richardboydenreport

Home » Articles posted by Richard Boyden

Author Archives: Richard Boyden

Prominent Pagan Black Witch States Abortion Is A “Sacrament”!

Image result for Ginette Paris witch

From The Sacrament of Abortion by Ginette Paris

“I have drawn inspiration throughout this book from a guiding image, the Artemis of Greek mythology (known to the Romans as Diana, the Huntress). She is an untamed Goddess, a champion of what we would think of today as ecological values … her myth is full of what appears to be the same kinds of contradictions that abound in considerations of abortion. Artemis is both protector of wild animals and a hunter who kills them with unerring aim…” (p. 1)

“The same goddess thus offers protection and also death to women, children, and animals. Why these apparent contradictions … personified in a feminine divinity? Is it a way of saying that a woman’s protective power cannot function properly if she does not also possess full power, namely, the power over death as well as life? Her image belongs to us as well as to antiquity, because like all fundamental images of the human experience, which C.G. Jung called ‘archetypes,’ she never really ages but reappears in different forms and different symbols … She encourages us to become more aware of the power of death, its inescapable nature, and its necessary role in a living ecology. Abortion is about love, life, and death.” (p. 2)

“The collective unconscious has always used different ways to reduce the population when resources and space are lacking or when the social climate deteriorates.” (p. 26)

“Artemis had a reputation for liking bloody sacrifices, including human ones … a practice that has given paganism such a bad name…. The story of Artemis claiming Iphigena as a sacrifice can be told and understood in more than one way … in one, Iphigenia is a victim, offered in sacrifice on the altar of Artemis; in the other Iphigenia becomes a heroine, and sacrifice takes on a different meaning. Since abortion is a kind of sacrifice, I believe an exploration of this myth may open up fresh avenues of thought.” (p. 34)

“From a pagan point of view, it is quite stupid and even absurd to sacrifice a mother for the sake of a newborn, because the child obviously needs her … Artemis, who personifies respect for animal life, accepts the necessity of the hunt, but only if the rules and the absolving rituals are observed. In most Goddess religions a similar reasoning is applied to the fetus and the newborn. It is morally acceptable that a woman who gives life may also destroy life under certain circumstances …” (p. 53)

“Our attitudes toward abortion are subconsciously stamped by Judeo-Christian values, even among those people who consider themselves completely liberated from them. We are now on the threshold of a liberalization of attitude toward abortion in many ways comparable to the freeing up of sexual attitudes thirty years ago.” (p. 5)

“Abraham’s bloodthirsty God had been encouraging human sacrifice long enough for the patriarch to believe that the offering of his only son would be pleasing to Him … When he restrains Abraham’s arm, Jehovah states that he doesn’t want to be honored in that way any more: this scene marks an evolution in Judeo-Christian mythology.” (p. 37)

“Paganism was discredited by the image of an innocent child being dragged by evil pagans to an altar to be sacrificed to a cruel female Goddess, as if God hadn’t also demanded the sacrifice and crucifixion of his only son.” (p. 41)

“Judeo-Christian mythology has had the major influence on our Western culture for over two thousand years, providing the ideas, values, and symbolic images. Can we erase two thousand years of monotheistic influence by dropping all religious practice and declaring ourselves free of our parents’ faith? Certainly not as has been proved by our sudden awakening to ecological values. We’re only beginning to understand how a religion which strips nature of its sacredness so as to place everything sacred in one God (whose realm is not of this world) can be dangerous to trees, animals, oceans, forests, and body-consciousness, all of which were considered receptacles of the divine in polytheistic antiquity.” (p. 4)

“…there is more than one way to define morality, human dignity, children’s rights, and the collective responsibility for life and death issues. It is also clear that all of this is intimately connected with global ecology.” (p. 6)

“…we must constantly monitor the values attached to shame, as we educate the next generation, so that it can be put aside when it no longer expresses our ideals… “When an abortion is necessary, not only should there be no shame but there should be a new consensus that to have a child who cannot adequately be cared for is shameful.” (p.106)

“It is not immoral to choose abortion; it is simply another kind of morality, a pagan one. It is time to stop being defensive about it, time to point an accusatory finger at the other camp and denounce its own immoral stance.” (p. 56)

“As Artemis might kill a wounded animal rather than allow it to limp along miserably, so a mother wishes to spare the child a painful destiny.” (p. 56)

“… men who decide whether or not to kill in war then dare to talk about crime and murder when a woman sacrifices a fetus no bigger than a raisin and less conscious than a chicken…. The beings sacrificed in abortions do not suffer as do the victims of war and ecological disaster…. War is sanctified … by our religious leaders. But let a woman decide to abort a fetus that doesn’t even have the neurological apparatus to register suffering, and people are shocked.” (p. 25)

“It’s rare for a woman to choose abortion because in some way she dislikes the fetus. She sacrifices it for the sake of something she judges at this moment to be more important, whether it be her existing children … or her own physical, economic, or psychological survival, or the fate of the planet.” (p. 95)

“This same quality allows us to visualize a world of increasing respect for children, a world in which one can occasionally resort to abortion when it is necessary to sacrifice the fetus to a higher cause, namely, the love of children and the refusal to see them suffer.” (p. 107)

“Some values are worth the sacrifice … Abortion always has been and continues to be another way of choosing death over life.” (p. 51)

“… the return of the ancient Goddess Artemis invites us to imagine a new allocation of life and death powers between men and women, and allocation that allows men to appreciate the cost of a life and women to make decisions based on their mother-knowledge.” (p. 27)

“One must preserve in one’s self … an intact strength, inviolable and radically feminine; this is the Artemesian part of the anima which guards the untamed zone of our psyche, without which we risk becoming over-domesticated human beings, too easily touchable.” (p. 107)

“Obviously, everyone has a right to his or her religious beliefs, but what if mine are Pagan?” (p. 57)

“Our culture needs new rituals as well as laws to restore abortion to its sacred dimension, which is both terrible and necessary.” (p. 92)

“Abortion is a sacrifice to Artemis. Abortion as a sacrament for the gift of life to remain pure.” (p. 107

NEW CRIMES DEFINED AS “TERRORISM”

2005 Was when this was published but now you can see how far this has come up to this day! Exposure of those who are the enemies of this country cloaking themselves as being “one of us” while planning to murder us.

 

NEW CRIMES DEFINED AS “TERRORISM”

For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth.  Luke 21:35

“The Imminent Military Takeover of the United States” was a 1996 speech by the Rev. Jim Ammerman to the Prophecy Club of Topeka, Kansas. In this videotaped presentation, Ammerman warned that President Clinton, aided by masses of foreign troops already on American soil, would soon put the nation under martial law, unless God intervened to save America.  Now that the Clinton administration is safely out of power, most conservative Christians believe the danger is past and the United States is experiencing the promised national revival under the “born-again” administration of George W. Bush.  With their guard down, few Christians suspect that the snare of which Ammerman spoke is about to spring, not only on America, but upon the world as prophesied by Jesus Christ in Luke 21.

The Uniting and Strengthening America Act of 2001 was described as “A bill to deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.” Sponsored by Sen. Thomas Daschle, the USA Act passed the Senate on October 11 without amendment by a Yea-Nay Vote of 96 – 1.  On Sunday, October 14, the House of Representatives voted 339 – 79 to approve the USA Act.  This piece of legislation, which gives broad surveillance powers to the federal government to combat terrorism, may be found at the Library of Congress; then go to SEARCH BILL TEXT page and insert S. 1510 in “2. Bill Number”.

During the Senate debate on S. 1510, the lone dissenting voter, Sen. Russell Feingold [D-WI] revealed that that the senators were allowed insufficient time to read, understand and debate the legislation. The tentatively scheduled debate was moved from Thursday, October 11, to Tuesday, October 9, and restrictions on debate/amendments were the order of the day:

“But there has not been an open process in the Judiciary Committee, much less the full Senate, for Senators to have an opportunity to raise concerns about how far this bill goes in giving powers to law enforcement to wiretap or investigate law-abiding U.S. citizens. As of the end of last week, we were told the bill would probably come up on Thursday of this week. Today the request is made to bring it up immediately under extremely restrictive [[Page S10364]] terms for debate that would not allow any opportunity for amendments other than the one the majority leader mentioned. Senators must have the opportunity to read and debate this 200-plus page bill and offer amendments. It does not have to take weeks or even days, but it cannot be done before most Senators have even had a chance to read and understand the far-reaching changes this bill makes on our laws.”

Senator Feingold’s pleas for a full debate went unheeded and three amendments he proposed to safeguard precious liberties were rejected by the Senate.  Similar protests against the anti-terrorist legislation have issued forth from the conservative, libertarian and liberal sectors of American society.  In Washington, a hastily organized In Defense of Freedom Coalition appealed to Congress to exercise caution and presented “a list of principles they hope Congress will follow when weighing laws in response to…attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.”

    “Our overriding concern is that the country may move too far too quickly without a good plan, just for the appearance of doing something,” says Bradley Jansen, an analyst at the Free Congress Foundation.
    “Lori Cole of the Eagle Forum says she’s worried about a national I.D. card, tentatively endorsed by Rep. Mary Bono (R-California) during a recent newspaper interview.
    “We are greatly afraid that in the name of anti-terrorism, they’re going to suggest bad ideas,” says Cole. “Bad ideas before are bad ideas now.”

Cato Institute’s position paper on the recent legislation, Watching You: Systematic Federal Surveillance of Ordinary Americans, concludes:

“Having exposed most areas of American life to ongoing government scrutiny and recording, Congress is now poised to expand and universalize federal tracking of citizen life. The inevitable consequence of such constant surveillance, however, is metastasizing government control over society. If that happens, our government will have perverted its most fundamental mission and destroyed the privacy and liberty that it was supposed to protect.”

The American Civil Liberties Union criticized the Senate bill saying it “poses significantly more danger to civil liberties than the measure adopted earlier this week by the House Judiciary Committee… Most Americans do not recognize that Congress has just passed a bill that would give the government expanded power to invade our privacy, imprison people without due process and punish dissent.”

A similar bill, the “PATRIOT Act” [H.R.2975] — standing for Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism — was passed in the House of Representatives.  Like S. 1510, the misnamed PATRIOT Act gave the State unprecedented surveillance powers over the American people in the name of the War on Terrorism.  PATRIOT was merged into the Senate Bill and, on October 24, the full House of Representatives adopted the USA Patriot Act (HR 3162) by a vote of 357 to 66.

UPDATE:  The next day, October 25, the Senate passed the final piece of legislation with one dissenting vote (Feingold) and almost negligible news coverage, which was diverted to the Anthrax scare [see below] and war in Afghanistan.  On October 26, 2001, President Bush signed the USA PATRIOT Act into law.  The U.S. Congress used highly irregular procedures in passing this legislation.  Both House and Senate were forced to vote on legislation which members did not have the opportunity to read.  House/Senate offices were closed during a highly exploited Anthrax scare and staff were not able to access their papers to fully prepare for this important vote.  Regular order was rejected which the ACLU rightfully declares “an offense to the thoughtful legislative procedures necessary to protect the Constitution and Bill of Rights at a time when the rights of so many Americans are being jeopardized.”  The hasty procedure forced upon the Senate and House went as follows:

“After bypassing a Judiciary Committee mark-up, a few Senators and their staffs met behind closed doors, on October 12, 2001 to craft a bill. The full Senate was presented with anti-terrorism legislation in a take-it-or-leave-it fashion with little opportunity for input or review. No conference committee met to reconcile the differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill.”“Once again, a bill is coming to the House floor that bears little resemblance to the significantly modified version of the bill unanimously adopted by the House Judiciary Committee on October 3, 2001. No conference committee met to reconcile the differences between the House and Senate versions of the bill.”

With the powers of the federal government now dangerously expanded, we may expect that every American will henceforth be placed under surveillance. Those who publicly question or disagree with government activities and policies will be subject to the unconstitutional provisions of this Act, from which such persons will no longer have legal recourse.

Among the more flagrant violations of constitutional rights contained in the USA/Patriot Act of 2001 are also those which:

    • Permit the Attorney General to indefinitely incarcerate or detain non-citizens based on mere suspicion, and to deny re-admission to the United States of non-citizens (including lawful permanent residents) for engaging in speech protected by the First Amendment.
    • Minimize judicial supervision of telephone and Internet surveillance by law enforcement authorities in anti-terrorism investigations and in routine criminal investigations unrelated to terrorism.
    • Expand the ability of the government to conduct secret searches — again in anti-terrorism investigations and in routine criminal investigations unrelated to terrorism.
    • Give the Attorney General and the Secretary of State the power to designate domestic groups as terrorist organizations and block any non-citizen who belongs to them from entering the country. Under this provision the payment of membership dues is a deportable offense.
    • Grant the FBI broad access to sensitive medical, financial, mental health, and educational records about individuals without having to show evidence of a crime and without a court order.
    • Lead to large-scale investigations of American citizens for “intelligence” purposes and use of intelligence authorities to by-pass probable cause requirements in criminal cases.
    • Put the CIA and other intelligence agencies back in the business of spying on Americans by giving the Director of Central Intelligence the authority to identify priority targets for intelligence surveillance in the United States.
    • Allow searches of highly personal financial records without notice and without judicial review based on a very low standard that does not require probable cause of a crime or even relevancy to an ongoing terrorism investigation.
    • Allow student records to be searched based on a very low standard of relevancy to an investigation.
    • Create a broad new definition of “domestic terrorism” that could sweep in people who engage in acts of political protest and subject them to wiretapping and enhanced penalties.

 

THE IMMINENT MILITARY TAKEOVER OF THE U.S.

Consider that the grandfather and great grandfather of President Bush were directors of the London-affiliated New York banking house of Brown Brothers-Harriman and various fronts which funded and directed the military-industrial complex behind Hitler and the Nazi revolution [See The Rise of the Fourth Reich], and that the president’s father, George Herbert Walker Bush is presently a paid senior adviser to the Carlyle Group, a Washington-based investment firm and the 11th largest defense contractor in the nation, which also shares joint investments with the bin Laden family, and that President George W. Bush has also been a business partner, through his oil drilling company, Arbusto Energy, with Osama bin Laden and his father.

Consider also that the terrorist event of September 11 has the signature of being an “inside job,” planned and executed by U.S. intelligence, that the only logical explanation for the numerous evidentiary discrepancies is that the planes involved were controlled by advanced robotics and remote-control technology rather than suicidal hijackers, and that this domestically orchestrated catastrophic event has brought forth from the United States government Hitlerian decrees which nullify the Bill of Rights.

Considering all of the evidence of a globally-planned overthrow of the U.S. Constitution, conservative Christians will soon have to face the fact that America is not on the threshold of a national revival, but instead is about to become a military police state—in direct violation of the Posse-Comitatus Act of 1878 which prohibits the use of the military in any action against the civilian population of the United States.  With the Chinese military controlling the Panama Canal and stationed at our borders, having access to NAFTA Corridors throughout America, and NATO dispatched German AWACS [Airborne Warning and Control System] surveillance aircraft deployed over U.S. skies for support of anti-terrorist operations here, America is poised for a military takeover once the president signs away our Bill of Rights.

Please see: The Coming American Holocaust
WHAT NEXT?

What would be the logical next step toward reducing the U.S. to a police state? Watchman Ricardo Lopez provides insight:

“Foreign troops stationed in the U.S. and Mexico and German Luftwaffe (Air Force) jets flying around the American Southwest from Alamogordo, New Mexico will undoubtedly be utilized to smash and round up anti-government militias, menacing street gangs, and patriotic citizens who’ll refuse to surrender their national sovereignty.” [R. Lopez, 10/16/01-What’s Next?]

The real global terrorists must disarm the U.S. citizenry before a military takeover can occur.  A formidable threat needs to be “perceived” and feared by the masses in order to justify extraordinary measures for law enforcement authorities to deal harshly with the perceived terrorists.   Already rumblings that the next terror event would be of a biological nature are being fulfilled on Capitol Hill.

*Anthrax Exposures to Close Capitol Hill*

Oct. 17 —   The House of Representatives will be closed for at least five days so that half of the Capitol complex can be swept for the presence of potentially deadly anthrax spores, Speaker Dennis Hastert announced Wednesday. Hastert said the closure was prompted by the discovery of the bacteria in the ventilation system of the Senate and in a Capitol mailroom. The shutdown came after 29 employees at a Senate office building tested positive for exposure to anthrax as a result of a letter containing a “very potent form” of the bacteria that was sent to Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle’s office.” [ Ed. note: Sen. Tom Daschle sponsored the USA Act of 2001 in the United States Senate.]

BIO-PROPAGANDA

Not that the pathological danger of a biological scare must be warranted by scientific facts.  One biologist has created a web site to educate the public on the facts about biological warfare which are grossly exaggerated by the mainstream media.  Interestingly, Gary Novak states that no one except the United States and Russia is producing anthrax spores in the powdered form necessary for use as a biological weapon, and even in the event that anthrax is released on a large population, only a few dozen people would contract the disease.

The Dark Cellars of Government: A Biologist’s Perspective    “Propaganda on biological weapons including anthrax originates in the dark cellars of government for the purpose of swaying the public for increased police powers. A terrorist threat is hyped or contrived, while military research on contagious diseases is concealed.”

Anthrax As Disinformation

    “Biowarfare is promoted through a combination of ignorance and propaganda. The researchers, who should know better and often do, are getting paid to produce the agents, so they do not want to admit the futility of it. The nonresearchers cannot realistically evaluate the claims, and they have propaganda motives. They want to militarize society, and scare tactics go a long ways in that direction.
    “The point here is not that large countries cannot make a lot of persons miserable with biological weapons. It’s that the small countries and terrorists cannot do so on their own; and it cannot be done on a large scale and in some magical way as described in the media.
    “Numerous persons have asked me how I interpret recent events. I think recent events substantiate my statements to the nth degree. Only half a dozen persons have been stricken by anthrax instead of the millions which authorities were predicting upon a terrorist attack. It shows that anthrax is almost impossible to use effectively.
    “The question is who succeeded in converting it to a dry powder. Certainly bin Laden could not have. It must have been some country.
    “The field tests of white powders are not credible. Anthrax powder is gray or brown, not white.”

The real warfare against America has been on the psychological level rather than biological.  According to Media Rant-‘100% Chance of Bioattack in the US’, the source of the bio-warfare propaganda is the U.S. Defense Department in partnership with two private enterprises, Bio Port and Global Options, which manufacture anthrax and paranoia respectively:

    “Former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. William J. Crowe Jr. was part of the crew that sold Saddam Hussein the deadly means to wage war with anthrax germs…
    “Not only is it disturbing that such a means of mass destruction was provided to Saddam Hussein (and who knows how many others) by our own government, it is equally disturbing to consider that retired Admiral William J Crowe Jr. is now in a position to reap profits from the sale of anthrax vaccine to the US Department of Defense. Or, one shudders to think, in a position to perhaps prevent the manufacture of the vaccine.
     “Crowe is on the board of directors and owns a 13% share of the Lansing, Michigan-based BioPort Corporation, the only company in the United States licensed to make a vaccine for anthrax. His 13% share ensures he will make a tidy profit from any sale of anthrax vaccine to the government. However, and this is what disturbs me most, BioPort has not produced a single drop of vaccine since they purchased Michigan Biologic Products Institute from the State of Michigan in 1998. In the meantime the Defense Department advanced BioPort $18 million in 1999 and another $24 million in 2000.    “Admiral Crowe is also an advisor to Global Options LLC, ‘an international crisis management firm based in Washington’. Their web site (http://www.globalops.com) contains the slogan, ‘The Corporate Equalizer’.
    “Also on the advisory board for Global Options is former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, R. James Woolsey.
   “The chairman and CEO of Global Options is Neil C. Livingstone, one of the people quoted in a 11 September 2001 article published by the Boston Globe after the attacks on the World Trade Center towers and the Pentagon. He was quoted as saying, ‘I think we are at war. I liken this to Pearl Harbor.’
   “The President and every talking head at every major media outlet repeated this theme for days after the attacks. Is there a connection? Or, would we all have come to this same conclusion?”

There is a similar expose on The Great Anthrax Stock Swindle.  Both reports are valuable and should be read in their entirety.
NEXT ON THE *MOST WANTED* TERRORIST LIST

A CNN anchorman stated early the morning of October 17 that there was no known connection between the Capitol Hill bio-terror attack and Osama bin Laden.  Later in the day, CNN analyst Greta van Susteren interviewed national correspondent Eileen O’Connor who suggested *domestic terrorists* like militia and anti-abortionists as likely suspects in the Capitol Hill bio-event:

CNN THE POINT WITH GRETA VAN SUSTEREN [selected excerpt]THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

ANNOUNCER: THE POINT: *Tracking the Terrorists, The World’s Most Wanted.*

ANNOUNCER: Where did it come from? And who is responsible?

ANNOUNCER: Tonight, the anthrax terror that has a nation on edge. And what has history taught us? Could the cause of the anthrax scare be domestic?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: There are a lot of people who still don’t like the United States, and some of them are right here within this country.

ANNOUNCER: How a national scare evolved.  THE POINT: *Tracking The Terrorists: The World’s Most Wanted.*

Now from Washington, Greta Van Susteren.

GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, HOST: Now we know what to watch for. I took a good, long look and you will probably want to, as well. Authorities today made public the similar envelopes, which contained anthrax, received on Capitol Hill and at NBC News in New York. CNN national correspondent Eileen O’Connor has more on the envelopes, plus today’s latest developments in the anthrax story.

VAN SUSTEREN: You know, the — there’s — you’ve said in your piece that there’s no — that they’re not focused on a particular group, that nobody has been ruled out. Who is in the university of possibilities according to these investigators?

O’CONNOR: Well, there’s a lot of international terrorist groups, but there’s a lot of domestic terrorist groups.

VAN SUSTEREN: Like?

O’CONNOR: Like, for instance, white supremacist group, anti-abortion rights groups. There’s also left wing groups. There could be people who are militia groups and others. There also could be just a person out there perhaps deranged who has a particular ax to grind, a person like the convicted Unabomber, Ted Kaczynski.

On October 6, the day before the Capitol Hill spectacle, the British press published an article suggesting that a future bio-terrror event ought to be blamed on the militias. It seems the militia movement have been under investigation by the FBI for threatening to use biological weapons against the global conspirators.  The article in the UK Herald ominously portends that these armed patriots will be next on the most wanted list of terrorists.  Christians also received dishonorable mention in the article which, notably, was authored by a descendant of the Merovingian “Bruce” lineage.  The profile of the militia movement presented in the very loaded UK article is that of neo-Nazi Aryan race bigots. And doubt is cast upon the constitutionality of the right to bear arms, as if the jury is still out on the 225 year old Constitution:

Backwoods militias suspected of being behind biowar threat

    “THE FBI’s domestic terrorism unit is investigating the possible role of illegal militia groups in the spate of anthrax outbreaks in Florida and New York.
    “Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma bomber who killed 168 people when he blew up a federal building in 1995, was a supporter of one such group, the National Alliance.
    “Others have threatened to use biological weapons, including anthrax, botulism, and ricin, in their struggle against what they see as a global conspiracy between the US administration and the United Nations to disarm and enslave them. Every state has its own “patriot” group of disaffected right-wing Christian radicals opposed to central government and federal regulations. Most are organised along paramilitary lines…    “They range in outlook from Pat Robertson, a failed 1988 presidential candidate, with his vision of a *Christian America* to the sinister Posse Comitatus, Aryan Nations and Minnesota Patriots’ Council, who favour armed insurrection.
    “All have links with the National Rifle Association, the influential lobby group which represents weapons’ manufacturers, hunters and gun clubs and campaigns for the right of all Americans “to own and bear arms”.
    “There is some doubt as to whether this right is enshrined legally in the American constitution but the NRA has powerful supporters in both senate and congress and no-one has yet managed successfully to challenge the all-pervasive nationwide gun culture.
    “Most of the militias’ philosophy is based on white-supremacist principles, looking down on blacks as ‘mud people’ and Jews as instigators of the global plot against them and manipulators of the world economy for their own benefit.”

Have you noticed how the British seem to be running the show from across the Atlantic?  When the United States was asked to produce evidence against Osama bin Laden, Tony Blair responded to the world on our behalf!  Then New York mayor, Rudy Guiliani, was knighted by the Queen of England, an honor reserved for British subjects alone.  Is the United States a British colony?  In fact, British Freemasonry is now enfolding the nations of the world in the vision of Cecil Rhodes — the federation, expansion and consolidation of the British Empire.

UPDATE:  Now that the necessary legislation is in place to round up and eliminate anti-New World Order resisters without the inconvenience of due process, the news media is openly pointing the finger at right wing militia groups.  The October 27 Washington Post announced:

“FBI and CIA Suspect Domestic Extremists: Officials Doubt Any Links to Bin Laden.”

    “Top FBI and CIA officials believe that the anthrax attacks on Washington, New York and Florida are likely the work of one or more extremists in the United States who are probably not connected to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda terrorist organization, government officials said yesterday… ‘Everything seems to lean toward a domestic source,’ one senior official said. ‘Nothing seems to fit with an overseas terrorist type operation.’ The FBI and U.S. Postal Inspection Service are considering a wide range of domestic possibilities, including associates of right-wing hate groups and U.S. residents sympathetic to the causes of Islamic extremists.”

A VERY DIFFERENT KIND OF WAR

The globalist planners of this military coup knew better than to expect American traditionalists to surrender their civil rights under an administration of New Age, ultra-liberal, Communist-sympathizers such as Bill Clinton or Al Gore.  A right-wing party with a conservative platform sufficiently duped pre-Nazi Germans and has worked as well on American conservatives, many of whom are naively trustful that George W. Bush and Co. will restore the Bill of Rights once “terrorism” has been eradicated throughout the world.

HOWEVER, our president has told us that this war against terrorism is going to take a long time—30 years or so!  Why so long?  Does the global coalition against terrorism also plan to eradicate the state-sponsored terrorism within their own ranks?

“There can be concerted international action against international terrorism only if the international community is of one firm mind and resolve as to what is terrorism, who are the terrorists and how they are to be fought. Will George W. Bush insist that [Pakistan President] Musharraf’s reward for joining hands with him in tracking Osama is that Musharraf must henceforth stop referring to the terrorists in Kashmir as ‘‘freedom-fighters’’? Will Bush tell the Dutch government that harbouring Isaac Chisi Swa and T. Muivah of the National Socialist Council of Nagaland in Amsterdam is no longer acceptable international practice? Will George W. convey to his British, French and Canadian lapdogs the message from the Sri Lankan president that succour and safe havens to the LTTE must end forthwith? Will Washington promise to nuke Beijing if China’s assistance to the Maoist terror groups in Nepal does not cease forthwith? Are the insurgents of the Chittagong Hill Tracts people who must be eliminated — or freedom fighters who must be helped? Should Bhagat Singh and Chandrasekhar Azad be celebrated or denounced?”Will George W. tell Ariel Sharon of Israel that sending helicopter gunships into Gaza to target bomb the Al-Fatah headquarters of President Yasser Arafat is terrorism of the same order that destroyed the World Trade Center? Or swear they will never again bomb someone else’s palace as they did when Muammar Gadhafi’s three-year old daughter was killed by the US Air Force sleeping in her cot? Or a pharmaceuticals factory in Khartoum pummelled because the CIA thought (oops, wrong again!) that it was Osama’s munitions manufacturing facility?

”Does Washington regard the Chechnians as terrorists, as Moscow does? If Spain moves to do a Guernica on Basque separatists, will US marines be landed landed at Biarritz? Do Tibetans of the Dalai Lama’s persuasion qualify as terrorists, as Beijing insists? Are Altaf Hussain’s people in Karachi mujahirs struggling for justice — or terrorists, as the Pakistan government sees them? Is Aung San Suu Kyi a noble rebel, as we believe, or a dangerous subversive, as the Myanmar government perceives her? Why go so far? Will the US president crack down on Catholic and Protestant Irish Americans who have been relentlessly stoking terrorism in northern and southern Ireland?

”Yes, it is a terrible tragedy that 5,000 innocents lost their lives to terrorism at the World Trade Center. But is it not worse that 500,000 infants have died in Iraq because the Americans orchestrated a blockade of essential medicines for over a decade?” [Ready for World War III?]

Of course, the coalition against terrorism does not plan to eliminate the state-sponsored terrorists which serve the national security, economic and expansionist interests of their own nations.  We must inquire WHO ELSE is among the global terrorists that will take 20-30 years for the coalition against terrorism to exterminate in their “very different kind of war.”
TERRORISM REDEFINED

In the PATRIOT and USA Acts of 2001, the definitions of a “terrorist” and “terrorism” are deliberately vague, broad and subjective, which gives enormous freedom of interpretation to law enforcement and intelligence agencies.  Under Section 803 of the USA Act of 2001, a person commits the crime of domestic terrorism if within the U.S. they engage in activity that involves acts dangerous to human life that violate the laws of the United States or any State and appear to be intended to: (i) intimidate or coerce a civilian population; (ii) to influence the policy of a government by intimidation or coercion, or (iii) to affect the conduct of a government by mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping.

How the terms “intimidation” and “coercion” will be interpreted remains to be seen, but we can gather some clues from those who are working diligently to stamp out terrorism, as well as our Bill of Rights, especially the 1st, 2nd, 4th and 5th amendments. [See Bill of Rights below]  A three-pronged attack on the Constitution has been launched within the very sectors of society which Alice Bailey predicted would be infiltrated and controlled by Freemasonry to bring about a New World Order: government, education and religion.  Although the second example occurred in Canada, the profoundly disturbing PATRIOT and USA Acts of 2001 portend that it is only a matter of days before political dissent in American educational institutions is silenced.
THE HOMELAND SECURITY AGENCY

Under the new “Homeland Security” laws, state and federal security agencies are being merged into one super agency under Federal control — a sort of Super FEMA. This is the underlying theme of the “Homeland Security” premise. Governor Tom Ridge, newly appointed head of the newly instituted Office of Homeland Security, has stated that his definition of a terrorist includes someone who merely “lashes out” at a fellow citizen:

See Cutting Edge News: Bush Administration is Already Redefining Terrorist

Ridge Vows Balance of Rights, Security”, News-Item Newspaper, Shamokin, Pennsylvania, 10/3/01, Page 1.“To those Americans who would lash out at your fellow citizens, simply because they worship differently, or dress differently, or look differently than you, there is one word for such behavior: terrorism.” [Governor Tom Ridge, in his farewell address to the State Legislature as Pennsylvania Governor, before taking up his new position at the White House as Director of Homeland Security].

GOVERNMENT OF CANADA VS.
UNIVERSITY OF B.C. PROFESSOR

In Canada, hate criminals may now include those who deny the Holocaust, distribute anti-Muslim literature or criticize U.S. foreign policy.   Sunera Thobani, a professor at the University of British Columbia, has been accused of a hate crime, viz., “publicly inciting hatred against Americans” after she “argued that the U.S. government — not international terrorists — is the most dangerous global force, ‘unleashing prolific levels of violence all over the world.  From Chile to El Salvador, to Nicaragua to Iraq, the path of U.S. foreign policy is soaked in blood,’ she said in comments that received front-page coverage in Canada’s daily newspapers, including The Vancouver Sun.”

Excerpts from full article: Canadian professor accused of hate crime against Americans

“Section 319 of the Criminal Code of Canada allows for a jail sentence of less than two years for anyone convicted of the ‘public incitement of hatred’ against an identifiable group of people, when the comments lead to a breach of the peace.”“’This is just pure harassment,” [Sunera Thobani] said. “They are trying to silence dissent in this country.’

“Thobani said her speech was intended to explain how U.S. foreign policy has affected life in many countries of the world.

“’If you point to the factual record of U.S. foreign policy, you are now accused of spreading hate,’ she said. ‘It really is unbelievable.’

“The RCMP’s Labossiere wouldn’t disclose any more specifics about the complaint or the complainant. He said he forwarded the complaint to the hate crimes unit of the Ottawa-Carleton police force, which has jurisdiction in the area where the offence is alleged to have occurred…

“Convictions for public incitement of hatred are rare in Canada, but not unprecedented.

“In 1982, Alberta public high school teacher Jim Keegstra was fired for teaching students that the Holocaust — where millions of Jews died in Nazi concentration camps — was a fabrication of a ‘Jewish conspiracy’ that wanted to destroy Christianity. The courts later convicted Keegstra of promoting hatred and ordered him to do 200 hours of community service work.

“In 1999, a Christian evangelist in Ontario was convicted of inciting hatred against Muslims in flyers he distributed and in a phone-line message. Mark Harding received a three-month conditional sentence and was required to perform more than 300 hours of voluntary service for the Islamic community.”

The issue, of course, is not whether Prof. Thobani’s criticisms of the U.S. government are justified, or whether deniers of the Holocaust and Christians who expose the false religion of Islam have are morally just.  The burning issue is their right to express their convictions in a free society.  The Bill of Rights, Amendment I states: “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press…”
THE UNITED RELIGIONS ORGANIZATION (UR)

According to the founder of the United Religions Initiative, Episcopal Bishop William E. Swing, members of any religion who hold to the fundamentals of their particular “scriptures” should be classified as terrorists.  According to Swing and others present at a meeting of the U.N. Church Center in Washington, D.C., the scriptures of all religions contain violent content which must be removed.

The following account of the U.N. Church Center meeting was found on the web site of a Catholic organization located at the United Nations Plaza:

UN RELIGIOUS MEETING BLAMES RELIGION FOR TERROR ATTACK ON US    The founder of the United Religions Initiative, a movement that seeks to become the dominant religious voice at the UN, blamed religion for the September 11th terrorist attacks on New York and Washington. At a Wednesday meeting at the UN Church Center, the Episcopal Bishop of San Francisco, William E. Swing, asserted that the hijackers did not hold a corrupted version of Islam because religions – all religions – are guilty of fostering terrorism. “There is a lot of terror and violence in a lot of scripture. There has to be a critique of that. We have to hold the religions’ feet to the fire for the violence and terror within them.”
    Swing said, “The nations of the world have met every day for the past fifty years, the religions of the world have not. Who is more moral, the nations of the world or the religions of the world?” URI seeks to create a permanent body of religious ambassadors – a parallel organization to the UN – to address the problem of “fundamentalists in our own groups,” an issue that traditional religion “wimps out on.” Swing proclaimed that, in light of the terrorist attack, “It’s a new day for inter-religious activity in the United States.”
    Other participants at the meeting criticized either religion or capitalism. One person said, “The problem is religion – the whole concept of religion that requires conformity. The truth is different for every individual.” Another claimed, “All religions have fanatical elements, we must delete those elements from scripture.”  Still another said, “The underlying causes are economic. We want more oil and bigger cars.” Swing agreed, repeatedly saying “we must address the brokenness at the root of the terrorist attacks by bridging the chasm between the ‘haves’ and the ‘have-nots.'” One participant wondered “how we can have a heart to heart dialogue with the terrorists.”
    Giandomenico Picco, former UN Under Secretary General, recounted his experiences dealing with terrorists in Lebanon and Afghanistan. Picco grew increasingly exasperated by the comments of Swing and the other participants. Picco said the terrorists engaged in a “hijacking of Islam, a hijacking of ideas.” Picco also said that “Collective responsibility is baloney – there is individual responsibility for actions or no responsibility at all. Blaming institutions, religious or economic, allows individuals to get away with murder, literally. Why did they do it? Because they are wrong, they are criminals. We should not look for profound justifications.” According to Picco, the real “chasm” Swing referred to is not between rich and poor, but between “those willing to kill innocent people and those not willing to kill innocent people.” In response to the anti-Western bias of many of the statements, Picco said, “We still are very good.” Picco, who is the personal representative of the Secretary-General for the UN Year of Dialogue among Civilizations, warned that dialogue with terrorists often results in death.
    URI was founded in 1995 and is active in 58 countries. Along with Protestants and disaffected Catholics, URI includes witches, Druids and members of New Age movements. Swing himself is hostile to traditional and conservative faiths, once saying that “proselytizing will be illegal in the United Religions zone,” an area he says he wants to create. The Vatican has condemned URI for syncretism, which is the blending together of elements of all religions. (Catholic Family & Human Rights Institute, FRIDAY FAX, Oct. 12, 2001, Vol. 4, No. 42, http://www.c-fam.org)

Based on this new definition of “terrorism”, certain prophetic events in the book of Revelation, which at one time may have seemed obscure and remote, are suddenly up close and personal:  Christians who refuse to use sanitized versions of the Bible will be tried in global tribunals — without the protections of due process required by their Constitution — and executed as “terrorists”.

“And when he had opened the fifth seal, I saw under the altar the souls of them that were slain for the word of God, and for the testimony which they held.” (Rev. 6:9)“And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hand…” (Rev. 20:4)

The Good News

The good news is that the Lord Jesus has told us: “And when these things begin to come to pass, then look up, and lift up your heads, for your redemption draweth nigh.” Luke 21:28

A few verses later, however, Jesus qualified this statement with a condition:

“But take heed to yourselves, lest at any time your hearts be overcharged with surfeiting, and drunkenness, and cares of this life, and so that day come upon you unawares. For as a snare shall it come on all them that dwell on the face of the whole earth. Watch ye therefore, and pray always, that ye may be accounted worthy to escape all these things that shall come to pass, and to stand before the Son of man.” Luke 21:34-36

To understand what Jesus meant to “be accounted worthy to escape all these things”, let us consider the parable of the Ten Virgins:

“Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom.  And five of them were wise, and five were foolish.  They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them: But the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps. While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept.“And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him. Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps.  And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are gone out. But the wise answered, saying, Not so; lest there be not enough for us and you: but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves. And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut.

“Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us. But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not. Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.” Matt. 25:1-13

In the Bible, oil is a type of the Holy Spirit, which cannot be transferred from one person to another despite what modern prophets tell us. Rather, the Holy Spirit fellowships with individual believers as they abide in Christ and obey His commandments.

“If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you. I will not leave you comfortless: I will come to you.  Yet a little while, and the world seeth me no more; but ye see me: because I live, ye shall live also.  At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father, and ye in me, and I in you.  He that hath my commandments, and keepeth them, he it is that loveth me: and he that loveth me shall be loved of my Father, and I will love him, and will manifest myself to him.  Judas saith unto him, not Iscariot, Lord, how is it that thou wilt manifest thyself unto us, and not unto the world?“Jesus answered and said unto him, If a man love me, he will keep my words: and my Father will love him, and we will come unto him, and make our abode with him.  He that loveth me not keepeth not my sayings: and the word which ye hear is not mine, but the Father’s which sent me.  These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you.  But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you.” John 14:23-26

Our first priority in this late hour must be our personal preparation to meet the Bridegroom.  Dear reader, we urge you to take seriously and ACT upon the following exhortations to watchful prayer and holy living:

“Beloved now we are the sons of God, and it doth not yet appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is. And every man that hath this hope in him purifieth himself, even as he is pure.” I John 3:3“Having these promises, dearly beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of the Lord.” II Cor. 7:1

“Follow peace with all men, and holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord.” Heb. 12:14

If you have not repented from your sin and believed on the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation, we invite you to read what the Bible says about  God’s Plan of Salvation.

Where Is the Promise of His Coming? A Review and Defense of the Pre-Tribulation Resurrection of the Church


THE BILL OF RIGHTS

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

Amendment VII

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.


 

 

Was Columbus A Mass Murderer, Rapist and Sex Trafficking Pedophile Jew and “Animal”?

Columbus was not a White Italian Catholic…but in fact…was a Jew…DOCUMENTED!

richardboydenreport

Image result for meme resounding yes

Introduction: I am responding to the vile hateful Jewish and Gentile inspired attacks on Michael Palombo and his business V Roast Bistro in Albuquerque New Mexico because he expressed his anger at the documented history of those Jews he considered “animals” who were guilty of crimes against “Non Jews”. That history I document to the degree necessary to vindicate this man beginning with identifying and documenting  “Columbus The Jew” and his “animalistic” crimes against Indigenous Peoples.

What qualifies a Gentile to be labelled as a animal and worse? Read and learn below in the Jewish Talmud that non-Jew  Gentiles are labeled animals as quoted!

About me: Having lived in Israel in 1972, my college room mate was an Israeli, had a personal letter posted on Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu’s web page warning him or a REAL anti semite William Jefferson Clinton as well as having put the only Jewish…

View original post 9,834 more words

LGBTQ’S Legacy Of Child Abuse “SODOMY FOR ALL” Embraced By Megan Rapinoe And Jewish Girlfriend Sue Bird

Related image

I feel God led to dedicate this blog to the most vile evil filty perverted inbred by the devil himself demon in the flesh…Mark Zuckerberg…a Synagogue of Satan Jew who more then any on this earth has allowed for the New World Order of Sodom and Gomorrah to find a platform and a typhonian tunnel to disseminate the works of darkness in and through his “stolen” Facebook. Zuckerberg in my opinion is a closet pedophile and supporter of the information I share below if not literally a practitioner of…while he censors any and all truth exposing the evils which he represents in the realms of time as the son of Satan. He makes sure those guilty of the abominations below are never identified and exposed and this is because Zuckerberg is “One Of Them”…a Tulmadic Murdering Raping Peodphile Jew by “spiritual default” after the order and example of Columbus The Jew!

Image result for warning graphic language

https://richardboydenreport.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/harlots-mystery-babylon.jpg

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/Whore-of-babylon-blake-1809.jpg

https://richardboydenreport.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/rapinoe-award-event.jpg

I will work the work of wickedness

I will kill my heart

I will be loud and adulterous

I will be covered with jewels and rich garments.

I will be shameless before all men

I will, for token thereof, will freely prostitute my body to the lusts of each and every living creature that shall desire it

I claim the Mystery of Mysteries, BABALON the Great,

and the Number 156, and the robe of the Woman of Whoredomes and the Cup of Abominations

This blog is dedicated to Karen Sue Andras who the demon Aliester Crowley appeared to as a child and said “You have what I want”…even she who later as a “wife” said she listened to Satan to destroy me and my ministry and worked direct with those listening to the same devil to have me murdered because she chose to listen to Crowley with them. She ended up being “owned” by Crowley along with her children and grandchildren. She now has them exposed to the very same abominations documented below…which is what happens when one rejects the “I am that I am”!

giphy

https://richardboydenreport.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/bird-rapinoe.jpg

Magan Rapinoe and Sue Bird evidently love “transparency” as active open bragging members of the LGBTQ community and want the whole world (including yours truly) to witness how they live and what they believe in and why. They do so boldly and with courage having no shame while laughing behind their closed bedroom door saying one to the other….”If they only knew what we really believe in and embrace!!!”

Guess what daughters of the devil? I know!

Below I share what “I am that I am” even Jesus Christ has allowed me to find with sources being both Gentile and the Synagogue of Satan Jews which Bird is a member of.  I am going to share this documented truth with the same world who takes you at “face value” because the world needs to know the “rest of the story” in intimate graphic detail about your world and the spiritual source of the abominations which you sanction as the very emblems in the flesh and as “Goddesses” what and who you truly represent in spirit and truth…word and deed. Lucifer is he who is acknowledged and glorified by those in your world and therefore identified as the one glorified through the most heinous crimes of the flesh known among men committed by those named and who are the spiritual founders of the your LBGTQ world of demons.

The below introductory summary I share comes from a man who put into words both the temporal and spiritual essence of what I share and which Rapinoe and Bird and those in their world both believe and partake of. He connects each and every dot in simple but graphic detail the abominations that define the LBGTQ world of pure vile filth and evil thus giving you a concise as well as a basic foundation of understanding few are aware of…except those that is…who laugh behind their closed bedroom doors knowing of what takes place in the devil’s secret chambers of darkness

I make no apologies for what is shared below. I simply source and identify. I quote and I copy and paste the very words and images representing the world which Rapinoe and Bird represent and are by default “citizens of”.

Beware and be forewarned. What you will be exposed to is not for the faint of heart realizing that those who commit these crimes of abomination against Almighty God using innocent children, women and men…have no heart and are without feeling and this because of who owns their souls.

P.S. Feces eating Rapinoe and Bird represent the vile “Bowel Movement Sex” Uranus fraternity revealed in this article written by a women who exposes in the fullness the sodomite filth that contaminates my Marine Corp…

https://concienciaradio.com/ab/images/PAJ_LooseLeaf_Circe_OpaquePage_100.jpg

Introductory Summary Defining What The Spiritual Goal Of Rapinoe’s and Bird’s LBGTQ Is…

From the priesthood of ancient Egypt and Babylon to Aleister Crowley’s Victorian era to Marina Abramovic’s Crowley recipe book spirit cooking for John Podesta, BIll and Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama in modern day America, the telltale spiritual signatures of the practiced mystical rites and the evil they reverence could not be more clear.

The celebration of sodomy of both males and females. The sexual abuse of children. The trafficking of women and children to be used in the rites of desecration and ceremonial blood sacrifices to amplify the empowered demonology of the titans of entertainment, science and politics. The abortuary burnt offering of children to Baal, to Molech and to Goddess Jezebel. Planned Parenthood, by another name.

 

Sick and Twisted: Raping Murdering Pedophiles Marina Abramovic and John Podesta’s  LGBTQ Art Collection (Rapinoe and Bird “approved”!)

Human exterminism. Genocidal depopulation. Eugenicist manipulation of the human genome. And the fulfilled envisioning of physically immortal human beings without soul, without consequence, who will never require nor experience an afterlife of connotation or consequence for earthly endeavor.

As was the intended destiny of the Third Reich, so remains the religion of the New World Order. The perversion of humanity, the destruction of innocence and the systemic infliction of visceral, palpable planetary misery for the harvest of spiritual energy are the holy sacraments of the order.

The ritual sodomy of young boys and girls just prior to an inflicted violent death in what Crowley termed, the Supreme Rite.

“The Supreme Rite is to bring about a climax in the death of a victim. By this rite, one can attain the summit of the dark magical arts. Even better, is to slay a virgin girl, preferably after she has been rendered a willing victim. After violating her, the body should be cut into nine pieces with the names of appropriate gods written on the skin of each piece. The head should be burnt in honor of either Juno or Minerva. This Supreme Rite should not be performed on ordinary occasions. And only with profound purpose for the acquisition of greatest power, or the defeat of a powerful enemy.”  Aleister Crowley’s Babylonian Mystery Religion realized.

And an endless supply of exploited, missing, stolen and vanished women and children to fulfill the Luciferian bloodlusts of the most powerful of the world elite. Full fledged dessert in the backrooms and dungeons after Marina’s Spirit Cooking parlor games are complete. Wish to God that it were not the truth. Repent to God for being ignorant and impotent to stop it for so long.

Lest you still doubt the resurrected Babylonian Rite and the thorough infusion of Luciferian nihilistic principle in modern culture, perhaps look around and realize that young generations in the America of today are unknowing and joyful public practitioners of Thelema, engaged in every bit of the hedonistic, androgynously orgiastic celebrations of wanton fleshly indulgence in a way thoroughly impossible before Crowley and his ilk flung wide the Golden Dawn. Awash as we all are in the flotsam of destroyed families, warring sexes, individuals without ownership or connection or security, given only to empty momentary impulse in worship of animalistic need.

And poised on the precipice as the aspiring demon lords of the present age spin their pretty lies in their quest for Ultimate Power and wage their ancient warfare against the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, and all those who claim Him as Yahweh, I Am, That I Am.

 

 

http://www.shadolsonshow.com/2019/07/09/aleister-to-hitler-to-abramovic-luciferian-pedophilia-powers-the-deep-state-and-rules-the-world/

Image result for wickedness evil actions perverted sexual acts done to children.

Heinous: Webster Dictionary page 448…extremely wicked; atrocious; odiously sinful.

The word wickedness is describing the evil actions and perverted sexual acts done to children. The flagrant acts of wickedness were always done with a goal and religious significance behind these acts. These men were performing ancient rites to achieve immortality,and to enter the celestial abode through the tunnels of Typhon.

They gain access through these tunnels to ten evil gods known for extreme wickedness. The new religion they have established and now practice in their temples and lodges is called “Thelima.”Thelima is shown to have 11 degrees were they perform homosexual act sin their ritual. This form of sex magic teaches that through sodomy one can excess and open up the tunnels of Typhon. The altars on which these sexual rituals are performed emulated the Trapezoid, a symbol for the Frustra which is the pyramid found on the back of the dollar bill with the All Seeing Eye. This is called a Frustum because it is designed for the manifestation of demons.

All the altars of ancient antiquity were built for that purpose and the All Seeing Eye of Horus or Lucifer is symbolic of the “rectum”.The pyramid consists of 13 levels revealing a sophisticated pyramid scheme.

The passing of children through the fire as we stated above was designed to achieve something that these individual believed they would receive through wicked acts of perversion.The ancient mystery religion taught that sexual abuse of a child was more powerful when it is performed with demonic sex magic. The other aspect of passing the children through the fire has to do with trauma based mind altering procedures. These rituals consisted of both sex magic and ritual trauma (the inflicting of torture and other mind altering process) are based on the ancient mystery rituals of “Akkadian-Hittie-Canaanite and Babylonian rituals”. Excerpt from the paper….  Child Molestation-Forced by Ritual Influence

 

Homosexuality And Child Sexual Abuse

Drink the menses of blasphemy, ejaculate the semen of infamy.
Masturbate the whore of sodomy, deep inside the womb of depravity.
Penetrate the harlot of bestial impurity, goddess of heretical perversity.

Luciferian rituals of nun defloration, rape the daughters of darkness.
Necrophiliac orgies of diabolical retribution, embalm her genitals in goat sperm.

Mystical practices of vaginal haruspication.
Praise the queen of sexual magick, praise the goddess of heretical perversity.

Moloch also spelled Melech, a Canaanite deity associated in biblical sources with the practice of child sacrifice. The name derives from combining the consonants of the Hebrew melech (“king”) with the vowels of boshet (“shame”), the latter often being used in the Old Testament as a variant name for the popular god Baal (“Lord”).

In the Hebrew Bible, Moloch is presented as a foreign deity who was at times illegitimately given a place in Israel’s worship as a result of the syncretistic policies of certain apostate kings. The laws given to Moses by God expressly forbade the Jews to do what was done in Egypt or in Canaan. “You shall not give any of your children to devote them by fire to Moloch, and so profane the name of your God” (Leviticus 18:21). Yet kings such as Ahaz (2 Kings 16:3) and Manasseh (2 Kings 21:6), having been influenced by the Assyrians, are reported to have worshipped Moloch at the hilled site of Topheth, outside the walls of Jerusalem. This site flourished under Manasseh’s son King Amon but was destroyed during the reign of Josiah, the reformer. “And he defiled Topheth, which is in the valley of the sons of Hinnom, that no one might burn his son or his daughter as an offering to Moloch” (2 Kings 23:10).

Child Sexual Abuse

There is a clear relationship between satanic ritual (SRA), Blood Sacrifice and child sacrifice and pedophilia. The possessing parasitic entity in its human host uses the pure essence of a child’s life force and soul energy to feed, siphon, usurp or bind it into servitude.

Practicing satanists are educated in how to use SRA to create dissociative identity (DID) and mental body fragmentation in their own children and child relatives, in order to bind the soul body to an extradimensional satanic entity. Through the binding of servitude, the parents, the bloodline lineages are allowed to remain in power of the financial and economic resources on the earth. This is the diseased seed of the Negative Alien Agenda.[5][6]

Deeply anti-Christian Führer

“The Führer is deeply religious but deeply anti-Christian. He regards Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race.”— Goebbels in his diary in 1939

The Nazi Party was founded in Munich in the Bratwurstgloeckl, which just happened to be what today is known as a “gay bar”.    This was no coincidence because the  party was largely homosexual.    Many of its rituals and symbols came from sodomite organizations and individuals, among them the “Sieg Heil” salute, the double lightning bolt “SS” symbol, and the inverted triangle to identify classes of prisoners in the concentration camps.  (which were guarded by sodomites)

Otto Dix, Metropolis (1928). Berlin in the heyday of the Weimar Republic: a hedonistic hellpit of sexual depravity.

“The decay of moral values in all areas of life—the period of deepest German degradation—coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany.”  — Dr Friederich Karl Wiehe, Germany and the Jewish Question. [1]

https://i2.wp.com/heartcommunicators.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/AllConnected.jpg

THE SEXUAL DECADENCE OF WEIMAR GERMANY

Megan Rapinoe’s and Sue Bird’s Nazi “LGBTQ + P” Party of Sodomites, Pederasts and Pedophiles!

The militant homosexual core of the National Socialist party — by: Scott Lively, 1996, source: Leadership University
MHP hypertext version for non-profit educational use only

Sodomism is the ideology of homosexual superiority, in which the homosexuals desire to usher in — through propaganda, violence and state coercion — a utopia in which homosexuality is seen as a supreme ideal, and those who believe in the conjugal union as is affirmed and established by the Christian Faith, are viewed and treated as enemies.

 

The LGBTQ+P For Pedophile

“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and feeble lies. We shall seduce them in your schools…in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms…wherever men are men together.” Michael Swift, “Gay Revolutionary”

“[I]f the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.

 

Image result for sue bird synagogue

https://richardboydenreport.files.wordpress.com/2019/09/sue-bird.jpg

 

 

Faggotry is only one little baby step away from outright pedophilia.

Homosexual Predators Montage final xprt
 Globalist Jews (and the Megan Rapinoe’s and Sue Bird’s) are itching for the day they can just “let it all hang out” and satisfy their sick perversions (including for little children) without fear of serving time in Goyim prisons. And they have the “chutzpah” to yap about catholic priests all the time! source: incogman

Perversion & misogyny in Torah Judaism which Rapinoe and Bird “endorse”!

https://richardboydenreport.files.wordpress.com/2019/10/sanhedrin-54b-steinsaltz.jpg

Talmud Permits Child-Adult Sex

Talmud law permits sexual intercourse between children and adults. This doctrine is contained in a number of Mishnahs. Before we examine them, however, it is necessary that the reader be familiar with the word kethubah.

According to the Soncino Talmud Glossary:

KETHUBAH (Lit., ‘a written [document]’); (a) a wife’s marriage settlement which she is entitled to recover on her being divorced or on the death of her husband. The minimum settlement for a virgin is two hundred zuz, and for a widow remarrying one hundred zuz; (b) the marriage contract specifying the mutual obligations between husband and wife and containing the amount of the endowment and any other special financial obligations assumed by the husband.

— Babylonian Talmud, Soncino Talmud Glossary

Zuz is a unit of currency. We see, then, that a dollar (or zuz) value is put on virginity.

Now let’s look at a Mishnah from Kethuboth 11a:

MISHNAH. WHEN A GROWN-UP MAN (7) HAS HAD SEXUAL INTERCOURSE WITH (8) A LITTLE GIRL, (9) OR WHEN A SMALL BOY (10) HAS INTERCOURSE WITH A GROWN-UP WOMAN, OR [WHEN A GIRL WAS ACCIDENTALLY] INJURED BY A PIECE OF WOOD (11) — [IN ALL THESE CASES] THEIR KETHUBAH IS TWO HUNDRED [ZUZ]

— Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Kethuboth 11a
Soncino 1961 Edition, page 57

The translator, Rabbi Dr. Samuel Daiches, amplifies the text with footnotes:

  1. A man who was of age.
  2. Lit., ‘who came on’.
  3. Less than three years old.
  4. Less than nine years of age.
  5. Lit., ‘One who was injured by wood’, as a result of which she injured the hymen.

— Rabbi Dr. Daiches

Let’s review the above-cited Mishnah: “When a grown-up man has had sexual intercourse with a little girl, or when a small boy has intercourse with a grown-up woman …” It is obvious that sex activity between a grown man and a little girl, and between a grown woman and a little boy, is a part of the woof and the warp of everyday Talmud life; such relationships, in the eyes of the Sages, are unremarkable. There is no prohibition on sexual activity between adults and young children — it is simply regulated. Recall the words of the Very Reverend the Chief Rabbi of the British Empire the late Dr. Joseph Herman Hertz:

Religion in the Talmud attempts to penetrate the whole of human life with the sense of law and right. Nothing human is in its eyes mean or trivial; everything is regulated and sanctified by religion. Religious precept and duty accompany man from his earliest years to the grave and beyond it. They guide his desires and actions at every moment.

— Rabbi Dr. Hertz

Thus, if the Talmud permits girls three years old and younger to be sexually used by adults, that is the law. The concern of the Sages is to ensure that the adult is not, technically speaking, in violation of any of the rules.

Full article, with notes, references, and sidebars

Source and Credit:  http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html

The Jewish Torah on pedophilia & sodomy…it is connected and documented! https://judaism.is/pedophilia-and-sodomy.html#mezizah

 

Homosexual Pedophiles are Vastly Over represented in Child Sex Abuse Cases. Homosexual pedophiles sexually molest children at a far greater rate compared to the percentage of homosexuals in the general population.

A study in the Journal of Sex Research found, as we have noted above, that “approximately one-third of had victimized boys and two-thirds had victimized girls.” The authors then make a prescient observation: “Interestingly, this ratio differs substantially from the ratio of gynephiles (men who erotically prefer physically mature females) to androphiles (men who erotically prefer physically mature males), which is at least 20 to 1.”

In other words, although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses. Similarly, the Archives of Sexual Behavior also noted that homosexual pedophiles are significantly over represented in child sex offense case. http://www.lanternproject.org.uk/library/general/articles-and-information-about-sexual-abuse-and-its-impact/homosexuality-and-child-sexual-abuse/

Pedophilia pervades Jewish communities because of Judaism’s enduring doctrinal encouragement of perversion

 

A salient example of how the rabbis nullify God’s Law with their Oral Torah. Consider God’s Law in the Scriptures:

And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the LORD. Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion. Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you And the land is defiled therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants  Leviticus 18:20-25

Rabbis nullify God’s Law with their Oral Torah:

“If a boy under the age of nine perpetrated sodomy upon an adult, the adult is not liable for punishment, for the intercourse of a boy under nine years of age is not legally an act of intercourse. Since a child less than nine years old cannot commit sodomy, he can also not be the object of sodomy….This Baraita supports Rav, for it teaches that if a man engaged in homosexual intercourse with a child under the age of nine, he is exempt from liability.”

Sanhedrin 54b

“…intercourse with a boy under nine years old is not considered a significant sexual act…”

Ketubot 11b

“A girl who is three years and one day old whose father arranged her betrothal can be betrothed with intercourse, as, despite her age, the legal status of intercourse with her is that of full-fledged intercourse. And in a case where the childless husband of a girl three years and one day old dies, if his yavam (brother) engages in intercourse with her, he acquires her as his wife…as despite her age she is legally considered to be a married woman.”

Sanhedrin 69a

“If a girl is less than three years old, it is permitted to be secluded with her. Likewise, if a boy is less than nine years old a woman is permitted to be alone with him.”

Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: A Classic Guide to Jewish Law (Metsudah Publications, 1996) v. 2, p. 1023

“If a grown up man has intercourse with a little girl, it is nothing, for having intercourse with a girl less than three years old is like putting a finger in the eye.”

Ketubot 11b

“A father may betroth his daughter without her consent as long as she is a minor, and she also remains under his authority as long as she is a maiden. . . . If she is three years and one day old, she may be betrothed by an act of intercourse with the consent of her father.” Maimonides “the Great Rambam,” Sefer Nashim 3:11

Crafting “Gay” Children: An Inquiry Into the Abuse of Vulnerable Youth via Government Schooling & Mainstream Media

 

The LBGTQ + P party of Megan Rapinoe and Sue Bird Party is the party of Pedophilic Rape and is spiritually connected to child rapist and Satanist Aleister Crowley by “default”, even he who sodomized, sacrificed and murdered young Whites males!

Image result for crowley quote "those magicians

Image result for crowley a male child of perfect innocence

Image result for crowley quotes "it would be unwise to condemn

From The Book of the Law, by Aleister Crowley:

With my Hawk’s head I peck at the eyes of Jesus as he hangs upon the cross……

There is no law beyond Do what thou wilt.

From SATANIC EXTRACTS, by Aleister Crowley:

The Oath of Fealty

I bind my blood in Satan’s hands,

All this that lieth betwixt my hands

To thee, the Beast, and thy control,

I pledge me; body, mind, and soul.

Pledge

I swear to work my Work abhorred,

Careless of all but one reward,

The pleasure of the Devil our Lord

“I shall fight openly for that which no living Englishman dare defend, even in secret—Sodomy!”[3]

Aleister Crowley introduced sodomy as the highest form of achieving seniority in highest Satanic Freemasonry organization in the world, the O.T.O./Ordo Templi Orientis. When a male is engaged in the act of sodomy, at the point of orgasm when the brain is feeling like what men know it feels like during orgasm, the brain almost feels like it’s in a different world

Not only is it male-on-male sodomy in particular they are using to channel evil, the most effective way to channel those dark forces is by combining sodomy with pedophilia and human sacrifice/blood drinking. The reason for this is to supremely blaspheme the Creator God in the absolute, most extremely worst way possible.

By doing this, the malevolent “demons” grant them favors because it pleases them to provoke and anger God.

Again, the Aleister Crowley quote, which describes killing a young boy at the moment of orgasm for the maximum blasphemy possible: “For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim. But the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more efficacious; and for nearly all purposes human sacrifice is the best. In the Sacrifice during Invocation, however, it may be said without fear of contradiction that the death of the victim should coincide with the supreme invocation (the orgasm).” -Aleister Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice

Crowley and the Ritual of Bloody Sacrifice Of A Child

The following is extracted from Crowley’s book Magic in Theory And Practice https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/showthread.php?11718-Paedophilia-and-occult-rape-tortue-and-quot-bloody-sacrifice-quot

The blood is the life. This simple statement is explained by the Hindus by saying that the blood is the principal vehicle of vital Prana. There is some ground for the belief that there is a definite substance, not isolated as yet, whose presence makes all  the difference between live and dead matter. It would be unwise to condemn as irrational the practice of those savages who tear the heart and liver from an adversary, and devour them while yet warm. In any case it was the theory of the ancient Magicians, that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal, and in quality according to its mental and moral character.

At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or the Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape. An animal should be selected whose nature accords with that of the ceremony — thus, by sacrificing a female lamb one would not obtain any appreciate quantity of the fierce energy useful to a Magician who was invoking Mars.

In such a case a ram  would be more suitable. And this ram should be virgin — the whole potential of its original total energy should not have been diminished in any way. For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim
which contains the greatest and purest force.

A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim. For evocations it would be more convenient to place the blood of the victim in the Triangle — the idea being that the spirit might obtain from the blood this subtle but physical substance which was the quintessence of its life in such a manner as to enable it to take on a visible and tangible shape. Those magicians who abject to the use of blood have endeavored to replace it with incense. For such a purpose the incense of Abramelin may be burnt in large quantities. Dittany of Crete is also a valuable medium.

But the bloody sacrifice, though more dangerous, is more efficacious; and for nearly all purposes human sacrifice is the best. The truly great Magician will be able to use his own blood, or possibly that of a disciple, and that without sacrificing the physical life irrevocably. An example of this sacrifice is given in Chapter 44 of Liber 333. This Mass may be recommended generally for daily practice. One last word on this subject.

There is a Magical operation of maximum importance: the Initiation of a New Aeon. When it becomes necessary to utter a Word, the whole Planet must be bathed in blood. Before man is ready to accept the Law of Thelema, the Great War must be fought. This Bloody Sacrifice is the critical point of the World-

Ceremony of the Proclamation of Horus, the Crowned and conquering Child, as Lord of the Aeon. This whole matter is prophesied in the Book of the Law itself; let the student take note, and enter the ranks of the Host of the Sun.

The victim must be in perfect health — or its energy may be as it were poisoned. It must also not be too large: the amount of energy disengaged is almost unimaginably great, and out of all anticipated proportion to the strength of the animal. Consequently, the Magician may easily be overwhelmed and obsessed by the force which he has let loose; it will then probably manifest itself in its lowest and most objectionable form. The most intense spirituality of purpose<> is absolutely essential to safety.

In evocations the danger is not so great, as the Circle forms a protection; but the circle in such a case must be protected, not only by the names of God and the Invocations used at the same time, but by a long habit of successful defence. If you are easily disturbed or alarmed, or if you have not yet overcome the tendency of the mind to wander, it is not advisable for you to perform the “Bloody Sacrifice”.

Yet it should not be forgotten that this, and that other art at which we have dared darkly to hint, are the supreme formulae of Practical Magick. You are also likely to get into trouble over this chapter unless you truly comprehend its meaning.

Carefully read, the foregoing is quite clear. Crowley’s comment above refers to an example of Bloody Sacrifice that is contained in Liber 333 under Chapter 44, and reads as follows:

ΚΕΦΑΛΗ ΜΓ
MULBERRY TOPS
Black blood upon the altar! and the rustle of angel wings above!
Black blood of the sweet fruit, the bruised, the violated bloom that setteth The Wheel a- spinning in the spire.
Death is the veil of Life, and Life of Death; for both are Gods.
This is that which is written: A feast for Life, and a greater feast for Death! in THE BOOK OF THE LAW.
The blood is the life of the individual: offer then blood!
92
COMMENTARY (MΓ)
The title of this chapter refers to a Hebrew legend, that of the prophet who heard a going in the mulberry tops and to Browning’s phrase, a bruised, black-blooded mulberry.
In the World’s Tragedy, Household Gods, The Scorpion, and also The God-Eater, the reader may study the efficacy of rape, and the sacrifice of blood, as magical formulae. Blood and virginity have always been the most acceptable offerings to all the gods.
By the wheel spinning in the spire is meant the manifestation of the magical force, the spermatozoon in the conical phallus. For wheels, see Chapter 78.

From the foregoing, we learn that rape, virginity (i.e., innocence) and blood sacrifice is magically efficacious. Joining the dots from the previous extract we know that a “male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most suitable victim.
Crowley also claimed in the earlier account that he (Frater Perdurabo) “has never dared to use this formula in a fully ceremonial manner, save once only…

Satanic Artwork 30 Best Baphometh Images On Pinterest Darkness Baphomet And Devil
One of the other names Crowley used for himself was Frater Perdurabo read this quote below and it will become clear.

From The Magick, in Paris, France:

“…it was the theory of the ancient magicians that any living being is a storehouse of energy varying in quantity according to the size and health of the animal , and in quality according to its mental and moral character. At the death of the animal this energy is liberated suddenly. The animal should therefore be killed within the Circle, or Triangle, as the case may be, so that its energy cannot escape…For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim.” (Magick, by Master Therion, published in 1929 by the Lecram Press, Paris, France)

A footnote on p. 95 says: “(4) It appears from the Magical Records of Frater Perdurabo that he made this particular sacrifice on an average about 150 times every year between 1912 and 1928.

The Devil’s Lair

Anal Sex

Anal sex between males is very important in the extreme left handed paths. It will in some way speed up the process along the path to Hell. Even in the East some Tantric Masters fuck their male students as a final ritual on completion of their training. It seems this radically effects the sub conscious mind and causes some sought of cathartic experience. With anal fucking the kundalini energy at the base of the spine instead of going up goes in reverse down to Hell. Although there may be differences of opinion here. Some saying it just activates that energy which rises up. One of the middle eastern religions stated that when man fucked man they became demons. That is of course what we want to do in Satanism. But it does seem to have a radical effect on the psyche. There are of course strong reactions from main stream religions to sodomy But for Satanist’s surely this is an even a stronger reason for it to be done.  The Demons like it since man on man sex is generally extremely lustful, powerful and aggressive which in some way gives them energy. Nothing can be more powerful and stimulating than seeing men fucking. That may be why so many homosexuals are drawn to Satanism. Many enemas in some way speeds up the detoxing of the body. With all the glands in the anus the entrance of sperm must have radical effects on the body. It can probably cause some form of transcendence or spiritual enlightenment. Below are some interesting comments I have come across:-

1) Ritual Sodomy

“The initiation into the light of Lucifer is achieved by Sodomy”

Sodomy is extremely important in Satanic orgy rituals and sex magik, because we know that if you sodomize Ialdabaoth (the deity  known as Jehovah) you get his power and this elementary principle has been followed for millennia by the Greeks, the Romans, the Fascists and left-hand path initiates.

Ritual sodomy  stimulates what’s called the kundalini gland, which acts to stimulate the pineal gland. Some use drugs like peyote, mescaline or DMT for a similar experience, but RITUAL SODOMY is the preferred means that appears to have NO real substitute. There is a powerful ritual sex magick that was practiced by the ancients and is practiced today, which still manifests a powerful transformative supernaturalism…!

The act of sodomy is also performed to open up the initiate’s “third eye” which is suppose to enhance psychic ability. During this  act, a demonic Entity/ies, called Legion, is/are invoked,refered to as an “unclean spirit”.

The key is in the trauma: the complete destruction of the inner spirit. Then at the propitious moment the initiate’s third eye is opened so as to completely resocialize them and open their psychic abilities. in doing so, a bridge is created between this physical world and the spiritual realm. Once the Pineal Gland is opened, it allows a person to see into that realm. Thus, the reference to it being the Third Eye…


2) The Mystical Doctrine

The Rites of the Hyena King of Shemeber

by Aloysius Foszdyke

Sodomy is extremely important to the Alpha Lodge because we know that if you sodomize Ialdabaoth (the deity you know as Jehovah) you get his power. It’s just that simple and this elementary principle has been followed for millennia by the Greeks, the Romans, the Fascists and left-hand path initiates.

Austin Osman Spare found, bum sex both benumbs (which allows the subconscious to be accessed without the conscious mind interfering) and binds.

If binding is required the penetration of the ‘wand’ must occur at an upward angle so as to impress the nerves at the end of the spine and produce flashes of white light in the very mind of the initiate (enlightenment).

The XI degree of the OTO uses anal sex as do a number of affiliated groupings. There is a reversal of the body’s subtle energy flows that is achieved by the aristocratic virtue of whitewashing the rear entry.

Since the proliferation of pornography, anal congress has established itself in the heterosexual world where the wonders of rectal romance are plain to apprehend. You don’t even require a trained eye. By divorcing sex from any meaning it looses all meaning. Sex becomes an end in itself. Instead of lovers, there are sexual athletes. Love with all of its sentimental and cultural accretions is freed. Sodomy is normalized then consecrated.

Repressed homosexuals, in particular, display greater devotion. And by collecting the workings of such rites, acts of Magick can be effectively grounded (talismans, etc.) or used as a sacrament.


3) We maintain that the Eye of Hoor is better than the Mouth of Isis whichever the gender involved.

Satan and his Demons enter.

The direct invitation to demonic hordes:

Ritual sodomy  stimulates what’s called the kundalini gland, which acts to stimulate the pineal gland. Some use drugs like peyote, mescaline or DMT for a similar experience, but RITUAL SODOMY is the preferred means that appears to have NO real substitute. There is a powerful ritual sex magick that was practiced by the ancients and is practiced today, which still manifests a powerful transformative supernaturalism…!

The demons (and Satan himself) whose abode is the spiritual realm, desperately want to get into this physical realm. They can only do so via invitation into this realm by human beings.

Demons access and affect this realm the greatest through their direct association with human beings. This could be anything from interfering with a human, to controlling aspects of their life, to outright possession of that individual. If they possess the individual, they have access to their brains as well as their bodies, controlling them to do whatever they want. Our being becomes transformes and demonized through this possession.All they need is an invite.

The point is that Satan has something for everyone. He can open that gateway to the spiritual realm through RITUAL SODOMY,rock music, drugs, pornography, New Age mysticism, Shamanism, the Occult, and many other ways…

4) SACRED SATANIC SODOMY

“Those Sons of Mighty Satan who practice the dark occult arts believe and preach proudly to the world that Sodomy is a vehicle through which the door is open to the spiritual realm.”

Sodomy is Satan’s sex or Satan’s new birth of the Initiate.Sacret Sodomy is the foundation for Gay Satanists. It is also called the key of David..

The affinity between the secretions of the endocrine glands and the vibrations radiating from the subtle chakras explored through sodomic rituals, forms the basis of sexual magick which utilizes these vibrations in a way as yet unknown to science. All the so-called phallic cults originally possessed the true knowledge of these matters before it was lost or perverted by improper use. What remains of the ancient wisdom is the remnant only of debased and phallic rites…!

In order to be fully consumed by the Satanic Flame there needs to be a change in the way the mind of the sodomised man works.  This change can only be achieved through  SODOMY..!! http://satanichomo.blogspot.com/2016/01/anal-sex_13.html

Ritual Sodomy

Freemasonry

Freemasonry’s Best Kept Secret: Ritual Sodomy

Bill Morgan – henrymakow.com August 19, 2012

The best kept secret of the esoteric grades of Freemasonry is ritual sodomy. They believe it opens the “third eye” to Luciferian illumination.  It attacks a pressure point of nerves at the base of the spine, causing temporary neurological paralysis and a shift of consciousness.

MK-ULTRA survivors have testified that sodomy causes identity “splits” in children up to age 5, so it was standard for programming multiples.

In order to produce a mind control slave, it must be done ideally between age two and four.   The pressure point causes memory blackout, which is why victims don’t experience flashbacks before a physiological change in the brain occurs between age 28 and 32.

When introduced at eleven or older it doesn’t cause splits, but initiates the victim or ‘neophyte’ into the Sado-Masochistic “brotherhood”.

The initiation is metaphysical so it doesn’t matter whether it is done formally as an initiation, or informally Jerry Sandusky style. The Illuminati are a class of people that have this “illumination” in common whether the perp was a Freemason or not.

Anyone that has experienced sodomy has been illuminated or initiated into the Luciferian initiation because “Lucifer” is real.

“No one will enter the New World Order unless he or she will make a pledge to worship Lucifer. No one will enter the New Age unless he will take a Luciferian Initiation.”  – David Spangler (Leading figure in the ’70’s and 80’s New Age movement and United Nations affiliated NGO’s:  Findhorn Foundation, Lindisfarne Association.)

This is why sodomy laws have been overturned almost world wide since 1970.

By 1996, Satanist rocker Marylin Manson was literally selling sodomy to teens, and laughing all the way to the bank.

Satanist Explains the Rites of Sodomy

September 30, 2010

[Disclaimer: While I find this material disgusting, I am posting it for its educational value. The Illuminati adhere to these beliefs and take part in  these practices.]

“For the highest spiritual working one must accordingly choose that victim which contains the greatest and purest force. A male child of perfect innocence and high intelligence is the most satisfactory and suitable victim” –Aleister Crowley

The Mystical Doctrine

Of The Bloody Sacrifice: and Matters Cognate (Pt. I) Chapt. 12

Magick

Sodomy is extremely important to the Alpha Lodge because we know that if you sodomize Ialdabaoth (the deity you know as Jehovah) you get his power. It’s just that simple and this elementary principle has been followed for millennia by the Greeks, the Romans, the Fascists and left-hand path initiates. In its highest ranks even British Intelligence uses the back passage.

When initiating children, the Alpha Lodge maintains: the younger the better, for a number of reasons I won’t go into. Our methodology is that the child is deprived of food and sleep for days. Depending on how they react, sometimes beatings are employed. Occasionally the child is made to take part in sacrifices. The key is in the trauma: the complete destruction of the inner spirit. Then at the propitious moment the child’s third eye is opened so as to completely resocialize them and open their psychic abilities.

Those awakened retain the mindset of the age at which their awakening took place and this mindset can be accessed in a number of ways and for a number of purposes.

Moreover, and as Austin Osman Spare found, bum sex both benumbs (which allows the subconscious to be accessed without the conscious mind interfering) and binds.

If binding is required the penetration of the ‘wand’ must occur at an upward angle so as to impress the nerves at the end of the spine and produce flashes of white light in the very mind of the initiate (enlightenment).

The XI degree of the OTO uses anal sex as do a number of affiliated groupings. There is a reversal of the body’s subtle energy flows that is achieved by the aristocratic virtue of whitewashing the rear entry.

Since the proliferation of pornography, anal congress has established itself in the heterosexual world where the wonders of rectal romance are plain to apprehend. You don’t even require a trained eye. By divorcing sex from any meaning it looses all meaning. Sex becomes an end in itself. Instead of lovers, there are sexual athletes. Love with all of its sentimental and cultural accretions is freed. Sodomy is normalized then consecrated.

I’ve never been one for homosexual congress unless the individual manifested the middle pillar, encapsulating the feminine in a male body. After all, as the old saying goes, ‘women are breeders; men are for love’.

In these regards Asian men are far more feminine. Repressed homosexuals, in particular, display greater devotion. And by collecting the workings of such rites, acts of Magick can be effectively grounded (talismans, etc.) or used as a sacrament.

We maintain that the Eye of Hoor is better than the Mouth of Isis whichever the gender involved.

Foszdyke was responsible for giving this material to the world: “Australian Adept Unveiled World Satanic Control” 

https://ministryteamtools2.blogspot.com/p/ritual-sodomy.html

 

https://i0.wp.com/heartcommunicators.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Baal.jpg

In the House of the Strong Man Sodomy is the key TO DEMONIC POSSESSION/PROGRAMING BY


The act of sodomy is also performed to open up the victim’s “third eye” which is suppose to enhance psychic ability. During this vile act, a demonic system called, “Legion” is installed. In the King James Bible, Legion is refered to as an, “unclean spirit”.

Sodomy is the biggest occult power source there is, so how did they get their power without it? I was not there, I was never invited to go there, I could not have gone there because I was never a victim of sodomy as a child. Now, the Masons do recruit people who are innocent bystanders just for the image and the dues. But the real driving force of the Masons are the sodomites, just check the de Molay thing. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland

Sodomy has a spiritual component in it that is far more sinister than anybody recognizes. It is the most underrated evil power to the general public.But to the people who are in the know, they know that this is the ultimate rebellion against God Himself. This is what they hope to use to gain the whole human race for their side and defeat God Himself. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland

When a man sodomizes a child at three, the child bonds to that man as if he were their father, and when he’s a man of the cloth, of the Church, the child bonds to the Church, too. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland

The belief in the occult world is if you could sodomize God, you’d get God’s power. You become as gods through sodomy; that’s the way the Greek gods became gods. Alexander the Great was a great sodomizer and his Greek army was the most fierce. Hitler tried to pattern his SS and military after the Greek warriors using sodomy. When you put that all together, the civilizations that God wiped out boiled down to the practice of sodomy. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland 

The Nazis were not Right-Wing Conservative Creationists; they were Left-Wing Darwinian Evolutionary Socialists.  As a principle, an increase in pederasty and homosexualism parallels a militaristic Hellenic revival.  History discloses that the most warlike nations are those whose male leaders were the most addicted to sexual relations with young boys.…..

The Pink Swastika documents how, from their beginning, the National Socialist revolution and the Nazi Party were animated and dominated by militaristic homosexuals, pederasts, pornographers and sado-masochists.…..As Igra explains in Germany’s National Vice, “the criminals who wreaked such astounding horrors on innocent civilian populations were not acting as soldiers drunk with the fury of battle, nor as patriotic fanatics, but as chosen instruments of a satanic religion to the service of which they had been dedicated by the systematic teaching and practice of unnatural vice”     

A pederast is defined as a physically mature man who engages in or desires to engage in sex with boys around the age of puberty,…..  Self-defined “boy-lovers” who have formed “children’s rights” organizations such as the North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) in this country, and who formed the Gemeinschaft der Eigenen in Germany, generally seem to focus their sexual attention on boys roughly between the ages of 8 and 18 years, with an apparent preference for boys about 12 years old.  The Pink Swastika

Sodomy is a spiritual thing. Let’s say Ben sodomizes either a man or woman. When he does that, that person has a spirit by the name of Ben that changes the way that person relates to things. This can even be as an adult. You can’t put the Legion mindset in when they’re 40 years old, but you can put Ben in when they’re 40 years old and it will change the way that person thinks. I’ve had different women who separated from abusive husbands and for some reason couldn’t break loose of the soul tie to their husband, but when we cast out the sodomy spirit by their husband’s name, their feelings about their ex-husbands changed. The most classic example is the lady who had slept with her husband before they were married, committed adultery at 40 years of age, and when I commanded the Strong Man to give its name it was her husband’s name that entered at 40 when he sodomized her. That spirit of sodomy was more damaging to her than the spirit of adultery or fornication. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland
When a man sodomizes a child at three, the child bonds to that man as if he were their father, and when he’s a man of the cloth, of the Church, the child bonds to the Church, too. This sodomy thing has been around for hundreds of years. Ignatius Loyola, founder of the Jesuits, was a Catholic mystic; he had to have been a sodomized one. He was the guy who headed up the Inquisition to persecute those who didn’t adhere to the tenets of the Catholic faith. Terribly cruel! How could you be that cruel if you didn’t have the sodomy rage? The torture they put people through! Later, Joseph Mengele developed the programming and brought it up to another level. He was a Catholic alter boy. I think he was also a Rothschild and a Jesuit. The founder of the Illuminati was Adam Weishaupt, trained as a Jesuit. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland
I haven’t found anybody who was just sexually fondled and became multiple, and I’ve never found anybody who went through occult rituals without sodomy. So I can’t tell you whether being put through a sacrifice ritual without sodomy makes a multiple. People are trying to say that would be the case — that the ritual murders and sacrifices are traumatic enough to produce MPD — but I’ve never found a case out there that only had sacrifice. They’ve always had the sodomy. They don’t always remember it, but when push comes to shove, they’ve got the symptoms. The occult groups know — and they think all Christians are stupid and can’t catch on — they know that sodomy is required to achieve what they want to achieve. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland
One guy I know knew a Saudi who said that over there women are for children and men are for love. The violence and hatred in that kind of stuff is produced by sodomy; it produces the internal rage. Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland
The perpetrator’s goal is to gain power. They believe that the devil has the most power, and the most powerful component in the rituals is the blood sacrifices in blasphemy of Christ’s atonement. Another very important component is the act of sodomy which is the opposite of the “new birth” we have in Christ. The ritual abuse system is normally built around a three year old child, because this usually is the optimal time to create dissociation or MPD. This system is actually a mirror image or reflection of what appears to be a shattering of the core personality.
They take a child at approximately three years of age and make the child fast for several days, force the child to witness human sacrifices, and to participate in a cannibalistic communion service. In some instances, they physically abuse the child and then place he or she in a cage or coffin to further the trauma. The child is sometimes drowned in a baptismal ceremony and brought back to life. In the process of all this blasphemy, the child’s mind is reversed or shattered into multiplicity. The act of sodomy is also performed to open up the victim’s “third eye” which is suppose to enhance psychic ability. During this vile act, a demonic system called “Legion” is installed.  In the King James Bible, Legion is referred to as an, “unclean spirit”. This is systematically done to have complete control over the child, like creating a programmed robot.
The Illuminati belief system says that freedom is only obtained through the entrance of true or pure light (sodomy) and life (sacrifice) is only obtained through death.
Now these survivors have told me that the, “Key of David” is the Rothschild sodomy. The penetration occurs at an upward angle, so it strikes the nerves at the end of the spine and produces white flashes of light in the brain. They do this on a regular basis — sort of maintenance program to keep everything intact. As a side note, there are Catholic black masses where they sodomize children with a crucifix calling it the, “Peace of Mary” because once the dissociation occurs, it almost produces a calming affect; sort of a peaceful feeling THE MASTER PLAN OF THE ILLUMINATED ROTHSCHILDS: Ron Patton interviews Marion Knox
The initiation into the light of Lucifer is achieved by sodomy of the three year old. However, if that person does not follow through, he can become a dud — he doesn’t go anywhere, so he hasn’t really risen to any rank within the movement of the body of the Illuminati. They have certain degrees associated with being a high-level Illuminati — you wouldn’t get there simply by being initiated as a three year old. The initiation of the three year old is the beginning requirement of someday rising up into the ranks of a group that is considered to be the Illuminati. A lot of people think of the Illuminati as being a political group of people, but in another sense it’s a brotherhood of sodomites that’s like family.Deprogrammer Interview with Marion Knox: In the House of the Strongman, Sodomy is the Key – by Elana Freeland

Child Abuse as Sex Magick & Sexual Research: Aleister Crowley & Alfred Kinsey (Occult Yorkshire 14)

Alfred Kinsey  violated children sexually and based his writings on the testimony of criminals who sexually assaulted children.

Labour of love … Liam Neeson plays Alfred Kinsey, who devoted his academic career to researching sex. Photograph: Allstar/20th Century Fox/Sportsphoto Ltd

How else, she wonders, would anyone come up with the data in his infamous Table 34?

There, Kinsey claimed that an 11-month-old child experienced 10 orgasms in one hour, another 11-month-old had 14 in 38 minutes, a 2-year-old child had 11 in 65 minutes, a 4-year-old had 26 in 24 hours. A 10-year-old had 14 in the same time, and a 12-year-old had three in three minutes. Because someone wasn’t sure of those results, the experiment was repeated on the 12-year-old, who then reportedly experienced nine in two hours.

According to David Kupelian, author of “The Marketing of Evil,” Reisman found Table 34 “purports to be a scientific record of ‘multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.'”

Wrote Kupelian: “Reisman wondered: How did Kinsey and his associates obtain this ‘research’ that infants as young as five months of age enjoyed sex? Child sexual abuse is a felony – how could such research be conducted legally? Why had nobody raised this issue before?”

Reisman herself explained: “Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal ‘child sexuality.’ Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts.”

Paul Gebhard, one of Kinsey’s assistants, admitted that some of the men interviewed were convicted pedophiles. They would ask them how many children they had “done it with,” the child’s age, and whether or not they thought the child had come to climax. He further admitted that he was aware of the child abuse inherent in Kinsey’s work. Kinsey even had help from Nazi pedophile Dr. Fritz Van Balluseck who contributed to Kinsey from 1936-1956. Not only did Von Balluseck rape his own daughter, he raped the eleven-year-old son of a minister and forced the boy to write down his experience for Kinsey. Van Balluseck was tried in Berlin in 1957 for the murder of a ten-year-old girl, Loiselotte Has.

In 1948, Alfred Kinsey published Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, revealing to the public that homosexuality was far more widespread than was commonly believed. The book also reported Kinsey’s findings about child sexuality. Tables 31-34 were the tables or lists in the book which purported to display the number of times infants and young children were aroused when the researcher attempted to masturbate them. The table noted that “many of the infants cried and fought” against this so-called “clinical research.”




Even though this obvious sexual abuse of children was displayed in the text of the work itself (a study often said to have kick-started the sexual revolution), it was not until 1981 that Dr. Judith Reisman drew attention to the implications. Her charges were eventually confirmed, in the August 25, 1997, issue of the New Yorker, by James H. Jones, former-member of the Kinsey Institute’s Scientific Board of Advisors; they were then validated by the Institute for Media Education. According to Reisman, however, Jones avoided any mention of the hundreds of infants and children under Kinsey’s control.

“These little ones could not talk or flee from the sexual assaults, both ‘oral and manual,’ they endured from the Kinsey pedophile team, the ‘trained observers’ who used stop watches as they raped the infants and boys to record their ‘thing.’ Jones justifies these heinous and sadistic experiments by simply saying Kinsey desired to free society from its “disapproval of adult-child sexual contacts.” [1]

Homosexual men are 15x more likely to be paedophiles than heterosexual men

We now do the maths on the following data.

1. 33.3% of the victims of paedophilia are boys and 66.7% are girls.
2. 3% of the male population are homosexual and 97% are heterosexual.
3. 98% of paedophiles are male and 2% are female.

Since 98% of the perpetrators are male, at least 31.3% of all paedophilia is male on male. So 3% of men (homosexuals) carry out 31.3% of the child abuse and 97% of men (heterosexuals) carry out 66.7% of the child abuse and women carry out 2% of it.

So the chances of a homosexual male being an abuser are 31.3/3 times more than average, whereas the chances of a heterosexual male being an abuser are 66.7/97 times the average (i.e. less than the average).

The Journal of Sex & Married Therapy, in a study of male sex offenders against children, found that one-third of the offenders directed their sexual activity against males. And the Journal of Sex Research found that homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of sex offenses against children.

This fact is particularly disturbing. Homosexuals comprise just two percent of the population, yet are responsible for 33% of all child sexual abuse. They offend against children at 16 times the rate of the normal population.

The Archives of Sexual Behavior, in a study of 229 convicted child molesters, found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.”

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER

WELL AUTHENTICATED CASES IN EARLY AND MEDIÆVAL TIMES, 1171 TO 1510.IN this, and subsequent chapters, I place descriptions of cases in chronological order, in which there seems to me to be no reason whatever to dispute the historical accuracy of the facts given. In this Chapter, I record such cases between 1171 and 1510 inclusive; and I would point out to the reader the great importance of the murder of St. Simon of Trent in 1475 and of the Toledo case in 1490; in fact, should the reader be one of those who approach the subject as unbelievers, I recommend that he should read about these two cases first, and the others after.

The following abbreviations are used in this Chapter among the references to authorities: Magd. Cent. for Magdeburg Centuries, a Protestant History of the Christian Church compiled at Magdeburg, sixteenth century. Chron. Hirsaug. for Chronicon Hirsaugiense, a history produced by Abbot J. Trithemius, 1514. Cosm. Munst. for Sebastian Munster’s Cosmographia Universalis, 1544. Spec. Vinc. for Vincent of Beauvais’s Speculum Historiale, of 13th century. 1171. Blois, France.

At Passover, a Christian child was crucified, his body drained of blood and thrown into the river. A number of Jews were executed. Authority: Monumenta Germaniæ Historica, VI, 520; Magd Cent., 12, c. 14 and 13, c. 14. 1179. Pontoise. The authorities for this case are the Bollandists (Acta, Vol. III, March, 591); Madg. Cent., 23, c. 14; Spec. Vinc, 129, c. 25; and Cosm. Munst., 23, c. 14.

A boy named Richard was tortured, crucified and bled white. Philip Augustus’s chaplains and historians, Rigord and Guillaume l’Armoricain, attested this case. The body of the boy was taken to the Church of the Holy Innocents in Paris and he was canonised as St. Richard. Under date 1080, Haydn’s Dictionary of Dates, 1847, p. 282, says: “Thinking to invoke the divine mercy, at a solemnisation of the Passover, they (the Jews) sacrifice a youth, the son of a rich tradesman at Paris, for which all the criminals are executed and all Jews banished [from] France.” 1192. Braisne. Philip Augustus attended to this case personally, and had the criminals burnt. It was a case of the crucifixion of a Christian sold to the Jews by Agnes, Countess of Dreux, who considered him guilty of homicide and theft. Authority: Histoire des Ducs et Comtes de Champagne, IV, 1st part, p. 72, Paris, 1865 by A. de Jubainville; Spec. Vinc., 129, c. 25; Gaguin, L. 6, De Francis; Magd. Cent., 12, c. 14, col. 1670.

JEWISH RITUAL MURDER 17 1235. Fulda, Hesse-Nassau.

Five children murdered; Jews confessed under torture, but said the blood was wanted for healing purposes. Frederick II exonerated the Jews from suspicion, but the Crusaders had already dealt with a number by putting them to death. Frederick II called together a number of converted Jews, who denied the existence of Jewish ritual murder. But Frederick’s bias is evident in his own words when, in publishing his decision, he gives his objects in calling these people together, “although our conscience regarded the innocence of the aforesaid Jews adequately proved on the ground of several writings.” Had Frederick II lived to-day, he would have relied little upon religious literature in deciding whether Jewish Ritual Murder exists or not. Authority: Chron. Hirsaug., and Magd. Cent., 13, c. 24. 1247. Valreas, France.

Just before Easter, a two-year-old girl’s body was found in the town moat with wounds on forehead, hands and feet. Jews confessed under torture that they wanted the blood of the child, but did not say that it was for ceremonial purposes. Pope Innocent IV said that three of the Jews were executed without confessing, but the Jewish Encyclopædia, 1903, Vol. III, p. 261, says they confessed. 1250.

Saragossa. A boy crucified, afterwards canonised as St. Dominiculus. Pius VII, 24th Nov., 1805, confirmed a decree of the Congregation of Rites of 31st August, according this canonisation. 1261. Pforzheim, Baden. An old woman sold a seven-year-old girl to the Jews, who bled her, strangled her and threw the body into the river. The old woman was convicted on the evidence of her own daughter. A number of Jews were condemned to death, two committing suicide. Authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, p. 838; Rohrbacher, L’ Histoire Universelle de l’Eglise Catholique, Vol. XVIII, pp. 697-700; Thos. Cantipranus, De ratione vitæ Vol. II, xxix. The child was canonised as a saint. 1287.

Berne. Rudolf, a boy, was murdered at Passover in the house of a rich Jew called Matler. Jews confessed that he had been crucified; many were put to death. The boy was canonised as a martyr, and his name can be found in several martyrologies. Documental authorities: Bollandists, Acta, Vol. II, April; Helvetia sancta (H. Murer); Karl Howald, Die Brunnen zu Bern, 1848, p. 250; Cosm. Munst., 13, p. 482. But a stone monument still exists in Berne commemorating the crime. It is called The Fountain of the Child-Devourer, and is now on the Kornhausplatz. It represents a monster, with a Jewish countenance, eating a child. The figure wears the Judenhut, the hat prescribed for the Jews to wear by decree of the Fourth Lateran Council in 1215. This monument was first placed in a street of the Jews’ quarter as a reminder of the monstrous crime and as a punishment for the whole of Berne Jewry. Later, it was removed to its present situation.

18 MY IRRELEVANT DEFENCE 1288. Troyes, France. Some Jews were tried for a ritual murder and 13 were executed by burning. Authority: Jewish Encyclopædia, 1906, Vol. XII, p. 267. 1286.

Oberwesel, on the Rhine. A boy named Werner was tortured for three days at Passover, hanged by the legs and bled white. The body was found in the river. This boy was beatified in the diocese of Treves, and his anniversary is on 19th April. A sculptured representation of this ritual murder is still to be seen in the Oberwesel Church. Authorities: Aventinus, Annals of Bavaria, 1521, 17, p. 576; Chron. Hirsaug., Magd. Cent., 13, c. 14. 1462. Rinn, Innsbruck.

A boy called Andreas Oxner was bought by the Jews and sacrificed for his blood on a stone in the forest. The body was found by his mother in a birch-tree. No Jew was apprehended because, the border being near, they had fled when the crime was made known. The Abbe Vacandard, defender of the Jews, says there was no trial. Well, of course there wasn’t. Even in 1937 there is no trial for a crime where the criminals have escaped! The boy has been sanctified by Pope Benedict XIV in his Bull Beatus Andreas, Venice, 1778, which says he was “cruelly assassinated by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ.”

This last is admitted by Pope Clement XIV, who wrote his report on the investigation he made into the matter of Jewish Ritual Murder when, as Cardinal Ganganelli, he had been commissioned by Pope Benedict XIV to go into the matter; and in this report, he says “I admit the truth of another fact, which happened in the year 1462 in the village of Rinn, in the Diocese of Brixen, in the person of the Blessed Andreas, a boy barbarously murdered by the Jews in hatred of the faith of Jesus Christ.” No one questions the historical occurrence of this case. An engraving on wood representing the Ritual Murder still exists in the church. 1468.

Sepulveda, Segovia, Spain. The Jews sacrificed a Christian child on a cross. The Bishop of Segovia investigated the crime, and ordered the culprits to Segovia, where they were executed. It is important to know that this Bishop was himself son of a converted Jew; Jean d’Avila was his name. Colmenares’s History of Segovia records the facts of the case, which was juridically decided by a man of Jewish blood. That may be the reason that one finds no mention of it in Strack’s book in defence of the Jews, The Jew and Human Sacrifice. 1475.

The Case of St. Simon of Trent. In 1475, a three-year-old boy named Simon disappeared in the Italian town of Trent; the circumstances were such that suspicion fell upon the Jews. Hoping to avert this suspicion, they themselves “found” the child’s body in a conduit where they afterwards confessed to having thrown it. Examination of the body, however, revealed that the boy had not been drowned; there were strange wounds on the body, of circumcision and crucifixion.

About seven Jews were arrested; they were tortured and confessed that the boy had been ritually murdered for the purpose of obtaining Christian blood to mix with the ceremonial unleavened bread; these confessions were made separately and agreed in all essential details. The Jews were tried and were ultimately executed. The officer in charge of the investigation of the crime, Jean de Salis de Brescia, had before him a converted Jew, Jean de Feltro, who described how his father told him that Jews of his town, Lanzhat, had killed a child at Passover to get the blood of which they partook in wine and cakes.

NAMBLA…NORTH AMERICAN MAN BOY LOVE ASSOCIATION

In Their Own Words

In the words of Harry Hay, the gay icon and founder of the American gay movement:

If the parents and friends of gays are truly friends of gays, they would know from their gay kids that the relationship with an older man is precisely what thirteen-, fourteen-, and fifteen-year-old kids need more than anything else in the world.

You can be assured that such relationships would often become sexual, thereby providing the entry point into the larger homosexual “lifestyle.” (For other quotes from Hay, see here.)

Similarly, the renowned gay activist Larry Kramer opined,

In those cases where children do have sex with their homosexual elders … I submit that often, very often, the child desires the activity, and perhaps even solicits it, either because of a natural curiosity … or because he or she is homosexual and innately knows it. … And unlike girls or women forced into rape or traumatized, most gay men have warm memories of their earliest and early sexual encounters; when we share these stories with each other, they are invariably positive ones.

That’s why “man-boy love” has been celebrated in homosexual culture through the centuries, that’s why there’s a page listing “Historical pederastic couples” on a gay Wikipedia site, and that’s why George Takei could speak glowingly of his first sexual encounter at the age of 13 (with a 19-year-old male camp counselor), at a time when he admits he didn’t know he was gay.

In this light, the outrageous statement by philosopher Michael Foucalt, arguing for lowering the age of consent, doesn’t sound as outrageous: “It is quite difficult to lay down barriers [particularly since] it could be that the child, with his own sexuality, may have desired the adult.”

Ah yes, it was the child asking for it again. This too is sickening beyond words.

The reality is that children, especially pre-teens and young teens, are tremendously impressionable and malleable, as confirmed by this account shared by a Christian family activist (reflecting on his pre-Christian youth):

When I was about 14 or 15, I spent an afternoon smoking pot with a ‘gay’ guy in his 20’s who explained that young people during puberty have a very fluid sexual identity and how easy it had been for him to turn young teen boys into sex partners … A confirming study I later saw said 25% of young teens suffer same-sex confusion but most grow out of it naturally by the end of adolescence.

Ex-gay Robert Lopez, raised by his mother and her lesbian partner, had this to say:

In a society soaked in porn where sexual orientation is discussed openly in front of small children, there will certainly be 12- and 13-year-olds who think they want sex and think they are ready for it. When we discuss ‘gay identity’ with 6th graders, which is very common, what are we discussing? We are talking about sexual acts. Perhaps people need to stand up and resist the Human Rights Campaign’s recent push to force such curricula on elementary and middle schools.

It is truly distasteful to speak of such things, but speak about them we must, given the ever-increasing scope of gay activism, especially in our children’s schools. And with the terribly painful issue of childhood sexual abuse coming to the fore in recent days, let’s use this as a teachable moment.

We can do this by: 1) being on the lookout for signs that our own children may have been abused; 2) refusing to allow our kids to be experimental pawns in the culture wars, because of which we strongly oppose sex-based LGBT curricula in the schools; and 3) no longer denying the common connection between childhood sexual abuse and adult homosexuality, thereby providing a path for healing and wholeness.

By doing these things, we will not only make this a teachable moment, but we will also make it a redemptive one. Source

Violence and Homosexuality

In 1992 two Jeffersonville, Indiana lesbians, aged 17 and 16, abducted a 12-year-old girl whom they accused of trying to “steal a girlfriend.” The little girl was pushed into the trunk of a car, stabbed repeatedly, and beaten with a heavy metal bar. While still struggling, they poured gasoline on her and set her ablaze. Later that year a Fort Lauderdale, Florida 14-year-old was convicted of first-degree murder for helping to kill his 40-year-old father. The father “was stabbed 45 times and beaten so badly with an iron skillet that the skillet shattered.” The boy confessed that he helped his father’s former homosexual lover and roommate kill him so he and the 31-year-old “could live together.”

These murders fit traditional psychiatric opinion: excessive violence is naturally associated with other forms of social pathology. From this perspective, those who rebel against society’s norms — homosexuals, prostitutes, alcoholics, etc. — are more apt to be violent also. Gay leaders reply that they are not pathological, rebellious, or sexually deviant. They contend that gays are gentle, loving people and that the violence they experience proves that they need special ‘hate crimes’ laws to protect them from non-homosexual ‘gay bashers.’

Who’s right? Does the excess of violence naturally well up from within a pathological gay subculture or do outsiders direct it toward homosexuals? Keeping in mind that only about 2-3% of adults are homosexual or bisexual,1 let’s examine varieties of violence.

Murder and Mass Murder

Although the total number of victims dispatched by a given killer is often in doubt, (e.g., homosexual Henry Lucas claimed that he killed 350), it appears that the modern world record for serial killing is held by a Russian homosexual, Andrei Chikatilo, who was convicted in 1992 of raping, murdering and eating parts of at least 21 boys, 17 women, and 14 girls. The pathology of eating one’s sexual victims also characterized Milwaukee’s Jeffrey Dahmer in 1992. He not only killed 17 young men and boys, but cooked and ate their body parts.

The top six American male serial killers were all gay:

  • Donald Harvey claimed 37 victims in Kentucky;
  • John Wayne Gacy raped and killed 33 boys in Chicago, burying them under his house and in his yard;
  • Patrick Kearney accounted for 32, cutting his victims into small pieces after sex and leaving them in trash bags along the Los Angeles freeways;
  • Bruce Davis molested and killed 27 young men and boys in Illinois;
  • A gay sex-murder-torture ring (Corll-Henley-Brooks) sent 27 Texas men and boys to their grave; and
  • Juan Corona was convicted of murdering 25 migrant workers (he “made love” with their corpses).

Lesbian Aileen Wuornos laid claim in 1992 to “worst female killer” with at least 7 middle-aged male victims. She singlehandedly topped the lesbian nurse team of Catherine Wood and Gwen Graham, who had killed 6 convalescent patients in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

The association between serial murder and homosexuality isn’t recent. Two gays compete for the spot of “world’s worst murderer.” During the Nazi reign of terror, Auschwitz executioner Ludwig Tiene strangled, crushed, and gnawed boys and young men to death while he raped them. Though his grand total is uncertain, he often murdered as many as 100 a day. Gilles de Rais (Bluebeard) brutally destroyed the lives of 800 boys. Each lad was lured to his home, bathed and fed. Just as the poor boy thought “this is my lucky day,” he was raped, then killed by being ripped or cut apart and either burned or eaten.

A study of 518 sexually-tinged mass murders in the U.S. from 1966 to 1983 determined that 350 (68%) of the victims were killed by those who practiced homosexuality and that 19 (44%) of the 43 murderers were bisexuals or homosexuals.2

Though probably less than a majority of mass murderers are homosexual, given that no more than 3% of the populace is gay, homosexual murderers show up much more frequently than one would expect (even Richard Speck engaged in homosexuality).

Along with serial murder, there appears to be a connection between homosexuality and murder. Evidence from before the modern gay rights movement is limited. Of 444 homicides in one jurisdiction from 1955-1973, investigators noted 5 clear “sexual motivation” murders. Three of the 5 involved homosexuality and 2 involved heterosexuality.3

Probing more deeply into the connection between murder and homosexuality, Jim Warren, who worked as a counselor at the Washington State Corrections Center, did the intake interview for almost all the younger murderers (i.e., under age 36) in the state of Washington from 1971-82 (during the growth of the gay rights movement). He was “probably the only one who examined the entirety of each of their case files.” Warren testified that he was struck with how frequently homosexuality turned up in the cases.4

Starting with a trickle of 2 or 3 murders/year in 1972 until dozens/year by the 1980s, he noted a recurrent pattern: Although the motive listed in the report was often robbery or theft, “about 50% of the time” it was also associated with homosexuality. Typically, a homosexual would meet someone at a bar or park and invite him to his home. Before the morning, an argument would ensue and he or his visitor would be dead.

Violent Sexual Practices

A substantial minority of homosexuals (between 22%5 to 37%6 indulge in painful or violent sex (e.g., bondage and discipline [B/D], where the partner is physically restrained and mildly tortured, or sadomasochism S/M], where partners are tortured or hurt during sex).

Even in the 1940s, psychiatrist David Abrahamsen noted,

“It is well known that homosexual inclinations may be accompanied by sadistic or masochistic tendencies…. These perversions play a great part in many sexual offenses and in many cases of murder.”7

In a national survey of random samples of homosexuals and heterosexuals,8 32% of those males who called themselves homosexual or bisexual versus 5% of heterosexual males reported having engaged in sadomasochism; 17% of lesbians versus 4% of heterosexual women also admitted to S/M. Likewise, gays and lesbians were about four times more apt to engage in bondage than were heterosexuals.

Homosexual books and magazines celebrate the “fun” of violent sex. For instance, a Denver gay columnist (the “leathersex fairy”), told his readers how to strangle and flog one’s partner during sex. He also extolled the practice of “hanging from a tree by meat hooks through the pectoral muscles” and described “guys who like to have burning cigars, cigarettes, or matches held near or pressed into their skin.”9 Likewise, national and international gay tour books matter-of-factly list places where sadomasochistic sex can be obtained.10

In 1993, London gays raised £100,000 to appeal a conviction in which the judge ruled that “sex is no excuse for violence…. Pleasure derived from the infliction of pain is an evil thing.” The crime? “Nailing a foreskin and scrotum to a board” and “pouring hot wax in a urethra.”11

The 1980 CBS-TV documentary, Gay Power, Gay Politics reported that about 10% of the accidental deaths among young men in San Francisco resulted from sadomasochistic sex gone awry.

Deliberately Infecting Others During Sex

Gay activists often argue that what consenting adults do in private is nobody else’s business. However, gays have sex with so many different partners12 that they increase their risk of getting or transmitting sexually transmitted diseases (STDs). Indeed, homosexuals are considerably more apt to get STDs than are non-homosexuals.13

Most who get an STD decide that they will do all in their power not to infect others. But others — an important minority — decide that they will make their partners suffer as much as they have. As Mirko Grmek noted14

“every historian of disease knows that such an attitude of vengeance, or at least of recklessness, had contributed in other times to the spread of tuberculosis and syphilis.”

Limited evidence suggests that, compared to heterosexuals, homosexuals are more apt to harm their sexual partners deliberately. The only comparative study on this issue found that about 1% of male and female heterosexuals compared to 7% of gays and 3% of lesbians admitted to deliberately passing on STDs that they had acquired.15

When the disease is AIDS, the personal and social costs of deliberate infection are exceptionally high. Several examples of homosexuals who were deliberate spreaders of AIDS have been documented,16 but the most notorious is that of “patient zero,” the Canadian flight attendant who, until his death at age 32, shared his body and infection with 250 men every year. From the late 1970s through the early 1980s he was personally responsible for at least 40 of the first 248 American cases of AIDS and told public health officials in San Francisco it “was nobody else’s business but his own.”

There also appears to be a connection between the practice of violent sex and one’s willingness to deliberately infect someone else. Dividing our random national sample17 into those with no interest in homosexual activity (non-homosexual) and those with at least some homosexual interest (homosexual) — and combining males and females — we found that 4.0% of the non-homosexual vs. 21.8% of those with at least some homosexual interest said that they had participated in sadomasochism (S/M); 7.8% of the non-homosexuals admitted to bondage (B/D) vs. 27.5% of the homosexuals. Further, those who had engaged in violent sex of either type were twice as likely to have deliberately attempted to infect a partner than those without such violent experience.

In 1992 three London STD clinics reported that almost half of their homosexual patients who knew they were infected with HIV had then gotten rectal gonorrhoea.18 These gays were not permitting their deadly infection to spoil their sexual fun. By 1993, over 100,000 U.S. gays had died of AIDS and tens of thousands had died of hepatitis B. Most of these had been infected, many deliberately or carelessly, by other homosexuals.

Homosexual Rape

The National Crime Survey19 reported that about 1 of every 10,000 males over the age of 11 is raped each year (vs. 13 of every 10,000 females) — that is, about 7% of rapes are homosexual. In two jurisdictions, Columbia, SC20 and Memphis, TN,21 males accounted for 5.7% of the victims of rape reported to authorities. In only one instance was the assailant a woman.

Along with the rise of the gay rights movement, homosexual rape of men appears to have increased in the past few decades.22 Homosexual rape is twice as common in urban areas where gays congregate than in suburban or rural areas.23

It may also be more common where the gay subculture is accepted: a 1970 study in San Francisco found that 9% of male heterosexuals and 24% of gays; 2% of female heterosexuals and 11% of lesbians reported having been homosexually raped.24 In our 1983 national urban survey (which did not include San Francisco), 1.3% of heterosexual men vs. 12.5% of gay men and 0.6% of heterosexual women vs. 8.6% of lesbians reported having been homosexually raped.25

More alarmingly, between 15% to 40% of statutory rape (child molestation) involves homosexuality.26 In one study, 25% of white gays admitted to sex with boys 16 or younger when they were aged 21 or older.27

Rape at any age is violent and emotionally devastating. But it can also edge victims toward homosexuality. In our national study, almost half the lesbians said they had been heterosexually raped — perhaps gravitating to homosexuality because of the experience. Males often react differently. Thus the Masters and Johnson Institute reported that a

“25-year-old man had had his first sexual experience when he was 13 years old. It was arranged by his lesbian mother with an older gay man. After that episode, his imagery and interpersonal sexual experience were exclusively homosexual.”28

Likewise,

“Mr. K, age 22, felt that his change in sexual preference was related to his having been raped by two men…. After the assault he experienced sexual identity confusion and began engaging voluntarily in homosexual activity. When he was seen for evaluation he labeled himself as openly homosexual.”29

Impact of Violence On The Homosexual Lifespan

A pioneering study of 6,714 obituaries30 in gay newspapers across the U.S. revealed that 3% of 6,574 gays and 20% of 140 lesbians had died violently:

  • 1.4% of gays and 7% of lesbians were murdered (rates over a hundred times those of non-gays);
  • 0.6% of gays and 5.7% of lesbians committed suicide (rates dozens of times those of non-gays); and
  • 0.6% of gays and 4.3% of lesbians died in motor vehicle accidents (over 17 times the rate of non-gays)

These events, coupled with various STDs (especially AIDS) gotten from other gays, resulted in a median age of death of 40 among gays and a median age of death of 45 among lesbians. In the same study, comparison samples of married men had a median age of death of 75 and married women a median age of death of 79. For divorced or single persons the median age of death was 57 for men and 71 for women.

Conclusion

The ‘hate crimes’ gays complain about are infrequent and seldom involve more than name-calling or snide remarks. The FBI reported 431 hate crimes against homosexuals for the U.S. in all of 1991. Only one was “confirmed” for Washington, D.C. — yet D.C. gay activists claimed 397 incidents! When pressed, they admitted that at least 366 of these “crimes” consisted of “verbal harassment.”31

In line with traditional psychiatric opinion, violence goes hand-in-hand with the ‘gay’ lifestyle. Almost all the exposure by homosexuals to violence and disease is encountered within the gay subculture, rather than outside of it. Most of the murderers in the lifespan study whose sexual orientation could be determined were also homosexual. While violence toward homosexuals is deplorable, most violence involving gays is self-induced. Overall, the gay subculture may export more violence than it absorbs from without.

    1. Muir (1993) Homosexuals and the 10% fallacy. Wall Street J March 31.
  • Cameron (1983) Is homosexuality disproportionately associated with murder? Paper presented at Midwestern Psychological Assn Chicago.
  • Swigert, et al (1976) Sexual homicide: social, psychological, and legal aspects. Archives Sexual Behavior 3:391-401.
  • Warren (1989) Testimony before the Law and Justice Committee of the Washington State Senate December 15.
  • Gebhard & Johnson (1979) The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews Conducted by the Institute for Sex Research. New York:Saunders.
  • Jay & Young (1979) The Gay Report New York:Summit; Cameron, et al (1989) The effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order. Psychological Rpts 64:1167-79.
  • Abrahamsen (1944) Crime and the Human Mind. New York:Columbia Univ Press, p122.
  • Cameron, et al (1989) The effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order. Psychological Rpts 64:1167-79.
  • Out Front (1992) August 5, p10.
  • e.g., Sparticus, Bob Damron’s Address Book.
  • Smith & Rodgerson (1993) Free the spanner men. Gay Times April, p8.
  • Gebhard & Johnson (1979) The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews Conducted by the Institute for Sex Research. New York:Saunders; Jay & Young (1979) The Gay Report New York:Summit; Cameron, et al (1989) The effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order. Psychological Rpts 64:1167-79.
  • Cameron, et al (1985) Sexual orientation and sexually-transmitted disease. Nebraska Medical J 70:292-9.
  • Grmek (1990) History of AIDS Princeton:Princeton Univ Press, p19.
  • Cameron, et al (1989) The effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order. Psychological Rpts 64:1167-79; Cameron, et al (1985) Sexual orientation and sexually-transmitted disease. Nebraska Medical J 70:292-9.
  • Grmek (1990) History of AIDS Princeton:Princeton Univ Press
  • Cameron, et al (1989) The effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order. Psychological Rpts 64:1167-79; Cameron, et al (1985) Sexual orientation and sexually-transmitted disease. Nebraska Medical J 70:292-9.
  • Newell (1992) Sexually transmitted diseases and anal papillomas. British Medical J 305:1435-6.
  • Harlow (1991) Female victims of violent crime. U.S. Dept Justice January, NCJ-126826; Bachman (1992) Crime victimization in city, suburban, and rural areas: a national crime victimization survey report. U.S. Dept Justice NCJ-135943.
  • Forman (1983) Reported male rape. Victimology 7:235-6.
  • Lipscomb, et al (1992) Male victims of sexual assault. J American Medical Assn 267:3064-6.
  • Gebhard & Johnson (1979) The Kinsey Data: Marginal Tabulations of the 1938-1963 Interviews Conducted by the Institute for Sex Research. New York:Saunders; Harlow (1991) Female victims of violent crime. U.S. Dept Justice January, NCJ-126826; Bachman (1992) Crime victimization in city, suburban, and rural areas: a national crime victimization survey report. U.S. Dept Justice NCJ-135943; Forman (1983) Reported male rape. Victimology 7:235-6.
  • Harlow (1991) Female victims of violent crime. U.S. Dept Justice January, NCJ-126826; Bachman (1992) Crime victimization in city, suburban, and rural areas: a national crime victimization survey report. U.S. Dept Justice NCJ-135943.
  • Bell, et al (1981) Sexual Preference: Statistical Appendix Bloomington:Indiana Univ Press.
  • Cameron, et al (1989) The effect of homosexuality upon public health and social order. Psychological Rpts 64:1167-79; Cameron, et al (1985) Sexual orientation and sexually-transmitted disease. Nebraska Medical J 70:292-9.
  • Cameron (1985) Homosexual molestation of children/sexual interaction of teacher and pupil. Psychological Rpts 57:1227-36.
  • Bell, et al (1981) Sexual Preference: Statistical Appendix Bloomington:Indiana Univ Press.
  • Schwartz & Masters (1984) The Masters and Johnson treatment program for dissatisfied homosexual men. American J Psychiatry 141:173-81.
  • Goyer & Eddleman (1984) Same-sex rape of non-incarcerated men. American J Psychiatry 141:576-9.
  • Cameron, et al (1993) The homosexual lifespan. Paper presented at Eastern Psychological Assn April 17.
  • Washington Blade (1993) FBI releases stats on hate crimes. January 1, p1. https://www.familyresearchinst.org/2009/02/violence-and-homosexuality/

Homosexual Murders and Brutality

See also: Gay bashing

According to the New York Times, Dr. William Eckert was a world-renowned authority in the field of pathology and he worked on major murder cases including the assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy and the Charles Manson murders.[4] Dr. Eckert founded the American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology.[4][5] According to Time magazine, Dr. Eckert was a pioneer who encouraged collaborative effort between law-enforcement and forensics teams.[5]

Dr. Eckert wrote regarding homosexual murders the following:

Equally high is the number of homicides, many probably related to transient attachments, which often lead to suspicion, jealousy, and murder. When murder does occur it is exceptionally brutal with an overkill appearance… Overkill, as it is seen in homosexual and lesbian murders, is certainly a form of sadistic crime. In these instances multiple stabbing and other brutal injuries…are common findings…[6]

The eminent pathologists Bernard Knight and Pekka Saukko stated that it is a fact that some of the most violent homicides seen by pathologists are among male homosexuals.

Bernard Knight CBE, MD, BCh, MRCP, FRCPath, FHKCPath, DMJ (Path) was a Professor of Forensic Pathology in the University of Wales until he retired in 1996.[7] In 1993 he was made a Commander of the British Empire (CBE) for his services to forensic medicine.[7][8] Dr. Bernard Knight has been involved in many notorious murder cases, including Fred West and Rosemary West, Roberto Calvi (the Vatican banker), the child killer Mary Bell, and the Steven Truscott case in Canada.[7] Dr. Pekka Saukko is Professor and Head of the Department of Forensic Medicine at the University of Turku in Finland.[8] Dr. Saukko is also the editor of Forensic Science International.[9] Doctors Knight and Saukko coauthored a pathology textbook entitled Knight’s Forensic Pathology in 2004 which declared:

As with heterosexual offenses, the cause of death in fatal cases is almost always some form of general trauma, such as strangulation or head injuries. Homosexual activity, however, may be a parallel event; it is a fact that some of the most violent homicides seen by pathologists are among male homosexuals.[10]

The previously cited article in the Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine states regarding homosexual murders: “These “Lovers’ quarrels” between male homosexuals manifest an increased level of violence due to the fact that the parties involved in the emotional conflict are both sexual aggressors.”[3]

The Encyclopedia of Serial Killers by Michael Newton reports:

Homosexual slayers clearly have no monopoly on violence, but it is true that their crimes often display extremes of “overkill” and mutilation… On balance, it seems fair to say that while homosexuals sometimes fall prey to “gay bashing” violence by bigoted “straights,” they are far more likely to be murdered by another homosexual than in a random hate crime.[11]

The previously cited pathology textbook by Knight and Saukko stated the following: “In addition, quite a number of fatal altercations arise because a heterosexual man becomes violent when importuned by a homosexual.”[12]

Other Forensic Journal Articles on Homosexual Murders and Overkill

There have been a number of journal articles on the issue of homosexual homicides and overkill.[13][14][15] In 1996, the forensic journal The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology published an article entitled Homicide in homosexual victims: a study of 67 cases from the Broward County, Florida, Medical Examiner’s office (1982-1992), with special emphasis on “overkill”. The abstract for the journal article states:

Forensic pathologists often state that homosexual homicides are more violent than those with heterosexual victims. Overkill or wounding far beyond that required to cause death is a frequently used descriptor of these deaths. We quantified the number and extent of injuries between homosexual and heterosexual homicide victims to determine whether one group suffered more violence than the other…Homosexual homicides are more violent than heterosexual homicides when one compares the mean number of injuries (fatal sharp, blunt, and total)/case and the extent of injuries on the body.[13]

Serial Killers who were Lesbians

Name # of People
Killed
Year Killer’s Home Location of Murders Notes
Magdalena Solis 8 1963 Monterey, Mexico Mexico
Aileen Wuornos 7+ 1989-90 south of Daytona, Florida Florida killed male “johns”
Tyria Moore 7+ 1989-90 south of Daytona, Florida Florida killed male “johns”
Catherine Wood 6 Grand Rapids, MI Grand Rapids, MI nurse who killed patients
Gwen Graham 6 Grand Rapids, MI Grand Rapids, MI nurse who killed patients

7_ Disembowelling before death commonly practiced

Occult Crimes directily connect Satanically/spiritually to the LBGTQ+P movement of Rapinoe and Bird https://usminc.org/crime6.html

 

Anti-Christian sentiment

The anti-christian sentiment is associated with the following phenomena taking place in society:

  • I) Discrimination: Denial of Rights of Christians
    • • Violation of freedom of expression
    • • Violation of freedom of conscience
    • • Violation of parents’ rights with regard to the education of the children[note 1]
    • • Violation of the institutional or collective dimension of religious freedom
    • • Discriminatory “equality” policies
  • II) Intolerance: Marginalization of Christians. The proposition to attack the organized religion was made, for example, by Richard Dawkins, an adherent of Militant atheism[6] and proponent of LGBT ideology Sir Elton John who would like to have all organized religion banned.[7]
    • • Exclusion of Christians from social and public life
    • • Exclusion of Christian symbols from the public
    • • Social disadvantages for Christians
    • • Incitement, insult or defamation
    • • Misrepresentation of Christians in the media through negative stereotyping
  • III) Hate Incidents
    • • Hate crimes against Christians[8] On October 3, 2017 a Charles Miller brutally assaulted 63 year old Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Newark, Most Reverend Manuel A. Cruz during an opening prayer that was partially dedicated to commemorating the life of Catholic baseball legend Roberto Clemente, who died in a tragic death in a plane crash en route to deliver aid to earthquake victims in Nicaragua in 1972.[9]
    • • Hate incidents such as the disruption of services. For example, in 2008 a radical homosexual organization called Bash Back disrupted Sunday services at a Michigan Assemblies of God-affiliated church, throwing fliers, shouting slogans at churchgoers including one that Jesus was homosexual, and kissing each other. The group involved activists dressed in pink and black equipped “with a megaphone, black flags, picket signs, and an upside-down pink cross.”
    • • Vandalism and desecrations

Statistics

Violence against Christians is under-reported by the mainstream media, and it doubled between 2017 and 2019.

In 2015 and 2016, the Center for Studies on New Religions was reported that Christians were the most persecuted of any type of group in the world, with almost 600 million Christians being affected by persecution and 90,000 killed in 2016 alone. Between 2005 and 2015, over 900,000 Christians were martyred for their faith. According to Open Doors USA in January 2018, at least 215 million Christians globally face severe persecution, and according to Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), over 500 million Christians face persecution. According to Pew Research Center, restrictions on religious liberty increased in 2016 for the second year in a row, with Christianity being the most affected. According to a 2017 report by Open Doors USA, the persecution of Christians is growing and is being seen in an increasing number of countries, and it reported that the number of Christians facing persecution rose 14% between 2015 and 2018. A 2017 report by Pew Research, concerning 2014 and 2015, yielded similar findings.

The countries with the most extreme persecution of Christians, as of 2017, tend to be Muslim nations, even though the most anti-Christian nation is North Korea. As recorded between November 1, 2015, to October 31, 2016, Pakistan had the largest number of Christians killed and churches attacked. The U.S. Commission for International Religious Freedom reported in May 2017 that religious freedom around the world was “worsening in both the depth and breadth of violations.”

According to a 2015–2017 ACN study, Christians comprised 75% of all the victims of religious persecution around the globe.[17] According to the news agency Fides, at least 447 Roman Catholic missionaries alone were killed from 2000 through 2017.[18]

Despite strong persecution in the Middle East, thousands of Muslims are turning to Christ.

Americas

Canada

Like the rest of the West, the Canadian government (currently, the Liberal Party of Canada under Prime Minister Justin Trudeau) has become more hostile towards Christianity. In 2017, a local school district, the Battle River School Division, ordered a Christian school to stop teaching “offensive” passages from the Bible, something that would alter the Christian message and omit key portions of the Bible from being taught.

In 2017, the Canadian government chose to ban employers who oppose abortion or homosexual “marriage” from being able to receive summer job grants for students,[99][100][101] and in March 2018, the Canadian House of Commons voted 207–93 against reversing the requirement that employers sign an attestation affirming their support for such issues. In January 2018, Prime Minister Trudeau indicated that pro-life speech is not protected speech. When asked on where the Canadian government limits free speech, Trudeau mentioned abortion, stating that “an organization that has the explicit purpose of restricting women’s rights by removing rights to abortion, the right for women to control their own bodies, is not in line with where we are as a government and quite frankly where we are as a society.”

In June 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled against an explicitly Christian law school, saying that is was “proportionate and reasonable” for some Canadian law societies to deny accreditation to the school’s graduates because the school opposed homosexuality due to its Christian values.

In 2018, Canadian activist Bill Whatcott faced being unjustly sentenced to two years in prison for what his persecutors claimed was his committing “Wilful [sic] Promotion of Hatred against an identifiable group” – AKA passing out pamphlets at a 2016 “gay pride” parade that shared the Christian message that homosexuality is a sin and that repenting of all sin leads to “the free gift of eternal life.”

The New Democratic Party government of Alberta heavily promoted the homosexual agenda in the state’s education system, such as forcing Christian schools to create Gay-Straight Alliance Clubs even if only one student wanted one, and threatened to defund religious schools if they do not remove religious content from their curriculum.

United States

Persecution mainly exists in ridicule, liberal biasbigotry and/or religious discrimination of traditional Christian family values by Hollywood.[108][109][110] If this is further tolerated, there is a distinct possibility that violence against Christians could be next. Numerous Christians, whether business owners or other people, such as Kim Davis or Roy Moore, have been persecuted in various ways (lawsuits, loss of business, arrest, threats, etc.) for holding on to their sincerely-held beliefs and refusing to bow down to the homosexual agenda.

Don Feder, founder of a group called Jews Against Anti-Christian Defamation, used his condemnation of the 2005 film “V for Vendetta” to say, “It’s very much in keeping with what has become Hollywood’s standard anti-Christian message – that Christians are hypocritical hate-mongers, with tendencies toward violence, who are waiting to seize the reins of government and persecute unbelievers. David Limbaugh says, “This anti-Christian bias manifests itself in unflattering portrayals of Christians in Hollywood films and entertainment television.

In a government report released in 2016, Martin R. Castro, the chairman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, claimed that “The phrases “religious liberty” and “religious freedom” will stand for nothing except hypocrisy so long as they remain code words for discrimination, intolerance, racism, sexism, homophobia, Islamophobia, Christian supremacy or any form of intolerance.

In 2014, Houston Mayor Annise Parker, a leftist and the first openly-homosexual mayor of the city, illegally issued subpoenas on pastors, ordering them to turn over sermons concerning homosexuality.

On October 1, 2017, a homosexual coffee shop owner kicked several Christians out of his shop because he claimed their very presence “offended” him. Leftist organizations which regularly make demands for Christians to be forced to serve homosexuals with no exceptions, such as the ACLU, hypocritically remained silent on this incident. In one reported instance (out of many), the owners of a Pennsylvania bridal shop chose to close their business because of threats from homosexual activists.

Christianity is increasingly coming under attack at public education institutions. For example, in October 2017, Wayne State University, a public institution, de-recognized InterVarsity Christian Fellowship as the student group required its members to be Christians.

The owner of the Masterpiece Cakeshop in Colorado, Jack Phillips, has come under repeated assault for his non-compliance with state-imposed liberal ideology. After winning a Supreme Court case (on very narrow grounds) protecting his religious freedom with regards to being forced to violate his conscience by corrupt Colorado state officials, other left-wing groups, including satanists and transgender people, jokingly requested cakes expressing their anti-Christian points of view, and he even was sued for this with the willing assistance of the same state officials who have been illegally persecuting him in deliberate ignorance of the Supreme Court ruling.

In 2019, the State of California attempted to evict an elderly woman from a veterans’ home because she led Bible studies.

Liberal censorship

Liberal censorship refers to liberal attempts to mute all opposition to liberal beliefs, is one of the core tenets of liberalism, and is an almost exclusively liberal practice in modern times. Deceitful techniques of liberal censorship include:

  • On college campuses, liberals censor a conservative speaker by claiming he somehow makes some feel “unsafe”
  • Liberals exaggerate offhand remarks by sports players in an attempt to chill their speech, particularly if the comments are contrary to the homosexual agenda
  • The Huffington Post censored an article on the possible relationship between school shootings and violent video games[1]
  • Ben Carson was forced to withdraw as commencement speaker of his own school, Johns Hopkins University, because of his criticism of same-sex “marriage”
  • Liberal opposition to free speech forced Tim Tebow to cancel a speaking event at a large church because its pastor has opposed the homosexual agenda
  • Opposing information for women that would let them know that abortion increases their risk of breast cancer, as confirmed by numerous studies
  • Expelling a young athlete from the 2012 Summer Olympics because she tweeted a joke about immigration, despite her apology, thereby destroying her dream and years of hard work
  • Monopolizing discussions and repeatedly talking more than the other side, despite saying nothing coherently
  • Censoring readership of the Bible by deceptively pulling people from it, as in their formative years
  • Feigning offense in order to censor classroom prayer and religious symbols
  • Branding statements as “hate speech,” with the ultimate goal of marginalizing the Bible in that way
  • Intimidating sponsors of conservative speaking events by harassing them
  • Seeking information about donors to traditional marriage referenda in order to harass them
  • Engaging in violent protests at conservative events, vandalizing conservative wikis on the Internet (particularly Conservapedia), or censoring by forcing the removal of conservative YouTube videos via frivolous and baseless “hate speech” claims
  • Getting a legitimate contributor banned from all or part of a website because of remarks he made on a different website
  • Censoring quotations from the Bible that contradict their personal opinions of what God meant to say
  • Censoring conservative speech on liberal-controlled comment forums while allowing liberal hate speech and attacks on conservatives to remain; any complaints to the site administrators or moderators regarding their behavior on the boards is often ignored

Liberals inevitably demand censorship of ideas that challenge and counter their views due to their fear of opposing views, ideas, and facts, and thus attempt to silence all criticism of their ideology by slandering conservatives and other opponents as “racist” and “reactionary“, legally enforce political correctness, and establish legislation making many forms of religious speech illegal under misnamed “hate speech” laws. This is especially true in its most extreme political manifestation, Communism.

The National Republican Senatorial Committee makes this claim:

  • Realizing that their ideas couldn’t compete in the Free MarketDemocrats schemed for ways to crush conservative talk radio‘s success. Their answer? The so-called “Fairness Doctrine” which, despite its name, was anything but fair except to those in the liberal media. The revival of the “Fairness Doctrine” would have the chilling effect of censoring conservative talk radio and freedom of speech by requiring radio stations to air liberal content. Democrats would demand that talk stations air liberal content or their station license would be revoked. It’s unfortunate that Democrats are willing to trample on our First Amendment rights for political gain.[2] Fortunately, Ronald Reagan put an end to the forced inclusion of liberal content on talk stations with the repeal of the Fairness Doctrine in 1987 and, as expected under a free market, the liberal talk format faltered and largely collapsed (including the demise of the short-lived liberal Air America radio network).

In an attempt to divert attention from this demand, liberals charge that conservatives also censor when they can. An example some give is Conservapedia. They claim that edits that disagree with the prevailing conservative viewpoint here regularly lead to a block, even though Conservapedia does not block for ideological reasons.

Unlike liberals, Conservapedia does not censor on ideological grounds. Occasionally it is necessary to take action to prevent liberals from abusing its hospitality to ideas by seeking to damage or destroy the project through waves of vandalism from outside and deep cover subversion from within by the site’s few regular liberal-leaning editors. Such action is necessary to protect and defend freedom of expression.

Opposition to Christianity

Many individuals, groups, and even cultural movements in modern times are antichristian. This means they actively seek to attack, undermine, and denigrate the Christian faith while deceiving the public about the nature of Christianity, its heritage, and accomplishments. Read

StevieRay Hansen
Editor, HNewsWire.com
Conservative Christian World News

“And it shall come to pass afterward, that I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh; and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions.” (Joel 2:28.)

John Wesley who said that what we tolerate in our generation, will be embraced by the next. Wesley is 100% correct! We are living in sick times.

Usually, the Lord doth no great thing for or against his people, without giving warning of it before it comes.

They perverted justice among themselves (v. 7): “You turn judgment to wormwood, that is, you make your administrations of justice bitter and nauseous, and highly displeasing both to God and man.’’ That fruit has become a weed, a weed in the garden; as nothing is more venerable, nothing more valuable, than justice duly administered, so nothing is more hurtful, nothing more abominable, than designedly doing wrong under color and pretense of doing right. Corruptio optimi est pessima —The best, when corrupted, becomes the worst.

It is impossible to find anyone in the Bible who was a power for God who did not have enemies and was not hated.

2 Corinthians 4:8-11 New King James Version (NKJV)
8 We are hard-pressed on every side, yet not crushed; we are perplexed, but not in despair; 9 persecuted, but not forsaken; struck down, but not destroyed— 10 always carrying about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our body. 11 For we who live are always delivered to death for Jesus’ sake, that the life of Jesus also may be manifested in our mortal flesh.

“Pedophile” has reverberated throughout America. But beneath our anger and revulsion, a fundamental question pulsates: Are those who abuse their positions of trust to prey upon children—a category certainly not limited to those in religious orders—sick … or are they evil? We need the answer to that fundamental question. Because, without the truth, we cannot act. And until we act, nothing will change.

My job is protecting children. It has taken me from big cities to rural outposts, from ghettos to penthouses, and from courtrooms, into demonic battlefields. But whatever the venue, the truth remains constant: Some humans intentionally hurt children. They commit unspeakable acts—for their pleasure, their profit, or both.

FOOTNOTES and things of interest

Effect of homosexuality on public health and social order https://www.familyresearchinst.org/2010/08/effect-of-homosexuality-upon-public-health-and-social-order-2/

Sexual Orientation and Sexually Transmitted Disease

Author: Paul Cameron, Kay Proctor, William Coburn, Jr., and Nels Forde

Summary: 4,340 adults randomly drawn from five metropolitan areas were questionnaired about their sexual orientation, involvement with unusual sexual practices (e.g., sadomasochism, bondage & discipline), oral/anal sex, number of homo- and heterosexual partners, and sexually transmitted disease (STD) experience. Bi/homosexuals of both genders (4.4% of the sample) reported higher lifetime rates for most of the STDs and admitted to higher rates of deliberate infection of others than their heterosexual counterparts. Stepwise regression analysis indicated that degree of participation in unusual sexual practices, anal/oral contact, age and number of homosexual partners predicted STD experience. Younger adults and homosexuals more frequently reported engaging in both unusual sexual activities, oral/anal contact, and having had STD experience. Homosexuals appear to contribute no less than 15% of the nation’s STDs and probably act as a significant vector in generating additional fractions to the STD pool.

References: Nebraska Medical Journal, 1985, 70(8), 292-299. https://www.familyresearchinst.org/2008/12/sexual-orientation-and-sexually-transmitted-disease/

PORNOGRAPHY AND ITS CONNECTIONS TO CHILD MOLESTERS

American Life League


Amazing as it may seem in this child-hating and homophobic society, boy lovers [pederasts] find boys attractive and like their spontaneity and openness.

Flyer distributed by NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association).[1]

WARNING!
Some of the material described in
this chapter is extremely
offensive in nature.

Introduction.

One of the most popular themes of hard-core pornography is the subjugation and sexual torture of children. Most such porn deals with teenaged girls, although very small toddlers of both sexes may be forced into such activity.

The subthemes of bestiality and Satanism are frequently included in sexual materials that depict child abuse and torture. Some of these movies go so far as to record the actual killing of children and others the so-called “snuff films.”

Children as Sex Objects.

Soft-Core Porn.

Although hard-core “kiddie porn” is a grave problem, by far the most serious threat posed by pornography is the so-called soft-core “gentleman’s magazines,” due to their large circulation and their ‘mainstreaming’ effects on porn.

The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention of the Department of Justice recently examined every issue of Playboy (373 issues), Hustler (126 issues), and Penthouse (184 issues) published from 1953 to 1984.[2]

These three magazines were selected for study because their popularity and widespread circulation. It is estimated that one-quarter of the adult male population, or about 27,560,000 persons, reads one or more of these three magazines each month.

The Department of Justice found that the total of 683 separate issues included;

• 14,854 images of crime and violence;

• more than 50,000 images of female breasts and genitals; and

• a total of 6,004 depictions of children, or an average of nine per issue. Hustler Magazine depicted children an average of 14 times per issue. Of these 6,004 depictions,

• 1,675 involved nudity;

• 1,225 involved genital activity;

• 989 showed sexual activity with adults (almost all of which showed the child enjoying or benefiting from the activity);

• 792 adults were depicted as children in some manner;

• 592 examples depicted coercion;

• 267 involved sex with animals or objects; and

• about half involved children in the age range of 3 to 11 years.

Chester the Molester.

Many sexual perversions (both heterosexual and homosexual) overlap others, and pedophilia is certainly no exception. There is a large market for homosexual pornography depicting sex acts between children and adults, and this market extends into ‘heterosexual’ hard-core porn magazines like Hustler, which commonly features cartoons by homosexual Dwayne Tinsley. These cartoons depict the torture, degradation, and murder of small children.

The most blatant example of this trivialization is Hustler’s cartoon series “Chester the Molester,” which follows the ‘adventures’ of a lecherous old man who has a fixation with young girls.

A typical “Chester” cartoon (Hustler, October 1977) showed a leering Chester sitting naked in an easy chair, with three frightened and bound girls of about 8-10 years old firmly in his grasp. Meanwhile, a television voice asked, “It is eleven o’clock … do you know where your children are?”

It is amusing in a macabre way that the publishers of Hustler vehemently denied any connection between their depictions of child abuse and the commission of actual sexual crimes against children. They continued to play the victim even after 44-year old Tinsley, who draws the “Chester the Molester” comic strip, was arrested in May of 1989 for allegedly molesting a teenage girl for several years. Tinsley is employed by LSP Inc., the parent company of Hustler magazine.[3]

Tinsley was charged with felony incest, sodomy, child molestation, rape and oral copulation. His own 18-year old daughter testified during his trial that he molested her up to three times a day for five years.[4]

The cartoonist was convicted by a Southern California jury of five counts of child molestation. He was also convicted of three counts of “having substantial sexual contact” with the 13-year old girl whose accusations led to his arrest. According to evidence presented at trial, Tinsley explained that “You can’t write this stuff all the time if you don’t experience it.”[4]

The Attorney General’s Findings.

A sampling of the titles of the films, books, and magazines dealing with the theme of child sex unearthed by the Attorney General’s Commission on Pornography are listed below.

These materials are available in most pornographic bookstores. It takes little effort to imagine how many small children have been ruined by the heavy demand for such materials. The number is, by now, certainly in the tens of thousands.

TITLES OF MOTION PICTURES FOCUSING ON CHILD SEXUAL MOLESTATION

“Baby Dolls”
“Baby Games”
“Barely Legal”
“High School Bunnies”
“Hot Fun Schoolgirl”
“Juvenile Sluts”
“Little Girls Talking Dirty”
“Love Under Sixteen”
“Milky Squirts”
“Naked Teen On a Leash”
“Older Men With Young Girls”
“Older Women With Young Boys”
“Pretty Young Girls”
“Schoolgirl By Day”
“Teenage Anal Climax”
“Ten Little Maids”
“Tender Young Things”
“Too Young to Know”
“Torrid Tots”
“Young Prey”
“Youthful Lust”

Reference. The Attorney General’s Report on Pornography. Washington, D.C.: United States Government Printing Office, 1986. 711 pages. This report lists 5,420 titles of hard-core pornographic books, magazines and movies found in a sampling of porn shops across the United States.

General Conclusions.

The information presented in the above paragraphs shows that the constant depiction of children in soft-core pornography magazines blurs the line between adults having sexual activity with other adults and adults having sexual activity with children.

The ultimate effect is inevitable and devastating: Children are portrayed as desirable sex partners and early sexual activity is depicted as harmless or even beneficial to them.

Organized Child Molesters.

Introduction.

Believe it or not, even child molesters have unions! Incredibly, organizations that openly promote pedophilia operate freely in this and other countries. The Rene Guyot Society operates out of California and “boasts” 10,000 members. Its motto is “Sex before eight or it’s too late!” Its East Coast counterpart is the North American Man-Boy Live Association (NAMBLA), whose membership is concentrated in eleven major Northeast and Midwest cities.

The major British pervert group is the Paedophilic Information Exchange (PIE), which wants to lower the age of consent to four years. Other such organizations include the Lewis Carroll Collector’s Guild, the Childhood Sensuality Circle, the Eulenspiegel Society, and PAN.

Pedophile Techniques.

Organized child molesters have taken advantage of the latest technology and information management techniques to establish a highly-organized network that poses a grave threat to our nation’s children.

Child molesters in these clubs run at least 135 electronic “bulletin boards” which exchange the names and descriptions of children who have been brutalized into accepting the sadistic behavior of the predators, usually for fear of extreme punishment if they do not comply. The information exchanged also includes new techniques for controlling children and destroying their inhibitions and values. One of these techniques includes raping the children with flagpoles (complete with American flag), and Bibles with hard corners.[5]

According to Dr. Ann Burgess of the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, there are now 275 monthly “kiddie porn” magazines in circulation.[5] These specialized, high-quality ‘molester mags’ include tips on luring children, such as using soap crayons in the bath to get young children to disrobe.

Incredibly, these groups also perform studies and publish scientific articles that ‘support’ pedophilia. Some of this propagandist “research” is as laughable as it is hideous. For example, The Rene Guyot Society’s proposed revisions to the California Penal Code included the conclusions reached in Figure 137-1.

FIGURE 137-1
CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE REVISIONS SOUGHT BY THE RENE GUYON SOCIETY

HOMOSEXUALITY (Anal Copulation, PC 286).

We Suggest: At age 4, and sometimes sooner, both male and female children want, can easily hold after massage, and will be allowed to have a teenager of older male’s condom-covered penis in their anus. Tiny children will be required to wear a small “finger stall” or “finger cot” (obtainable from a drug store) condom from age 4 or any earlier age that they start penetrating male and female anuses. 99% of the day there is no fecal matter in the anus. No enema is required.

Reasons: Makes child aware of anal venereal disease and its prevention. [Anal copulation is] part of the natural progress of development to heterosexuality.

ORAL COPULATION (PC 288a).

We Suggest: At age 4, and sometimes sooner, both male and female children want, can easily hold, and will be allowed to have a tiny child, teenager, or older male’s penis in their mouth. This will bring an end to thumbsucking. The child will at last get valuable hormones that appear in the mature male’s ejaculate that have been denied children in the past. Very young, teenage and adult females will be allowed to provide sexual satisfaction with their mouths and tongues to the penis and clitoris of young children.

Reasons: Trains for heterosexuality. No data exists showing that any harm is done. [Oral copulation is] part of the natural progress of development to heterosexuality.

HETEROSEXUALITY (Penis-Vagina Copulation (PC 261.1)).

We Suggest: At age 10, 11, or 12, females want, can easily hold, and will be allowed to have a teenager or older male’s condom-covered penis in their vagina. From the earliest age of desire, a very young female will be allowed to have a tiny male’s penis in her vagina if the penis is covered with a “finger stall” or “finger cot” (obtainable from a drug store). At all ages prior to age 18 for the female, the female is required to have vaginal foam inserted before penetration of the covered penis.

Reasons: Prevents venereal disease and pregnancy. Older person passes on tender, loving mannerisms. Lack of premarital sex leads to divorce, crime, and suicide.

MASTURBATION OF CHILD (PC 288 & PC 288.1).

We Suggest: No restrictions will be on the masturbation of a child so that such enjoyment will be provided by family, friends, or neighbors so that the child will no longer seek out strangers for this satisfaction. Self-masturbation, from crib age on, not to be discouraged).

Reasons: Parents and nonparents help a child toward good mental health by masturbating it or encouraging it to masturbate. Lack of premarital sex leads to divorce, crime, and suicide.

NUDITY ALONE WITH NO SEXUAL ACTIONS.

We Suggest: No restrictions; thus freeing Law Enforcement to tackle disease-spreading and unwanted-pregnancy activity and photos. Almost all American children have seen an erect male penis and an adult spread-eagle vagina or pictures thereof.

Reference: Rene Guyon Society promotional/information package distributed in Beverly Hills on March 20, 1981. Also reprinted in Father Enrique T. Rueda. The Homosexual Network: Private Lives & Public Policy. 1982: Old Greenwich, Connecticut; Devin Adair Publishers. Pages 178 and 179.

Try to imagine forcing oral sex on a four-year old in the name of eliminating thumbsucking and providing vitamins! Whoever performed this “research” is either blinded by his perverted addictions or has a very low opinion of the intelligence of the lawmakers who briefly considered (and promptly round-filed) this trash.

Pedophile Goals.

As the above proposed laws show, one of the primary goals of these pedophile groups is to lower the age of sexual consent to four years of age or to eliminate such laws altogether.

The Homosexual-Pedophile Connection.

Historically, radical feminism portrayed pornography as exploitative. Now we’re saying it can be beautiful.

                                                                 San Francisco lesbian Laura Thomas.[6]

So-called “gay rights” groups know very well that their most damaging enemies are the pedophiles who lurk within their own ranks. If the homosexual pedophiles were exposed to the public, the entire sodomite movement would be discredited, and its carefully-cultured “victim” persona would be destroyed or heavily damaged.

Homosexual strategists Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill recognize the importance of “hiding” the organized child molesters, and acknowledge their strong connection to the “gay rights” movement;

Portray gays as victims, not as aggressive challengers. In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector … jaunty mustachioed musclemen would keep a very low profile in gay commercials and other public presentations, while sympathetic figures of nice young people, old people, and attractive women would be featured (it goes without saying that groups on the farthest margin of acceptability, such as NAMBLA, must play no part at all in such a campaign: suspected child-molesters will never look like victims.[7]

It would be a grave mistake to disassociate homosexual activity from pedophilic activity. The laws that the pedophiles want could only be formulated, enacted, and enforced after society had been sufficiently numbed to the heinous activities of adult homosexuals.

In fact, the homosexuals are hard at work at this very moment in their drive to undercut and eventually overturn laws against child sexual molestation. As with all other Neoliberals, the sodomites simply ignore laws that they do not like. Therefore, it is not surprising that homosexual activists Karla Jay and Allen Young, in their work The Gay Report, say that 73% of all homosexuals have acted as “chicken hawks” that is, they have preyed on adolescent or younger boys.

According to the FBI Bulletin, a homosexual guide named “Where the Young Ones Are” listed 378 establishments in 54 major cities where child sex is marketed.

And “kiddie porn queen” Kathryn Wilson was arrested in Los Angeles in 1982, while in possession a mailing list of 30,000 men who sodomize young children.[8]


References: Pornography and Pedophilia.

[1] Flyer distributed by NAMBLA (North American Man-Boy Love Association). Described in “NAMBLA Cancels Meeting Following NFD Protest.” November/December 1987 National Federation for Decency Journal, page 5.

[2] United States Department of Justice, The Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Project No. 84-JN-AX-K007. Images of Children, Crime and Violence in Playboy, Penthouse and Hustler Magazines. This is an extract from the original three-volume, 2,000 page research performed by Judith A. Reisman, Ph.D. Order from the Institute for Media Education, Post Office Box 7404, Arlington, Virginia 22207, telephone: (703) 237-5455.

[3] “Cartoonist in Custody in Sex Case.” Associated Press report in The Oregonian, May 21, 1989, page A24.

[4] “Hustler Artist Convicted of Molesting Child.” Focus on the Family Citizen, April 1990, page 5. Also see: Shirley J. O’Brien. “The Child Molester: Porn Plays a Major Role in Life.” National Federation for Decency Journal, May/June 1987, pages 9 to 11.

[5] Dr. Kenneth Wooden. “The Undeclared War on Children.” National Federation for Decency Journal, July 1986, pages 6 and 7. Dr. Wooden is a contributing editor for ABC News, and has written a booklet that allows parents to prepare their children for defense against child predators. The booklet, entitled “Child Lures,” can be ordered from Child Lures, 4345 Shelburne Road, Shelburne, Vermont 05482.

[6] San Francisco lesbian Laura Thomas, quoted in Eloise Salholz. “The Future of Gay America.” Newsweek Magazine, March 12, 1990, page 23.

[7] Marshall K. Kirk and Erastes Pill. “The Overhauling of Straight America.” Guide Magazine, October and November 1987.

[8] Quoted in Gary Bullert. “Homosexuals and the Homosexual Rights Movement.” American Family Association Journal, April 1990, pages 13 to 15.


Further Reading: Pornography and Child Molestation.

Shirley J. O’Brien. Why They Did It: Stories of Eight Convicted Child Molesters.
Order from Charles C. Thomas, 2600 South First Street, Springfield, Illinois 62794-9265. The detailed stories of the origins of child abuse in eight molesters, how the perversion evolved in them, how they entrapped children, and how they were caught. These men give extremely valuable advice on how children can avoid being molested or being trapped in dangerous situations with molesters.

Dr. Judith Reisman, president of the Institute for Media Education. “The Role of Pornography and Media Violence in Family Violence, Sexual Abuse and Exploitation, and Juvenile Delinquency.”
Study sponsored by the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention at American University in Washington, D.C. The 24-page executive summary of this 2,000 page report and a packet of material on the exploitation of children in Playboy, Penthouse, and Hustler magazines may be obtained by sending a large, self-addressed stamped envelope and a small fee to Dr. Judith Reisman, Institute for Media Education, Post Office Box 7404, Arlington, Virginia 22207, telephone: (703) 237-5455. The Executive Summary, which is ideal for giving to store managers who might be carrying this soft-core porn is available by itself (without the additional materials) from the American Family Association, Post Office Drawer 2440, Tupelo, Mississippi 38803.

Father Enrique T. Rueda. The Homosexual Network: Private Lives and Public Policy.
1986, 700 pages. Order from the Devin Adair Company, 143 Sound Beach Avenue, Post Office Box A, Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870. The author covers every aspect of the homosexual network; its acceptability, tactics, subculture, ideology, goals, everything; this is the most complete book on the subject ever written. The book addresses in detail the homosexual ideology, subcultures, religion, goals, funding, and intimate connections with Neoliberalism. It includes a 72-page section on the influence and role of homosexuality in the Catholic Church. Also covered are the “Gayellow Pages,” ties between the movement and the Neoliberals and Neofeminists. The book also deals with the connections between homosexuality and organized pedophile groups.

The Transexual Torah

When Jews boast about “defeating God” in their “Torah,” what else would you expect but a trajectory of diabolical perversion and blasphemy ever farther from God? The six ‘genders’ of the satanic insanity known as Talmudic Judaism

Zachar:  is term is derived from the word for a pointy sword and refers to a phallus. It is usually translated as “male” in English.

Nekevah:  is term is derived from the word for a crevice and probably refers to a vaginal opening. It is usually translated as “female” in English.

Androgynos: A person who has both “male” and “female” sexual characteristics. 149 references in Mishna and Talmud (1st-8th Centuries CE); 350 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes (2nd -16th Centuries AD).

Tumtum: A person whose sexual characteristics are indeterminate or obscured. 181 references in Mishna and Talmud; 335 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes.

Ay’lonit: A person who is identified as “female” at birth but develops “male” characteristics at puberty and is infertile. 80 references in Mishna and Talmud; 40 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes.

Saris: A person who is identified as “male” at birth but develops “female” characteristics as puberty and/or is lacking a penis. A saris can be “naturally” a saris (saris hamah), or become one through human intervention (saris adam). 156 references in mishna and Talmud; 379 in classical midrash and Jewish law codes.

source: http://www.transtorah.org/PDFs/Classical_Jewish_Terms_for_Gender_Diversity.pdf

“Torah” insanity—the rabbis teach that Adam was originally an androgynous hermaphrodite made in the image of God Who himself is an androgynous hermaphrodite. Study the regression of talmudic illogic in a perversion of God’s Word so typical of Judaism:


Aggada (The way we tell our stories):

Text Study on Bereshit Rabba 8:1

God created the adam in His own image; in the image of God He created him – male and female [God] created them. — Genesis 1:27

Said Rabbi Jeremiah ben Elazar: “When the Holy One, blessed be the One, created the first adam, [God] created him [an] “androgynos.” As there it is written: ‘When God created the adam, He made him in the likeness of God; male and female [God] created them.’

— Genesis 5:2

Said Rabbi Shmuel Bar Nachman: “At the time that the Holy One, blessed be the One, created the first adam, He created him double-faced and [then] split him, and made for him two backs – a back here and a back there.”  They asked him: “But isn’t it written: ‘and He took one of his ribs [tzelah]’?” He said to them: “[This actually means] one of his sides…as we understand it, ‘and one of the sides [tzelah] of the tabernacle.’”— Exodus 26:20

Rabbi Tanchuma in the name of Rabbi Benayah and Rabbi Berechya in the name of Rabbi Elazar said: “At the time that the Holy One, blessed be the One, created the first adam, [He] created him as a golem [an unformed physical substance]; and it was extended from one end of the world to its other end, as there it is written: “My golem Your eyes have seen…” (Psalm 139:16) — Midrash Rabbah 8

source: http://www.transtorah.org/PDFs/Text_Study_Bereshit_Rabbah.pdf

Keep in mind—in Judaism, only Jews are adam (man): “You are called men, but non-Jews are not called men.”

Bava Metzia 114b

Note Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai’s ruling: “…only ‘you,’ the members of the Jewish people, are called men, but non-Jews are not called men.”

more ‘wisdom’ from the ‘sages’

How Hasidic Sages Supported Transgender People — 200 Years Ago

by Forverts Staff, July 5, 2018

Yiddish original: http://yiddish.forward.com/articles/210284/a-torah-lesson-on-gender-with-abby-stein/

Reprint in Forward: https://forward.com/culture/404661/how-hasidic-sages-supported-transgender-people-200-years-ago/

A Torah Lesson on Gender with “Abby” Stein

“Isaac was born with the soul of a woman… we know how reincarnation works…Sometimes, for whatever reason, the soul gets switched…”

https://youtu.be/cfd9R70jtc4

law and liturgy for the perverts

http://www.transtorah.org/resources.html

source: http://www.transtorah.org/PDFs/Gender_Diversity_In_Halacha.pdf

Excerpts from the book entitled “The Culling Of Man

The Bible plainly states that the people who partake in King Nimrod’s Babylonian Mystery Religion, aka the Great Plan, aka the New World Order, are black-magic-practicing, human-sacrificing, blood¬ drinking, pedophile-sodomite Satan worshippers, whose goal is to enslave the world under a one world government, ultimately unveiling the Antichrist, which they call the Masonic Christ/Resurrected Nimrod/Osiris/Apollo/etc.and to beware of them.

What is happening right now with the orchestration of what the Great Plan has pulled off is exactly as told in Biblical prophecy, throughout the Bible, both Old and New Testament. There are explicit warnings about these exact people, and is in fact the cornerstone of Biblical prophecy. The very reason Jesus Christ was sent by the Creator God to start with was for good men and women of all races, creeds, colors, etc. to have a path to God, giving them an “out” of the spiritually unfulfilling life following the path blazed by the Great Plan. The culmination of the New Testament contained in the Book of Revelation is literally Jesus Christ returning to Earth to fight and defeat the resurrected King Nimrod and his minions. That’s it, that’s the bottom line truth. Hopefully by this point in this book you have been enlightened that warning humanity of the Great Plan was one of the main purposes of the Bible. If, instead of God, it was the proponents of the Great Plan who concocted the Bible, they would have certainly left out the parts explicitly implicating them as the evildoers. Realizing this fact was the crucial turning point transforming me from an atheist to believing in God. The fact that the people currently running the planet, the Luciferian Great Planners, not only believe in God but hate Jesus Christ in particular with a passion, was very incriminating to me. .

It is by glorifying Lucifer and his demonic entourage, animal/human sacrifice, and sex magick rituals that they accomplish this blasphemy. There is a special chemical called adrenochrome, which is a powerful mind-altering drug that is generated in the blood of human sacrifice victims. The more the victim is terrorized/tortured/sexually abused the more of this substance is generated through the synthesis of adrenaline. The Luciferians then drink this drug-laden blood, which alters their thought process and literally puts them in the realm of the demonic entities. This was one of the main purposes of the human sacrifice/blood drinking ritual. The proponents of the Great Plan from ancient times have always sacrificed humans, drank their blood, ate their flesh, and without question were involved in pedophilia/sodomy as a way of paying tribute to the malevolent spirits.

The Biblically prophesized one world government is supposed to be Satanic. Hopefully you now see that it is unfolding right before your eyes. “It is generally agreed that the biggest single influence in the modern expansion of ritual magic, and the occult explosion in general, in the Western world, was the Golden Dawn. This magical fraternity, founded by Freemasons at the end of the 19th century, developed a complex ritual system with ten degrees of initiation relating to the Cabalistic Sephiroth.” – Janet and Stewart Farrar, world renown witches, from their book “The Life and Times of A Modern Witch”. They also wrote “A Witches Bible Complete” There exists even higher degrees of Freemasonry above the “enlightened” status of the 33 rd degree level where some of our Presidents, Prime Ministers, media moguls, and industrial titans exist. Let me re-emphasize that the ONLY way to get to the 33 rd degree of Freemasonry or higher is that you either have to be born into one of the Luciferian bloodlines of the Illuminati, or you have to be INVITED to join them, after displaying that you are capable of perpetrating the kind of evil they want and need out of you. This brings us to discussing the levels of Freemasonry above the 33 rd degree—the esoteric, Luciferian degrees. 99.99% of lower-ranking, blue lodge Freemasons don’t even know these exist. This is where the hardcore Satanists aspire to rise to and dwell. The “Church of Satan” and people 144 who partake in that organization are amateurs compared to what the Illuminati upper echelon partake in: direct contact with the entity Lucifer.

The Illuminati/Freemasons are highly regarded in Satanic circles as the “scientists/engineers” of the occult world. We already went over that to become a 33 rd degree Mason you need to declare that Lucifer is the god of the Freemasons/Babylonian Mystery Religion/Great Plan/New World Order.

The higher degrees are achieved through wicked sodomy-based sex and murder rituals, and that is enough for you to know from me. This is why Satanist Aleister Crowley proudly boasted of being a 90 th degree Mason, when most people in his day had not a clue what that meant. These higher levels of Freemasonry are the degrees that really get involved with interacting with malevolent supernatural beings. There is a reason that the Illuminati are all Luciferians and practice these black magic rituals and everything that goes along with that: the supernatural forces of evil are real, and they draw their power to control the world through these supernatural beings and always have since the days of King Nimrod.

For all intents and purposes, the “Illuminati” are Satan’s current primary minions on Earth. They are the pinnacle of Satanism. The Illuminati are the people that “run of the mill” Satanists look up to as the ultimate echelon of closeness to Lucifer/Satan. The very reason they are called the Illuminati, is that they have received the light of Lucifer, which means “light bearer”, to guide them and have therefore become “illuminated”. These higher rites of Freemasonry above the 33 rd degree are called the Misraim rites, rising up to the 90 th degree, and are primarily populated by the upper echelons of the Illuminati.

 



“. . . We have made a covenant with DEATH,
and with HELL are we at agreement;. . .”

Isaiah 28:15

Dr. Terry Watkins Dial-the-Truth Ministries

When you hear the word “halloween” what images appear? What “spirit” is invoked at the whisper of Halloween? Halloween openly promotes death, devils, witches and flagrant “appearances of evil” (1 Thess. 5:22). Halloween leaves most people scratching their heads questioning, “How and where did Halloween come from”? This article unearths the hellish tomb of Halloween to exhume its sinister “covenant with death and hell.”

Halloween began over 2,000 years ago among the Celts and their pagan priests called the Druids. The Druids are, without question, history’s king of the occult. Witchcraft, Satanism, paganism and virtually all facets of the occult acquire instruction from the Druids. From the popular jack-o’-lantern, trick-or-treat, costumes, to the pranks, ghoulish ghosts, demons, goblins and witches – Halloween owes its morbid birth to the Druids.

Halloween—the day itself is of Druidic origin. (Myers, Robert J. Celebrations: The Complete Book of American Holidays, p. 258)

The mystic rites and ceremonies with which Hallow’en was originally observed had their origin among the Druids. . . (Douglas, George William. The American Book of Days, p. 566)

The Druids celebrated two special nights of the year: Beltane and Samhain. Beltane took place on May 1 and marked the birth of summer. Samhain occurred on November 1 and signified the death of summer. Samhain, a night celebrating death and hell, was the Druids most important ritual. It was a terrifying night of human sacrifices. And it was the original Halloween.

The Druids believed, during Samhain, the mystic veil separating the dead from the living opened. The Druids taught these roaming spirits loosed on Samhain went searching for a body to possess. The frightened Celts would masquerade as demons, evil spirits and ghosts, hoping to convince the roaming evil spirits, they were another evil spirit, and leave them alone.

The Celts also prepared meals as “treats” to appease the evil spirits from “tricks” or malicious acts; hence our custom of “trick or treat.” The Druids performed horrifying human sacrifices and other vile rituals during Samhain. Let there be no doubt—Samhain night was a terrifying “covenant with death, and with hell.” And let there be no doubt – Samhain was the original Halloween night.

All histories of Halloween inevitably wind back to the ancient Celtic festival of Samhain. . . (Skal, David J. Death Makes a Holiday: The Cultural History of Halloween, p. 20)

Halloween had its origins in the festival of Samhain among the Celts of ancient Britain and Ireland. (Encyclopedia Britannica 2005 “Halloween”)

Halloween can be traced directly back to Samhain, the ancient Celtic harvest festival honoring the Lord of the Dead. (Thompson, Sue Ellen. Holiday Symbols and Customs, p. 251)

The rituals of the Druids reek from the deepest hell. Their most repulsive activities involve their human sacrifices of children on the night of Samhain or Halloween.

First-born sacrifices are mentioned in a poem in the Dindshenchas, which records that children were sacrificed each Samhain . . . (Rogers, Nicholas. Halloween: From Pagan Ritual to Party Night, p. 17)

Halloween. That was the eve of Samhain . . . firstborn children were sacrificed. . . Samhain eve was a night of dread and danger. (National Geographic. May 1977, pp. 625-626)

The Druids would drink their victim’s blood and eat their flesh.

They [Druids] sacrificed victims by shooting them with arrows, impaling them on stakes, stabbing them, slitting their throats over cauldrons (and then drinking the blood). . . (Guiley, Rosemary Ellen. Harper’s Encyclopedia of Mystical & Paranormal Experience, p. 167)

Therefore we cannot too highly appreciate our debt to the Romans for having put an end to this monstrous cult, whereby to murder a man was an act of the greatest devoutness, and to eat his flesh most beneficial. (Pliny, Natural History, xxx, 13)

The Druids “counted it an honourable thing” to eat their father’s flesh and perform incest with their mothers and sisters.

. . . since they are man-eaters as well as heavy eaters, and since, further, they count it an honourable thing, when their fathers die, to devour them, and openly to have intercourse, not only with the other women, but also with their mothers and sisters;. . . (Strabo, Geography)

May I remind you, this is what occurred on the original Halloween night! Today, Halloween lives and breathes with the foul stench of the diabolical Druids.

The Druids also celebrated the festival of Beltane. The word Beltane (Beltaine, Beltinne, Beltain, Beiltein) literally means the “fires of Bel.” Bel is the same god called Baal, found over 80 times in the King James Bible. The Lord condemns Baal worship probably more than any other false “god.”

. . . then the Druids lit the Baal-Tinne, the holy, goodly fire of Baal. (Wilde, Lady Francesca Speranza. Ancient Legends, Mystic Charms, and Superstitions of Ireland)

The god whom the Druids worshipped was Baal, as the blazing Baal-fires show, and . . . children were offered in sacrifice to Baal. (Hislop, Alexander. The Two Babylons, p. 232)

• HALLOWEEN: BAAL WORSHIP •

The original Halloween was a hellish night of Baal worship and child sacrifice. And most of our current Halloween customs derived directly from Baal rituals!

On November first was Samhain [Halloween] . . . Fires were built as a thanksgiving to Baal. . . (Kelley, Ruth Edna, The Book of Hallowe’en, Lothrop, Lee and Shepard Co. Boston, 1919)

The mystic rites and ceremonies with which Hallow’en was originally observed had their origin among the Druids . . . ancient Baal festivals from which many of the Hallow’en customs are derived. (Douglas, George William. The American Book of Days, p. 569)

Baal is also a synonym for the devil. (Burns, Cathy. Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated, p. 327)

Halloween glorifies death in worship to Baal or the devil!

The Druid festival of Samhain was a celebration of death. Strutting its hellish death images of skulls, skeletons, ghosts, demons, devils and incarnate evil – today’s Halloween glorifies Death. David Skal titled his history of Halloween—Death Makes a Holiday:

The grand marshal of the Halloween parade is, and always has been, Death. (Skal, David J. Death Makes a Holiday: The Cultural History of Halloween, p. 18)

Halloween can be traced directly back to Samhain, the ancient Celtic harvest festival honoring the Lord of the Dead. (Thompson, Sue Ellen. Holiday Symbols and Customs, p. 251)

The Devil glorifies death. Hebrews 2:14 says, “. . . that through death he [Jesus] might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil;” Proverbs 8:36 says all they that hate the Lord “. . . love death.” Revelation 6:8 says the rider of the antichrist’s pale horse, “. . . and his name that sat on him was Death, and Hell followed with him.”

• THE ORDINATION OF HALLOWEEN •

Understanding the hellish history of Halloween—why in the world did decent people so embrace it? What magic “trick” transformed rancid Samhain into the giddy Halloween?

As the Catholic missionaries swarmed Britain and Ireland seeking the mass conversion to Catholicism their orders from Pope Gregory in 601 A.D. was to cunningly convert the Druid rituals into Catholic rituals. The Catholics converted the ritual of Samhain into the festival of All Saint’s Day, a day of celebration and prayer to dead “Saints.”

Halloween begins well over 2,000 years ago in the British Isles. Here, we find the holiday stripped to its most essential element: a night when Celtic tribes communed with the spirits of the ancestral dead. These grand and glorious pagan celebrations were assimilated by the Catholic church. . . Rather than extinguish old customs, the church leaders provided Christian versions of them: from the Middles Ages on, All Saints’ Day and All Souls’ Day replaced the ancient Celtic celebrations of the dead. (Bannatyne, Lesley Pratt, Halloween: An American Holiday, an American History, Facts on File, Inc., New York, 1990 p. x)

The Catholic festival of All Saints Day was also known as All Hallows Day, with the word “hallow” replacing “saints.” The day before All Hallows Day (October 31) was recognized as All Hallows Eve. Eventually, All Hallows Eve became Hallows Eve; hallow’even; hallow’en and ultimately today’s Halloween.

All Saints’ Day perpetuated the pagan Samhain of November Eve. (Bonwick, James, Irish Druids and Old Irish Religions, Dorset Press, 1984 (1986ed), p.87)

Many traditional beliefs and customs associated with Samhain . . . continued to be practiced on 31 October, known as the Eve of All Saints, the Eve of All Hallows, or Hallows Even. It is the glossing of the name Hallow Even that has given us the name Hallowe’en. (Santino, Jack editor, Halloween and Other Festivals of Death and Life, The University of Tennessee Press, Knoxville, TN 1994 p. xvi)

 

In 835, Pope Gregory IV “blessed” All Saint’s Day as a sacred “day of obligation,” consequently on that day, the Catholic Church officially “ordained” Halloween. Halloween owes its very life and breath to the “blessing” of the Catholic Church. Samhain would have breathed its last breath many years ago if not for the “ordination” of the Catholic Church.

Few holidays have a stranger or more paradoxical history than Halloween. Technically, it is the vigil of All Saints Day, observed by Roman Catholics . . . Halloween has clear connections with the rites of the druidic priests. . . (Douglas, George William, revised by Helene Douglas Compton, The American Book of Days, The H.W. Wilson Company, New York, 1948, p. 741)

A perverse and blasphemous twist to Halloween concerns the name “Halloween.” The word “hallow” means “holy, sanctify or consecrate.” The popular Lord’s Prayer in Matthew 6:9 begins with, “. . . Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. . .” The label “hallow” belongs to God the Father—Hallowed be thy name. Halloween was a night sacrificing young children to the worship of Baal. It is no accident that the name of history’s most hellish night, glorifying “death and hell,” wears God the Father’s holy name of “hallow.” The blasphemous name of “Halloween” clearly bears the fingerprints of Lucifer as found in Isaiah 14:12, “. . . I will be like the most High.”

• THE OCCULT & HALLOWEEN •

While Halloween masquerades as childish fun and frolic, it’s serious business in the occult world. Witchcraft, Wicca, Satanism and paganism believe, on the night of Halloween, devils and spirits are unleashed. They perform their most hideous and potent rituals on the night of Halloween.

Samhain: This is the “Witch’s New Year” and the primary Sabbat from which all others flow. (RavenWolf, Silver. Teen Witch, p. 42)

Halloween is one of the four major Sabbats celebrated by the modern Witch, and it is by far the most popular and important of the eight that are observed. . . Witches regard Halloween as their New Year’s Eve, celebrating it with sacred rituals. . . (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 120)

Halloween is also among Satanism’s most cherished days. Anton LaVey, founder of The Church of Satan and author of The Satanic Bible writes:

After one’s own birthday, the two major Satanic holidays are Walpurgisnacht (May 1st) and Halloween. (LaVey, Anton Szandor. The Satanic Bible, p. 96)

Satanic High Priestess Blanche Barton, on The Church of Satan web site, praises Halloween:

It [Halloween] gives even the most mundane people the opportunity to taste wickedness for one night. They have a chance to dance with the Devil . . . I see Satanists all over the world meeting in small groups this night and Hallowe’ens 500 years hence, to raise a glass to the Infernal Hosts. . .

The Satanic Calendar decrees for Halloween: “One of the two most important nights of the year. . . Blood and sexual rituals. Sexual association with demons. Animal and human sacrifice—male or female.” (www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/satanic_calendar.htm)

Former occultist Johanna Michaelsen reveals, “Halloween is also a prime recruiting season for Satanists.” (Michaelsen, Johanna. Like Lambs to the Slaughter, p. 192)

• THE ORNAMENTS OF HALLOWEEN •

The ornaments decorating Halloween came directly from the Druids and the occult.

The popular associations of Halloween are derived from ancient Celtic and Druid pagan religious customs. (Mather, George A. and Larry A. Nichols. Dictionary of Cults, Sects, Religions and the Occult, p. 237)

Samhain was a vital part of Celtic culture, its rituals were passed from generation to generation through the oral tradition of the Druids. The genesis of many of America’s Halloween traditions can be found in these ancient celebrations . . . (Bannatyne, Lesley Pratt, Halloween: An American Holiday, an American History, Facts on File, Inc., New York, 1990 p. 6)

WITCHES are the reigning Queen of Halloween. If you’ve been lullabied by the gospel of Halloween that witches are harmless folks, wake up, witches worship the devil:

In many instances, according to the confessions of the witches, besides their direct worship of the devil, they were obliged to show their abhorrence of the faith they had deserted by trampling on the cross, and blaspheming the saints, and by other profanations. (Spence, Lewis. An Encyclopedia of Occultism, p. 433)

The witches held a party at Hallowe’en and the women . . . sold their soul to the devil, would put a stick in their beds anointed with the fat of murdered babies. . .(Douglas, George William. The American Book of Days, p. 569)

Although witches vigorously protest they have no dealings with the devil, under the heading, “A Witch’s God,” the popular witch’s training manual, Witchcraft: Theory and Practice, plainly states:

A Witch’s God. . . He is . . . Lord of the Underworld [Hell] . . . He is named . . . Baphomet . . . Lucifer . . . Baal. . . (Angeles, Ly de. Witchcraft: Theory and Practice, p. 60)

The Lord God’s judgment upon witches should not be taken lightly.

Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live. Exodus 22:18

JACK-O’-LANTERN: If Witches are the Queen of Halloween, the smiling jack-o’-lantern is the King. The demonic jack-o’-lantern leaves most historians baffled tracing its spooky origin. One popular tale, tells of Jack who tricked the devil in a deal for his soul. But the origin of the jack-o’-lantern is much more sinister. It arrives from the Druid’s ghastly reverence of the severed human head! They proudly decorated their houses and temples with bloody severed heads. The Druids believed the head housed the soul, hence the light or candle in the skull. The original jack-o’-lantern was not a pumpkin or turnip, but a severed human head!

Trophy, charm, or ornament, the human head figured prominently in Celtic life. Warriors hung enemy heads on their houses as a show of prowess, and Druids, believing that the head harbored the soul, placed skulls in sanctuaries to ward off evil. (National Geographic, May 1977, p. 603)

. . . they hang the heads of their enemies from the necks of their horses, and, when they have brought them home, nail the spectacle to the entrances of their homes. . .(Strabo, Geography)

It is believed that faces, rather than other images or symbols, were originally carved onto the pumpkin because they gave the jack-o’-lantern the look of a head. The Celts of ancient times believed that the head was the most sacred part of the human body, for it housed a person’s immortal soul. (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 32)

. . . the jack-o’-lantern is generally presented in its traditional form as a festive euphemism for the death’s-head, the triangular nose hole and rictus grin being the “dead” giveaways. (Skal, David J. Death Makes a Holiday: The Cultural History of Halloween, p. 38)

Carved and illuminated by a candle, they are symbolic of death and the spirit world. (Thompson, Sue Ellen. Holiday Symbols and Customs, p. 256)

TRICK OR TREAT is another Druid inspired custom.

Every year on Halloween, many children throughout the world dress up in costumes and go door to door in a ritual known as trick or treating . . . unaware that their innocent masquerade is actually the remnants of a Druidic religious practice from times most ancient. (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 11)

Whatever the wrinkles, the root assumption is the same: trick or treat had its beginning in the Celtic dawn. (Santino, Jack. Halloween and Other Festivals of Death and Life, p. 82)

MASKS & COSTUMES: Masks and costumes carry a long history in the occult and demon possession. Masks are contacts to the spirit world to invite the spirit to “possess” them.

In rituals, a person wearing a mask of a god or spirit often feels possessed by the supernatural being. . . (World Book 2005, p. 263)

The person wearing the mask feels internally transformed and takes on temporarily the qualities of the god or demon represented by the mask. (Biedermann, Hans. Dictionary of Symbolism, p. 218)

BAT: “One of the animal shapes commonly used by these demons (or “familiars,” as they were often called) was the bat. Bats and their blood were also used in the casting of spells (especially those of black magick), the brewing of potions. . .” (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 29)

OWL: “On Halloween night, demons in the form of owls were said to have traveled with Witches and their cats . . . some were even believed to be Witches in disguise. . . (Interestingly, the owl was called a strix by the Romans—a word that means “Witch.”)” (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 43)

“BLACK CATS were associated with darkness and death . . . they embodied demons who performed the witches’ task of maleficia against their neighbors. . . Black cats are said to be the devil himself.” (Guiley, Rosemary Ellen. The Encyclopedia of Witches and Witchcraft, p. 49)

APPLES:The practice of bobbing for apples at a Halloween party comes form our Pagan ancestors, who highly valued apple magick.” (RavenWolf, Silver. Teen Witch, p. 42)

SKULL: “An interesting symbol, the skull . . . It is prominent in Witchcraft and Demon worship as a celebration of death.” (Burns, Cathy. Masonic and Occult Symbols Illustrated, p. 388)

• THE OBSCENE IN HALLOWEEN •

Halloween has always wallowed in the obscene. Its horrid history is paved with vandalism, destruction and wickedness. The sickening depravity of razor blades in apples and poisoned candies of the 1970’s was a clear testimony to the evil of Halloween.

Some say that Halloween brings out the evil side of human nature in certain individuals. The number of vandalism acts committed each year on Halloween certainly seems to support this. . . (Dunwich, Gerina. The Pagan Book of Halloween, p. 23)

 

Halloween has always been a night of perversion and inversion—a night where misrule rules and decadence masquerades as decency. Halloween’s “best kept secret” is its romantic love affair with homosexuals. Halloween was the golden key that unlocked the homosexual’s closet of perversion. Halloween’s spirit of inversion, bestowed the homosexuals one utopian night to publicly flaunt their decadence and perversion.

It is an opportunity to act out one’s desires or fantasies. . . Halloween is unquestionably a night of inversion. (Rogers, Nicholas. Halloween: From Pagan Ritual to Party Night, p. 137)

Halloween has always been a night of misrule and the outrageous. In recent years, it has been adopted by the gay community in America. . . (Morgan, Sheena. The Real Halloween, p. 42)

The Halloween machine turns the world upside down. One’s identity can be discarded with impunity. Men dress as women, and vice versa. Authority can be mocked and circumvented. (Skal, David J. Death Makes a Holiday: The Cultural History of Halloween p. 17)

Halloween has done more for the current acceptance of homosexuality than any other event. Years of huge homosexual Halloween street parades of gaudy perversion and decadence in New York’s Greenwich Village, Washington, D.C,’s Georgetown, New Orleans’s French Quarter and the infamous Castro Street in San Francisco almost single handily detonated the current homosexual explosion.

Greenwich Village has a long, albeit erratic, history of impromptu Halloween celebrations, and there is undoubtedly a link between the recent emergence of such carnivalesque celebrations and the increasingly public nature of gay culture. . . (Santino, Jack. Halloween and Other Festivals of Death and Life, p. 194)

Yet it has been the gay community that has most flamboyantly exploited Halloween’s potential as a transgressive festival . . . Indeed, it is the gay community that has been arguably more responsible for Halloween’s adult rejuvenation. (Rogers, Nicholas. Halloween: From Pagan Ritual to Party Night, p. 132)

For gay people, Halloween is a moment of utopian wishfulness . . . (Santino, Jack. Halloween and Other Festivals of Death and Life, p. 211)

• THE OMEN OF HALLOWEN •

While many deem Halloween as harmless fun and fantasy, Halloween subtlety disarms our (and especially our children) discernment of witches and the occult. Halloween’s magic potion of “fun and frolic” transformed witches, demons, devils and evil incarnate into “fine folks.” Over 1.2 million practicing and proud witches live in America. Witchcraft currently is the fastest growing religion in America. At some time, nearly every little girl becomes a witch on Halloween. Witch RavenWolf delights when a vulnerable little girl dresses as a witch on Halloween:

Today, just about every little girl in our society, at one time or another, has chosen to costume herself as a Witch. . . If you choose a Witch’s costume this Halloween . . . Hold your head up and wear your Witch’s garb proudly in their honor. (RavenWolf, Silver. Halloween: Customs, Recipes & Spells, p. 64)

Occult historian Jean Markale discloses Halloween bids more than childish dress-up. It is a pagan “initiatory journey” guided by someone [Satan] “hidden in the shadows,” and none “return from Halloween innocent”:

The passage into the world of Halloween is truly an initiatory journey. One does not return from it an innocent. But making the journey alone does not mean there was no guide, no initiator, someone who prompted the quest and who, sometimes hidden in the shadows, watches over the comings and goings of the neophyte through this labyrinth that is the Other World. (Markale, Jean. The Pagan Mysteries of Halloween, p. 127)

Dr. David Enoch, former senior consultant psychiatrist at the Royal Liverpool Hospital and the University of Liverpool, states:

Halloween practices open the door to the occult and can introduce forces into people’s lives that they do not understand and often cannot combat. . . (Parker, Russ. Battling the Occult, p. 35)

THE JEWISH CONTRIBUTION TO THE SEXUAL DECADENCE OF WEIMAR GERMANY

Published in Veterans Today

“The decay of moral values in all areas of life—the period of deepest German degradation—coincided exactly with the height of Jewish power in Germany.”  — Dr Friederich Karl Wiehe, Germany and the Jewish Question. [1]

Otto Dix, Metropolis (1928). Berlin in the heyday of the Weimar Republic: a hedonistic hellpit of sexual depravity.

 

Otto Dix, Metropolis (1928). Berlin in the heyday of the Weimar Republic: a hedonistic hellpit of sexual depravity.

No account of the Jewish Question in Germany can be complete without some mention of the tidal wave of sexual immorality that was to engulf the country during the period of the Weimar Republic (1919-1933) following World War One. This also happened to be the apogee of Jewish power in Germany. Every single sphere of major influence had now fallen under Jewish control.

1.  THE CULTURAL TAKEOVER OF GERMANY BY THE JEWS  

Dr Karl Wiehe, in his Germany and the Jewish Question, is painstaking in the details he provides:

Well before 1933 the Jews had taken possession of the film industry even more thoroughly than of the theater. That was understandable, because the earnings in the film industry overshadow the earnings of any other artistic activity….
The biggest step in the direction of the decline of the German cultural life [however] was taken in the field of the light entertainment genre. Here—in the genre of musical comedy and above all in revue and burlesque—frivolity and lasciviousness were to rear their ugly heads. So much so that during these years Berlin was quite correctly considered the most immoral city in the world.
It was Jews who introduced this pornographic “art form” to Germany, a debased genre completely unknown before the Great War, and so it is the Jews who can be held responsible for the general decline in morals.
The Jewish sexologists Ivan Bloch and Magnus Hirschfeld became the representatives of “sex research” camouflaged as science—a bogus science that was merely an excuse for pornography and propaganda designed to destroy the institute of marriage and the sanctity of the family.  [2]

Wiehe provides the following useful facts and statistics:

In 1931, over 60 percent of German films were produced by Jews and 82 percent of the film scripts were written by Jewish writers, though Jews made up less than 1 percent of the German population (0.9o%). A quick look at the names of directors, producers, stage managers, actors, script writers and critics, “revealed everywhere an overwhelming preponderance of Jews.”

Alexander Szekely, German brothel in Ghent
Alexander Szekely, German brothel in Ghent

A cursory survey of the film titles, Wiehe tells us, shows us that the Jews had only one thing on the brain: sex. Here are some typical titles: “Moral und Sinnlichkeit” (Morals and Sensuality); “Was kostet Liebe?” (What is the Price of Love); “Wenn ein Weib den Weg verliert” (When a Woman loses her Way); “Prostitution” (Prostitution); “Sündige Mutter” (Sinful Mama); “Das Buch des Lasters” (The Book of Vices).

“The sensational titles correspond to the sleazy contents,” Wiehe complains. “All wallow in filth and display with cynical frankness the vilest scenes of sexual perversion.” [3]

Light entertainment (revue/burlesque) was a Jewish innovation. The revue theaters, all concentrated within great cities such as Berlin, were owned and run almost exclusively by Jews. Shows consisted of little more than excuses for sexual titillation involving the display of the female form in lascivious dances that were to degenerate later into striptease and scenes of public masturbation. “In these revues,” Wiehe notes indignantly, “the uninhibited sex drive surrendered itself to disgusting orgies. All life was reduced to a common denominator of lust and its satisfaction. Chastity and self-discipline were mocked as old-fashioned prejudices.”

The Jews had managed, in the space of a mere fourteen years, to bring about a major “transvaluation of values” [4] in Weimar Germany. The vices of the past were now its virtues. The only vice that remained was chastity.

A glance at the revue titles is again sufficient:  “Zieh dich aus” (Get Undressed); “Tausend nackte Frauen” (One Thousand Naked Women); “Die Sünden der Welt” (The Sins of the World); “Häuser der Liebe” (The Houses of Love); “Streng Verboten!” (Strictly Forbidden!);  “Sündig und Süss” (Sweet and Sinful). [5]

Finally, there was the rich field of sexology: a new science consisting largely of dubious “case histories” purporting to reveal the depraved sexual habits of various anonymous patients. In order to give an air of academic respectability and erudition to these masturbatory fantasies—thrilling adventure stories involving necrophilia, bestiality and handkerchief fetishism—the more exciting details were often given in vulgar Latin “in order to exclude the lay reader.” [6] However, it was not long before the Latin was diligently translated into the vernacular for the benefit of the unlatined lay reader, thus defeating the purpose of the prim “schoolmaster’s Latin”.

Wiehe reels off a long list of Jewish sexologists who he claims were in the forefront of writing such salacious treatises that were no more than pornography masquerading as science. Drs Magnus Hirschfeld [7] and Ivan Bloch [8] were the star writers in this field, their books still read avidly today by a gullible public hungry for details of the bizarre, the kinky and the perverse. Drs Ludwig Lewy-Lenz, Leo Schidrowitz, Franz Rabinowitsch, Georg Cohen, and Albert Eulenburg are some of the names Wiehe mentions.

Otto Dix, The Salon, 1921 Berlin prostitutes awaiting the pleasures of the evening
Otto Dix, The Salon, 1921
Berlin prostitutes awaiting the pleasures of the evening

Here are some of their depressing titles: “Sittengeschichte des Lasters” (The History of Perversions); “Sittengeschichte des Schamlosigkeit” (The History of Shamelessness); “Bilderlexikon der Erotic” (Picture Lexicon of Eroticism); “Sittengischichte des Geheime und Verbotene” (The History of the Secret and the Forbidden). And here are some of the titles published by Dr Magnus Hirschfeld’s Institute of Sexual Science in Berlin [9]: Aphrodisiacs, Prostitution, Sexual Catastrophes, Sexual Pathology, The Perverted.  Wiehe describes all these books as “the filthy publications of these pseudo-scientists”, all of them written by Jewish authors and published by Jewish publishers. He continues in the same acerbic vein:

These books were allegedly supposed to be scientific treatises, their ostensible purpose being to “educate” the broad masses about the dangers of sexual excesses. Under the guise of science, however, they speculated in the lust and lower instincts of their audience. Criminals, prostitutes and homosexuals took center stage in their repertoire. One looks in vain for any known non-Jewish “sexual scientist”! [10]

Wiehe points out that masturbation, hitherto a hole-in-corner vice, began to be shamelessly promoted for the first time in Weimar Germany by Jewish-run organizations. He mentions Dr Max Hodan, Jewish medical officer for Berlin, and ticks him off for circulating a booklet recommending regular masturbation for the working classes.

It was in Weimar Germany, long before Hannibal Lecter, that the serial killer was to become an iconic figure — a source of secret fantasies and frissons.
It was in Weimar Germany, long before Hannibal Lecter, that the serial killer was to become an iconic figure — a source of secret fantasies and frissons.

It is worth noting that one of the world’s worst serial killers, Peter Kürten, committed all his crimes in Germany during the 1925-1930 period.

This was of course the  heyday of the Weimar Republic when the German people lay completely under Jewish domination and when the first dress rehearsal for the later Sexual Revolution of the 1960s was arguably being run.

Significantly, when asked what his primary motive for murder was, Kürten replied: “to strike back at an oppressive society.” [11]

This was a society in which the serial killer was to become a popular icon, enough to create a whole genre of sensational sex crime literature. (See book title on left).  [12]

2.  THE DESCENT INTO SEXUAL DEPRAVITY

British historian Sir Arthur Bryant describes throngs of child prostitutes outside the doors of the great Berlin hotels and restaurants. He adds: “Most of them—the night clubs and vice resorts—were owned and managed by Jews. And it was the Jews among the promoters of this trade who were remembered in after years.” [13]

Arriving in Berlin during the hyperinflation crisis (1923), Klaus Mann—son of the great German novelist Thomas Mann—remembered walking past a group of dominatrices:

Some of them looked like fierce Amazons, strutting in high boots made of green, glossy leather. One of them brandished a supple cane and leered at me as I passed by. ‘Good evening, madam,’ I said. She whispered in my ear, ‘Want to be my slave? Costs only six billions and a cigarette.’ [14]
Georg Grosz, Before Sunrise. Prostitutes and their clients in the red-light district… this is how they actually dressed and paraded themselves in the garish, lamp-lit streets.
Georg Grosz, Before Sunrise. Prostitutes and their clients in the red-light district… this is how they actually dressed and paraded themselves in the garish, lamp-lit streets.

10-year-old children turned tricks in the railway stations. A group of 14-year-old Russian girls, refugees from the Red Terror in Stalin’s Communist slaughter house, managed to make a lucrative living in Berlin as dominatrices. Little girls were freely available for sex not only in child brothels and pharmacies but could be ordered by telephone and delivered to clients by taxi, like takeaway meals. Particularly bizarre were mother-and-daughter teams offering their services to the same client simultaneously. Mel Gordon writes: “One French journalist, Jean Galtier-Boissière, described, in sickly pornographic detail, the creeping horror of feeling a nine-year-old girl’s tiny, but proficient, fingers stroking his upper thigh while the broken-toothed mother covered his face with hot sucking kisses.” [15]

In Mel Gordon’s Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin, we enter a depressingly sordid milieu akin to the subterranean world of the sewer rat: a world which owed its existence in large part to German Jewry. Without Jewish money and influence, such a world would never have come into being. Nor was there anything the Germans could do to extricate themselves from this artificially created hothouse of erotomania and sexual deviance in which they now found themselves ensnared.

There were no fewer than 17 different prostitute types in this Jew-created brothel city: eight outdoor types and nine indoor ones, each with their specialities and slang terminology.

Outdoor prostitutes:  (1) Kontroll Girls: legal prostitutes checked for venereal disease.  (2) Half-Silks: part-time amateurs with day jobs as office workers, secretaries and shopgirls; evening and weekend workers.  (3) Grasshoppers: lowly streetwalkers who gave handjobs and standup sex in dark alleys.  (4) Nuttes: Boyish teenage girls who worked for “pocket money” after school without their parents’ knowledge.  (5) Boot-girls:  dominas (or dominatrices) in shiny patent leather boots who offered to stamp all over their clients.  (6) Tauentzien girls: Chic mother-and-daughter teams, fashionably dressed, who offered their services to men who wanted threesomes.  (7) Münzis: Heavily pregnant women who waited under lampposts (very expensive, since they offered an erotic speciality). (8)  Gravelstones: hideous hags with missing limbs, hunchbacks, midgets, and women with various deformities. “The most common German word for them was Kies. In other accounts, they were referred to as Steinhuren.” [16]

Otto Dix, Three Wenches. These prostitutes were willing to work individually or in a team.
Otto Dix, Three Wenches. These prostitutes were willing to work individually or in a team.

Indoor prostitutes(1) Chontes: Low-grade Jewish prostitutes, mostly Polish, who picked up their clients in railway stations.  (2) Fohses (French argot for “vaginas”): Elegant females who discreetly advertised in magazines and newspapers as private masseuses and manicurists.  (3) Demi-castors (or “half-beavers”): Young women from good families who worked in high-class houses in the late afternoons and early evenings.  (4) Table-ladies: Ravishingly beautiful escorts of exotic appearance who came with the reserved table in an exclusive nightclub. Clients had to be fabulously rich in order to afford the cultured conversation of these high-class call girls who accompanied the caviar and champagne and who later unveiled their charms in a sumptuously furnished chamber of delights. (5) Dominas: Leather-clad women, athletic and Amazonian, who specialized in whipping and erotic humiliation. They were often found in lesbian nightclubs which also catered for kinky males.  (6) Minettes (French for “female cats”): Exclusive call girls who offered S&M fantasy scenes, foot worship, bondage, and enforced transvestism. They worked in top class hotels.  (7) Race-horses:  Masochistic prostitutes who let themselves be whipped in “schoolrooms” or “dungeons” liberally supplied with instruments of torture. Clients were carefully screened to make sure they didn’t go too far.  (8) ‘Medicine’: Child prostitutes (age 12-16), so called because they were prescribed as “medicine” in pharmacies. All  the client needed to do was tell the pharmacist how many years he had suffered from his ailment (e.g., 12), without mentioning what ailment it was, and  request the color of the pill he preferred (e.g., red). He was then escorted to a cubicle where his “medicine” awaited him: a 12-year-old redhead. (9) Telephone-girls (often billed as “virgins”): expensive child prostitutes (ages 12-17) ordered by telephone like a takeaway meal; the nymphettes were delivered by limousine or taxi. [17]

Luigi Barzini, in his social memoir The Europeans, describes the saturnalian scene in the Tingel-Tangels or sleazy bordellos of sex-crazed Berlin in the 1920s, the Golden Age of the Jews:

I saw pimps offering anything to anybody: little boys, little girls, robust young men, libidinous women, animals. The story went the rounds that a male goose whose neck you cut at just the right ecstatic  moment would give you the most delicious frisson of all—as it allowed you to enjoy sodomy, bestiality, homosexuality, necrophilia and sadism at one stroke. Gastronomy too, as one could eat the goose afterwards.  [18]

In October 1923, when one US dollar could buy 4.2 billion marks and six wheelbarrows of banknotes could barely buy a loaf of bread, it was said that “the most exquisite blow job to be had in Berlin never cost an American tourist more than 30 cents.” [19]

WEIMAR BERLIN BROTHEL SCENE. Erich Schütz, Raiding the Nacktlokal, 1923
WEIMAR BERLIN BROTHEL SCENE.
Erich Schütz, Raiding the Nacktlokal, 1923

“Berlin nightlife, my word, the world hasn’t seen anything like it!” Klaus Mann, son of the great German author Thomas Mann, enthused sardonically. “We used to have a first-class army. Now we have first class perversions.” [20]

German author Erich Kästner, writing of Weimar Berlin, was to reflect on the topography of the soul sickness that had now taken possession of the once proud city: “In the east there is crime; in the center the con men hold sway; in the north resides misery, in the west lechery; and everywhere—the decline.” [21]

German Jewish author Stephan Zweig has much to say about homosexuality, pointing out that even in Ancient Rome—where fourteen of the first fifteen Roman emperors were homosexual—the degree of drunken depravity and public shamelessness was far less shocking than in Weimar Berlin:

Bars, amusement parks, honky-tonks sprang up like mushrooms. Along the entire Kurfürstendamm powdered and rouged men sauntered and they were not all professionals; every high school boy wanted to earn some money and in the dimly lit bars one might see government officials and men of the world of finance tenderly courting drunken sailors without any shame. Even the Rome of Suetonius had never known such orgies as the pervert balls of Berlin, where hundreds of men costumed as women and hundreds of women as men danced under the benevolent eyes of the police. In the collapse of all values a kind of madness gained hold. Young girls bragged proudly of their perversion; to be sixteen and still under suspicion of virginity would have been a disgrace.” [22]
THE CITY OF DREADFUL JOY Weimar Berlin, 1928
THE CITY OF DREADFUL JOY
Weimar Berlin, 1928

3.  CONCLUSION: WEIMAR GERMANY AS A DRESS REHEARSAL FOR THE SUBSEQUENT SEXUAL REVOLUTION OF THE 1960s

My own impression, though I could well be mistaken here, is that Weimar Germany can be seen as a trial run or dress rehearsal for the Sexual Revolution of the 1960s, a revolution in attitudes and behavior that was to convulse America and then spread like a moral virus to Europe and the rest of the world.

Recollect that it was in Germany during the Weimar period—in 1923 to be exact—that the Institut für Sozialforschung was set up at the University of Frankfurt. Financed by the Argentian Jew Felix Weil, this was later to become the infamous Frankfurt School. [23]

It is my own hypothesis that the Germans were to be the initial guinea pigs of these Cultural Marxists [24], all of them initially Jewish apart from Habermas. These were revolutionaries intent on complete social control by the imposition of their Marxist worldview on the rest of society. It is self-evident that there is no other way to get control of a society with strong moral values than to weaken those values. The formula is simple: destroy the belief system on which that society is founded, especially its religion and its traditional codes of honor and decency. Promote godlessness and a philosophy of despair. To put it in even plainer language: reduce men to beasts if you wish to control them.

It was George Lukács [25], one of the founding fathers of the Frankfurt School, who had called for “a culture of pessimism and a world abandoned by God.” [26] And it was one of their most fanatical ideologues, Willi Munzenberg [27], who had said he wanted to turn the world upside down and make life a hell on earth. His exact words:

We must organize the intellectuals and use them TO MAKE WESTERN CIVILIZATION STINK! Only then, after they have CORRUPTED ALL ITS VALUES AND MADE LIFE IMPOSSIBLE, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat. [28, emphasis added]

With Jewish intellectuals like this at the helm, doing their utmost to promote moral anarchy and create an Orwellian dystopia, is it any wonder that the Germans went helter-skelter down the slippery slope and ended up where they did?

In America the Cultural Marxists were to apply a variation of their Weimar techniques, but refined and honed to a high degree. This time, they would use multiculturalism as a weapon of mass destruction in addition to moral corruption. They would flood the country with immigrants, legal as well as illegal. They would turn race against race (engineered ethnic conflict), parent against child (attack on authority), and man against woman (radical feminism). Above all, they would teach the non-White races to regard the White race as the ultimate evil: “the cancer of human history”, to quote Jewish feminist Susan Sontag. [29]

The above comments are admittedly controversial and will elicit anger in many quarters. For this I apologize. My purpose is simply to give voice to an urgent and widespread perception. Not to be able to say what many people increasingly believe is clearly undesirable.

What did the cultural Marxists learn from Weimar Germany?

They learned that the Sexual Revolution, in order to succeed, had to be a slow and gradual process. “Modern forms of subjection,” the Frankfurt School had learned, “are marked by mildness.” [30] Weimar had failed because the pace had been too frenetic. People were aware they were being corrupted. That was fatal.

To corrupt a nation effectively one must make sure that the descent into degradation is an infinitely slow and imperceptible process, one miniscule step at a time—just as those who wish to cook frogs alive in a saucepan, reducing them to a state of comatose stupor, are advised to place them in cold water and boil them to death as slowly as possible. [31]

Lest I be accused of antisemitism by this portrayal of the systematic sexual corruption of the German people at the hands of their Jewish masters—a classic instance of social engineering practiced on an entire population—let me allow a well-known and respected Jewish authority on the Weimar era to have the final word. He is Dr Manfred Reifer, and he is writing in a prestigious Jewish publication:

Whilst large sections of the German nation were struggling for the preservation of their race, we Jews filled the streets of Germany with our vociferations. We supplied the press with articles on the subject of its Christmas and Easter and administered to its religious beliefs in the manner we considered suitable. We ridiculed the highest ideals of the German nation and profaned the matters which it holds sacred.”  —  Dr Manfred Reifer, in the German Jewish magazine Czernowitzer Allegemeine Zeitung, September 1933

In the same month those words were written, September 1933, Adolf Hitler removed every single Jew from positions of influence in the mass media: from the fields of literature, art, music, journalism, the cinema, and popular entertainment in general [32]. The influence that the Jews had exerted on the German psyche was to be regarded henceforth, rightly or wrongly, as pernicious. And Kulturbolschewismus, or “Bolshevik culture”, a derogatory term for Jewish culture itself, became synonymous with moral anarchy and sexual decadence.

*            *            *

ENDNOTES

[1]        Dr Friedrich Karl Wiehe, Germany and the Jewish Question.  Published in 1938 in Berlin by  the Institute for Studies of the Jewish Question, this eight-part booklet runs to approximately 23,500 words in the English translation. As I have quoted this important work extensively both here and in my forthcoming 4-part essay How the Jews Rose to World Power, I felt it would be advisable to paraphrase/translate the defective Germanic English of the English version completely, quoting the original translation only when the English was free from grammatical and orthographical  errors. Readers who know German are invited to consult the original German essay here: Deutschland und die Judenfrage.
[2]       Wiehe, Ibid.
[3]       Wiehe, Ibid.
[4]       “transvaluation of values”
[5]       Wiehe, Ibid.
[6]       Krafft-Ebing’s Psychopathia Sexualis
[7]       Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935). The first advocate for homosexual and transgender rights  and himself a homosexual, Hirschfeld figured out that there were 64 different types of male, ranging from the extremely masculine heterosexual male to the extremely feminine homosexual male. Whether there are also 64 different types of females, ranging from the extremely feminine heterosexual female to the extremely masculine butch lesbian, is not clear. Described as the “the Einstein of Sex”, Hirschfeld thought abortion was a good thing and approved of miscegenation and the mongrelization of the White race.
[8]       Ivan Bloch (1872-1922).  Like Hirschfeld, Bloch was a Jewish homosexual whose main interest in life was sexual perversion. Author of the 3-volume Handbuch der gesamten Sexualwissenschaft in Einzeldarstellungen (“Handbook of Sexology in its Entirety Presented in Separate Studies”), Bloch was an expert on sadism and helped to popularize the work of the Marquis de Sade. He apparently discovered the manuscript of de Sade’s The 120 Days of Sodom and published it under a pseudonym in 1904, presumably pocketing the royalties.
[9]      The Institute for Sexual Science (Institut für Sexualwissenschaft). Founded in 1919 in Berlin, the Institute was housed in a villa purchased by Hirschfeld not far from the Reichstag building. It housed his immense library of sex books, most of them pornographic, and offered the public advice on their sex problems (“medical consultations”). People from around Europe visited the Institute, including the homosexual duo Auden and Isherwood, “to gain a clearer understanding of their sexuality.” (Wikipedia).  The Institute, which encouraged “educational” visits from school children, included a Museum of Sex full of pornographic pictures, dildos, “masturbation machines”, and other curiosities of a similar nature. In May 1933, after the Nazis had come to power, the Institute was attacked and thousands of its pornographic books and erotic artifacts destroyed in a “bonfire of the vanities” — this event later being portrayed by Jewish interests as a tragic loss to civilization, comparable only to the burning of the Great Library at Alexandria in 645 AD.
[10]      Wiehe, Ibid.
[11]       Peter Kurten, “to strike back at an oppressive society.”
[12]      An example: Marina Tatar’s Lustmord: Sexual Murder in Weimar Germany.
[13]      Sir Arthur Bryant, Unfinished Victory (1940), pp. 144-145
[14]      Mel Gordon, Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin, p.39
[15]      Mel Gordon, Ibid., p.43
[16]      Mel Gordon, in an email to this author (1 March 2013).
[17]      Mel Gordon, Ibid., pp.28-32
[18]      Quoted in Stephen Lemons, Paradise regained: Weimar Berlin’s depraved, sin-filled nights tantalize the imagination anew in Mel Gordon’s “Voluptuous Panic”.
 [19]     Stephen Lemons, Ibid.  If 30 cents for a blowjob was considered a bargain for the American tourist in Weimar Germany, it is of interest to note that the blowjob rate for sex tourists in Moldova today is considerably lower—only  20 cents a pop. We learn this from a book originally published in Hebrew in Israel (In Foreign Parts: Trafficking in Women in Israel, by Ilana Hammerman. Am Oved. 199pp). “The local rate for sex services at the Chisinau  train station,” we are told, “is about NIS 0.70 for a blowjob.” (Quoted in “Land of Filth and Honey”, by Eli Shai, Jerusalem Post, November 5, 2004).  0.70 New Israeli shekels works out to 20 cents. Moldova, the poorest country in Europe, where the average income is US $300 per month and 20 percent of the population live in abject poverty on $3 per day, is a favorite destination for European and Israeli sex tourists, especially for pedophiles. Chisinau is the capital of Moldova, and it is at its railway station that gaunt, hollow-eyed children—some of them as young as 7—line up to offer their services to the incoming sex tourists. (See here).
[20]     Klaus Mann, The Turning Point (1942), quote.
[21]      Erich Kästner, quoted in “Institute for the study of western civilization: the twentieth century. Lecture 9: Weimar Culture.”
[22]     Quoted in Columbia University Press review of Weimar Cinema: An Essential Guide to Classic Films of the Era, edited by Noah Isenberg
[23]     The Frankfurt School: Wikipedia. For an alternative and more dissident viewpoint, see The Frankfurt School: Metapedia and its numerous links.
[24]     Readers who wish to know more about the philosophical milieu of modernity—i.e., the cultural swamp of sexual bolshevism in which the benighted masses are forced to flounder today—are advised to make a careful study of the following eight core articles:
(1)   Arnaud de Lassus’s The Frankfurt School: Cultural Revolution
(2)  Kevin MacDonald, The Culture of Critique, Chapter 5
(3)  William S. Lind, What is Cultural Marxism?
(4)  William S. Lind, Who Stole our Culture?
(5)  Timothy Matthews, The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt.  (Or my own shorter adaption of this with extended commentary, Satan’s Secret Agents: The Frankfurt School and its Evil Agenda.)
(6)  Michael Minnicino, The Frankfurt School and ‘Political Correctness’
(7) Cultural Marxism: (Metapedia).
(8) Sexual Bolshevism: (Metapedia).
[25]     Georges Lukács, Wikipedia.
[26]     Timothy Matthews, The Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt.
[27]     Willi Munzenberg, Wikipedia.  See also Sean McMeekin’s The Red Millionaire: A political biography of Willi Münzenberg, where Münzenberg  is described as “the perpetrator of some of the most colossal lies of the modern age…. He helped to unleash a plague of moral blindness upon the world from which we have still not recovered.”
[28]     Lasha Darkmoon, The Plot Against Art  (Part 1).
[29]     “The truth is that Mozart, Pascal, Boolean Algebra, Shakespeare, parliamentary government, baroque churches, Newton, the emancipation of women, Kant, Marx, and Ballanchine  ballets don’t redeem what this particular civilization has wrought upon the world. The white race is the cancer of human history.”  — Susan Sontag, Partisan Review,   Winter 1967, p. 57. This infamous quote, once cited in the Wikipedia article on Sontag, has recently been removed.
[30]     Arnaud de Lassus, The Frankfurt School: Cultural Revolution.
[31]      Boiling Frog (Wikipedia)
[32]    The Holocaust Timeline

Homosexual Serial Killers

This article is dedicated to Bill Bunting/William R. Bunting…proud member of the pedophile Jew run Southern Poverty Law Center who would call this information “hateful”!:)

 

Below is a list of serial killers who were homosexuals. This list is intended for reference purposes only and does not imply a causal relationship between homosexuality and serial killing.

Although incidents of serial killing are widely reported in the media because of the heinous and unusual nature of these crimes, there are actually very few serial killers relative to the general population. Research into this phenomenon is ongoing, and a small industry has sprung up around the practice of “profiling” serial killers in order to assist in their apprehension. But, law enforcement officials agree that each serial killer is unique. Society does not currently have sufficient knowledge to predict serial killing before it occurs and thus prevent it from happening.

Serial killers and their victims include people from all races, cultures, nationalities, economic background, educational levels, genders, and sexual orientations. Because serial killers are so rare, it is impossible to use any demographic indicator as a predictor. There are no “rules” and all apparent trends have been broken. But some general observations can be made.

Serial killers are nearly always men (93%). Furthermore, of the relatively few female serial killers, one third of them worked in partnership with males.

In the United States, serial killers are predominantly white. This makes sense statistically, because about 80% of the population is white. According to some sources, whites are over-represented and African-Americans are under-represented among serial killers, but this depends on how one defines a “serial killer.” The more celebrated, headline-grabbing serial killers are generally white, but if one counts all perpetrators of multiple homicides, including drug- and gang-related killings, then African-Americans account for between 20% to 30% of all multiple perpetrators, according to statistics compiled by the FBI. African-Americans comprise about 13% of the total U.S. population. Asians, who comprise probably under-represented among American serial-killers. Asian serial-killers are extremely rare in the United States, but Asians comprise only about 4% of the U.S. population so, statistically speaking, one would expect few Asian serial killers. There have been some high-profile Filipino serial killing and murder cases. Filipinos comprise a relatively newer and less affluent immigrant population relative to other major Asian groups in the United States.

Although the proportion of serial killers who are known to have had homosexual experience is high (over 43%), the total number of serial killers is too small to make statistically relevant statements about whether homosexuals are over- or under-represented among serial killers. [Click here for source, related studies and statistics.]

Also, it should be noted that many of the homosexual serial killers on this list were not active members of the Gay & Lesbian cultural community.

Many of the most famous serial killers (e.g., Jeffrey Dahmer, Andrew Cunanan, John Wayne Gacy, etc.) were homosexuals, but they became widely known due to the nature of their crimes or the identities of their victims, not because they in any way represent serial killers generally.

Given that less than 2% of adults are homosexuals (plus 1 to 2% who are bisexual), there would not need to be very many homosexuals among the total number of serial killers for them to be over-represented. But with such small overall numbers, and with no universally agreed upon definition of a homosexual, it would be impossible to determine the relative frequency of homosexuals among serial killers. Unlike gender and race (clearly ascertainable), there are no physical or genetic tests for sexual orientation. It can only be determined by behavior and self-identification.

Some serial killers engaged in sex with both males and females, which would prompt some people to classify them as bisexuals. Their actual identity would then be argued about by various biologists, gay writers, and others, who would classify their status as a variant of homosexuality, a distinct classification, or repressed homosexuals. Such hair-splitting is well beyond the scope of this paper. Suffice it say, all of the individuals listed here as “homosexual serial killers” can be classified as homosexual as the term is generally used.

Homosexual serial killers have most frequently chosen young boys or gay men as their victims, although some have victimized females as well. Most of the killers have raped their victims either before or after killing them, although in some cases they have killed after consensual homosexual sex. There have been heterosexual serial killers who have targeted gay victims (e.g., Colin Ireland), but this is very rare.

But more importantly, none of the serial killers listed here represent typical homosexuals, who, like the general population, are almost never involved in violent crime. The exact nature of each individual’s feelings, attitudes, and behavior with regards to sex is unique, in the general population as well as among serial killers. Legally, all or nearly all of the homosexual serial killers on this list would be considered sexual deviants because of the extreme and violent nature of their acts — not simply because of their homosexual orientation. It must be emphasized that violent sexual deviancy is exhibited by heterosexual serial killers as well.

No ethnic, religious or cultural group promotes this sort of violence. But in a free society, no culture is entirely free from violence, despite their best efforts. Kristi Degn eloquently wrote a letter to the editor in response to a writer who felt it was okay to single one culture out as perpetrators of violence:

In his letter “Man Is God Here” (Forum, Aug. 25, 2000), Dennis Kostecki wrote, “In my dating days here, I dated six women. All were from this culture. All were abused by their former husbands. Every one! It seems to me this culture promotes the degradation and abuse of their women for reasons only they know and understand.”Pinpointing the blame for abuse on any one “culture” is irresponsible and weak. Abuse is no respecter of culture or demographics. It is no respecter of gender, marital or relationship status.

Our statewide domestic violence hot-line number is 1-800-897-LINK. Perhaps Mr. Kostecki would be interested in knowing that calls received at this number are not from one “culture” only. Further, Mr. Kostecki’s statement is narrow-minded in relation to a problem which is a national concern.

 

Gay/Homosexual Serial Killers

Name # of People
Killed
Year Killer’s Home Location of Murders Notes Birth death
Jeffrey Dahmer 17 1978, 1988-91 Milwaukee Milwaukee and Chicago homosexual cannibal. He was killed by another inmate while in prison. 21 May 1960 28 November 1994
Andrew Cunanan 5 1997 San Diego, Calif. Minnesota; Chicago, IL; South Beach, FL killed fashion designer Gianni Versace 31 August 1969 23 July 1997
Gilles de Rais 300+ 1430s France France associate of Joan of Arc
Luis Alfredo Garavito 140+ Colombia Colombia Gay serial killer who murdered over 140 boys in Columbia. 25 January 1957
Randy Steven Kraft 65 (est.) 1971 to 1983 Oregon, Michigan, etc. “Score Card Killer”
Michael Swango 35 – 60 1983-97 Ohio, Illinois, New York, South Dakota, Virginia “Doctor of Death” — killed hospital patients
Andrei Chikatilo 52 until 1992 Russia Russia
Fritz Haarmann 40 (est.) until 1924 Germany Germany “Butcher Of Hanover”
John Wayne Gacy 33 until 1978 Chicago Chicago bisexual; 27 of his victims (young boys he seduced) were found buried in crawlspace under his house. Executed in Joliet, IL. 17 March 1942 10 May 1994
Patrick Wayne Kearney 28+ 1968 to 1977 Redondo Beach, Calif. gay cruising areas of Hollywood
David D. Hill 28? 1968 to 1977 Redondo Beach, Calif. Hollywood Patrick Kearney’s lover; confessed to being co-killer with Kearney, but police weren’t sure about the extent of his involvement
Hans Grans 27+ until 1924 Germany Germany accommplice and love of Haarmann, the “Butcher Of Hanover”
Wayne Williams 27 1979-81 Atlanta Atlanta Gay serial killer who preyed mostly on young black male hustlers. 27 May 1958
Dean Corll 27 1960s to 1973 Ft. Wayne, Indiana; later Houston, TX Houston, Texas
Elmer Wayne Henley 27 1960s to 1973 Ft. Wayne, Indiana; later Houston, TX Houston, Texas Bisexual. Victims were young boys who he kidnapped and tortured. 9 May 1956
David Owen Brooks 27 1960s to 1973 Ft. Wayne, Indiana; later Houston, TX Houston, Texas
Donald Harvey 25 – 40 (est.) 1970-71 London, Kentucky Kentucky
Juan Corona 25 1971 From Mexico; moved to Yuba City, CA in 1950s Yuba City, Calif. Born in Mexico. All of his victims were men that he first raped, and then killed with a machete over the span of six weeks. Presently resides in Corcoran State Prison. Juan Corona’s brother is Natividad, the gay, owner of the Guadalajara cafe in Marysville, CA. 1934
Adolfo de Jesus Constanzo 21 (est.) until 1989 Matamoros, Mexico Matamoros, Mexico “Matamoros Cult Killer”
Larry Eyler 19 1980s Chicago Illinois and Indiana
Huang Yong 17+ 2001-2003 Henan Province, China Henan Province, China Gay. Executed. Murdered boys that he flirted with and picked up at internet cafes. Saved their belts as souvenirs. His 18th victim escaped, leading to his arrest. 1974 26 December 2003
Dennis Nilsen 16 1978-83 U.K. U.K.
Marcelo Costa de Andrade 14 until 1991 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
William Bonin 12+ 1979-80 Orange County, Calif. Orange County, Calif.
Henry Lee Lucas 12+ 1970s and 80s Most in Texas, Southeastern U.S. 23 August 1936 12 March 2001
Ottis Toole 12+ 1970s and 80s West Coast, Florida, etc. accomplice of Henry Lee Lucas
Vaughn Greenwood 11+ 1974-75 Los Angeles Los Angeles
Richard Speck 8+ 1966 Chicago Chicago married, bisexual
Cayetano Hernandez 8 1963 Yerba Buena, Mexico Mexico
Eleazor Solis 8 1963 Monterey, Mexico Mexico
David Bullock 6+ 1981-82 New York City New York
Vernon Butts 6+ 1979-80 Calif. Orange County, Calif. accomplice of William Bonin
Paul Bateson 6 ? (est.) 1977-78 New York City New York City
Marc Dutroux 6 1995-1996 Belgium Belgium Bisexual. He is unusual among gay serial killers, in that his victims were all girls, who he kidnapped and tortured before killing. One of most notorious serial killers in Belgium’s history. 6 November 1956
Michael Terry 6 1980-86 Atlanta Georgia, Ohio, South Carolina
Orville Lynn Majors 6 Indiana Vermillion County Hospital, Indiana
Charles Cohen 5+ Delaware Delaware, San Francisco, New York, Miami, and New Orleans
Arthur Gary Bishop 5 1984 Utah Utah Utah serial killer of young boys. Years before his murder spree, in 1978, he had been excommunicated from the LDS Church. Bishop was an active homosexual and was no longer a member of the LDS Church when he became a serial killer. Executed in Utah State Prison. He said of his crimes, “With great sadness and remorse, I realize that I allowed myself to be misled by Satan. Pornography was not the only negative influence in my life, but its effect on me was devastating. I am a homosexual pedophile convicted of murder, and pornography was a determining factor in my downfall.” 1951 10 June 1988
Michael Lupo 4+ 1986 from Italy London
Peter Moore 4 1995 north Wales north Wales
Westley Allan Dodd 3+ Washingon Washington, Oregon
David P. Brown
(a.k.a. Nathaniel Bar-Jonah)
3+ 2000 Massachusetts Montana David Paul Brown. Victims were all young boys. 15 February 1957
Charles Manson 3+ 1968-72 Los Angeles Los Angeles Bisexual. One of nation’s most famous serial killers. Murdered actress Sharon Tate, the wife of film director Roman Polanski. Deeply interested in the occult. 12 November 1934
David Edward Maust 5+ 1981; 2003 Germany; Galveston, TX (1981); Hammond, IL (2003) Gay. Killed teenage boys, usually by stabbing 5 April 1954
Bruce Davis 2+ 1968-72 Los Angeles Los Angeles Charles Manson accomplice
Erik Menendez 2 20 August 1989 Beverly Hills, CA Beverly Hills, CA with his straight brother Lyle, Erik killed his parents (Jose Menendez and Kitty Menendez). Their trial was a major national news story. 27 November 1971

Although homosexual murderers of single victims are too numerous to list here, a number of particularly famous ones include: Nathan Leopold and Richard Loeb (the wealthy and academically bright gay Chicago couple who murdered a boy in 1924 just for fun; their story became one of the nation’s most famous murder cases, and was the basis for many movies, including Hitchcock’s film “Rope”); Armin Meiwes (the sexually deviant German cannibal known as “Der Metzgermeister” – The Master Butcher, who met a victim over the Internet who he ate and killed); John E. du Pont (the gay member of the wealthy du Pont famil who shot Olympic wrestler David Schultz to death); Gary Hirte (Waupaca, WI high school senior who admitted to killing 37-year-old substitute teacher Glenn Kopitske); Karla Homolka (Canadian lesbian who murdered her own sister). Other notable gay violent criminals include Kenneth Parnell (paid $500 to “purchase” a young black boy named Steven Stayner, who he then raped and kidnapped); John Wojtowicz (whose bank robbery inspired the movie Dog Day Afternoon).

Serial Killers who were Lesbians

Name # of People
Killed
Year Killer’s Home Location of Murders Notes
Magdalena Solis 8 1963 Monterey, Mexico Mexico
Aileen Wuornos 7+ 1989-90 south of Daytona, Florida Florida killed male “johns”
Tyria Moore 7+ 1989-90 south of Daytona, Florida Florida killed male “johns”
Catherine Wood 6 Grand Rapids, MI Grand Rapids, MI nurse who killed patients
Gwen Graham 6 Grand Rapids, MI Grand Rapids, MI nurse who killed patients

Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse

William Bunting

CountyFulton, GA
Booking Number231540
First NameWILLIAM
Last NameBUNTING
SO #P00872657
Hair ColorBlond or Strawbe
Weight165
Height69
Eye ColorBlue
RaceWhite
Booking Date2002-10-05
GenderM

This information is dedicated to pro pedophile and rapist Bill Bunting/William R. Bunting…almost murdered Karen Sue Andras, charged with felony assault of a law enforcement officer and considers real men like him are those who rape women as stated in his own words no less…

“Ummm…any woman raped by Russell Means or Bill Cosby should be grateful… I mean these are real men who should be able to take what they want from any woman they please… If she was a real woman she would be begging for more”- Bill  Bunting

Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse

Timothy J. Dailey, Ph.D.
http://www.frc.org/get/is02e3.cfm

Scandals involving the sexual abuse of under-age boys by homosexual priests have rocked the Roman Catholic Church. At the same time, defenders of homosexuality argue that youth organizations such as the Boy Scouts should be forced to include homosexuals among their adult leaders. Similarly, the Gay Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), a homosexual activist organization that targets schools, has spearheaded the formation of “Gay-Straight Alliances” among students. GLSEN encourages homosexual teachers — even in the youngest grades — to be open about their sexuality, as a way of providing role models to “gay” students. In addition, laws or policies banning employment discrimination based on “sexual orientation” usually make no exception for those who work with children or youth.

Many parents have become concerned that children may be molested, encouraged to become sexually active, or even “recruited” into adopting a homosexual identity and lifestyle. Gay activists dismiss such concerns — in part, by strenuously insisting that there is no connection between homosexuality and the sexual abuse of children.

However, despite efforts by homosexual activists to distance the gay lifestyle from pedophilia, there remains a disturbing connection between the two. This is because, by definition, male homosexuals are sexually attracted to other males. While many homosexuals may not seek young sexual partners, the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners. In this paper we will consider the following evidence linking homosexuality to pedophilia:

Pedophiles are invariably males: Almost all sex crimes against children are committed by men.

Significant numbers of victims are males: Up to one-third of all sex crimes against children are committed against boys (as opposed to girls).

The 10 percent fallacy: Studies indicate that, contrary to the inaccurate but widely accepted claims of sex researcher Alfred Kinsey, homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population.

Homosexuals are overrepresented in child sex offenses: Individuals from the 1 to 3 percent of the population that is sexually attracted to the same sex are committing up to one-third of the sex crimes against children.

Some homosexual activists defend the historic connection between homosexuality and pedophilia: Such activists consider the defense of “boy-lovers” to be a legitimate gay rights issue.

Pedophile themes abound in homosexual literary culture: Gay fiction as well as serious academic treatises promote “intergenerational intimacy.”

Male Homosexuals Commit A Disproportionate Number of Child Sex Abuse Cases

Homosexual apologists admit that some homosexuals sexually molest children, but they deny that homosexuals are more likely to commit such offenses. After all, they argue, the majority of child molestation cases are heterosexual in nature. While this is correct in terms of absolute numbers, this argument ignores the fact that homosexuals comprise only a very small percentage of the population.

The evidence indicates that homosexual men molest boys at rates grossly disproportionate to the rates at which heterosexual men molest girls. To demonstrate this it is necessary to connect several statistics related to the problem of child sex abuse: 1) men are almost always the perpetrator; 2) up to one-third or more of child sex abuse cases are committed against boys; 3) less than three percent of the population are homosexuals. Thus, a tiny percentage of the population (homosexual men), commit one-third or more of the cases of child sexual molestation.

Men Account for Almost All Sexual Abuse of Children Cases

  • An essay on adult sex offenders in the book Sexual Offending Against Children reported: “It is widely believed that the vast majority of sexual abuse is perpetrated by males and that female sex offenders only account for a tiny proportion of offences. Indeed, with 3,000 adult male sex offenders in prison in England and Wales at any one time, the corresponding figure for female sex offenders is 12!” 1
  • Kee MacFarlane, et al., writing in Sexual Abuse of Young Children: Evaluation and Treatment report: “The large majority of sexual perpetrators appear to be males (Herman & Hirschman, 1981; Lindholm & Willey, 1983).” 2
  • A report by the American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children states: “In both clinical and non-clinical samples, the vast majority of offenders are male.” 3
  • A study in the Journal of Sex Research states that “pedophilia does not exist, or is extremely rare, in women.” 4

A Significant Percentage of Child Sexual Abuse Victims are Boys

  • According to the Journal of Child Psychiatry: “It was commonly believed fifteen years ago that girls were abused in excess of boys in a ratio of about 9 to 1, but contemporary studies now indicate that the ratio of girls to boys abused has narrowed remarkably. . . . The majority of community studies suggest a . . . ratio . . . in the order of 2 to 4 girls to 1 boy.” 5 The study adds that “some authors now believe that boys may be sexually abused as commonly as girls (Groth, 1978; O’Brien, 1980).” 6
  • A study of 457 male sex offenders against children in Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy found that “approximately one-third of these sexual offenders directed their sexual activity against males.” 7

Sexual Abuse of Boys is Underreported

The actual percentage of child sexual abuse victims who are boys very likely exceeds the above estimates. Many researchers echo the view of the Journal of Child Psychiatry study, which refers to the “under-reporting of the incidence and prevalence of sexual abuse in boys.” 8

  • Dr. Robert Johnson, in Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality, reports: “The vast majority of cases of male sexual molestation is not reported. As a result, these young men keep both the incidents and their feelings to themselves.” 9
  • The Department of Justice report on child sexual exploitation explains why the percentage of boy victims is underestimated: “Adolescent boy victims are highly likely to deny certain types of sexual activity. . . . They are embarrassed and ashamed of their behavior and rightfully believe that society will not understand their victimization. . . . No matter what the investigator does, most adolescent boys will deny they were victims.” 10
  • The Journal of Child Psychiatry adds: “Boys are usually encultured into an ethos where self-reliance, independence and sexual prowess are valued, while showing hurt or homosexuality are denigrated. . . . This may lead to powerful repression or deletion of the experience, with failure to report.” 11

Homosexuals Comprise Less than 3 Percent of the Population

Relying upon three large data sets: the General Social Survey, the National Health and Social Life Survey, and the U.S. census, a recent study in Demography estimates the number of exclusive male homosexuals in the general population at 2.5 percent, and the number of exclusive lesbians at 1.4 percent. 12

  • A study of the sexual behavior of men in the United States based on the National Survey of Men (a nationally representative sample comprised of 3,321 men aged twenty to thirty-nine, published in Family Planning Perspectives), found that “2 percent of sexually active men aged twenty to thirty-nine . . . had had any same-gender sexual activity during the last ten years. Approximately 1 percent of the men (1.3 percent among whites and 0.2 percent among blacks) reported having had exclusively homosexual activity. 13
  •   J. Gordon Muir, writing in The Wall Street Journal, discusses a number of studies that have found that homosexuals comprise between 1 to 3 percent of the population. 14
  • In a survey of studies on homosexuals in different populations, the Archives of Sexual Behavior reported a random sample of Hawaii State residents interviewed by telephone. The study found “just about 3 percent of males and 1.2 percent of females as having engaged in same-sex or bisexual activity.” 15 However, this relatively higher number is attributed to the fact that the study was not limited to exclusive homosexuals, but included all those who at some time in their lives engaged in same-sex activities. 16

Homosexual Pedophiles are Vastly Overrepresented in Child Sex Abuse Cases

Homosexual pedophiles sexually molest children at a far greater rate compared to the percentage of homosexuals in the general population. A study in the Journal of Sex Research found, as we have noted above, that “approximately one-third of [child sex offenders] had victimized boys and two-thirds had victimized girls.” The authors then make a prescient observation: “Interestingly, this ratio differs substantially from the ratio of gynephiles (men who erotically prefer physically mature females) to androphiles (men who erotically prefer physically mature males), which is at least 20 to 1.” 17

In other words, although heterosexuals outnumber homosexuals by a ratio of at least 20 to 1, homosexual pedophiles commit about one-third of the total number of child sex offenses.

Similarly, the Archives of Sexual Behavior also noted that homosexual pedophiles are significantly overrepresented in child sex offence cases:

The best epidemiological evidence indicates that only 2 to 4 percent of men attracted to adults prefer men (ACSF Investigators, 1992; Billy et al., 1993; Fay et al., 1989; Johnson et al., 1992); in contrast, around 25 to 40 percent of men attracted to children prefer boys (Blanchard et al., 1999; Gebhard et al., 1965; Mohr et al., 1964). Thus, the rate of homosexual attraction is 6 to 20 times higher among pedophiles.” 18

The stark imbalance between homosexual and heterosexual child molestations was confirmed in the Archives of Sexual Behavior study itself, which divided 260 pedophile participants into three groups: “152 heterosexual pedophiles (men with offenses or self-reported attractions involving girls only), 43 bisexual pedophiles (boys and girls), and 65 homosexual pedophiles (boys only).” 19 In other words, 25 percent of the offenders were homosexual pedophiles — or 41 percent if those who molest girls as well as boys are included.

Other studies report an unusually high percentage of child molestations by homosexual pedophiles:

  • A study on pedophilia in the Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa reported: “According to the literature, findings of a two-to-one ratio of heterosexual to homosexual pedophiles have been documented.” 20
  • The Journal of Sex Research reports a study that included “199 offenders against female children and 96 offenders against male children. . . . This would indicate a proportional prevalence of 32 percent of homosexual offenders against children.” 21
  • A study of male child sex offenders in Child Abuse and Neglect found that fourteen percent targeted only males, and a further 28 percent chose males as well as females as victims, thus indicating that 42 percent of male pedophiles engaged in homosexual molestation. 22
Are Men Who Molest Boys Really ‘Homosexuals’?

Gay Apologists Insist on a Simplistic Stereotype of Pedophilia

Central to the attempts to separate homosexuality from pedophilia is the claim that pedophiles cannot, by definition, be considered homosexuals. Relying upon a questionable methodology 23, the gay advocacy organization Human Rights Campaign published a “Fact Sheet on Sexual Orientation and Child Abuse,” that states: “A sexual abuser who molests a child of the same sex is usually not considered homosexual.” 24

The basis for this claim is the view that pedophiles who molest boys cannot be considered homosexual if that individual has at any time been married or sexually involved with women.

‘Homosexual Pedophiles’: A Clinical Term

The fact is, however, that the terms “homosexual” and “pedophile” are not mutually exclusive: they describe two intersecting types of sexual attraction. Webster’s Dictionary defines “homosexual” as someone who is sexually attracted to persons of the same sex. “Pedophile” is defined as “an adult who is sexually attracted to young children.” The former definition refers to the gender of the desired sexual object, while the latter refers to the age of the desired sexual object.

A male “homosexual pedophile,” then, is defined as someone who is generally (but not exclusively, see below) sexually attracted to boys, while a female “homosexual pedophile” is sexually attracted to girls. 25

The term “homosexual pedophile” was first used in the early 20th century by the Viennese psychiatrist Dr. Richard von Krafft-Ebing, who pioneered the systematic study of sexual deviance. Krafft-Ebing described pedophiles as heterosexually, homosexually or bisexually oriented. 26 This division has been accepted by pedophiles themselves, 27 and is well attested in the literature:

  • A study of child molesters in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that “a homosexual and a heterosexual subgroup can be delineated among these offenders.” 28
  • The Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy published a study on the same topic, which discussed “the proportional prevalences of heterosexual and homosexual pedophilia.” 29 The study commented on a study that found that “the percentage of the homosexual pedophiles would be 45.8.” Even adjusted downward for exhibitionists, “this would still indicate a much higher percentage (34 percent) of homosexuals among pedophiles than among men who prefer physically mature partners.” 30
  • In a review of studies on pedophilia, the Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa concluded: “The findings of previous studies report that pedophiles can be divided into heterosexual and homosexual pedophiles according to their erotic preference. . . . This was confirmed in this recent study.” 31 The article classified homosexual pedophilia into three types: the socially inadequate homosexual pedophile, the intrusive homosexual pedophile, and the undifferentiated homosexual pedophile. 32
  • A study of pedophiles in Behavior Research and Therapy concluded: “The second, and perhaps the most important observation we made, is that a homosexual and a heterosexual subgroup can be delineated among these offenders. . . . Categorizing them in this way revealed important differences in the pattern of their sexual preferences.” 33
  • The International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology refers to homosexual pedophiles as a “distinct group.” The victims of homosexual pedophiles “were more likely to be strangers, that they were more likely to have engaged in paraphiliac behavior separate from that involved in the offence, and that they were more likely to have past convictions for sexual offences. . . . Other studies [showed a] greater risk of reoffending than those who had offended against girls” and that the “recidivism rate for male-victim offenders is approximately twice that for female-victim offenders.” 34

Homosexuals and Homosexual Pedophiles Engage in a Wide Variety of Sexual Behavior that Belies Simplistic Categories

Despite this evidence, in their efforts to divorce homosexuality from pedophilia, homosexual apologists insist on a rigid, narrow definition of the terms “homosexual” and “pedophile” that permits no overlap of the terms. They deny that homosexuals are attracted in inordinate numbers to boys. They also claim that pedophiles cannot be classified as “homosexual” if at any time they have had sexual relations with women.

However, such a narrow definition does not do justice to the complex nature of pedophilia. Researchers have long been aware that pedophiles exhibit a wide variety of sexual attractions and behavior — often to draw attention away from their primary lust for boys. A study on sex offenders in the International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology notes that “the reason child sexual abusers are successful at remaining undetected is because they do not fit a stereotype.” 35

The data indicates that both homosexuality and pedophilia are intersecting categories that admit to a wide variety of sexual behavior:

Homosexual Males are Sexually Attracted to Underage Boys

  • A study in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that homosexual men are attracted to young males. The study compared the sexual age preferences of heterosexual men, heterosexual women, homosexual men, and lesbians. The results showed that, in marked contrast to the other three categories, “all but 9 of the 48 homosexual men preferred the youngest two male age categories,” which included males as young as age fifteen. 36

In The Gay Report, by homosexual researchers Karla Jay and Allen Young, the authors report data showing that 73 percent of homosexuals surveyed had at some time had sex with boys sixteen to nineteen years of age or younger.” 37

Conversely, Homosexual Pedophiles are Often Attracted to Adult Males

A study of sex offenders against male children in Behavior Research and Therapy found that male homosexual pedophiles are sexually attracted to “males of all ages.” Compared to non-offenders, the offenders showed “greater arousal” to slides of nude males as old as twenty-four: “As a group, the child molesters responsed [sp] with moderate sexual arousal . . . to the nude males of all ages.” 38

  • A study of Canadians imprisoned for pedophilia in the Journal of Interpersonal Violence found that 30 percent of the adult male offenders engaged in homosexual acts with adult males. 39
  • Many pedophiles, in fact, consider themselves to be homosexual. A study of 229 convicted child molesters in Archives of Sexual Behavior found that “eighty-six percent of offenders against males described themselves as homosexual or bisexual.” 40

Fr. John Harvey, founder and director of Courage, a support ministry for Catholics who struggle with same-sex attraction, explains that “the pedophile differs from the ordinary homosexual in that the former admires boyishness in the object of his affections, while the latter admires manliness.” 41 However, the categories are not completely separate:

While granting that the majority of homosexuals are not aroused by young boys, the distinction between homosexuality and homosexual pedophilia is not quite absolute. In some cases the interest oscillates between young adolescents and adults, in others between boys and adolescents; in exceptional cases a man may be interested in boys at one time and adults at another. 42

Many Pedophiles are Attracted to Women, Marry, and Have Children

Gay activists insist that pedophilia has nothing to do with homosexuality because pedophiles are only sexually interested in children, whereas homosexuals only have sexual relations with adults. We have already seen that this stereotypical view is not correct with regard to homosexuals. There is also abundant evidence demonstrating that, while primarily interested in children, pedophiles nevertheless exhibit a wide variety of sexual behaviors, including relationships with women:

  • A study in Child Abuse and Neglect found that 48 percent of the offenders either were married or had been married at some time. 43
  • The Journal of Interpersonal Violence studied the sexual preferences of male pedophiles who sexually abused children. When they compared the sexual response of the pedophiles with the control group, they found, unexpectedly: “Surprisingly, the two groups did not differ in their response to the nude female stimuli.” 44
  • A study in the Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa reported that “most of the middle-aged pedophiles have had significant adult sexual activity.” 45 Fifty-eight percent of the pedophiles in one study had at least one child, while other research indicated that “more than two-thirds of the married pedophiles in their sample had children, with an average of two to three children per subject.” 46
  • A report by the Department of Justice addressed the devious stratagems of pedophiles, who will go to great lengths to conceal their true desires: “Preferential sex offenders may be ‘pillars of the community’ and are often described as ‘nice guys.’ They almost always have a means of access to children (for example, through marriage, neighborhood, or occupation.)” 47

Thus, the evidence shows that homosexual pedophiles cannot be narrowly defined as individuals who are solely attracted to underage boys. In fact there is considerable overlap between homosexuality and pedophilia.

Pedophilia in Gay Culture

The Historical Connection between Pedophilia and the Gay Rights Movement

David Thorstad is a homosexual activist and historian of the gay rights movement. 48 He is a former president of New York’s Gay Activists Alliance (gaa), a prototype activist group founded in December 1969. The gaa at its inception opposed age of consent laws, which prohibited adults from having sex with children. 49 Thorstad is also a pedophile and founding member of the North American Man Boy Love Association (nambla).

Thorstad argues that there is a natural and undeniable connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. He expresses bitterness that the gay rights movement has, in his view, abandoned pedophilia. Thorstad writes: “Boy-lovers were involved in the gay movement from the beginning, and their presence was tolerated. Gay youth groups encouraged adults to attend their dances. . . . There was a mood of tolerance, even joy at discovering the myriad of lifestyles within the gay and lesbian subculture.” 50

The inaugural issue of the Gay Community News in 1979 published a “Statement to the Gay Liberation Movement on the Issue of Man/Boy Love,” which challenged the movement to return to a vision of sexual liberation. It argued that “the ultimate goal of gay liberation is the achievement of sexual freedom for all — not just equal rights for ‘lesbian and gay men,’ but also freedom of sexual expression for young people and children.”

In the early years there was some reluctance to accept pedophilia, primarily among feminist and lesbian activist groups. In March 1979 the Lesbian Feminist Liberation (lfl) accusing “so-called Man/Boy Lovers” of “attempting to legitimize sex between children and adults. . . . Feminists easily recognize this as the latest attempt to make palatable the sexual exploitation of children.” The coalition went on record as opposing “the sexual abuse of children by heterosexual or homosexual persons.” 51

Despite this opposition, Thorstad claims that by 1985 homosexual pedophiles had won acceptance within the gay movement. He cites Jim Kepner, then curator of the International Gay and Lesbian Archives in Los Angeles: “A point I’ve been trying to make is that if we reject the boylovers in our midst today we’d better stop waving the banner of the Ancient Greeks, of Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, Oscar Wilde, Walt Whitman, Horatio Alger, and Shakespeare. We’d better stop claiming them as part of our heritage unless we are broadening our concept of what it means to be gay today.” 52

In 1985 nambla was admitted as a member in New York’s council of Lesbian and Gay Organizations as well as the International Gay Association — now the International Lesbian and Gay Association (ilga). In the mid-1990’s ilga’s association with nambla and other pedophile groups cost the organization it’s status as a Non-Governmental Organization in the United Nations.

ilga’s renewed attempt to gain admittance to the UN was rejected again in April 2000 because the organization “did not document that it had purged pedophile groups such as [nambla].” The Washington Times reports that Ishtiag H. Anrabi, Pakistani delegate to the UN Economic and Social Council, expressed concern that ilga was continuing to be secretive about ties with pedophile groups: “For more than a year, the ilga has refused to provide documentation or allow review of its membership list to demonstrate that pedophilia groups have been expelled.” 53

Pedophile Themes Abound in Gay Literature

The late “beat” poet Allen Ginsberg illustrates the seamless connection between homosexuality and pedophilia. Many know Ginsberg as an illustrious “out” homosexual poet: fewer are aware that he was also a pedophile.

Biographer Raymond-Jean Frontain refers to Ginsberg’s publications in both nambla Bulletin and nambla Journal. He discusses how Ginsberg’s biographers failed to discuss his poems that contained pederastic themes:

Although both Shumacher and Barry Miles (Ginsberg’s initial biographer) frankly discuss Ginsberg’s sexual politics, neither refers to his involvement with the controversial North American Man/Boy Love Association. . . . I reread Collected Poems and Ginsberg’s two subsequent collections, surprised by the pattern of references to anal intercourse and to pederasty that emerged. 54

Ginsberg was one of the first of a growing number of homosexual writers who cater to the fascination with pedophilia in the gay community. Mary Eberstadt, writing in the Weekly Standard, documents how the taboo against sex with children continues to erode — with the impetus coming from homosexual writers. 55

Revealingly, the examples she provides of pedophilia in current literature come from gay fiction. Eberstadt cites the Village Voice, which states that “Gay fiction is rich with idyllic accounts of ‘intergenerational relationships,’ as such affairs are respectfully called these days.” 56 Other examples of pedophilia-themed gay fiction include:

  • In the introduction of the “mainstream” homosexual anthology Penguin Book on International Gay Writing, David Leavitt notes matter-of-factly that “Another ‘forbidden’ topic from which European writers seem less likely to shrink is the love of older men for young boys.” Leavitt praises one book with a pedophilic theme included in the anthology as a “coolly assured narrative [which] compels the reader to imagine the world from a perspective he might ordinarily condemn.” 57
  • Several texts included in another anthology, The Gay Canon: Great Books Every Gay Man Should Read, feature scenes of man-boy sex. One such book is praised as “an operatic adventure into the realms of love, personality, ambition and art . . . a pure joy to read.” The protagonist is “a pedophile’s dream: the mind of a man in the body of a boy.” 58 Another novel which includes graphic descriptions of sexual violence against boys is said to “[tear] straight to the heart of one of the greatest sources, community-wide, of 1990’s gay angst: What to do with men who love boys?” 59
  • Yet another anthology of homosexual fiction, A History of Gay Literature: The Male Tradition, published by Yale University Press, includes “a longish chapter on ‘Boys and Boyhood’ which is a seemingly definitive account of pro-pedophile literary works.” 60 The author appears more concerned with the feelings and emotions of the man than with his boy victim. He explores the question of “whether or not you regard [having sex with boys] as a way of retreating from life or, on the contrary, as a way of engaging with it at its most honest and least corrupted level.” 61

A significant percentage of books that have appeared on the Gay Men’s Press fiction bestseller list contain pedophilia themes, including:

Some Boys: described as a “memoir of a lover of boys” that “evokes the author’s young friends across four decades.” 62

For a Lost Soldier: the story of a sexual relationship between a soldier and an eleven-year-old boy, set during World War II. 63

A Good Start, Considering: yet another story about an eleven-year-old boy (!) who suffers sexual abuse but is rescued by a teenager who “offers him love and affection” 64

Terre Haute: billed as “A poetic novel of sexual awakening in the American Midwest, tracing an adolescent’s journey from introspection to perilous desire.”

Shiva and Arun: the story of two Indian adolescents who “discover early on the joys of sex.”

Teardrops on My Drum: barefoot kids in 1920’s Liverpool search for “adventure, love and sex.”

Pro-pedophilia Publications

Recent years have seen the appearance of publications that lend a scholarly veneer to the fascination with pedophilia in the gay community. Such publications attempt to make the case for “intergenerational intimacy.” The nation’s largest gay publisher, Alyson Publications, which distributes Daddy’s Roommate and other homosexual books that promote homosexuality to children, publishes books advocating man-boy sex, including:

Paedophilia: The Radical Case, which contains detailed information on how to engage in sexual relations with young boys. 65

The Age Taboo, another defense of pedophilia which claims: “Boy-lovers . . . are not child molesters. The child abusers are . . . parents who force their staid morality onto the young people in their custody.” 66

The Journal of Homosexuality and Pedophilia

The Journal of Homosexuality is viewed as the premier “mainstream” English-language publication of the gay movement. One prominent editor is John DeCecco, a psychologist at San Francisco State University who also serves on the editorial board of the Dutch pedophile journal Paidika. It is therefore not surprising to see pedophilia promoted on its pages.

In 1990 the Journal of Homosexuality published a series of essays on pedophilia that were eventually published as Male Inter-Generational Intimacy: Historical, Socio-Psychological, and Legal Perspectives, edited by pedophile Edward Brongersma. None of the essays offered any substantive criticism of pedophilia: most blatantly promoted man-boy love as the natural right of homosexuals.

In 1999 Helmut Graupner, wrote an article on pedophilia in the Journal of Homosexuality, in which he claims: “Man/boy and woman/girl relations without doubt are same-sex relations and they do constitute an aspect of gay and lesbian life.” Graupner argues that, as such, consensual sexual relations between adult homosexuals and youths as young as fourteen qualifies as a “gay rights issue.” 67

The fascination with pedophilia continues to be a cause of concern even within the gay community. Lesbian columnist Paula Martinac, writing in the homosexual newspaper Washington Blade, states:

[S]ome gay men still maintain that an adult who has same-sex relations with someone under the legal age of consent is on some level doing the kid a favor by helping to bring him or her ‘out.’

[S]ome gay men still maintain that an adult who has same-sex relations with someone under the legal age of consent is on some level doing the kid a favor by helping to bring him or her ‘out.’ It’s not pedophilia, this thinking goes — pedophilia refers only to little kids. Instead, adult-youth sex is viewed as an important aspect of gay culture, with a history dating back to ‘Greek love’ of ancient times. This romanticized version of adult-youth sexual relations has been a staple of gay literature and has made appearances, too, in gay-themed films. 68

Martinac adds that “When some gay men venerate adult-youth sex as affirming while simultaneously declaring ‘We’re not pedophiles,’ they send an inconsistent message to society. . . . The lesbian and gay community will never be successful in fighting the pedophile stereotype until we all stop condoning sex with young people.” 69

Victim’s Turned Victimizers: The Consequences OF Homosexual Child Abuse

The steadfast denial of the disturbing ties with pedophilia within the homosexual movement is no purely academic matter. Perhaps the most tragic aspect of the homosexual-pedophile connection is the fact that men who sexually molest boys all too often lead their victims into homosexuality and pedophilia. The evidence indicates that a high percentage of homosexuals and pedophiles were themselves sexually abused as children:

  • The Archives of Sexual Behavior reports: “One of the most salient findings of this study is that 46 percent of homosexual men and 22 percent of homosexual women reported having been molested by a person of the same gender. This contrasts to only 7 percent of heterosexual men and 1 percent of heterosexual women reporting having been molested by a person of the same gender.” 70
  • A study of 279 homosexual/bisexual men with AIDS and control patients discussed in the Journal of the American Medical Association reported: “More than half of both case and control patients reported a sexual act with a male by age 16 years, approximately 20 percent by age 10 years.” 71
  • Noted child sex abuse expert David Finkelhor found that “boys victimized by older men were over four times more likely to be currently engaged in homosexual activity than were non-victims. The finding applied to nearly half the boys who had had such an experience. . . . Further, the adolescents themselves often linked their homosexuality to their sexual victimization experiences.” 72
  • A study in the International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology found: “In the case of childhood sexual experiences prior to the age of fourteen, 40 percent (of the pedophile sample) reported that they had engaged ‘very often’ in sexual activity with an adult, with 28 percent stating that this type of activity had occurred ‘sometimes'” 73
  • A National Institute of Justice report states that “the odds that a childhood sexual abuse victim will be arrested as an adult for any sex crime is 4.7 times higher than for people . . . who experienced no victimization as children.” 74
  • A Child Abuse and Neglect study found that 59 percent of male child sex offenders had been “victim of contact sexual abuse as a child.” 75

The Journal of Child Psychiatry noted that “there is a tendency among boy victims to recapitulate their own victimization, only this time with themselves in the role of perpetrator and someone else the victim.” 76

The circle of abuse is the tragic legacy of the attempts by homosexuals to legitimize having sex with boys. For too many boys it is already too late to protect them from those who took advantage of their need for love and attention. All too many later perpetrate the abuse by themselves engaging in the sexual abuse of boys. Only by exposing the lies, insincere denials, and deceptions — including those wrapped in scholastic garb — of those who prey sexually on children, can we hope to build a wall of protection around the helpless children among us.

Dr. Dailey is a senior fellow for culture studies at the Family Research Council.


Notes

1. Dawn Fisher, “Adult Sex Offenders: Who are They? Why and How Do They Do It?” in Tony Morrison, et al., eds., Sexual Offending Against Children (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 11.

2. Kee MacFarlane, et al., Sexual Abuse of Young Children: Evaluation and Treatment (New York: The Guilford Press, 1986), p. 9.

3. John Briere, et al., eds., The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment (Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, 1996), pp.  52, 53.

4. Kurt Freund, et al., “Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference,” Journal of Sex Research 26 (February 1989): 198. See also Freund (1992): “In females, pedophilia is either very rare, or virtually nonexistent,” p. 34.

5. Bill Watkins & Arnon Bentovim, “The Sexual Abuse of Male Children and Adolescents: A Review of Current Research,” Journal of Child Psychiatry 33 (1992); in Byrgen Finkelman, Sexual Abuse (New York: Garland Publishing, 1995), p. 300.

6. Ibid.

7. Kurt Freund, et al., “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 10 (1984): 197. “The proportional prevalence of offenders against male children in this group of 457 offenders against children was 36 percent.” See also, Kurt Freund, et al., “Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference,” “Approximately one-third of these individuals had victimized boys and two-thirds had victimized girls. This finding is consistent with the proportions reported in two earlier studies,” p. 107.

8. Watkins & Bentovim, p. 215.

9. Robert L. Johnson, “Long-term Effects of Sexual Abuse in Boys,” Medical Aspects of Human Sexuality (September 1988): 38.

10. “Understanding and Investigating Child Sexual Exploitation,” (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 1997), p. 12.

11. Watkins & Bentovim, p. 302.

12. Dan Black, et al., “Demographics of the Gay and Lesbian Population in the United States: Evidence from Available Systematic Data Sources,” Demography 37 (May 2000): 150.

13. John O. G. Billy, et al., “The Sexual Behavior of Men in the United States,” Family Planning Perspectives 25 (March/April 1993): 58.

14. J. Gordon Muir, “Homosexuals and the 10 percent Fallacy,” Wall Street Journal (March 31, 1993).

15. Milton Diamond, “Homosexuality and Bisexuality in Different Populations,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 22 (1993): 300.

16. Ibid. Significantly, a number of studies that were surveyed, and which skewed the overall percentages of homosexuals upwards, included such vague definers as those having had “any homosexual body contact.” In contrast, one study that was limited to self-identifying homosexuals found that less than 2 percent of the male respondents considered their “sexual orientation” to be homosexual, p. 293.

17. Kurt Freund, et al., “Heterosexuality, Homosexuality, and Erotic Age Preference,” p. 107. In this and previous studies, Freund claims that homosexuals are no more likely than heterosexuals to be attracted to children (p. 115). However, Silverthorn, et al., mentions the limitations of studies by Freund and others: “Studies of homosexual male preferences are also limited. . . . The Freund et al. (1973) study was possibly compromised because the homosexual men used in the study were selected to be sexually attracted to adults, but not teenaged, males. The Bailey et al. (1994) study was limited in that it did not present participants with objective stimuli but simply asked participants to report what age of sexual partner they preferred . . . the Jankowiak et al. (1992) study . . . was limited in two ways: the homosexual male participants had a limited age range of ‘middle-aged professionals’ and the stimuli presented to participants were also of a limited age range (‘university to middle-aged’).” Silverthorn attempted to correct these deficiencies, and in his study found that homosexuals “preferred younger partners than those who preferred female partners” — including those as young as fifteen. Zebulon A. Silverthorne & Vernon L. Quinsey, “Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 29 (February 2000): 67–76.

18. Ray Blanchard, et al., “Fraternal Birth Order and Sexual Orientation in Pedophiles,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 29 (2000): 464.

19. Ibid., p. 471.

20. John M. W. Bradford, et al., “The Heterogeneity/Homogeneity of Pedophilia,” Psychiatric Journal of the University of Ottawa 13 (1988): 225. Elsewhere the study notes: “Researchers have variously estimated the incidence of homosexual pedophilia between 19 percent and 33 percent of reported molestations,” p. 218.

21. Freund, “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” p. 197.

22. Michele Elliott, “Chld Sexual Abuse Prevention: What Offenders Tell Us,” Child Abuse and Neglect 19 (1995): 581.

23. The fact sheet discusses a study by Carole Jenny, et al., which claims that only 2 of 269 child molesters could be identified as gay or lesbian. Carole Jenny, et al., “Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?” Pediatrics 94 (July 1994): 41–44. However, the Jenny study utilized an atypical research technique: the reported child molesters themselves were not interviewed. Instead, the researchers relied upon the subjective opinions of “informants” who accompanied the child victim to the medical clinic. The qualifications for such “informants” to determine the sexual behavior of the accused molester were not established. However, once it is “determined” beforehand that pedophiles who molest boys cannot be considered gay or homosexual if they have had sexual relations with women, it is a foregone conclusion that few if any of the pedophiles –who often have girlfriends, are married, and have children – will be labeled homosexual. The Jenny study used this narrow profile despite the fact that the study itself found that 22 percent of the perpetrators were of the same sex as the victim. In these cases the molesters clearly engaged in homosexual sexual molestation.

24. “Fact Sheet on Sexual Orientation and Child Abuse,” Human Rights Campaign (2001): available at: http://hrc.grassroots.com/family/soandchildabusefact/. The fact sheet discusses a study by Carole Jenny, et al., which claims that only 2 of 269 child molesters could be identified as gay or lesbian. Carole Jenny, et al., “Are Children at Risk for Sexual Abuse by Homosexuals?” pp. 41–44. However, the Jenny study utilized an atypical research technique. The reported child molesters themselves were not interviewed; instead, the researchers relied upon the subjective opinions of “informants” who accompanied the child victim to the medical clinic.

25. Note that the well-accepted definition of “child” as someone between infancy and the age of maturation is employed here.

26. John M. W. Bradford, et al., p. 218.

27. “[pedophiles] can be of either sex or any [sexual] orientation, i.e., homosexual, heterosexual or bisexual.” Paedophilia: Some Questions and Answers (London: Paedophilic Informational Exchange, 1978); quoted in Seth L. Goldstein, “Investigating Child Sexual Exploitation: Law Enforcement’s Role,” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin 53 (January 1984): 23.

28. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Sexual Offenders against Male Children: Sexual Preferences,” Behavior Research and Therapy 26 (March 1988): 390.

29. Kurt Freund, et al., “Pedophilia and Heterosexuality vs. Homosexuality,” p. 194.

30. Ibid., p. 197.

31. Bradford, et al., p. 217.

32. Ibid., pp. 218, 219.

33. Ibid., p. 390.

34. Bickley, p. 56.

35. Krisin A. Danni, et al., “An Analysis of Predicators of Child Sex Offender Types Using Presentence Investigation Reports,” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 44 (2000): 491.

36. Zebulon A. Silverthorne & Vernon L. Quinsey, “Sexual Partner Age Preferences of Homosexual and Heterosexual Men and Women,” p. 70.

37. Karla Jay and Allen Young, The Gay Report: Lesbians and Gay Men Speak Out about Sexual Experiences and Lifestyles (New York: Summit Books, 1979), p. 275

38. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Sexual Offenders against Male Children: Sexual Preferences,” p. 383.

39. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Early Onset and Deviant Sexuality in Child Molesters,” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 6 (1991): 323-336.

40. W. D. Erickson, “Behavior Patterns of Child Molesters,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 17 (1988): 83.

41. John F. Harvey, O.S.F.S., The Homosexual Person: New Thinking in Pastoral Care (San Francisco: Ignatius Press: 1987): 219

42. Ibid., p. 221.

43. Elliott, p. 581.

44. W. L. Marshall, et al., “Sexual Offenders against Male Children: Sexual Preferences,” p. 383.

45. Bradford, p. 219.

46. Bradford, p. 224.

47. “Understanding and Investigating Child Sexual Exploitation,” p. 2.

48. Thorstad is co-author, with John Lauritsen, of The early homosexual rights movement (1864-1935) (New York: Times Change Press, 1974).

49. David Thorstad, “May/Boy Love and the American Gay Movement” Journal of Homosexuality 20 (1990): 252.

50. Ibid., p.  253.

51. Ibid., p. 258.

52. Ibid., p. 266.

53. George Archibald, “U.N. Group Keeps Ban on Gay Lobby,” Washington Times (May 1, 2002).

54. Raymond-Jean Frontain, “The Works of Allen Ginsberg,” Journal of Homosexuality 34 (1997).

55. Mary Eberstadt, “‘Pedophilia Chic’ Reconsidered” The Weekly Standard 6 (January 8, 2001).

56. Ibid., p. 21.

57. Ibid., p. 22.

58. Ibid.

59. Ibid.

60. Ibid., p. 23.

61. Ibid. Emphasis added by Eberstadt.

62. Ibid., p. 23.

63. Ibid.

65. Tom O’Carroll, Paedophilia: The Radical Case (Boston: Alyson Publications, 1982).

66. Daniel Tsang, editor, The Age Taboo: Gay Male Sexuality, Power, and Consent (Boston: Alyson Publications ; London : Gay Men’s Press, 1981), p.144.

67. Helmut Graupner, “Love Versus Abuse: Crossgenerational Sexual Relations of Minors: A Gay Rights Issue?” Journal of Homosexuality 37 (1999): 23, 26.

68. Paula Martinac, “Mixed Messages on Pedophilia Need to be Clarified, Unified,” Washington Blade (March 15, 2002).

69. Ibid.

70. Marie, E. Tomeo, et al., “Comparative Data of Childhood and Adolescence Molestation in Heterosexual and Homosexual Persons,” Archives of Sexual Behavior 30 (2001): 539.

71. Harry W. Haverkos, et al., “The Initiation of Male Homosexual Behavior,” The Journal of the American Medical Association 262 (July 28, 1989): 501.

72. Watkins & Bentovim, p. 316.

73. Gary A. Sawle, Jon Kear-Colwell, “Adult Attachment Style and Pedophilia: A Developmental Perspective,” International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 45 (February 2001): 6.

74. Cathy Spatz Widom, “Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse – Later Criminal Consequences,” Victims of Childhood Sexual Abuse Series: NIJ Research in Brief, (March 1995): 1.

75. Elliott, p. 582.

76. Watkins, p. 319. Watkins mentions several studies confirming that between 19 percent and 61 percent of male sex abusers had previously been sexually abused themselves.

 

 

Traditional Values Coalition has published a number of other fact-based reports on the dangers of homosexuals and homosexual behavior to children and to our society. The following Special Reports are available for downloading from our web site:

and much more. Access our web site at: http://www.traditionalvalues.org

All materials ©2002-2003
®TVC ®Traditional Values Coalition
%d bloggers like this: