therefore a form of Luciferianism, in so far as it teaches the exaltation and worship of the (black) man, while the white race is scapegoated and demonized. This is the mirror opposite of Nazism, which exalts the white race and demonized Jews and people of color. Self-worship is a form of Luciferianism, whether one worships the red demon as a being or not.

So, the nomination stage can be considered to be an altar to Satan, not just because it is designed to look like the Pergamon Altar, but because Obama’s religion under Jeremiah Wright, Jr. is a form of satanism, and there have been many references to him being a god/messiah.

This design is of a very famous temple, but it is not the common design of a Greek temple. It is difficult to imagine that this design just happens to be coincidental and such bizarre occurrences happen too often to always be chance. It is more likely an intentional provocation and a symbol of Obama’s subversive inverted values relative to the rest of society.

About one month earlier, Obama gave a speech in Berlin, at the Siegessäule or “Victory Column”, just a short walk away from both the Pergamon Museum, where ‘Satan’s Altar’ is on display and also next to the bunker where Hitler committed suicide in April 30, 1945, Walpurgis night. The Victory Column is itself still seen by some Berliners as a Nazi symbol. It was a very fitting homage. The speech was given before a wildly-cheering, mesmerized crowd, the size and enthusiasm of which had not been seen in Berlin probably since the 1930′s and 40′s for such a political speech.

[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter – have to go to Blog]

Obama is a disciple of Saul Alinsky, who dedicated his famous book on political organizing to Lucifer. Alinsky’s techniques of organizing were based on the techniques of Al Capone’s mob. Alinksy said that the purpose of his method was foremost to “gain power,” which reflects the Luciferian ethic. Click here to see a review of other Luciferian influences on Obama and historical comparisons to other messianic movements.

Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgment to the very first radical: from all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins — or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom — Lucifer. Quoted from Saul Alinsky’s book “Rules for Radicals.”

If Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer, why should we be surprised, if Obama, a disciple of Alinsky, and also a member of a sect with a doctrine based on the principles of satanism, has dedicated his presidency to Lucifer?

ROBESPIERRE AND THE CULT OF THE SUPREME BEING

Another example of worship of leaders comes from the French Revolution. Like Obama and Adolf Hitler, the leader of the Jacobins and dictator of France, Robespierre, constructed a throne, so that he could be worshiped like a god at the fests of the Cult of Reason, also called the Cult of the Supreme Being. This was a Luciferian religion, which was made the state religion of revolutionary France. This painting depicts Robespierre seated on his throne. A small artificial mountain was built for the throne and he would mount the throne wearing a toga during the festivities of the cult.

Robespierre led the effort to de-Christianize France and the slaughter of several hundred thousand people. Cathedrals were were turned into stables for horses or were demolished. In the rebellious province of Vendée, Christians were exterminated by the hundred thousands, including men, women and children.

There are many examples from history of would be “great leaders” who wanted to be worshiped as a god. Adolf Hitler and Robespierre are just two examples from recent history. From a historical perspective, it is not unusual to see this type of behavior among megalomaniacs and psychopaths, who would like to become absolute rulers.

WHY OBAMA PROVOKES

Obama is a professional agitator in the Alinsky style. It is standard technique among occultists and Alinsky-style agitators to use such provocation. Obama is flaunting his real occult beliefs hoping to provoke a hysterical reaction among believers in biblical prophesy and conspiracy theorists, so he can paint his opponents as being backwards and ignorant, thereby discrediting them. He is a professional, serial provocateur and that appears to be what is happening here and as with many other provocations that he has done in the past, both during the campaign and as president. So, the point is, people need to be very careful about how they react to this provocation. Think about what he is trying to achieve with this. That is, foremost to discredit and bamboozle his opponents.

It is important to not overreact to such provocation, because that is their goal to have opponents launch themselves into the ozone layer. Another goal is actually to cause the public to fear him and his minions. When people think that he is the Antichrist they develop and spread fear among some of the public, who tend to think this way. This is an object of such agitation and it is really a shame for an American president to be using such perverse techniques.

RELATED POSTS

Bibliography of Obama’s Black Theology

Nazism & Obama’s Black Theology – The Parallels

Obama & Black-White Nazi Cooperation

Obama is Part of the Black KKK / Nazi Movement

The Neo-Genocide of Afrikaners

Obama and the Gnostic Occult

Obama’s Throne of Satan

Satanism 101 – Obama’s Luciferian Influence

Shocking Quotes from Black Liberation Theology

OTHER ARTICLES

Obama Mania – Endnotes

Pergamum: The Seat of Satan

Reed the source here:

Follow me @lastgreatstand on Twitter or https://www.facebook.com/LastGreatStand

The Curse On The Washington “Niggers” Football Team Continues!

Fair is fair you know. Name a practically all Black sports team using a “racial slur” with documented history of the word REDSKIN directly connected to the murderous extermination of Native Americans then don’t expect me to not call a “spade a spade”. To call this owned by a Jew…I mean KIKE…team NIGGERS fits the racial profiling used by Dan Snyder and his KKKuster fans and fellow Indian haters in the Jew, White, and Black world of sports.

Just another reminder for folks who are in mourning because their beloved Washington Niggers football team who just lost again, that THE reason for is because American Indian Spiritual Leaders prayed a curse on this professional football team. Why you ask?

Well, for most REAL American Indians, the name “redskin” is historically a racially slanderous, slurring, and offensive word and is equal to other racially offensive names identifying other races and cultures in a equally hateful, racist, and denigrating way and was used in the context of abject absolute homicidal Satanic inspired hate. Some prime examples are of course “kike”, “wetback”, “chink”, “gook”, and the infamous “nigger” word.

Of course we all know by now non-Indians gleefully and proudly ignore this historical hypocrisy as evidenced by rulings in various anti-Indian mascot court cases including the United States Supreme Court as well as in hundreds of editorials in the media by non-Indians and especially Jew…I mean KIKE publications. Even Verizon Wireless sponsors this team which should be reason enough to boycott their company, a company filled with racist (I personally experienced race hate from Blacks as a White man and Vietnam combat veteran) employees.

What also continues to be ignored in this quagmire of “racist double speak” and is important to note is that this Washington D.C. based football team is owned by a Jew…I mean KIKE Don Snyder. He has no problem with the word “redskin” and neither does the Black…I mean nigger players. But G-d forbid if any symbol, statement, or a movie etc. even hint or implies  anything slanderous or racist targeting their race. So why are Blacks and Jews so insensitive to any and all things that offend American Indians? Time for a short history course related to.

Historically speaking with Blacks, the answer might be found in the history of the Black Buffalo Soldiers who fought on behalf of the United States Government as paid “mercenaries” to protect Jewish owned railroad companies who needed their tracks protected as they were “treaty violated” placed on Tribal land. The Black Buffalo Soldiers were given the “race hating of American Indians” mission to track down and kill them for money and or to obtain their freedom as “slaves”. During this period of time, these murdering niggers were awarded 17 Medals of Honor by the United States Government for this while the breaking of treaties, the stealing of land, and the killing of American Indian men, women, and children was glorified.

Another little known historical black history factoid is that of the the 9th and 10th Coloured (Black) Calvary who were assigned to George Custers 7th Calvary and were present during the Dec. 29, 1890 cold blooded murderous massacre of 300 unarmed American Indian men, women, and children at Wounded Knee South Dakota who were Sitting Bull’s people. These same black soldiers brought to the “killing zone” the Hotchkiss guns/cannons  which were large shell rapid fire “machine guns” that shredded to pieces the bodies of these unarmed American Indian men, women, and children.

Eyewitness accounts recount the execution of women and children. “Four babies had their heads crushed in and when people surrendered, they were summarily executed. This was wholesale butchery”. Twenty members of the 7th Calvary received Medals of Honor for this act of bravery in the name of the United States Government.

After the slaughter, the spiritual forefathers of the Washington Niggers celebrated this mass murder of unarmed American Indians at Wounded Knee by writing a song that glorified the killing of the “redskins and savage chiefans”! As for how the United States Military profiled American Indians, there is this statement made by a member of who wrote…

“Every redskin must be killed from off the fact of the plains before we can be free from their molestations. They are of no earthly good and the sooner they are swept from the land the better for civilization. I do not think they can be turned aside and made good law abiding citizens any more then coyotes can be used for shepherd dogs”! (Please substitute the redskin word with NIGGER or KIKE!) Quote from Major John Vance Lauderdale, US Army surgeon attending physician at the Wounded Knee Massacre.

The truth about the Buffalo soldiers is a long time overdue. What people also don’t know is that the Buffalo Soldiers were in The Dakota’s as well. I spoke to a man from the Crow Creek Reservation. He mention that the Buffalo soldiers raped Dakota women while they were in the territory. That memory still reasonates with the Lakota people to this day. Be assured they did the same to Indian women wherever and whenever they had the opportunity to do so.

William Henry Harrison, who would later become president remarked that most frontiersmen “consider the murdering of Indians in the highest degree meritorious”. In September of 1868 the Buffalo Soldiers killed 25 Apaches and were allowed after the battle to collect scalps and souvenirs by Lieutenant Cusack. Upon their return to Fort Davis, Texas, they were observed “rigged out’ in “full Indian costume with the most fantastic head-dresses” and their “faces painted in a comical style”. How did the Buffalo Soldiers differentiate between friendly Indians and hostile? The formula was simple: “Indians who rejected reservation life were regarded as hostile”. When genocide is not condemned, it is glorified.

Other historical commentaries using the name of this professional and revered football team housed in the city  President Obama resides at include…

“Hunting redskins became for the time being a popular sport in New England, especially since prisoners were worth good money, and the personal danger to the hunters was now very slight”.From Douglas Leach, Flintlock and Tomahawk: New England in King Philps War (W.W. Norton & Co. 1958.

Here is another that is clear and concise when defining the word “redskin” in this particular historical context.

“Others say it was first used on signs at Dutch Trading Posts…most of which were owned by Indian hating Jews, that listed the “skins” they bought. Among them beaver skins – and redskins. On the Northeast coast, the U.S. Government put a bounty on American Indians’ heads. People had to prove they killed an American Indian in order to get the bounty.

How did they prove it? At first they would bring in a head but that got to cumbersome so it simply became the scalps. The prices paid for scalps were different depending on whether they were taken from a male or a female and whether they were taken from an adult or a child.

Adult females brought the most money because they could produce American Indian offspring. How did they prove the sex of the person the scalp once belonged to? For women they would cut off the breasts and present them with scalps. For children’s scalps it was often the feet that were cut off.” From the Cincinnati Zapatista Coalition, American Indian Mascot Page.

Jewish team owner Dan Snyder has this “historical” peer who personally glorified in the “scalping of redskins”.

His name was Sigmund Shlesinger, a Jewish immigrant from New York City. He gleefully participated in the genocide of American Indians as a part of the United States policy of “ethnic cleansing” on Cheyenne lands near Sheridan Kansas. He is recorded as writing…”Scalpt 3 Indians which were found 15 feet from my hole in consealt in grass…for the purpose of collecting BOUNTY”. (American Jewish Archives, Hebrew Union College, Cincinnati”.) So you see…in order for this Jew to collect the money reward for killing a “redskin”, he had to present a “scalp”.

Jews like Snyder have contributed to and been directly involved in the both the destruction of American Indians and the racially profiling of them as less then human in history and through Jewlywood produced movies.  Alcohol was intentionally used by Jews to take advantage of “drunk Indians” in any and all trading transaction…whether be “furs for beads” or the “signing off” of large tracts of Ohio Valley Tribal treaty land. And who started this “tradition”? Say Jews!

The very distribution of whiskey to Indians in the 1700’s was through whiskey distilleries owned by a Jew named Nicholas Lowe to take advantage of Indians in “commerce”. The first slaves were Indians…not Blacks and they were the cargo on the ship owned by a Jew named Columbus.

Recent Jewish racism and insensitivity targeting American Indians on the part of Snyder’s fellow Jews includes a Wall Street Journal article written by a Jew named Kaplan who glorified the various military campaigns of “Indian killing” as something to be proud of.

Another example of Jewish love for American Indians is found in the words of talk show host Michael Medved who stated that there was nothing close to a “Holocaust” of Indians compared to that of Jews. He called Indian Nations “Struggling Stone Age Societies”. Nothing like cultural/racial blasphemy and outright racism, right folks? Medved also forgets to mention that using “small pox infected blankets”as germ warfare was in fact a intentional act of decimation to exterminate American Indians and was in fact aided and abetted by Jews in the fur trade who are “spiritually related to Jews just like Medved…who by the way I consider a pathological liar when it comes to his spin on history!

Suffice it to say, the “curse” prayed upon this football team by American Indian Spiritual Leaders was once again demonstrated in the obvious faltering and lacking of intelligence in play calling, player substitutions, and  timely injuries to key players and this because was spiritually orchestrated by their Creator (called Tunkasila in Lakota). They also believe this curse will continue until the name “Redskin” is recognized for it’s racially slanderous, hateful, and disrespectful meaning and application attached to their people as found in the history of this country and is finally denounced and replaced by those who should know better and are responsible for it’s use…namely the Jews and Blacks who make up the integral part of this team and who should know better given their own history.

For American Indians who have no “representative in the flesh” to speak on their behalf, they continue to have comfort in knowing their Creator is covering their back. Keep that in mind whenever you glorify your team and it’s mascot symbol, the Washington “Redskins”.

As long as you do…I will call them the “Washington Niggers” owned by a “Kike” and who no different then the NAZI’S and yes…there is a REAL Jew who in fact states there was a American Holocaust!

https://richardboydenreport.wordpress.com/2015/12/23/the-american-holocaust-versus-the-jewish-holocaust/

 

 

Sodomites And Pederasts Have Been Mass Murderers Of Millions!

First off Obama…to set the record straight right up front…this treasonous sodomite and betrayer of the the Constitution and defiler of all things Holy is NOT my “President”. He does not morally or spiritually represent my G-d in any way shape or form.

I am going to share a very short history of how his “spiritual genetics” are connected to and revealed in the mass murders of hundreds of millions who represent the “Liar and Murderer From The Beginning” who is Satan and who accepted and embraced sodomy as “natural” so that the Law Abiding and G-dly Citizens of this country can understand Obama’s diabolical “gun control” agenda of disarming their citizens before mass murdering them for what it really is and is not.

Starting with the Nazis who were documented Sodomites and Pedophile by sharing links documenting the mass murdering history of sodomites..

HITLER AND THE NAZI’S: These links document the murderous spirit found in Hitlers Sodomite Pederast Controlled Nazi Party.

http://www.thepinkswastika.com/5201.html

Occultism, the Nazi Party, and Sodomy

http://www.kotipetripaavola.com/nazioccultism.html

Numbers of human beings “mass murdered” by the Nazi Sodomites including Jews…was well over 20 million.

https://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/NAZIS.CHAP1.HTM

KARL MARX AND COMMUNISM: Sodomites and promoters of the homosexual movement.

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/03/28/marxist-origin-of-the-homosexual-movement/

The numbers of human beings murdered by Marxist/Communists is in the hundreds of millions!

http://www.scottmanning.com/content/communist-body-count/

After hearing Obama’s town hall remarks…I decided to share these few historical tidbits to expose what the goal of gun control is.   Enjoy!

Sodomite Obama’s Jew Judge Throws “Terrorist” White Family In Prison

“New World Order” and the Hammond Family

Updated 1.7.16

PREFACE: Click highlighted RED links as found in select sentences!

I felt to share additional information for obvious reasons about what is happening to the Hammond family in Oregon and why and most importantly by who and for what reasons. I have included “links” so that you can critically examine the spiritual connections to this evil act.

Historically speaking…this “pattern of theft, war against that is legally implemented by paper or bullet” and incarceration is but a continuation of how this same “Synagogue of Satan” owned secret government did the same to American Indians!

Yes…there is a connection and all such actions…all EVIL actions in particular…”are first spiritual” in their origins and then they are acted out. In fact…this “secret government” was what Europeans tried to escape from in coming here but lo and behold…it is not only here running the country but the truth is they own us this being an example.

It is important to start with the President of this secret government and “Order Giver”….because it is his “spirituality” that demonstrates in real time what the Hammond family is experiencing in Oregon. Jesus would tell him direct “Your father is the devil”!

Before he changed his name to Barrack Obama…his name was “Barry Soetoro”. His child history includes being sodomized by his White mother’s Black suitors and “friends”. Over time Obama was “discovered” and then targeted to be groomed to be exactly the “Manchurian candidate” that he is today in representing the New World Luciferian Order which again needs to be pointed out is both the historical and spiritual power behind what is happening to the Hammond family.

Now fully developed and in control of this country by Obama’s “Synagogue of Jew” handlers as exemplified by his leadership (just like Hitler), the Hammond family is a open in the face of America micro-cosmic example of the NWO. Obama made his phone call to his supporter and “Synagogue of Satan” Jew Judge Ann Aiken in response to a Obama supporter Amanda Marshall request to to throw the Hammond men back in prison!

This “tag team” haters of American’s like this White family who did not one thing wrong in their obedience to the laws pertaining to the fires….were subjected to and jacketed with lies as being “terrorists” using a bill that was passed right after the false flag ….yes…false flag….Oklahoma City bombing and signed by rapist, murderer, and “domestic terrorist” himself Bill Clinton.

Using this fabricated to destroy the Constitution and US citizens law, the way was prepared to the Hammond family (as well as you and me) and legalized the theft of their land with the final act of sending them to a federal prison to eliminate them once and for all i.e. murder assassination”. Obama and his Sodomite Nazi hare no different the the Nazi’s in what they did to REAL JEWS! And the there is another connection to Obama and the Nazi’s in that the Nazi’s were both sodomites and pederasts or “man boy lovers” keeping in mind that Obama’s childhood including him being “loved by a man”.) Yes…the NWO order wanted their land…the Bundy’s land and they already have most of all American Indian Land. This is the sames as National Socialist Movement Party of Hitler and the Communist Parties history…but there is MORE!

What Obama’s Jew Judge Ann Aiken did is exactly after the order of the 100,000 Jews who worked for Hitler!

A couple of historical tidbits FYI. Columbus was a JEW, Free Masonic Lodges were established by JEWS, and FREE MASONS were in the lead in breaking treaties…or ignoring the Constitution then and now with the Hammond family. Connecting the dots yet?  Free Masons were called “Synagogue of Satan Jews” by Jesus who saw the evils in their heart when He said to them…”Your father is the Devil”!

Free Masons state that they are the only government and true religion that all must follow and obey. They also state that their “god” is LUCIFER! George Bush alluded to this when he made his New World Order “Thousand Points of Lights” statement. The Hammond family is experiencing this reality!

The same Sodomite led Nazi Free Masonic Terrorists that run our Congress allowed the SAME Bureau of Land Management to attack the Dann sisters, two Shoshone Native American women who also had their land and animals destroyed by the BLM! I interviewed them and was the only White talk show host who did.

So when you read this information and truth about what the Hammond family is dealing with, you will see exactly what the NWO Free Masonic Luciferian parallels and connections are to Native American’s who also had their “private property” stolen “legally” by this same collective of diabolical demon owned souls!

My web page both exposes and proves Free Masonry is connected direct to Lucifer who they call their “god”! Their words…Albert Pike even…not mine!

Now you know just a part the “Rest of the Story” of why the Hammond and Bundy families were targeted for death and destruction just like Native Americans and by the same “Occult Brotherhood” who are receiving their inspiration from and as followers of Lucifer…even Satan so that they can put in place their New World Order.

To ignore this is to find yourself profiled by the words of Ben Franklin who said….”We are all born ignorant but we have to work hard to stay stupid!

Lastly…a most comforting “spiritual” understanding for us to remember is that “We war not against flesh and blood …. but principalities, powers, rulers of darkness, and spiritual wickedness in high places” and that in the end…IF you have read the “last chapter” of His words…even Jesus… WE WIN and those who have listened to their “father” will burn with him in the Lake of Fire…no matter what they do to us now!

The American Holocaust Versus The Jewish Holocaust

The American Holocaust Versus The Jewish Holocaust

“The American Holocaust” Of Indigenous People

Dare to Compare: Americanizing the Holocaust by LILLIAN FREEBERG

“For several centuries now, men of the White and JEWISH race have everywhere destroyed the past, stupidly, blindly, and deliberately both at home and abroad. The past once destroyed never returns. The destruction of the past is perhaps the greatest of all crimes. Today the preservation of what little of it remains ought to become almost an obsession. We must put an end to the terrible uprootedness which European colonial methods always produce, even uder their least cruel aspects. We must abstain, once victory ours, from punishing the conquered enemy by uprooting him still further: seeing that it is neither possible nor desirable to exterminate him.”
Simone Weil, The Need for Roots: Prelude to a Declaration of Duties Towards Mankind
The Dynamics of Denial: Uncle Sam’s Willing Executioners

German-speaking Jewish writers have long felt comfortable expropriating images and analogies from the site of Native American identity in their literary imagination. 1 Today, a growing sentiment of sympathy for the “vanishing American” in Germany has upped the ante in the identity-appropriations game, and German-speaking Jewish writers now appropriate Native American identity in the attempt to inflect their own historiography with an added degree of moral currency on the landscape of a contemporary Germany still caught in the throes of denial concerning its own genocidal past.

In German-speaking literary circles, the examples of Else Lasker-Schüler, who stylized herself as an American Indian, and Franz Kafka’s wish to be a “Red Indian” are well known. George Tabori’s 1990 stage production of the Jewish Western Weisman und Rotgesicht wittily pitted [Jewish] white man against [partly Jewish] red man in a verbal duel in which the protagonists exchange a hilarious blow-for-blow account of injuries and insults suffered by the victimized [End Page 353] populations they represent. But the phenomenon of conflating Jewish and “Indian” identity is not unique to foreign-language publications. As Seth Wolitz points out, in his discussion of Weisman und Rotgesicht, this “tradition of spoofing Jewish-Indian interrelations . . . reaches back to a Yiddish playlet, Tsvishn Indianer.” 2 This 1895 play, “Among the Indians, or The Country Peddler,” as its translator states, “is not an anomaly, but rather a pathbreaker in a well-defined line of Jewish-American entertainment that leads to the films of Mel Brooks and others.” 3 The American leg of this lineage includes Eddie Cantor’s redface minstrelsy in Whoopie! (1930) and Woody Allen’s Zelig (1983). Fanny Brice sang herself to stardom with “I’m an Indian,” and Bernard Malamud’s The People provides a classic example of the phenomenon.

Most recently perhaps, Raphael Seligmann has gone on record stating that the Jews are “the Indians of Germany.” 4 That this statement begs the question of identifying “Uncle Sam’s willing executioners” seems, however, of minimal concern to the Jewish community in America and abroad. In fact, when the time comes to put the Shoah on the other foot and parallels are drawn between atrocities experienced by the American Indian population over a five-hundred-year period and those experienced by the Jewish population of Europe in the twelve-year reign of Nazi terror, the knowledge of self-described “Jewish Indians” recedes into the recesses of repressed memory. In a seditious reversal of national identity politics, Lucy Dawidowicz charges those who would dare to compare with “a vicious anti-Americanism.” 5 Rabbi Irving Greenberg, founder of the Holocaust Resource Center and first director of the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Commission, has described the comparison of the Nazi Holocaust with other acts of genocide as “blasphemous.” 6 In The Holocaust in American Life, Jewish historian Peter Novik describes the way in which any attempt to compare is dismissed as a “felonious assault” on truth and memory. 7

In the pathological dynamic of genocidal histories, the perpetrator culture invariably turns its gaze to the horrors registered in the archives and accounts of the “other guys.” 8 This is why Holocaust studies in the United States focus almost exclusively on the atrocity of Auschwitz, not of Wounded Knee or Sand Creek. Norman Finkelstein, in his discussion of the way images of the Holocaust have been manufactured to reap moral and economic benefits for members of the Jewish elite, states that the presence of the Holocaust Museum in Washington is “particularly incongruous in the absence of a museum commemorating crimes in the course of American history” and makes specific reference to the slave trade and genocide against the American Indians. 9 Peter Novik suggests that the Holocaust has become a sort of “civil religion” for American Jews who have lost touch with their own ethnic and religious identity, and asserts that “in the United States the Holocaust is explicitly used for the purpose of national self-congratulation: the Americanization of the Holocaust [End Page 354] has involved using it to demonstrate the difference between the Old World and the New, and to celebrate, by showing its negation, the American way of life.” 10

The Historikerstreit or “Historians’ Debate” in Germany during the mid-1980s disrupted the traditional historiographical narrative, which placed three groups of actors at the scene of the Nazi crime–perpetrators, bystanders, and victims. Saul Friedländer summarizes the controversy as “a debate about the shape of the past in terms of public memory and national identity.” 11 Conservative historians, in their efforts to “historicize” the Nazi period and thus suture the wound of discontinuity presented by a “past that refused to go away,” attempted to relativize the crimes of the Nazi period by situating them in the context of a narrative that included an amalgamated fourth character in the plot: the Soviet and American forces who forced Germans into a victim position from which only further victimization could ensue. These abnegationist attempts at historical revision were staunchly contested by left-wing social philosopher Jürgen Habermas in a series of essays that have since been collected and published in German and in English. 12

The Historians’ Debate directed international attention to the issue of historical liability as it relates to public memory and national identity in territories known to have been host to genocidal campaigns. However, what got lost in translation when the debate migrated to America was the very real opportunity this controversy might have presented for an authentic “working through” or “mastery” of this country’s traumatic genocidal past. Instead, the dispute conveniently constructed a site of transference upon which the melancholic drama of “manifest manners” could be acted out. 13 American intellectuals, confronted with the quandary of whether to see or not to see, chose to look the other way. George Tabori, in “Hamlet in Blue,” provides an apt metaphor for this dynamic of denial: “the old Hamletian ploy of dodging action by mind-fucking.” 14 As Henryk Broder points out in “Die Germanisierung des Holocaust,” today one speaks of the “Americanization of the Holocaust” as though the Jews were slaughtered on American soil. 15 This, in turn, cultivates fertile breeding ground for absolutionist scholarship and public discourse on both sides of the Atlantic. In the end, only the interests of the respective aggressor cultures are served.

The same kinds of arguments attempting to “historicize” America’s past in the interest of “normalizing” its present from the perspective of the perpetrator population do not unleash the same scandalous international controversy as do similar efforts on the part of historians negotiating a revision of German history. The genocide against the Jews is considered an ugly chapter in Germany’s past and acknowledged internationally as one of the gravest crimes against humanity in the twentieth century. But while the whole fabric of German culture remains “under the shadow of Hitler,” the genocide against indigenous [End Page 355] populations in North America is still today denied or dismissed as the inevitable prelude to the rise of the greatest nation on Earth.

Reactionary historian James Axtell, in his 1992 study, Beyond 1492: Encounters in Colonial North America, writes:
We make a hash of our historical judgments because we continue to feel guilty about the real or imagined sins of our fathers and forefathers . . . [We] can stop flogging ourselves with our “imperialistic” origins and tarring ourselves with the broad brush of “genocide.” As a huge nation of law and order and increasingly refined sensibility, we are not guilty of murdering Indian women and babies, of branding slaves on the forehead, or of claiming any real estate in the world we happen to fancy. 16

Statements like this, when proffered in defense of Germany’s genocidal history, elicit vehement opposition from the academic and intellectual community, yet, with regard to America’s tragic past, go virtually unchallenged and are integrated into the canon of acceptable discourse.

As the success of Daniel Jonah Goldhagen’s indictment of the German people in Hitler’s Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust illustrates, public flogging of the German people for their willing participation in the melee represents an acceptable and indeed lucrative form of public and academic discourse. The 1996 publication of Goldhagen’s Ph.D. dissertation thrust the previously little-known Harvard professor into the international limelight. His thesis, that widespread “eliminationist anti-Semitism” among the ordinary men and women of Germany, not the ruthless racial policies of the Nazi regime, was the sole cause of the extermination of the Jews, has been contested by Holocaust scholars and historians the world over. But the book, translated into thirteen languages, became an international bestseller and secured for Goldhagen the prestigious German Democracy Prize in 1997. It also unleashed an international debate that has been dubbed “The Goldhagen Wars,” not to mention a series of highly paid speaking engagements for its author throughout the world. Goldhagen’s staunchest opponent has been Norman Finkelstein, the Jewish scholar whose rebuttal of “the Goldhagen thesis” first appeared in The New Left Review (July/August 1997) under the title “Daniel Goldhagen’s ‘Crazy’ Thesis.” 17 In a statement printed by the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on 21 April 1998, Goldhagen proudly asserts: “My book has sold more copies in Germany than anywhere else. It’s been embraced by the German people.” It is interesting to note, in this context, that Native American scholar Ward Churchill’s stellar and seminal piece of scholarship on Holocaust and denial in the Americas, A Little Matter of Genocide, did not meet with the same degree of public success. [End Page 356]

Taking the American people to task in the little matter of genocide against indigenous populations of North America remains a terrible taboo registered in the “Don’t you Dare” category of “Academic Do’s and Don’ts.” Like any taboo, this act of transgression does not derive from a vacuum but rather emanates from a specific social consciousness–or lack thereof. As journalist William Greider notes in One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism:

German social consciousness was anchored in the country’s tragic knowledge of guilt and defeat, a humbling encounter with self-doubt that Americans have so far evaded in their national history. . . . American history did provide ample basis for humility and social introspection: slavery and the enduring wounds of race, “winning” the West by armed conquest, Hiroshima and the nuclear potential for mass destruction, the bloody failure of the neocolonialist war in Vietnam. . . . The social meaning of these experiences was usually deflected, however, and repackaged by the optimistic American culture as stories of triumph. . . . Thus, Americans generally managed to evade any national sense of guilt or defeat. Critical reflection on the national character was discouraged, ridiculed as “un-American.” 18

Dominick LaCapra has established a clear relationship between the implications of the Historians’ Debate for American scholars and objections raised by German scholars on the left-wing side of the skirmish. He states that liberal historians may have had strategic as well as more deep-seated philosophical reasons for not placing too much emphasis on the ambivalence of Western traditions and the possibly dubious role of a critique of revisionism in lessening awareness of the implication of other Western countries in massively destructive or even genocidal processes. Given the history of the United States, this danger is clear and present for an American, and identification with Habermas’s position may be facilitated by the narcissistic and self-justificatory gains it brings. 19

But even before the Historians’ Debate, the relative singularity of the Nazi Holocaust had long been the center of international debate. Uniqueness proponents such as Deborah Lipstadt, Steven Katz, Saul Friedländer, Michael Marrus, Yehuda Bauer, Lucy Dawidowicz, and others share an insistence on the exclusivity of the Nazi Holocaust as an unparalleled event in the history of the twentieth century. This view has been challenged by survivors and scholars, among them a number of Jewish intellectuals such as Hannah Arendt, Irving Louis Horowitz, Israel Charny, Helen Fein, Simon Wiesenthal, Norman Finkelstein, Peter Novik, and others. Increasingly, Native American scholars and their allies have entered the conversation, pointing out that the historical [End Page 357] archive of the American Holocaust has been compiled, collated, and indeed constructed to a large degree by perpetrators, their descendants, and beneficiaries writing from a subject position inflected with a vested interest in maintaining the illusion of innocence concerning the “facts of the case.”

The exclusivists’ most compelling argument against the comparability of the two acts of genocide has been that the decimation of the American Indian population, unlike the extermination of the Jews, was unintentional–“caused by microbes, not militia . . . that is, this depopulation happened unwittingly rather than by design.” 20 Preeminent uniqueness proponent Steven Katz, in The Holocaust in Historical Context, while documenting the fact that the American Holocaust far exceeded the Nazi Holocaust in scope, at the same time reduces the American travesty to a mere case of “depopulation.” 21

These conclusions are drawn from comparisons not of a simple corpse count but rather of the rate of extermination experienced by each group. Recent studies demonstrate that precontact population estimates generated by historians and demographers from the subject position of the perpetrators have been egregiously low. It is today commonly assumed that precontact populations were far and above the one-million figure that has acted as a standard of measure for centuries. More recent and more honest studies estimate the precontact civilization to have been between nine and eighteen million. This standard of measure puts the rate of attrition of indigenous populations at between 98 and 99 percent–that is, near total extermination. The rate of attrition of Jewish populations in Europe is commonly calculated at between 60 and 65 percent. Put in terms of survival rates, this means that two-thirds of the global Jewish population and about one third of the European Jewish population survived the Nazi Holocaust, whereas a mere remnant population of 1 to 2 percent survived the American Holocaust. This seriously calls into question any notion of “unparalleled” or “total extermination” of the Jews in the Nazi Holocaust.

Katz argues that the Nazi Holocaust is “phenomenologically” unique based on the “merciless, exceptionless, biocentric intentionality of Hitler’s ‘war against the Jews.’” 22 Katz’s argument centers on documented intentionality and governmental policy in the Nazi period. What Katz does not take into account is that a twelve-year period in a twentieth-century industrialized society lends itself more readily to documentation than a five-hundred-year period, most of which is historically and geographically situated in the midst of a pre-industrial “virgin wasteland,” nor does he significantly engage the discourse generated by Native American scholars in recent years. It does not, however, take a paragon of intellectual prowess to deduce an implied intent to “destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group,” from the events that transpired in the process of “depopulating” the New World–a slaughter that Katz patently refuses to define as “genocide” even though it conforms precisely to [End Page 358] the definition of the phenomenon as outlined by Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term in his 1944 Axis Rule in Occupied Europe. 23 The murder of 96 percent of any given population does not occur “inadvertently,” especially when members of that group are viewed by their assassins as belonging to a separate (and inferior) national, ethnic, racial and religious order.

Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that the introduction of diseases to the Native populations of North America was anything but an incidental by-product of “westward expansion.” In what is likely the world’s first documented case of genocide accomplished by bacterial means, Lord Jeffrey Amherst suggested that smallpox-infected blankets be distributed to the Ottawa and Lenape peoples, stating in a 1763 letter to his subordinate, Colonel Henry Bouquet, “You will do well to [infect] the Indians by means of blankets as well as to try every other method that can serve to extirpate this [execrable] race.” 24

This statement indicates that the annihilation of the Indian population by way of disease was neither arbitrary nor incidental to the aims of the European settler population and its government. Even as early as 1763, the settler population and its sovereign representatives acted in full cognizance of the impact their introduction of disease would have on the Native populations. Stannard points out, with regard to the “enemy microbe” argument, that by focusing almost entirely on disease, by displacing responsibility for the mass killing onto an army of invading microbes, contemporary authors increasingly have created the impression that the eradication of those tens of millions of people was inadvertent–a sad, but both inevitable and “unintended consequence” of human migration and progress. This is a modern version of what Alexander Saxton recently has described as the “soft side of anti-Indian racism” that emerged in America in the nineteenth century and that incorporated “expressions of regret over the fate of the Indians into narratives that traced the inevitability of their extinction. Ideologically,” Saxton adds, “the effect was to exonerate individuals, parties, nations, of any moral blame for what history had decreed.” In fact, however, the near-total destruction of the Western Hemisphere’s Native people was neither inadvertent nor inevitable. 25

Survivor testimony and statistical records from the Nazi death camps reveal that the uncontrolled spread of disease among inmates was also a major factor contributing to the death toll during the Nazi Holocaust, but that argument has never been forwarded in favor of exonerating the perpetrators–at least not in serious scholarship on the subject.

If, as Yehuda Bauer contends, “[t]here was no governmental intention to exterminate the victim population” in the Americas, how else are we to understand the now well-known statement attributed to General Philip Henry Sheridan at [End Page 359] Fort Cobb in January of 1889: “The only good Indian is a dead Indian?” 26 While Bauer concedes that “important figures in the U.S. administration expressed genocidal hopes and intentions,” he still insists that “there was no clear governmental policy of total murder.” 27 It would seem redundant, in this context, to point to the innumerable studies that have been conducted since 1945 in the attempt to ascertain whether or not Adolf Hitler himself had issued the order for the Final Solution.

The introduction of diseases to indigenous populations was accompanied by a systematic destruction of “the indigenous agricultural base [in order to] impose starvation conditions upon entire peoples, dramatically lowering their resistance to disease and increasing their susceptibility to epidemics.” 28 What is more, the ideology of Manifest Destiny is itself founded on an implied intent to kill–it is the “central constituent ideology translated into action” that Bauer posits as the defining characteristic that sets the Nazi Holocaust apart from all other genocidal campaigns in the history of humanity.

Fortunately, pseudo-scholarly revisionists who would deny the Nazi atrocities have been properly (and legally) excluded from legitimate academic and public discourse in many countries–Germany, Austria, France and Canada among them. But, As Ward Churchill has argued in A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492–Present: “the ugly enterprise of Holocaust denial has a flip side–indeed, a mirror image–which is equally objectionable but which has been anything but marginalized by the academy, popular media, or the public at large.” 29 According to Churchill, exclusivists insisting on the uniqueness of the Nazi Holocaust succeed in “outstripping the neo-nazis” in terms of denial:

Whereas the latter content themselves with denying the authenticity of a single genocidal process, exclusivists deny, categorically and out of hand, the validity of myriad genocides. Yet, unlike the neonazis, those holding to the postulates of Jewish exclusivism are not only treated as being academically credible, but are accorded a distinctly preferential treatment among the arbiters of scholarly integrity. 30

Manifest Destiny: My Brothers’ Killer

Cogent arguments have been made to suggest that the same notion of creating space for the “master race” is as germane to the ideological framework of Hitler’s Lebensraumpolitik as it is to the U.S. government’s doctrine of Manifest Destiny: In each instance, the extermination of “inferior races” is justified in the interest of making way for a “superior race” of peoples. 31 According to [End Page 360] Hitler biographer John Toland, the Führer is known to have “expressed admiration for the ‘efficiency’ of the American genocide campaign against the Indians, viewing it as a forerunner for his own plans and programs.” 32 Even Steven Katz concedes that the “depopulation of the New World” was a “salient precursor” to the Nazi Holocaust. 33 Thus, the American Holocaust might be viewed as the prototype for the extermination of the Jews in Europe. At the very least, the event must be seen as a predecessor to the Nazi Holocaust.

While Hitler’s policy of Lebensraumpolitik has been vilified and condemned for the toll it took in terms of human lives–even in the Historians’ Debate, the essential criminality and moral reprehensibility of the Nazi regime was not challenged–heroes are made of men in America whose words were inspired by the same kind of thinking and whose actions resulted in the murder of millions of human beings considered to be members of “inferior” civilizations. Theodore Roosevelt, in The Strenuous Life, writes, in 1901:

Of course our whole national history has been one of expansion . . . That the barbarians recede or are conquered, with the attendant fact that peace follows their retrogression or conquest is due solely to the power of the mighty civilized races which have not lost the fighting instinct, and which by their expansion are gradually bringing peace to the red wastes where the barbarian peoples of this world hold sway. 34

Hannah Arendt, in the Origins of Totalitarianism, identifies metaphysical Jew-hatred as one element in the “subterranean stream of Western history” that subsequently translated into the political anti-Semitic consciousness in Europe and constituted the defining principle of Hitler’s Nazi regime. 35 Similarly, Richard Drinnon argues that the “national metaphysics of Indian-hating was central to the formation of national identity and political policy in the United States.” 36

The crucial issue at stake here is that, according to Drinnon’s analysis, this national metaphysics of Indian-hating rested on the “collective refusal to conceive of Native Americans as persons.” 37 Had the people of Europe–Jews and Gentiles alike–recognized these “barbarians” to be human entities and embraced them as siblings in the “family of man,” they might well have foreseen the fate that would befall civilized populations in Europe just a few short years later because, as Richard Drinnon points out in Facing West: The Metaphysics of Indian-Hating and Empire Building:

The sober truth was that the white man’s burden of Winning the West was crushing global folly. The West was quite literally nowhere–or everywhere, which was to say the same thing. For Homer’s Greeks and North American tribal peoples alike, the West was the land beyond, Spiritland, the land of [End Page 361] mystery, of death and of life eternal. It was not a Dark and bloody Ground to be “won.” But for Anglo-Americans it was exactly that, the latest conquest. Yet how could they conclusively “win” it? If the West was at bottom a form of society [as James Turner contended in “The Problem of the West”] then on our round earth, Winning the West amounted to no less than winning the world. It could be finally and decisively “won” only by rationalizing (Americanizing, Westernizing, modernizing) the world, and that meant conquering the land beyond, banishing mystery, and negating or extirpating other peoples, so the world would be subject to the regimented reason of one settlement culture with its professedly self-evident middle-class values. 38

Hitler’s Lebensraumpolitik was not without precedent or parallel. Four centuries after Columbus, the ideology of a master race had firmly established itself on American soil. A “color line” had been drawn, and it was clear that, in the national consciousness as in public policy, “Native Americans were natives and not Americans . . . the irreducible prerequisite of being an American, was to be of European stock.” 39 The color line drawn between the

Children of Light, the light of the Gospel, of Enlightenment institutions, law and order, progress, philanthropy, freedom, Americanization, modernization, forced urbanization . . . and the Children of Darkness, “savages” who stood in the way of the redemption and the rationalization of the world . . . unmistakably shaped national patterns of violence by establishing whom one could kill under propitious circumstances and thereby represented a prime source of the American way of inflicting death. 40

The hidden narratives of the master race and Manifest Destiny governing our understanding of American history distort perceptions of our own historiography. The ideology of Manifest Destiny–the fantasy and the fancy of the master race–is transferred from one generation to another so that there is no need for the kind of propaganda machinery required to make “willing executioners” of “ordinary men” and women in Germany. Americans, in their drive to forge “one Nation under God,” fought with “God on their side.” 41 Stannard, in this regard, explains that the Eurocentric racial contempt for the indigenous peoples . . . reflected in scholarly writings of this sort is now so complete and second nature to most Americans that it has passed into popular lore and common knowledge of the “every schoolboy knows” variety. No intent to distort the truth is any longer necessary. All that is required, once the model is established, is the recitation of rote learning as it passes from one uncritical generation to the next. 42 [End Page 362]

Giorgio Agamben has argued against the use of the term Holocaust as a descriptor for the Nazi extermination of the Jews because “Jews were exterminated not in a mad and giant holocaust but exactly as Hitler had announced, ‘as lice,’ which is to say as bare life.” 43 The notorious California Indian-killer H. L. Hall justified the murder of Native infants based on the argument that “a nit would make a louse.” John Chivington, commanding colonel in the infamous Sand Creek Massacre, reformulated the sentiment to justify similar actions with the statement “Nits make lice.” 44 Perplexing in this context is that Hitler’s perception of the Jews as “life unworthy of living,” that is, as “lice” or “bare life,” is received with moral outrage in the scholarly community and in public consciousness in the U.S. and elsewhere. But when Indians are placed on the same level of the “evolutionary scale” and assigned the same status in the biopolitical order, it becomes a justifiable sacrifice made in the name of “progress.”

Hitler’s willing executioners and the ordinary men and women of Germany had to be convinced that the Jewish population was not human; they had, after all, for centuries prior, lived and worked side by side with these people who were systematically exterminated as “like lice.”

Before the Final Solution could be implemented, the Jewish population of Europe had to be reduced to the level of “bare life.” But for the American settlers, the notion that the life form to be clear-cut from the vast, “unpopulated” wilderness in order to make way for their American way of life was somehow not human ranked among those truths held to be self-evident; the “execrable race” of red men and women was viewed from the very onset as existing at the level of “bare life.”

And yet, from a perspective that acknowledges the essential humanity of indigenous populations and the sophistication of the established forms of social organization, governance, and religious ritual prevailing among the indigenous populations at the time of contact, it becomes clear that, while the Nazi Holocaust was indeed unique in scope and in kind to the twentieth century, the American Holocaust was, as Stannard has stated, “far and away, the most massive act of genocide in the history of the world.” 45

Fortunately, Hitler was stopped before he could consummate the Final Solution. But some contend that Uncle Sam’s willing executioners are still today engaged in the effort to eradicate what remains of the indigenous population in North America. For others, the loss of Native lives and lifeways cannot be acknowledged as homicidal, genocidal, or suicidal because the “savage” is not–however ostentatiously liberal-minded individuals and institutions in this country may contend otherwise–considered fully human: “we” are not related. While a revisionist narrative of the West would attempt to suffuse its world-view with a politically correct moral underpinning by making superficial [End Page 363] linguistic concessions, no longer applying such terms as “savage” and “primitive” to indigenous peoples, contemporary scholarship still draws its insights and impulses from the same body of research and the same doctrine of universal superiority it now seeks to disavow and revile. The appearance of euphemisms such as “ethnocide” and “depopulation” applied to the genocide committed against Native populations is just one index of the continued resistance to the notion that this devastation involves a human tragedy.

Nominally, indigenous peoples have been grudgingly adopted into the “family of man” in the prevailing paradigms of Western thought. Phenomenologically, they are still today perceived not as human others, but in fact as a separate (and inferior) “species.” Depending on one’s interpretation of the Latin siluaticus (of the wood; belonging to a wood), from which the term “savage” is derived, one might suspect that, in the Western biopolitical order, the “savage life” acquires the status of one less than bare life or Homo sacer. If that is the case, then what occurred in this country must be viewed as a gigantic bonfire in which neither mice, lice, nor men, women or children were sacrificed and burned for the sake of clear-cutting a space for the master race–what was sacrificed here were merely logs. Driftwood. Dead weight. Useless waste. In the world of the uniqueness proponents, the “depopulation” of the New World is on a par with “deforestation.”

What is perhaps “unique” about the Nazi Holocaust is that it represents the first incidence in history of genocidal assault directed at an assimilated, “civilized” (and therefore human) population in central Europe. 46 Katz refers to the phenomenon as one of “Judeocide.” It might, however, more accurately be termed fratricide–brothers killing brothers–squabbling sons of the same God in a serial rerun of Cain and Abel. This is not to imply that fratricide is any less grievous a crime against humanity than genocide, merely to clarify the relationship of spiritual kinship existing between perpetrators and victims in the Nazi Holocaust and the way this works to influence our perception of the event’s primacy. It could in fact be argued that fratricide is indeed the more heinous crime since it involves the extermination of life that is clearly defined as “human” in the Judeo-Christian paradigm. Brothers killing brothers is classified as a mortal sin by the religious doctrines governing moral standards in both religions, but brothers killing savages is apparently sanctioned by the moral dictates of both these dominant world religions. If the ideology of Manifest Destiny is, on the other hand, subsumed under the mandate to “be fruitful and multiply,” then the extermination of indigenous populations is indeed ordained by the supreme deity common to the Christian and the Judaic faiths. From this perspective, mass murder is the implied mandate of Manifest Destiny.

Churchill speaks in terms of the need for a “denazification . . . a fundamental alteration in the consciousness of this country.” 47 I would suggest that “de-manifestation” [End Page 364] is a more apt designation for the paradigmatic shift requisite for decentering the hegemonistic reign of the “master narratives” of Manifest Destiny and the master race that govern our understanding of history as it relates to national identity in the United States. Thinking in terms of “de-manifestation” has the advantage of disaggregating the specific modalities of similar, but not identical, historical phenomena and of dislocating–geographically and intellectually–the source of the “problem” from the site of European history to that of American history. What follows is an attendant shift in temporal focus that allows us to properly place the postulates of Manifest Destiny and the master race in historically correct chronological order with relation to the subsequent emergence of theories of Lebensraumpolitik and the assumed superiority of the Aryan race on the European continent. Whereas “de-nazification” clearly connotes a “thing of the past,” “de-manifestation” implies a present, “manifest” reality. From this vantage point, the German Sonderweg is rerouted and an already trammeled trail of rampant plundering, pillage, and mass murder is revealed to have been blazed in the forward wake of the historical caesura that the Nazi Holocaust represents.

Holocaust in Contemporary Context: Collective Suicide

Most importantly, perhaps, what distinguishes the American Holocaust from the Nazi Holocaust is what is at stake today. The Nazi Holocaust represents a historical event that threatened the entire Jewish population of Europe. Relegating this event to the archive of oblivion would involve a fatal miscalculation resulting in wholesale moral bankruptcy for the entire Western world. But the worldwide Jewish population can hardly be said to be at risk of extermination today–certainly not in the United States. American Jews stepped up their efforts to direct attention to the Nazi Holocaust at a time when they were by far the wealthiest, best-educated, most influential, in-every-way-most-successful group in American society–a group that, compared to most other identifiable minority groups, suffered no measurable discrimination and no disadvantages on account of that minority status. 48

Norman Finkelstein cites the Jewish income in the United States at double that of non-Jews and points out that sixteen of the forty wealthiest Americans are Jews, as are 40 percent of Nobel prizewinners in science and economics, 20 percent of professors at major universities and 40 percent of partners in law firms in New York and Washington. 49

Native Americans, by contrast, have long been subject to the most extreme poverty of any sector in the present North American population, and still have the highest rate of suicide of any other ethnic group on the continent. 50 High-school [End Page 365] dropout rates are as high as 70 percent in some communities. As Anishinabeg activist and Harvard-educated scholar Winona LaDuke notes with regard to the Lakota population in South Dakota: “Alcoholism, unemployment, suicide, accidental death and homicide rates are still well above the national average.” 51 Alcoholism, intergenerational posttraumatic stress, and a spate of social and economic ills continue to plague these communities in the aftermath of the American Holocaust.

As Peter Novik has made abundantly clear in his study of the way the Holocaust functions as a sort of “civil religion” and signifier of identity for American Jews, much of the commemoration rhetoric and practice propagated in this country centers on maintaining a consensual symbol of unity for American Jews who thus experience the Holocaust “vicariously.” As Novik states, while most American Jews (and Gentiles) may be saddened, dismayed, or shocked by the Nazi Holocaust, there is little evidence to suggest that they have actually been traumatized by it. 52

The Americanization of the Holocaust, according to Novik’s analysis, serves a symbolic function for American Jews, ascribing victim status to a community that demonstrates little sign of actual victimization in a culture where the victim is victor. Norman Finkelstein, the vociferous Goldhagen critic who lost most of his family in the death camps and ghettoes of Nazi-occupied Europe, has expressed similar views. His forthcoming publication asserts that the “Holocaust industry” was born with the Six-Day War in June of 1967. Before that, there was little mention of the Holocaust in American life. He argues that the development of the “Holocaust industry” in the United States is part of a strategic campaign to justify American political interests in Israel. 53

This is not to deny or diminish the clear and present danger in the ominous resurgence of anti-Semitic sentiments reflected in isolated incidences of racial violence against Jews and Jewish institutions both here and abroad. However, the material realities confronting the Native American population remain, in many instances, comparable to those prevailing in Third World countries. The Native American experience of persecution is not a vicarious one. For substantial portions of this population, it is a lived reality.

What is more, an unrelenting sentiment of Indian-hating persists in this country:

There is a peculiar kind of hatred in the northwoods, a hatred born of the guilt of privilege, a hatred born of living with three generations of complicity in the theft of lives and lands. What is worse is that each day, those who hold this position of privilege must come face to face with those whom they have dispossessed. To others who rightfully should share in the complicity and the guilt, Indians are far away and long ago. But in reservation border towns, Indians [End Page 366] are ever present. . . . The poverty of dispossession is almost overwhelming. So is the poverty of complicity and guilt. In America, poverty is relative, but it still causes shame. That shame, combined with guilt and a feeling of powerlessness, creates an atmosphere in which hatred buds, blossoms, and flourishes. The hatred passes from father to son and from mother to daughter. Each generation feels the hatred and it penetrates deeper to justify a myth. 54

Attempts on the part of American Indians to transcend chronic, intergenerational maladies introduced by the settler population (for example, in the highly contested Casino industry, in the ongoing battles over tribal sovereignty, and so on) are challenged tooth and nail by the U.S. government and its “ordinary” people. Flexibility in transcending these conditions has been greatly curtailed by federal policies that have “legally” supplanted our traditional forms of governance, outlawed our languages and spirituality, manipulated our numbers and identity, usurped our cultural integrity, viciously repressed the leaders of our efforts to regain self-determination, and systematically miseducated the bulk of our youth to believe that this is, if not just, at least inevitable.” 55 Today’s state of affairs in America, both with regard to public memory and national identity, represents a flawless mirror image of the situation in Germany vis-à-vis Jews and other non-Aryan victims of the Nazi regime. 56

Collective indifference to these conditions on the part of both white and black America is a poor reflection on the nation’s character. This collective refusal to acknowledge the genocide further exacerbates the aftermath in Native communities and hinders the recovery process. This, too, sets the American situation apart from the German-Jewish situation: Holocaust denial is seen by most of the world as an affront to the victims of the Nazi regime. In America, the situation is the reverse: victims seeking recovery are seen as assaulting American ideals.

But what is at stake today, at the dawn of a new millennium, is not the culture, tradition, and survival of one population on one continent on either side of the Atlantic. What is at stake is the very future of the human species. LaDuke, in her most recent work, contextualizes the issues from a contemporary perspective:

Our experience of survival and resistance is shared with many others. But it is not only about Native people. . . . In the final analysis, the survival of Native America is fundamentally about the collective survival of all human beings. The question of who gets to determine the destiny of the land, and of the people who live on it–those with the money or those who pray on the land–is a question that is alive throughout society. 57 [End Page 367]

“There is,” as LaDuke reminds us, “a direct relationship between the loss of cultural diversity and the loss of biodiversity. Wherever Indigenous peoples still remain, there is also a corresponding enclave of biodiversity.” 58 But, she continues,

The last 150 years have seen a great holocaust. There have been more species lost in the past 150 years than since the Ice Age. (During the same time, Indigenous peoples have been disappearing from the face of the earth. Over 2,000 nations of Indigenous peoples have gone extinct in the western hemisphere and one nation disappears from the Amazon rainforest every year.) 59

It is not about “us” as indigenous peoples–it is about “us” as a human species. We are all related. At issue is no longer the “Jewish question” or the “Indian problem.” We must speak today in terms of the “human problem.” And it is this “problem” for which not a “final,” but a sustainable, viable solution must be found–because it is no longer a matter of “serial genocide,” it has become one of collective suicide. As Terrence Des Pres put it, in The Survivor: “At the heart of our problems is that nihilism which was all along the destiny of Western culture: a nihilism either unacknowledged even as the bombs fell or else, as with Hitler or Stalin, demonically proclaimed as the new salvation.” 60

All of us must now begin thinking and acting in the dimension and in the interest of the human species–an intellectual domain of vita activa that indigenous people have inhabited since time immemorial. It is this modality of thought as a process of reflection that the “civilized” nations must learn from the “savage” ones. Vine Deloria, in “Native American Spirituality,” has attempted to clarify this distinction:

American Indians look backwards in time to the creation of the world and view reality from the perspective of the one species that has the capability to reflect on the meaning of things. This attitude is generally misunderstood by non-Indians who act as if reflection and logical thought were synonymous. But reflection is a special art and requires maturity of personality, certainty of identity, and feelings of equality with the other life forms of the world. It consists, more precisely, of allowing wisdom to approach rather than seeking answers to self-generated questions. Such an attitude, then, stands in a polarized position to the manner in which society today conducts itself. 61

It is not a matter of moral bookkeeping or of winners and losers in the battle of the most martyred minority. It is not a matter of comparative victimology, but one of collective survival. The insistence on incomparability and “uniqueness” of the Nazi Holocaust is precisely what prohibits our collective comprehension of genocide as a phenomenon of Western “civilization,” not as a reiterative series of historical events, each in its own way “unique.” It is what [End Page 368] inhibits our ability to name causes, anticipate outcomes, and, above all to engage in preemptive political and intellectual action in the face of contemporary exigencies.

In Tabori’s 1990 production Weisman and Rotgesicht, the “calculus of calamity” is taken to hilarious heights to reveal the grave truth of the matter. In his 1994 discussion of “The Contemporary German Fascination for Things Jewish,” Jack Zipes states of Weisman und Rotgesicht:

The resolution that Tabori offers, though hilarious, is meant to be taken seriously: a verbal duel so that both sides can expose themselves and realize how ridiculous it is to quarrel with one another. Hilarity becomes a nomadic means of questioning majority culture and of reversing identities so that understanding between different groups can be generated. 62

Ultimately, fostering a “solidarity of memory” that might fundamentally challenge majority culture must be the aim of any comparison of “minority” situations, but the conclusion Zipes draws from this particular conflation of identities in conflict is flawed by a misapprehension of the play’s historically and culturally specific geographic setting in the Western wilderness and its relationship to indigenous peoples. As I have argued elsewhere, while Tabori does not specify the site of the duel in the desert, the play could be interpreted to be set in what is now the state of Colorado. 63 This is the site of the Sand Creek Massacre–a historical event with culturally specific meaning to the Native American people. It is at once a site of sanctity, of sacrifice, and of sacrilege. It represents the rampant desecration that has devastated an entire civilization and its way of life. But according to Jack Zipes’s analysis: “There are many parallels that one can draw with the conflict in this play: Jews and blacks in the States, or blacks and Koreans; Jews and Turks in Germany; Jews and Arabs in the Middle East.” 64 Clearly, other subaltern Others share similar relationships to other, more distant desert lands and wilderness landscapes, but Zipes’s analogies are flawed on several counts.

In the case of the conflicts between the first two groups cited, the element of violent conquest and the dispossession of lands at the heart of the American Indian-European immigrant “dispute” is absent: Jews and blacks, like Jews and Koreans, are engaged in a struggle for cultural, racial, economic, and social equity in territories to which they have been introduced as Others–either as slaves, immigrants, or refugees. In the German-Turkish situation, the “minority” group is the “alien element” or, as the German euphemism would have it, “guest workers.” None of these struggles involves legal agreements between sovereign nations–that is to say treaties between sovereign political entities–the terms of which have not been upheld by an outlaw state whose legitimacy as a “world power” is nevertheless recognized by the international community [End Page 369] .

As Seth Wolitz has stated in this regard, “the text can also be read allegorically as a version of the Israeli-Palestinian encounter between two subalterns squabbling over land which the ‘Gewittergoi’, the imperialist powers, can always regain and control.” 65 The problem with this allegory, though, is that the North American territories that function as the setting and backdrop for the territories at issue in the Indian-immigrant conflict have yet to be manumitted from colonialist bondage. The lands remain in control of the “imperialist power.”

Precisely this is central to understanding the double-edged ironies and conflicts addressed in Weisman und Rotgesicht. The setting involves a geographical site that is readily associated with the actual site of a massacre and, as such, the site itself is ambiguous: it signifies both a site of (ongoing) sanctity and one of (ongoing) desecration. If the parallel is to be drawn between the Jewish and American Indian subaltern situations, the course of history as well as the present state of affairs must be taken into account: the fact is that Hitler lost the war and the State of Israel was formed as partial reparation for the losses sustained by the Jewish population as a result. However, the United States government, even as it sought to help absorb the losses sustained by the Jewish population in Europe not only through its support of Israel, but by offering refuge to Jewish immigrants in territories seized from the indigenous populations, won its war against the Indians. 66 The crucial difference between a regime whose demise was rooted in genocide and one for whom genocide was its foundational principle and the prerequisite to its existence is elided by this analogy.

Moreover, at the level of sheer abstraction, the solidarity between subaltern groups that the Jewish-American tradition of “spoofing” Jewish-Indian relations seeks to evoke is marred by its unilateral initiative–emanating from the Jewish perspective in the context of a Judeo-Christian framework that demonstrates little regard for or knowledge of the cultural and religious world-views of Native Americans, either as a collective entity or as heterogeneous individual nations–each with its own relationship to specific geographic sites within the boundaries of occupied territories now defined as the United States.

The land, “the Wilderness” or “the Desert” which has come to signify a “wasteland” in the symbolic and spiritual orders of other peoples, has never been associated with anything but abundance and eternal sustenance for indigenous peoples because revelation is rooted in the life of reflection on and with the land, not in catastrophic upheaval or divine intervention. Vine Deloria explains the “problem” of misconstrued understandings of this relationship in this way:

Almost every tribal religion was based on land. . . . Some of the old chiefs felt that, because generations of their ancestors had been buried on the lands and because the sacred events of their religion had taken place on the lands, they [End Page 370] were obligated to maintain the tribal lands against new kinds of exploitation. . . . Especially among the Pueblos, Hopi, and Navajo, the lands of the creation and emergence traditions are easily identified and are regarded as places of utmost significance. . . . Government officials have ruthlessly disregarded the Indians’ pleas for the restoration of their most sacred lands, and the constant dispute between Indians and whites centers around this subject. 67

If anything sets the American Indian apart from other victims of genocide or oppression in this country, it is this:

Native Americans are not, in the strictest sense of the word, a “diasporic” people. 68 While the policies of Indian Removal certainly served to disperse, displace, disparage, and dislocate Native cultures and identities from coast to coast, imposing upon Native North American peoples conditions of existence that might be described as “diasporic” in a Judeo-Christian or postcolonialist context, I would caution against the appropriation of the diasporic metaphor with regard to the state of Native North America. The traditional Deuteronomic narrative of the Diaspora implies divine punishment in response to a breach of covenant. In order for a “diasporic” situation to prevail, the peoples of the diaspora must have entered into a contract with the divinely intervening deity. But indigenous peoples of this country stood in no such relationship to the Judeo-Christian God and his sovereign representatives on Earth. The notion of a “Native Diaspora” in the United States presupposes an adherence to the doctrine of Manifest Destiny as divine intervention on the part of the Judeo-Christian God in His effort to create “living space” or Lebensraum for His children–“chosen” and “unchosen” alike. Even if we were to accept the contemporary permutations of the concept in the postcolonialist attempt to subvert and decenter traditional narratives of nationalism and imperialism as these relate to identity formation and the location of culture, the diasporic metaphor is inapplicable because the peoples and lands at issue here have yet to be manumitted from neo-colonialist bondage.

Uprootedness, homelessness, exile–these are maladies forced upon Native North American populations by the invading Europeans. What Simone Weil has written about this affliction in reference to Euro-African relations in Africa applies equally to the situation on Turtle Island.

[T]he white man carries [uprootedness] about with him wherever he goes. The disease has even penetrated the heart of the African continent, which had for thousands of years, nevertheless, been made up of villages. These black people at any rate, when nobody came to massacre them, torture them, or reduce them to slavery, knew how to live happily on their land. Contact with us is making them lose the art. That ought to make us wonder whether even the [End Page 371] black man, although the most primitive of all colonized peoples, hadn’t after all more to teach us than to learn from us. 69

Native Americans have been “extirpated” as “savages” and as “barbarians” on their own soil. That soil has been contaminated by pestilence, poisons, toxins, oil spills, nuclear waste dumps and all the other deadly by-products Western “civilization” inevitably leaves as its legacy. Sacred sites have been effaced; graves have been robbed. Synagogues and churches can be rebuilt, but Mount Rushmore is not likely to be restored to its original glory by geological cosmetic surgery. Taken literally, James Young’s figurative language in “America’s Holocaust: Memory and the Politics of Identity,” is laced with mordant irony:

By themselves monuments are of little value, mere stones in the landscape. But as part of a nation’s rites or the objects of a people’s national pilgrimage, they are imbued with national soul and memory. For traditionally the state-sponsored memory of a national past aims to affirm the righteousness of a nation’s birth, even its divine election. The matrix of a nation’s monuments emplots the story of ennobling events, of triumphs over barbarism, and recalls the martyrdom of those who gave their lives in the struggle for national existence–who in the martyrological refrain, died so that a nation might live. In assuming the idealized forms and meanings assigned this era by the state, memorials tend to concretize particular historical interpretations. They suggest themselves in indigenous, even geological outcroppings in a national landscape; in time, such idealized memory grows as natural to the eye as the landscape in which it stands.” 70 [emphasis mine]

The irony of his statements is certainly not lost on Young, who concludes his discussion with a section titled “Against a Culture of Competing Catastrophes,” and states: “In the end we must recognize that memory cannot be divorced from the actions taken in its behalf, and that memory without consequences may even contain the seeds of its own destruction.” 71 The “national monument” at Mount Rushmore represents the geographic and symbolic site in which the principles of Manifest Destiny and the master race are literally set in stone. 72

Only when the sanctity in the hearts and minds of the indigenous population of this “vast, untamed wilderness” itself has been duly acknowledged–when the dominant culture finally comes to grips with the fact that the ground they walk upon is not like a temple to the American Indian–it is the temple–then, and only then, will the nature of the devastation and desecration be driven home to them.

Once that has been established, the essentially suicidal nature of Western intellectual endeavor will also become apparent. The savage–an entity reduced in the Western scheme of things to the level of “bare (and hence [End Page 372] disposable) life” on a par with the plant–reveals himself, in the Native American world-view, to be precisely that: nothing more and nothing less than the tree itself–equals in a covenant and an evolutionary chain that does not shackle or bind, but merely bonds. To the Native American sense and sensibility, the tree represents life itself, and there is no split between the life of the tree and the life of the human. They are holistically, historically, and happily related in the nexus of mutually sustainable symbiosis.

If, following Agamben, “homo sacer is life that may be killed but not sacrificed . . . life that may be killed by anyone without committing homicide,” then no crime has been committed in the American Holocaust, nor is the dearth of “academic moves,” “scholarly turns,” and “paradigmatic shifts” toward a fundamental rethinking and reshaping of American national identity of any consequence in global, local, or national terms. 73 There has been no “human” sacrifice in the conquest of the West. Nothing but the forest has been lost to the victor culture. But, if Native theorists, religious leaders, and activists who have survived the holocausts are correct in asserting, as they do, that the fate of the forest will be that of man, then the master race is, in fact, engaged in the specter of committing collective suicide–exercising the authority of the sovereign over life and death on all our behalf.

If we are to divert the disaster, Mount Rushmore must be placed on a par with burning synagogues, whose fires can never be extinguished, and with black churches in the South subjected to racially motivated acts of arson. If the “Jews are the Indians of Germany,” then Mount Rushmore is Bitburg, writ large and indelible, engraved not only in our collective memory, but spat on the very floor of the temple–a civic memorial to a people and a way of life sacrificed to someone else’s “God.” 74 But it is also here that the master race, ex altera terra, has signed and sealed its own fate on this continent as that of homo sacer:

A life that, excepting itself in double exclusion from the real context of both the profane and the religious forms of life, is defined solely by virtue of having entered into an intimate symbiosis with death without, nevertheless, belonging to the world of the deceased. 75

The stones speak volumes that continue to fall on the deaf ears of an American public more German than the Germans in its persistent refusal to come to terms with a “little matter of genocide,” choosing instead to adopt as its own the foundling stone of a historical marker–that coveted historical caesura everyone wants to have, but no one wants to own in the “Americanization of the Holocaust.” 76 But in the canyons of deep memory, the song of the stones still echoes and rings true for the three million survivors of the American Holocaust.

Lilian Friedberg is a bilingual published author and political activist with a master’s degree in the humanities from the University of Chicago and is currently a doctoral candidate in Germanic Studies at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
Notes

1. The reader of this paper is instructed to note that the linguistic and literary intent of the writer includes a deliberate transgression of traditional boundaries in scholarship. This paper thus combines and at the same time challenges elements of various genres: from personal narrative, to scholarly discourse, to critical analysis and creative writing in a parodic idiom that, at times, borders on the “sacrilegious.” It is written from the subject position of a German-Jewish-Native-American-(Anishinabe)-Female and, as a “cross-genred” literary experiment, seeks to reflect the cultural hybridity of its author.

2. Seth Wolitz, “From Parody to Redemption: George Tabori’s Weisman und Rotgesicht,” in Verkörperte Geschichtsentwürfe: George Taboris Theaterarbeit, ed. Peter Höyng (Tübingen: Francke Verlag, 1998) 151-76, 163.

3. Mark Slobin, “From Vilna to Vaudeville: Minikes and Among the Indians,” The Drama Review 24, no. 3 (September 1980): 18.

4. Raphael Seligmann, Mit beschränkter Hoffnung: Juden, Deutsche und Israelis (Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe, 1991), 97-8; cited in Sander L. Gilman, Jews in Today’s German Culture (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1995), 19.

5. Lucy Dawidowicz, The Holocaust and the Historians (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981), 17. In Dawidowicz’s earlier work The War against the Jews 1933-1945 (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1975), her discussion of the Madagascar Plan speaks in terms of the “Madagascar reservation . . . a reservation for Jews that would become truly their final destination” (150-66) [emphasis mine].

6. Cited in Peter Novik, The Holocaust in American Life (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1999), 200.

7. Novik, The Holocaust in American Life, 198.

8. See also Henry R. Huttenbach, “The Psychology and Politics of Genocide Denial: A Comparison of Four Case Studies,” in Studies in Comparative Genocide, eds. Levon Chorbajian and George Shirinian (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999), 216: “Denial has become an integral part of genocide; not to take this aspect into consideration is to fail to comprehend a major component of the dynamics of extermination.”

9. At the time of this writing, Finkelstein’s most recent work The Holocaust Industry: Reflections on the Exploitation of Jewish Suffering was scheduled for publication by Verso in July 2000. Citations here are from an 11 June 2000 review by Bryan Appleyard published in the online version of The Sunday Times (http://www.Sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/06/11/stirevnws02006.html).

10. Novik, The Holocaust in American Life, 13.

11. Saul Friedländer, Memory, History, and the Extermination of the Jews of Europe (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993), 23.

12. Ernst Reinhard Piper, ed., Historikerstreit: Die Dokumentation der Konstervers um die Einzigartigkeit der national-sozialistischen Judenvernichtung (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1987); in English, James Knowlton and Truett Cates, trans., Forever in the Shadow of Hitler? Original Documents of the Historikerstreit, the Controversy Concerning the Singularity of the Holocaust (Atlantic Highlands nj: Humanities Press, 1993).

13. Gerald Vizenor, Manifest Manners: Narrative on Postindian Survivance (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1994), 4.

14. George Tabori, “Hamlet in Blue,” Theatre Quarterly 20 (1975): 117-32.

15. Henryk Broder, “Die Germanisierung des Holocaust,” in Volk und Wahn (Munich: Goldman Verlag, 1996), 214. English-language translations of “The Germanization of the Holocaust” and other essays by the same author are forthcoming in Lilian M. Friedberg and Sander L. Gilman, eds., To Each His Own: Selected Essays by German-Jewish Essayist Henryk Broder. Indeed, as Broder’s essay implies, a veritable cottage industry has developed around the Holocaust. Titles like Edward Alexander’s “Stealing the Holocaust,” (Midstream [November 1980]) reflect the lunatic proportions that characterize the debates. See also Norman Finkelstein at note 9 above.

16. James Axtell, Beyond 1492: Encounters in Colonial North America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), 262-63.

17. Finkelstein’s article was subsequently reprinted–together with an equally scathing critique of Goldhagen’s thesis and methodology by Ruth Bettina Birn, a recognized authority on the archives Goldhagen cites as sources for his research–in A Nation on Trial: The Goldhagen Thesis and Historical Truth (New York: Henry Holt, 1998).

18. William Greider, One World, Ready or Not: The Manic Logic of Global Capitalism (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1997), 368.

19. Dominick LaCapra, Representing the Holocaust: History, Theory, Trauma (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1996), 57.

20. Steven Katz, “The Uniqueness of the Holocaust: The Historical Dimension,” in Is the Holocaust Unique?: Perspectives on Comparative Genocide, ed. Alan Rosenbaum (Boulder CO: Westview Press, 1996), 21.

21. See Katz’s chapter on “The Depopulation of the New World in the Sixteenth Century” in The Holocaust in Historical Context: Volume I: The Holocaust and Mass Death before the Modern Age (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994), 87-91.

22. Katz, The Holocaust in Historical Context, 59.

23. Raphael Lemkin, Axis Rule in Occupied Europe (Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1944), cited in Katz, Holocaust in Historical Context, 125. Lemkin’s definition has been reprinted in most standard works on genocide. For the reader who may be unfamiliar with the text of Article 2 of the UN Convention on Genocide adopted by the General Assembly in November 1948, which was based on Lemkin’s original delineation of the term and the crime’s parameters, I reprint it here: “In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:

1. Killing members of the group.

2. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group.

3. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

4. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group.

5. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. (cited in Katz, Holocaust in Historical Context, 125)

Ward Churchill’s A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492-Present (San Francisco: City Lights Books, 1997) firmly establishes, point by point, the manner and degree to which policies and actions on the part of the U.S. government and its people conform to the definition of genocide as outlined by Lemkin and by the UN convention.

24. Lord Jeffrey Amherst, cited in Churchill, Matter of Genocide, 154.

25. David E. Stannard, American Holocaust (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992), xii.

26. While sources may disagree on the exact wording of Sheridan’s now infamous statement, the sentiment, regardless of wording, is always the same. My source here is The Oxford Dictionary of Quotations (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1955), 499. The examples cited here reflect but the tip of the iceberg in a documented litany of official and unofficial statements issued by governmental authorities and representatives of the people of the United States, which express clear and unequivocal intent to exterminate the entire indigenous population of North America.

27. Yehuda Bauer, “Comparison of Genocides” in Chorbajian and Shirinian, Studies in Comparative Genocide, 38.

28. Lenore A. Stiffarm with Phil Lane, “The Demography of Native North America,” in The State of Native America: Genocide, Colonization, and Resistance, ed. Annette Jaimes (Boston: South End Press, 1992), 33.

29. Churchill, Matter of Genocide, 63.

30. Ibid., 64.

31. Ibid., 147. See also Reginal Horsman, Race and Manifest Destiny: The Origins of American Racial Anglo-Saxonism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981); Frank Parella, “Lebensraum and Manifest Destiny: A Comparative Study in the Justification of Expansion” (master’s thesis, Georgetown University, 1950); Albert K. Weinberg, Manifest Destiny: A Study of Nationalist Expansion in American History (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1935); Frederick Merk, Manifest Destiny and Mission in American History: A Reinterpretation (New York: Knopf, 1963).

32. John Toland, paraphrased in Stannard, American Holocaust, 153.

33. Katz, Holocaust in Historical Context, 97.

34. Cited in Richard Drinnon, Facing West: The Metaphysics of Indian-Hating and Empire Building (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1980), 232.

35. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1973), ix. Arendt also identifies the doctrine of the master race as an element of the same “subterranean stream,” but her American exceptionalism renders her comments in this regard of little use to an analysis of the notion of “one nation under God” as a euphemistic veil for the concept of a master race. See Arendt, Origins, 152, 206.

36. Drinnon, Facing West, 463.

37. Ibid., 463.

38. Ibid., 465.

39. Ibid., 462.

40. Ibid., 463.

41. A discussion of the role Christian ideals played in the genocide of both the Jews and the indigenous populations of the Americas oversteps the scope of this study. Elie Wiesel, unaware perhaps of his own profundity in this matter, sums up the gist of the argument quite well when he states: “All the killers were Christian. . . . The Nazi system was the consequence of a movement of ideas and followed a strict logic; it did not arise in a void but had its roots deep in a tradition that prophesied it, prepared for it, and brought it to maturity. That tradition was inseparable from the past of Christian, civilized Europe” (in Irving Abrahamson, ed., Against Silence: The Voice and Vision of Elie Wiesel [New York: Holocaust Library, 1985], 33).

42. Stannard, American Holocaust, 13.

43. Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, trans. Daniel Heller-Roazen (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1998), 114.

44. Churchill, Matter of Genocide, 229.

45. Stannard, American Holocaust, x.

46. See also Terrence Des Pres’s (The Survivor: An Anatomy of Life in the Death Camps [Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976], 207) assertion that “[the survivor] is the first of civilized men to live beyond the compulsions of culture” [emphasis mine].

47. Ward Churchill, “A Summary of Arguments Against the Naming of a University Residence Hall After Clinton M. Tyler” (report prepared at the request of the assistant vice chancellor for academic services, University of Colorado at Boulder, July 1981, cited in Annette Jaimes, ed., The State of Native America, 5).

48. Novik, Holocaust in American Life, 9.

49. See note 9 above.

50. Eduardo and Bonnie Duran, Native American Postcolonial Psychology (New York: SUNY Press, 1995), 40.

51. Winona LaDuke, All Our Relations: Native Struggles for Land and Life (Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 1999), 148.

52. Novik, Holocaust in American Life, 9.

53. See note 9 above.

54. Winona LaDuke, Last Standing Woman (Stillwater, MN: Voyageur Press, 1997), 127. LaDuke’s reference here is to the state of Minnesota. Her discussion centers on the particularly virulent strain of metaphysical Indian-hating that permeates those areas in direct proximity to reservations.

55. Annette Jaimes, “Sand Creek–The Morning After,” in Jaimes, The State of Native America, 8. A detailed discussion of the “legal” means employed by the U.S. government in outlawing and criminalizing various elements of native culture far exceeds the scope of this study. Churchill states, in this regard,

It may seem curious that American Indians, who had mandatorily become U.S. citizens by 1924, should “need a special statute passed in the late 1970’s [The American Indian Religious Freedom Act, 1978] to be able to utilize the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment to the Constitution.” A number of statutes and regulations promulgated during the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, however, effectively criminalized a range of indigenous spiritual practices extending from the Lakota sun dance to the potlatch ceremonies of the nations of the Pacific Northwest. Further, given that many native traditions embody a concept of sacred geography, loss of lands had by the late twentieth century seriously curtailed site-specific practices of Indian spirituality (Ward Churchill, cited in Jaimes, The State of Native North America, 17).

Native and non-Native scholars have conducted a substantial amount of research on these issues.

56. The “New Age” spiritual movement’s fascination and appropriation of things Indian also presents a mirror image of the “contemporary fascination for things Jewish in Germany.” See article of the same title by Jack Zipes, in Sander Gilman and Karen Remmler, eds., Reemerging Jewish Culture in Germany: Life and Literature since 1989 (New York: New York University Press, 1994), 15-45; cf. Wendy Rose, “The Great Pretenders: Further Reflections on Whiteshamanism,” in Jaimes, The State of Native North America, 403-21.

57. LaDuke, All Our Relations, 5.

58. Ibid., 1.

59. Ibid., 1.

60. Des Pres, The Survivor, 207.

61. Vine Deloria, For this Land: Writings on Religion in America (New York: Routledge, 1999), 130.

62. Jack Zipes, “Contemporary Fascination,” 36.

63. Lilian Friedberg, “Mule Minus Forty Million Acres: Topographies of Geographic Disorientation and Redface Minstrelsy in George Tabori’s Weisman und Rotgesicht” (master’s thesis, University of Chicago, May 2000).

64. Zipes, “Contemporary Fascination,” 36.

65. Wolitz, “From Parody to Redemption,” 166.

66. Ward Churchill, speaking at the University of Chicago on 21 January 2000 made this point in his lecture on “A Little Matter of Genocide: Holocaust and Denial in the Americas 1492-Present.”

67. Deloria, For this Land, 127.

68. Any significant discussion of indigenous peoples and their relationship to the lands currently inhabited by other diasporic peoples is glaringly absent, for example, in Michael Galchnisky’s discussion of diasporism with regard to multicultural identity in the United States. See “Scattered Seeds: A Dialogue of Diasporas,” in Insider/Outsider: American Jews and Multiculturalism, eds. David Biale, Michael Galchinsky, and Susan Heschel (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998), 185-212.

69. Weil, The Need for Roots, 77.

70. James E. Young, “America’s Holocaust: Memory and the Politics of Identity,” in The Americanization of the Holocaust, ed. Helene Flanzbaum (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999), 69.

71. Ibid., 82.

72. While opinions in Native communities are divided with regard to the “Rushmore alternative”–the “Crazy Horse Monument”–it is the view of many that this monumental undertaking, initiated by European immigrants, constitutes an equally atrocious assault on the land, which only adds insult to injury, especially since Crazy Horse, throughout his life, had insisted that no graphic representations of his person be made.

73. Agamben, Homo Sacer, 101-3.

74. This is a reference to the international scandal surrounding then President Ronald Reagan’s conduct at the cemetery in Bitburg, Germany, where former SS soldiers are buried and were commemorated in 1986. For a more detailed discussion of the event and its meaning, see also David Singer, ed, Bitburg in Moral and Political Perspective (Bloomington: University Press of Indiana, 1986) and Ilya Levkov, ed., Bitburg and Beyond: Encounters in American, German, and Jewish History (New York: Shapolsky, 1987).

75. Agamben, Homo Sacer, 100.

76. Russel Means, 12 October 1992, American Indian Movement:

“All my life, I’ve had to listen to rhetoric about the United States being a model of freedom and democracy, the most uniquely enlightened and humanitarian country in history, a ‘nation of laws’ which, unlike others, has never pursued policies of conquest and aggression. I’m sure you’ve heard it before. It’s official ‘truth’ in the United States. It’s what is taught to schoolchildren and it’s the line peddled to the general public. Well, I’ve got a hot news flash for everybody here. It’s a lie. The whole thing’s a lie, and it always has been. Leaving aside the obvious points which could be raised to disprove it by blacks and Chicanos and Asian immigrants right here in North America–not to mention the Mexicans, the Nicaraguans, the Guatemalans, the Puerto Ricans, the Hawaiians, the Filipinos, the Samoans, the Tamarros of Guam, the Marshall Islanders, the Koreans, the Vietnamese, the Cubans, the Dominicans, the Granadans, the Libyans, the Panamanians, the Iraqis, and a few dozen other peoples out there who’ve suffered American invasions and occupations first hand–there’s a little matter of genocide that’s got to be taken into account right here at home. I’m talking about the genocide which has been perpetrated against American Indians, a genocide that began the instant the first of Europe’s boat people washed up on the beach of Turtle Island, a genocide that’s continuing right now, at this moment. Against Indians, there’s not a law the United States hasn’t broken, not a Crime Against Humanity it hasn’t committed, and it’s still going on” (cited in Churchill, Matter of Genocide, frontispiece).

Connecting The Dots To Obama’s Hate of Netanyahu, Israel, and Jews

richardboydenreport

Homosexuality, Pederasty, & Occultism’s Combined Influence On the Third Reich’s And Islam’s Hate of Jews

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu once upon a time posted on his web page a “warning letter” from me about Jew hater President Bill Clinton before Clinton came to Israel.

Again I feel the need to again warn you “Bibi”…you who I admire and respect more then many in Israel let alone most Jews here in America. What I am sharing I believe is necessary for you to include in what you say to the “cowardly congress” of this country, a sad collection of Gentiles and Jews who have allowed a despot inspired by the throne of hell itself to overthrow the laws of this land and who should of initiated impeachment proceedings against the most immoral, decadent, filthy, and spiritually reprobate minded soul to ever enter the doors of the White House.

To “condense/abridge the dots”…

View original post 810 more words

%d bloggers like this: