Home » Search results for 'Sigmund Freud'

Search Results for: Sigmund Freud


When I did my talk radio show on KCXL 1140… I interviewed Eustace Mullins…sold his books etc… Just found this and decided to share. He exposes the fallacy of the Synagogue of Satan Mental Health genocide agenda that targeted “GOI” AKA Gentiles up to this day… READ AND LEARN! All my interviews were STOLEN by radio owner and liar Pete Schartel who also stole my web page etc. Piece of scum…him and his wife Gayle Schartel who later divorced him for being a full time drunk!

Read and learn about Jew Sigmund Freud who created using his theory of “Psychoanalysis” to target Jesus Christ and Gentiles for “destruction”. One example of great magnitude was the actress Francis Farmer. It was Freud who was responsible for what was done to her among millions of other “Gentiles”.  Be prepared to be shocked!

Freud, Sigmund   Anti-Christ (Love)  Farmer, Frances


by Eustace Mullins 5/10/97

Freud, Sigmund   Anti-Christ (Love)  Farmer, Frances


by Eustace Mullins 5/10/97

Few Americans realize that the principal tool of Communist penetration in the United States is the pseudoscience of psychotherapy. Not only have many patriots who opposed Communist subversion been imprisoned for life without trial, but many others have been rendered helpless, their fortunes seized, and their exposures of Communist treachery discredited by the accusation of “mental illness”. In 1848, Karl Marx issued his Communist Manifesto, detailing the Jewish plans for subduing the gentile, but it was not until 1896 that the most workable system to achieve this goal, “psychoanalysis”, was unveiled by his fellow- Jew Sigmund Freud.

No one suspected at the time that Freud (pronounced Fraud) had invented the indispensable tool for the biological parasite in his quest to gain absolute control over the life of the gentile host. Psychoanalysis became the instrument which the Jew used to probe the deepest recesses of the mind of the host, thereby learning his best secrets, as well as the hidden fears and doubts which could be exploited by a clever enemy in order to become his master.

Beginning his career as a medical student, Freud concentrated on the study of the nervous system, obtaining a degree in neuropathology. Up to this point, his education had been strictly scientific, conducted according to methodical Teutonic principles of study in the Vienna Medical School. He now abandoned these principles. For the rest of his life, he would be the typical Jewish adventurer, seeking one path after the other until he hit upon the one which would lead him to fame, riches and, more important than either of these to the Jew, power over the gentile host.

For several years, Freud experimented with “cocaine therapy” or, as a policeman might put it, drug peddling. The only outcome of this was that he himself became a convert, and continued to use cocaine throughout his life. Even today, cocaine is the favored drug of the wealthy and influential Jews in New York and Hollywood who control the minds of the American people through television and the news media. They are loyal to cocaine solely because it was the drug of their master, Sigmund Freud.

After Freud discovered that putting his patients on cocaine brought him no sudden wealth or prominence, he began to cast about for some quicker road to fortune. He seemed to have found it when he began to practice hypnosis on his patients. For more than a century, hypnosis had been the favorite practice of Europe’s most notorious charlatans, Mesmer, Cagliostro, and Charcot. Freud now became the legitimate heir of these mountebanks. But how did he escape being branded by their well deserved reputations as necromancers and frauds? Early in his use of hypnosis, he made the fortunate discovery that it was no longer necessary to put his patients “under”, or to subject them to hypnosis in order to get them to reveal their innermost secrets. He had only to establish a suitable atmosphere of confidence and trust, and they would begin to talk about themselves. As Thomas Szasz, the famed critic of this pseudo-science, revealed in his book, THE MYTH OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, “Psychotherapy is merely talking.”

Freud’s reputation as the great inventor of an entire new science rests solely on his discovery that he could get his patients to talk about themselves without the use of hypnosis. Nevertheless, much of the mumbojumbo of psychotherapy was invented in order to create a hypnotic atmosphere. Freud’s discovery freed him from the stigma of the charlatans of hypnosis, and put a great distance between him and his discredited predecessors such as Mesmer, the father of Mesmerism. Nevertheless, the practice of psychoanalysis depends heavily on creating and maintaining a pseudo-hypnotic atmosphere in the psychiatrist’s office. The patient must be persuaded to relax, to place himself completely in the power of the psychiatrist, and to reveal his innermost self. Thus the pseudoscience of psychotherapy functions only because it is pseudohypnosis. No wonder that Freud is pronounced Fraud!

Once he had broken away from the unsavory reputation of his predecessors, and had put the stigma of charlatanism behind him, Fraud began to build an elaborate facade of intellectual supports for his new “science” of psychotherapy. This proved to be a difficult task, for, as Szasz has pointed out, psychotherapy is merely talk. It would not be easy to erect a vast superstructure of scientific procedures around the basic principle of a patient lying on a couch and chatting about himself to a listening doctor. Nevertheless, Freud, exhibiting all of the talent of his race for bewildering and misleading the gentile host, proceeded to do just that. He devised a “system” based upon incorrect and often obscene theories, using these theories to attack the basis of all family life by such developments as the “Oedipus complex”.

Not only has an “Oedipus complex” never existed, but Freud either completely misunderstood or more likely, purposely misrepresented, the entire basis of this “complex”. He based it upon an ancient Greek myth, the story of Oedipus. Although he first advanced the theory of the Oedipus complex in 1910, it was not until 1920 that he published three essays which purported to establish the foundations for this theory, the projection of “infantile sexuality”.

It has been said that the Oedipus complex is the nuclear complex of the neuroses and constitutes the most important part of their content, because this complex, appearing early in life, is the basis for all later neuroses. It represents the peak of infantile sexuality, which Freud claims appears in the first year of infancy, and forever after molds the nervous structure of the adult. In fact, there is not the slightest evidence that “infantile sexuality” reaches its peak in the first year of life, or that there is even such a phenomenon as infantile sexuality. Of course, this did not bother Freud. If there were no such thing as infantile sexuality, he would invent it. He built the Oedipus complex by tacking his pet sexual obsessions onto the myth of an
ancient Greek King, Laius of Thebes. When Laius consulted the Delphic Oracle to divine his future, he was told that a child born to him and his wife Jocasta would become his murderer. A son, Oedipus, was born to him, and he had the child set out to die on Mt. Cithaeron. Years later, Oedipus, who had been rescued and brought up by a kindly shepherd who found him lying there, met Laius on a narrow path. After a quarrel as to who had the right of way, they fought, and Oedipus killed him. He continued on to the city of Thebes, where he met Laius’ widow, Jocasta, who was also his mother, and married her. The shepherd then appeared, and revealed the true origin of Oedipus, ho was overcome by remorse. He blinded himself, while Jocasta hanged herself. This legend, typical of its overtones of traditional Greek tragedy, had deep implications that we must become aware of our identity if we are to lead satisfactory lives, but Freud showed no understanding of this. Instead, he completely distorted the legend by claiming that every male child, even in the first year of infancy, as it writhes in torments of infantile sexuality, is bedeviled by jealousy of the father, whom the child wants to kill so that he can have sex with his mother.

Only a Jew could bring to a traditional myth such perversion and such distortion. As Szasz points out, the Freudian elements, jealousy of the father and the desire to have intercourse with the mother, are completely lacking in the original myth. Donald Wormell, writing in the Encyclopedia Britannica, notes that the Freudian interpretation has no similarity to the classical Greek story, because Oedipus as an infant had no jealousy of his father, whom he did not know, or any desire to have intercourse with his mother, whom he did not know.

Despite these inconsistencies, Freud claimed that much of the neurosis of the twentieth century was caused by the Oedipus complex. The frustration of the infant, being unable either to kill the father or to have sex with the mother, became “repressed”, and was thus mentally affected for the rest of his life. This tissue of distortions, falsities, and perversions became the cornerstone of Freud’s entire “science” of psychotherapy. Freud’s reputation as “the father of psychoanalysis” rests upon the Oedipus complex.

The second foundation of the Freudian system is Freud’s “theory of repressed homosexuality”. Early in the course of his hypnotic treatment of patients, Freud had encountered a number of wealthy and dissolute aristocrats who, wearying of the usual vices of drug addiction, gambling and alcoholism, had taken up the practice of sexual perversion. After “treating” a number of these perverts, whose real problem was not so much their “homosexuality” as their boredom and their ability to spend as much money as they wished to purchase partners for their perverted acts, Freud decided that “homosexual impulses” were universal among men. Why, then, did not most men engage in homosexual acts? Freud had a ready answer for this: They “repressed” their homosexual impulses.

Now that he had created the problem, Freud had only to erect a “scientific” foundation for it. This proved to be a simple task for one of his racial duplicity and lack of morals. He appropriated the greatest figure of Western culture, Leonardo da Vinci, to carry the banner of his new theory. Freud decided that Leonardo da Vinci must have been a homosexual. Da Vinci had once been brought before a court on a charge of homosexuality, and had been acquitted. No other evidence existed that he had been a homosexual, and it had been several centuries since anyone had been around who could testify about it one way or the other. But Freud, the Jewish mountebank, found this important in order to denigrate da Vinci because he was a
great non-Jewish artist.

After a notable lack of success in his efforts to find any basis for his theory that da Vinci had been a homosexual, Freud finally came upon a rather dubious recording of a faint childhood memory, in which Leonardo da Vinci wrote that a vulture came down to his cradle and struck him in the mouth with his tail. Eureka! Freud had found what he had been looking for. He immediately interpreted this childhood memory, or dream, as an illustration of Leonardo’s “passive homosexuality”. Flimsy though this basis was, it became the cornerstone of Freud’s theory of universal repressed homosexuality among men. Unfortunately, as Freud’s disciples have desperately sought to conceal for many years, Thomas Szasz reveals that Freud’s entire theory was wrong because of his defective scholarship. He had based his theory on a German text in which the translator had incorrectly translated Leonardo’s word for “toy kite” as a “vulture”.

The tail of a toy kite had dragged across Leonardo’s cradle and brushed him. Freud, relying upon the wrong translation of the kite as a vulture, devised a complicated sexual theory by which Leonardo’s memory of the bird’s tail touching his mouth had been the conscious fulfillment of his subconscious homo sexual desires! From a wrong understanding, Freud now erected a vast superstructure of Leonardo’s entire art and, subsequently, the art of the Western nations being created from his homosexual nature. In so doing, Freud unleashed a terrible weapon against Western civilization.

Single-handedly, he created the enormous problem of the “gay” communities which plague America today. By identifying the greatest artist of Western culture as a homosexual, Freud gave an aura of respectability to a sexual deviation. By his claim that all men have “repressed” homosexual desires, he unleashed a torrent of sexual acts and a great blow against established family life. Young men who not only are searching for a career but who also have doubts about their sexual identity have only to abandon themselves to Freud’s theories, and they can, simultaneously release all their “sexual repressions”, thus avoiding the danger of terrible neuroses, but they can become great artists as well.

Only a Jew could have unleashed such a poisonous theory on the gentile community to further confuse and destroy it. Despite Freud’s theories, scientists today have begun to doubt that there really is such a thing as a “homosexual impulse”. Instead, they lean to the finding that there are sexual impulses which, in the absence of a member of the opposite sex, tend to turn to a member of the same sex, as in prison, the army or private schools. Such a finding, of course, is devastating to the “gay” community, which has sought to turn perverse impulses into a modern religion. We could be accused of oversimplification if we sought to condemn the entire “science” of psychotherapy because its two principal foundations, Freud’s theory of repressed homosexuality and the Oedipus complex, have been shown to be little more than the products of his cocaine-stimulated imagination. Realizing from the outset that Freud’s theories might be subject to serious challenge, later practitioners of psychotherapy have sought to erect an even more complex superstructure of psychological theories to bolster their basic technique of “talk”. In this campaign, they have produced millions of words, but not a single
workable theory. As Thomas Szasz points out: “Psychotherapy is secular ethics. It is the religion of the formally irreligious—with its language which is not Latin but medical jargon; with its codes of conduct, which are not ethical but legalistic; and with its theology, which is not Christianity, but positivism.”

For several years, before fixing upon his theories of psychotherapy, Freud had experimented with various other “treatments”, such as electrotherapy, baths and massages. The German Dr. Wilhelm Erb (1840-1921), in his Handbuch der Elektrotherapie, described his technique for applying electric shock to the genitals, which later became a favorite form of torture in Latin America. Erb “assumed” that the victims on whom he practiced this technique had “neurosis”. During World War I, the most notorious practitioner of electric shocks was Dr. Julius Wagner-Jauregg, professor of psychiatry at the Vienna Medical School and a former teacher of Freud. Wagner-Jauregg was fond of using heavy doses of electric shock on soldiers
who suffered nervous breakdowns during artillery barrages in combat zones. Despite heavy criticism, Wagner-Jauregg continued to use electric shock on soldiers throughout the war. Freud defended him against his critics, calling the soldiers “malingerers”.

In 1920, the Austrian War Ministry, in response to the public outcry against Wagner-Jauregg, conducted a lengthy investigation of his mistreatment of soldier patients. Freud wrote a long memorandum defending Wagner-Jauregg’s torture technique of electrotherapy. “I know,” wrote Freud in Wagner-Jauregg’s defense, “that the motivating force in his treatment of patients is his humaneness”. This was a typical Jew view of humaneness. Electrotherapy was later replaced by chemotherapy, although Freud continued to use some electrotherapy on his patients. He explained it as “pretense treatment”, which he used to “keep in touch” with his patients.

Throughout his career, Freud was obsessed by sexual imaginings, which ranged from the ludicrous to the obscene. In one of his letters to Ludwig Binswanger, he wrote: “I have always lived on the ground floor in the basement of the building… I already found one for religion when I stumbled on the category ‘neurosis of mankind’.” One of his last writings (July 12, 1938) contained this “gem”: “As a substitute for penisenvy, identification with the clitoris; neatest expression of inferiority, source of all inhibitions.”

During the erecting of his psychotherapy empire, Freud was on the lookout for a suitable heir apparent. At one time he had selected a young non-Jewish doctor, Jung, after quarreling with his Jewish disciples. Jung spent much time with him, but found himself unable to accept Freud’s wild theories, and he finally dismissed Freud’s work as “too Jewish”.
IN MEMORIES, DREAMS AND REFLECTIONS, Jung wrote (p.149): “Above all, Freud’s attitude towards the spirit seems to me highly questionable. Wherever in a person or in a work of art, an expression of spirituality (in the intellectual, not the supernatural senses) came to light, he suspected it, and insinuated that it was repressed sexuality.” It took Jung several years to realize that the earthbound Jew was unable to comprehend anything spiritual, having to interpret it in the grossest physical sense, and he finally parted company with him.

It was Thomas Szasz, in THE MYTH OF PSYCHOTHERAPY, who writes most revealingly of Freud’s creation of “the science of psychotherapy” as an instrument of the Jew to be used to gain power over the gentiles. Szasz titled his chapter, “Sigmund Freud, the Jewish Avenger”.(editor’s note: Mr. Mullins uses the word “gentile” meaning all non-Jews, not just Christians).
Freud himself was born a Jew, was given the Jewish name of Schlomo after his grandfather, a rabbi, and remained a Jew.
Szasz further comments: “The inconsistency between Freud’s passionate anti-religious tirades and his profound commitment to Jewishness significantly highlights an important aspect of Freud’s personality and predilections, namely, his
anti-gentilism. The popular image of Freud as an enlightened, emancipated irreligious person who, with the aid of psychoanalysis, ‘discovered’ that religion is a mental illness is pure fiction.”

Szasz then defines the Freudian psyche permanently by writing: “Freud was throughout his life, a proud, chauvinistic, even vengeful Jew.” Thus Freud’s famed “irreligiousness” was merely his anti-Christian, antigentile bias. In his “science” of psychoanalysis, Freud focused the hatred of centuries which the biological parasite had cultivated against the host, a hatred irreconcilably rooted in the biological situation of the parasite that must live off the host, and that can have no existence without this relationship. Certainly the State of Israel typifies this relationship, as the entire budget of Israel is built on “loans”, “grants”, “gifts”, and the sale of worthless Israeli bonds.

David Bakan writes of Freud’s Jewishness: “Freud believed that anti-Semitism was practically ubiquitous in either latent or manifest form; the broad masses of England were anti-Semitic ‘as everywhere’; he refused to accept royalties of Hebrew and Yiddish translations of his works; he was sympathetic to Zionism from the first days of the movement and was acquainted with and respected Herzl. (Editor’s note: Herzl died of syphilis, his entire dream of a Jewish empire in Palestine being the product of the decaying brain of a Jew in the last and most violent stages of paresis). Freud’s son was a member of the Kadimah, a Zionist organization, and Freud himself was an honorary member of it.”

Szasz further notes: “In addition, Freud displayed his devotion to Judaism in the letters he wrote, the friends and enemies he made, and, last but not least, in his anti-gentilism. His interpretations of Western civilization, Oedipus was not a king, but a complex; Leonardo was not a heroic painter but a homosexual pervert.”

The final statement of Szasz on Freud’s racial bias is the most important (p.146). “One of Freud’s most powerful motives in his life was the desire to inflict vengeance on Christ.” At last we get to the meat of the matter! Psychoanalysis is the creation of a hate-filled Jew whose life was devoted to vengeance against Christ. Could any more definitive analysis of the satanic origins of “the science of psychotherapy” be made? The sick theories of this modern anti-Christ did not long remain theories.

They were quickly put to use by the Jews, not only in treating the “mentally ill”, but in the techniques of attaining and holding political power. The psychiatrists, interviewing the patients, most of them from wealthy and influential gentile families, learned trade secrets and political information invaluable to the Jewish dreams of enslaving the gentiles. These secrets were quickly turned to advantage in their war against the Christians. They spawned a host of “psychiatrists” that rapidly infested all of the gentile nations, and then turned up as the directors of mental institutions. The hapless patient who revealed an attitude critical of the Jews, or who was even suspected of such thoughts, was treated mercilessly. The mental institutions provided the Jews with the ideal laboratory for their wildest dreams of power over the non Jews. They now had an endless supply of victims, completely helpless, whose screams would never be heard by the outside world. What tortures, what murders, have gone on in these institutions in the fifty years since the Freudians took over their operations can only be
imagined. Most of the victims will never talk—they are dead. The survivors are “insane”; their stories of their sufferings at the hands of the Jews are merely the products of disordered minds.

Nevertheless, we do know that not even the highest government officials have been immune from Freudian “correction” when they strayed from Jewish programs. We have only to remember that when our first Secretary of Defense, James Forrestal, hesitated to commit our entire military power to the support of the State of Israel, within a few hours he suffered a “breakdown”. He was taken to Bethesda Naval Hospital and soon went out the window to his death. In April 1936, Congressman Marion Zioncheck, denounced J. Edgar Hoover on the floor of Congress. Already known as a “maverick”, Zioncheck had gone too far. Soon afterwards, he was taken under mysterious circumstances to a Washington, D.C., mental hospital, St. Elizabeth’s (where the patriot Ezra Pound was held as a political prisoner for thirteen years without trial, and then released because of pressure from his friends). Zioncheck was kept incommunicado at St. Elizabeth’s, and treated by several of the nation’s leading psychiatrists. After several attempts to escape, he was released in what his friends described as a “drugged, zombie-like condition”. He returned to Seattle, and soon fell to his death from the fifth floor of the Arctic Building. The verdict was suicide, but most people interviewed in Seattle believed he had been pushed. He was succeeded by Warren G. Magnuson, who enjoyed a long political career in Washington, and who was very careful not to
offend the Jews.

Shortly after the Crash of 1929, when many gentiles had been impoverished by Jewish money manipulation, the psychiatrists began to show their hands as the new masters. In May, 1930, an International Congress on Mental Hygiene was held in Washington, D.C. Four thousand psychiatrists from fifty-three countries were welcomed by the President of the United States, Herbert Hoover. The new masters drafted a charter stating that they alone had the knowledge to “understand and control human behavior… Psychiatry must now decide what is to be the immediate future of the human race.” The new pronouncement also boasted that “Psychiatrists alone possess the superior intelligence and knowledge to alter materially and permanently human behaviors.” Many of the bureaucrats got the message, and promptly signed up for lengthy series of “analysis”. Soon afterwards, a number of Communist cells were established in the government bureaus, chief among them the Harold Ware cell. Ware was merely the office boy for Felix Frankfurter, who masterminded this Communist group, placing Communist agents high in the official levels of every government department in Washington.

One of the principal speakers at the Washington Congress of Psychiatrists was Dr. Donald A. Nicholson, a psychiatrist from Seattle who was the president of the Washington State Medical Assn. Nicholson was later to examine Congressman Zioncheck shortly before his “suicide”. He committed thousands of Americans to mental hospitals, all of them on his unsupported testimony that they were “insane”. Few of them ever saw freedom again.

His most famous victim was the great Hollywood actress Frances Farmer. Frances who? A curtain of silence has been rung down on one of America’s greatest talents. When she flashed across the Hollywood screen, she became known as “the American Garbo”. Today her movies are never shown on television or in the theatres. Those Hollywood figures who knew her refuse to mention her name. They are terrified that they, too, might have to endure the sufferings visited on her. What
happened to Frances Farmer? A reporter spent five years investigating her story, which he recently published, Shadowland.

As a beautiful young woman in Seattle, Washington, Frances Farmer, was known as a brilliant, outspoken
person. She won a newspaper essay contest for a free trip to Russia. Despite warnings from her mother
and her friends, she insisted on taking the trip. When she returned, the reporters tried to get her either to
praise or condemn the Communist experiment, but she replied, quite honestly, that in such a brief trip she
had not seen enough to make a decision. The Communists decided that this meant she was really sympathetic;
but did not want to declare herself. Soon afterwards, she was “discovered” by talent scouts, and
went to Hollywood. Her radiant beauty proved to be very photogenic, and her movies were an immediate
sensation. Because of her famous trip to Russia, she was supposed to be a rabid Communist sympathizer,
although she had said or done nothing to support such a theory.

The large community of Jewish Communists in Hollywood, who completely controlled the making and distribution of movies, entertained her and raved about her beauty. She was then asked to become a Communist courier. She indignantly refused,
being an extremely proud and intelligent White girl who had no interest in Communism. The Hollywood Jews were infuriated and frightened by Frances Farmer’s refusal. They had supposed she was one of them, and had taken her into their confidence. Now she knew the identity of every prominent Communist in Hollywood. At a secret conference, they resolved that she must be disposed of. An “accident” to such a prominent star would be too risky.

The Jews decided that “psychoanalysis” was the answer to their dilemma. She would be railroaded to an insane asylum. Any accusations she might make would then be ignored.

At the very height of her fame, while everyone was predicting she would win an Academy Award, Frances Farmer was invited to a party at the home of a Jewish producer. She was given a drug during this party. When she drove away, she was soon stopped by a policeman, who claimed she had committed a minor traffic violation. Instead of giving her a ticket, he immediately took her before a judge, although it was late at night. The judge claimed that she was “confused”, and in what could only have been a prearranged plan, he committed her to a mental asylum. Reporters made a complete reversal of their usual practice when a movie star gets into trouble. Instead of headlining Frances Farmer’s predicament, they were told not to write about it! From that day on, her name was rarely mentioned in the press.

For six years, Frances Farmer was forced to endure horrors which, even without the drugs and shock treatments which she was given on a daily basis, would have destroyed anyone’s mind. After a few days in a California mental hospital, she was transferred to a state mental hospital, Steilacoom, near Seattle, Washington, ostensibly so that her mother could visit her, but actually to remove her from any contact with anyone in Hollywood. Many years later, a reporter, William Arnold, spent five years tracing the record of Frances Farmer during her years in Steilacoom. He discovered that the orderlies at Steilacoom were mostly convict trusties from McNeill Island Penitentiary on the other side of Puget Sound. He also discovered that Steilacoom was known as “the brothel of Ft. Lewis”.

Each evening, drunken soldiers from Ft. Lewis paid the convicts five dollars each and were admitted to certain wards. Here the convicts held down the women chosen by the soldiers, who then took their will. Arnold found inmates who could recall
seeing Frances Farmer, easily the most beautiful and desirable of the inmates, being held down by the convicts while she was being gang-raped by the drunken soldiers. Even the most diseased Jewish mind has never claimed that such horrors went on in the German concentration camps as were nightly enacted at Steilacoom.

To nullify any complaints from Frances Farmer, the orderlies regularly gave her bad reports, claiming that she was “uncooperative”. Since she was being forcibly held down during these outrages, her cooperation or lack of it does not seem to have presented any problem, but the Jewish doctors were eager to get this diagnosis. The entry of “uncooperative” by the name of any patient in a mental institution means that any and every possible form of drugs, “treatment” and other punishment is necessary. Frances Farmer was given massive doses of electric shock treatment every week. She was forced to endure medieval form of hydrotherapy by which she was thrown into a tub of ice water for periods of six to eight hours.

During the agony of these ordeals, she chewed her lips to pieces. After four months of “treatment”, her spirit had been
broken. She appeared before the psychiatrists and agreed to “cooperate”. A careful Dr. Nicholson immediately held a press conference to display his latest triumph. In a typical example of Communist “selfticism” and “confession”, Frances Farmer gave her performance. “I was rude and disrespectful,” she told the reporters. “I was very, very sick.”

“I think this case demonstrates how successfully antisocial behavior can be modified,” stated Dr. Nicholson. “Three months ago, this woman was mentally unresponsive, and today she is being returned to her family completely cured. This marks a significant victory for the mental hygiene movement in Washington.” Because of her fame as a movie star, Frances Farmer was chosen to be publicly exhibited as an example of the triumph of Freudian theories. The power of the psychiatrists had mushroomed during the war, as psychiatrists were stationed with each unit, just as Communists commissars were placed in each combat unit of the Red Army to identify and arrest any dissenters. As the sole victors of World War II, the Jews
rapidly extended the influence of psychotherapy over every aspect of American life. In 1946, Harry Truman signed the National Mental Health Act, which brought “mental health” organizations into almost every community in America. These organizations quickly became local outposts of the State of Israel, seeking out and punishing those Americans who were afflicted with “the running sores of anti-Semitism”, as the Jewish Gestapo group, the Anti-Defamation League, characterized anyone who criticized the subversion of the American government by the State of Israel.

No sooner had Dr. Nicholson released Frances Farmer than he received anxious messages. The news that their victim was no longer imprisoned terrified the Hollywood Communists. Dr. Nicholson was instructed to seize her and return her to Steilacoom. Her freedom had lasted less than two weeks. She was now to endure six years of concentrated treatment intended for only one purpose: To destroy her mind so that she would never be able to identify the Hollywood Communists. She was immediately put back on the weekly schedule of shock treatments. This medical boon to mankind came about when two Italians watched the convulsions of a pig after it had been accidentally electrocuted. At first they were merely amused; but they suddenly realized it would be great sport to try this technique on human beings, and electroconvulsive shock treatment was born. The technique called for sending 70 to 130 volts of electricity through the temples of the victim for a tenth of a second. This destroys large numbers of brain cells, and causes years of headaches, permanent loss of memory, and other unpleasant side effects. The benefits of this treatment, as years of experimentation on many thousands of patients has proved beyond all question, are nonexistent. For this reason, electric shock treatments have been outlawed in most European countries for many years. The United States, being firmly in the grip of the Jews, is the only developed nation
which still practices this form of barbarism.

Besides enduring the weekly shock treatments, Frances Farmer, who had been consigned back to Steilacoom at a court hearing at which she was not even present, now became the victim of a new operation, the CIA LSD experiments. It was recently revealed that she was the first person chosen to receive the LSD dosages. A Bronx Jew, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, joined the CIA to direct the LSD program, which he personally operated from 1951-1956. Through Teddy Kollek, a Jewish terrorist who was a close friend of Allen Dulles, Gottlieb obtained Dulles’ direct approval of the entire scheme. Kollek, presently mayor of Jerusalem, was at that time in this country illegally to raise money for the Jewish terrorist organization, Haganah.
He lived in Manhattan in a rent-free apartment, above the Copacabana night club, provided by its Jewish owners. Kollek was the only non-official person invited to Allen Dulles’ home for parties, and at one of these gatherings, he was introduced to Jim Angleton, later director of Special Operations for the CIA, who became a “Zionist” director of the CIA. Through this alliance, CIA funds were used to pay the entire budget of the Israeli Intelligence Service, while CIA agents all over the world were instructed that Israeli interests came first. They were directed to turn over all information on Arab economic and military operations to the Jews. With this inside information, which the Arabs themselves furnished to the CIA under an
agreement set up by Allen Dulles, the Israelis were able to win each confrontation with the Arabs. The CIA also paid King Hussein one million dollars a year for his private spending on blondes, airplanes and fast cars, as his country, Jordan, was penniless. In return, Hussein furnished the CIA complete information on all conferences of the Arab leaders. It was in retaliation for these CIA operations that the Arabs formed the OPEC alliance and raised the price of their oil. Had we not gone out of our way to make enemies of the Arabs, we would still enjoy low prices for oil. Every dollar we spend at the gas pumps is a fine which we pay for helping the Israelis, but your friendly local newspaper is not going to give you this information.

Richard Helms now became Gottlieb’s immediate superior in the LSD program. Because this program severely compromised the highest officials of the United States, Helms was later able to have himself appointed Dulles’ successor as Director of the CIA. When he faced dismissal and perjury charges, the personal file of this program enabled him to resign without punishment and to become Ambassador to Iran. On April 3, 1953, Helms sent a memo to Dulles, requesting “the covert use of chemical and biological materials” to develop controls over possible agents, foreign officials and other targets of CIA infiltration. In Nov. 1953, Dr. Gottlieb entertained a group of gentile scientists from the Army Chemical Corps, Special
Operations Division, Ft. Detrick, MD. He secretly gave them large doses of LSD in their drinks. One of the scientists, Frank Olson, leaped to his death after taking the dose. Twenty-five years later, his widow, learning of the true circumstances of his death, sued the government and obtained a three-million-dollar settlement.

Gottlieb also hired George White, a former narcotics agent, to operate a house of prostitution on Telegraph Hill in San Francisco. CIA officials and other government personages watched the activities through one-way glass and photographed the more unusual scenes. White’s assistant in this operation was one Ike Feldman. This operation proved so successful that a second house was opened in Marin County, Calif., and a third in New York City. When Gottlieb retired in 1973, he had most memoranda concerning his activities destroyed. He had spent more than fifty million dollars without a trace.

For more than a year, Frances Farmer received daily doses of LSD, as well as the weekly shock treatments. Despite this cruel regimen, her tormentors were dismayed to find that her brain had not been destroyed. There remained one final horror for her, a treatment which was guaranteed to destroy the brain of anyone. This was prefrontal lobotomy, which in every case had totally destroyed the rational capacity of its victims. A Portuguese doctor, Edgar Muniz, developed this technique for “curing mental illness” in 1935. For this contribution to human well-being, he received the Nobel Prize in 1949. Hundreds of
thousands of lobotomies were performed in Europe and the United States. Dr. Walter Freeman, head of the Dept. of Neurology at Georgetown University, became an enthusiastic advocate of prefrontal lobotomy after studying with Muniz. He refined Muniz’ technique by inserting an ice-pick type of instrument under the eyelid into the brain, and severing the nerve from the cortex to the thalamus which directed rational thought. This turned the human victim into a vegetable. Presto! No more anger, no more protest. Instead, there was meek compliance with any order. Deciding it might be more prudent to practice his technique away from Washington, Dr. Freeman went to Spencer State Hospital at Spencer, W. Va. The Jewish doctors at this institution lined up thirty-five women patients, and in a brilliant display of virtuosity, he lobotomized them one after the other.

Learning of this triumph, the CIA asked him to go to Steilacoom to lobotomize Frances Farmer. As a cover, he first lobotomized twelve other women patients. Frances Farmer was then brought in, and told that the doctor wished to examine her. To attendants seized her by the arms, and Dr. Freeman quickly inserted the ice pick into her brain. Two seconds later, Frances Farmer had become a human vegetable, her memory destroyed and her brain barely functioning, she was no longer a threat to the Hollywood Communist conspirators.

A few months later, satisfied that her memory was gone, the CIA authorized Dr. Nicholson to release Frances Farmer. Her years of horror were over. On March 23, 1950, she left Steilacoom. She was only thirty-six years old. Despite her ordeal, some traces of her former beauty remained, but when she tried to resume her acting career, she found she could not remember lines or follow directions. She died alone and in poverty in Indianapolis a few years later. Yet, even today, those who ordered her torture and destruction still fear the mention of her name. Not only does the blackout of her films remain in effect, but William Arnold found no one in Hollywood willing to be quoted about her fate.

We know the fate of Frank Olson and Frances Farmer only because those dedicated to their memories spent years fighting to uncover their tragic stories. We do not know the fate of many thousands of other victims of the Jewish pseudo-science of psychotherapy, because no one mourns them or remembers their names. They, too, were done to death by drug overdoses, shock treatments, or the Freeman ice-pick treatment. We must act at once to save thousands of other potential victims from the Jewish terrorists. We must outlaw electric shock treatments as humane nations have done; we must outlaw the practice of pseudo-therapy such as psychoanalysis, ice-pick in the brain, and indiscriminate use of LSD and other drugs in the mental institutions. Unless we act quickly, thousands more will die, the victims of Jewish sadism and Freud’s poisonous legacy. This Jew converted the shameless charlatanism of a few eighteenth-century necromancers into a worldwide system for “treating the mentally ill”, solely because of his anti-gentilism and his hatred of Christ. Freud gave the Jews their most powerful weapon against us. We must stop them now.

THE MYTH OF PSYCHOTHERAPY—by Thomas Szasz. SHADOWLAND; THE SEARCH FOR FRANCES FARMER—by William Arnold, McGraw Hill, New York City, N.Y. 1978. “SEX, DRUGS, AND THE CIA”, Saturday Review, Feb. 3, 1979. One single columnist spoke up in her behalf. That was John Rosenfield, at the time of her initial arrest, [quoting:] WHAT HAPPENED TO FRANCES FARMER SHOULDN’T HAVE HAPPENED AT ALL!

Just when the movie industry is winning the public’s admiration, Hollywood breaks out in a rash of petty scandals. It is not a tribute to a part of the press that some of these episodes have been played well beyond their merits as news. It was the lesser of sagacity that the industry permitted some of these affairs to get out of hand. The Frances Farmer Incident should never have happened. This unusually gifted actress was no threat against law and order or the public safety. Something that began as merely a traffic reprimand grew into a case of personal violence, a serious charge and a jail sentence. And all because a sensitive high-strung girl was on the verge of a nervous breakdown.

Miss Farmer, who is no prodigy of emotional stability or sound business management, needed a lawyer one unhappy night last winter. A helping hand might have extradited her immediately from nothing more than a traffic violation. The terrible truth is that she stood alone, and lost. [End quoting] Rosenfield’s was the only note of compassion. Tile rest of the press coverage followed the lethal lead of Lolly Parsons, who snickered: “Hollywood Cinderella Girl has gone back to the ashes on a liquor-slicked highway”

by Gene Blake
LOS ANGELES—Testimony of psychiatrists should not be permitted in court because they do not know any more about their subject than laymen, a National Homicide Symposium was told here recently. Jay Ziskin, a psychologist and professor of counseling at California State University, Los Angeles, said psychiatric testimony about the prior mental condition of a criminal defendant was worthless. (Psychiatrists are medical doctors who specialize in mental disorders, whereas psychologists are specialists in human behavior who approach the subject from a non-medical viewpoint.) “It does not meet the requirements of law of expert testimony,” he told the symposium sponsored by the California District Attorneys Association. “It is highly unreliable, highly inaccurate.” “A psychiatric diagnosis is more likely to be wrong than right. It is even more likely wrong when trying to assess the mental condition at some time previous to the examination.” Ziskin said he hopes that the American Psychiatric Association would consider it unethical for psychiatrists to offer testimony in court on a prior mental condition because “they don’t have the competence to do so.” “If you need a psychiatrist to tell you that the defendant is crazy,” Ziskin said, “he isn’t.” Ziskin added that studies had shown the experts are not better at making such diagnoses than are amateurs.

Taking issue with Ziskin was Dr. Seymour Pollack, a noted psychiatrist who has given expert testimony in criminal cases including that of Sirhan Sirhan, the convicted assassin of Senator Robert F. Kennedy. Pollack accused Ziskin of raising a “strawman”. Although conceding that medicine—including psychiatry—is an art rather than a science, Pollack said the average layman recognizes that there are people who are “crazy”. “They recognize there are a few offenders who are crazy as well, mentally impaired enough to justify some excuse from criminal responsibility,” Pollack said. Taken from The Los Angeles Times—1977

Snuff Porn Pedophilia: Killing Children for Sexual Pleasure Is What Bill Bunting and Wife Watch

Image result for karen sue andras   Image result for karen sue bunting

FOREWORD: The ACLU and SPLC are covert supporters and protectors of these demons being their “membership” includes the likes of these JEWS! Bill Bunting my stalking homo is a lifetime member of the SPCL 🙂 Mary Ward and her husband Jason are Buntings “Best Friends” who admire him and his family because they found out they have so much in common.

Bunting was sent to a school just for perverted filthy fixated porn freaks who watch this kind of porn by his failure of a mother. Read this and you find much of what he is about along with my xxx Karen Their “personalized” porn including watching each other sodomize themselves using SKYPE! There are 3 of Bunting’s family members in prison for raping children in Georgia. Say a inbred family of pedophiles!

This info represents pedophiles in the US and other world governments and who are protected by the CIA and FBI and the MOSSAD who are the arm of the Jews who are documented to be the major producers and distributor of this animated by Satan murderous evil…ALL HELL BOUND!

These links expose the spiritual connections to Satan and sodomy given that perversion is inseparable from this the ultimate end of that practice which practice is a “natural” for the Bunting’s.

This is who my “xxx” Karen Sue Andras is “married ” to

Snuff Porn Pedophilia: Killing Children for Sexual Pleasure

Before providing the gruesome details of the sadistic cruelties inflicted on sexually exploited children, many of them toddlers kidnapped from orphanages in Russia and tortured to death, it is necessary to set out the basic statistics: the principal facts and figures of the worldwide porn industry.


“This is a sick world we are living in.”
— Dr William Pierce (in video below)

These notes come from an unpublished article of mine written a few years ago which I have just found among my papers after misplacing them. I have updated the figures wherever possible, but I wouldn’t be surprised to learn they are in some cases an underestimate. This is because porn addiction sucks millions of new victims into its net every year. There were only 670 million internet users worldwide in 2002, for example, but by 2013 this figure had soared to 2.7 billion. (See here). In other words, the pool of potential victims of porn addiction has grown much larger with each passing year.   

Most of the figures  cited below, except those with separately numbered references within the text, are sourced from Family Safe Media’s Pornography Statistics. Otherwise, they will be found in Top Ten Reviews’ Internet Pornography Statistics.

Total world revenues per annum from pornography amount to $100 billion, with $3,100 spent on porn internationally every second. These revenues are larger than the revenues of the top technology companies combined: Microsoft, Google, Amazon, eBay, Yahoo, Apple, Netflix and EarthLink.

There are 7 billion people in the world spread over 200 countries. It would be of interest to know which countries are most given to porn consumption on a per capita basis. Given the inseparable link between pornography and masturbation, the citizens of those countries could then be justly regarded as the “most lustful in the world” — or, at any rate, as the world’s most prolific masturbators.

These are the top 10 countries most given to masturbatory lust, based on per capita expenditure on pornography:  (1) South Korea ($527 per capita). (2) Japan ($157 pc). (3) Finland ($115 pc). (4) Australia ($99 pc). (5) Brazil ($53 pc), (6) Czech Republic ($44.9). (7) United States ($44.6 pc), (8) Taiwan ($43.4 pc), (9), U.K. ($32 pc). (10) Canada ($30 pc).


Why the South Koreans and Japanese spend such enormous amounts of money on porn, compared to other nations, is subject matter for a sensational PhD thesis which I hope some eager doctoral student will write one day. For 11 years in a row, South Korea has ranked at No. 1 in the suicide rate among OECD nations. Whether there is any correlation between high porn consumption and high suicide rates is a fascinating conundrum which academic researchers might wish to solve.

Though China spends more on porn than any other nation in the world (a whopping 28 percent of total pornography revenues compared to America’s 14 percent), this is only because of China’s enormous population of 1.3 billion people. In spite of the fact that porn is officially “illegal” in China, a country sometimes described as “a land where porn doesn’t exist”, the Chinese appear to have easy access to pornography imported from Japan.

The annual expenditure on pornography in two countries alone, China and Japan, would be enough to feed the world’s hungry for an entire year.

There are over 4 million porn websites in the world, growing by the thousands every day. There are 68 million pornographic search engine requests a day, 25 percent of the total. Four out of 10 internet users view porn sites regularly. There are 100,000 websites offering illegal child pornography. The largest consumers of internet porn, surprisingly,  are children aged 11-17. There are 40 million regular users of porn in the US, and 20 percent of these are accustomed to peek at porn sites at work when they think no one is looking.

A new porn site is being created in the US every 40 minutes. The most expensive domain name ever purchased (site link deleted) cost $14 million: an indication of the enormous profits accruing to porn.

Roughly one in three visitors to porn sites are women, with almost one in six women (17 percent) admitting to a serious porn addiction. In the pre-internet age, women were relatively safe from the devastating effects of pornography. No longer. In the last three years alone, online porn viewership for women has quadrupled. It is a myth that women have different preferences to men and show less appetite for hardcore pornography.

A 2008 study found that women showed signs of arousal watching pretty much anything: masturbation, straight sex, girl-on-girl, guy-on-guy, bonobo chimps, everything — everything except pictures of naked men, which did not float a woman’s boat.

Average age of the first internet exposure to pornography is 11 years old. 90 percent of 8-16-year-olds have viewed porn online, mostly while doing homework.

Over half of global child porn (55%) is produced in the US, mostly in the Los Angeles area. There are 100,000 websites offering illegal child porn. Annual child porn revenues range from a low of $3 billion  to an unrealistically high $20 billion. Daily Gnutella “child pornography” requests are 116,000 and keep growing. Even more disturbingly, there is strong evidence that an addiction to “normal” adult pornography can lead in time to an appetite for child porn.

Between 2005 and 2009, there was a huge and unexplained 432 percent increase in child pornography use, taking this new sex plague to pandemic levels. [Link lost]

The top video porn producers are found in the US, with Brazil and the Netherlands coming in second and third. The top six US erotica cities are Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York, Chicago, San Francisco and Miami.

The fully employed female porn star can earn $100k-300k a year, three times more than the average male porn star. The more unnatural the sex is, the higher the rates. An actress who gets $500 for a session of straight vaginal sex can demand $1000 for a session of anal sex and $2000 for “double anal sex”. Celebrity porn stars naturally get paid much more. (Link lost). A criminal pedophile willing to molest a child in front of a live webcam can earn $1000 a night.

The top ten countries most opposed to porn are the Islamic countries, viz., Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Bahrain, Egypt, UAE, Kuwait, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Singapore.

Almost 90 percent of the world’s internet porn pages are produced in the US for distribution to other countries, so the US can be seen as the world’s premier sex emporium.

The big players in the porn distribution market are now the major corporations, and, ultimately, the fabulously rich and faceless executives who control them. These are Fortune 500 companies such as AOL Time-Warner, AT&T, and General Motors. Through their cable and satellite subsidiaries they have distributed, and continue to distribute, vast quantities of pornographic material worldwide.

The number of pornographic websites owned by American Jews is of course a closely guarded secret—this is one politically incorrect statistic Wikipedia is unlikely to supply—but it is common knowledge that Jews dominate the porn industry (See also here and here ). Indeed, it is also common knowledge that six Jewish-owned companies own 96 percent of the world’s media and that Big Media and Big Porn are interlocking and overlapping concerns.

—  §  —

The Jewish Role in Child Murder
and Snuff Pornography

If 55 percent of the world’s child pornography is produced in the US—according to the British charity National Children’s Homes—23 percent of the world’s child porn is produced in Russia. (Link suppressed)

Whether or not Russian child porn is dominated by Russian Jews remains a nebulous issue. There is a high probability that it is, given that there is substantial evidence of Russian Jewish involvement in sex trafficking, kidnapping, pedophilia, and even child murder in the production of snuff porn movies.

Let me now quote from a news report first published in October 2000. I will intersperse snippets of this report — “JEWISH GANGSTERS RAPED, KILLED CHILDREN AS YOUNG AS TWO ON FILM” — with comments on the same case by Dr William Pierce which you can listen to yourself in the video at the end of this article:

ROME, ITALY — Italian and Russian police, working together, broke up a ring of Jewish gangsters who had been involved in the manufacture of child rape and snuff pornography.

Three Russian Jews and eight Italian Jews were arrested after police discovered they had been kidnapping non-Jewish children between the ages of two and five years old from Russian orphanages, raping the children, and then murdering them on film.

Mostly non-Jewish customers, including 1700 nationwide, 600 in Italy, and an unknown number in the United States, paid as much as $20,000 per film to watch little children being raped and murdered.

Here is what Dr William Pierce has to say:

“I suggest that if you asked your favorite Jewish media boss why his report of the police raids in Italy and the arrest of the child pornographers in Moscow didn’t get more news coverage in the United States, he’ll tell you that such news would only generate hatred against the Jews. And you know, he’d be right.

“My view is that such people should SIMPLY BE KILLED ON THE SPOT whenever and wherever they are found. More than that, the people who promote and encourage the extreme individualist mindset through their control of the media SHOULD BE EXTERMINATED ROOT AND BRANCH AS A CLASS.”  

(Video transcript, emphasis added) 

The news report concludes:

Jewish officials in a major Italian news agency tried to cover the story up, but were circumvented by Italian news reporters, who broadcast scenes from the films live at prime time on Italian television to more than 11 million Italian viewers. Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they were spreading “blood libel.”

Though AP and Reuters both ran stories on the episode, US media conglomerates refused to carry the story on television news, saying that it would prejudice Americans against Jews. 

Dr Pierce is naturally outraged at these dirty tricks to conceal from the public the heavy Jewish role in snuff porn pedophilia: the systematic torture and murder of little children by Jewish pornographers in order to sate the jaded appetites of sexual perverts in the West:

“If there’s any group of people on this planet who have valid reasons for hating the Jews, it’s the Russians…. The Jews bled Russia dry with 70 years of Marxist rule and and murdered tens of millions of Russians—the best Russians—in the Communist slave labor camps or in the basements of the secret police headquarters or beside the shooting pits in forests all over Russia and Ukraine.

They have forced thousands of the prettiest young Russian women into prostitution and slavery after the fall of Communism; and now they kidnap Russian children and rape and sexually torture them in front of a camera in order to make child porn for rich perverts in the West.”

(Video transcript)

Are people in the West aware of the Jewish role
in producing the filthiest child porn imaginable?

With the full connivance of the American government,  Jews pursue this foul trade in the San Fernando valley, California, otherwise known as “Porn Valley”. (See here).  No, the public largely remains unaware of these iniquitous facts, for the simple reason that the media covers up the facts.

The situation in Russia is even more extreme, with the majority of Russians totally unaware of the historical crimes committed against them by Jews in the Communist era. Here is Dr Pierce’s incendiary comment, and we must make allowances for his white-hot anger:

The Jews are lucky they still control most of the television and other mass media in Russia—because if the Russian people ever are fully awakened to what the Jews are still doing to them, they will rise up and kill every Jew in Russia—every Jew—every Jew!—and they will be fully justified in doing so.

(Video transcript)

Whatever you do, don’t miss this electrifying video before it is banned.

VIDEO : 8.48 mins

Like this? Share it now.
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on RedditShare on TumblrBuffer this pageEmail this to someonePrint this page

Lasha Darkmoon

Dr Lasha Darkmoon (b.1978) is an Anglo-American ex-academic with higher degrees in Classics whose political articles and poems have been translated into several languages. Most of her political essays can be found at The Occidental Observer and The TruthSeeker. Her own website,, is now within the top 1 percent of websites in the world according to the Alexa ranking system.

78 thoughts on “Snuff Porn Pedophilia: Killing Children for Sexual Pleasure”

  1. I don’t give a fuck if you publish this or not but hear this mfs
    you and your lasha are perverts obsessed with porn like your master the devil
    you are representatives of the lucifer temple masquerading as Christians
    fuck you and fuck your lasha the resident whore


    1. NOTE:

      The three brackets round the name above have been added by Admin. This is an innovation of this website which we intend to make use of in future. The three brackets round the name do not necessarily imply that the person posting is a Jew or a Zionist troll, though this is probably the situation in many cases; the three brackets could also indicate a mentally disturbed goy who is hostile to this website and all it stands for.

      — JSM

  • Tikkum Olam:

    The Hebrew phrase tikkun olam (pronounced tee-KOON oh-LUHM) means “world repair.” In modern Jewish circles, tikkun olam has become synonymous with the notion of social action and the pursuit of social justice.

    Historic Roots
    The phrase tikkun olam is found in the Mishnah, a body of classical rabbinic teachings compiled in the 3rd Century. In this instance, the phrase is used when discussing issues of social policy, insuring a safeguard to those who may be at a disadvantage. (

    The Jew cries out to save the world as he rapes and snuffs out the life of your child.

  • Gabreal Jones says:
    May 22, 2017 at 3:51 pm

    Diablo Mick

    You ar a satanic jew satanist yourself. Pushing chabad jew Putin is a hero, pathetic child fucker,
    child killer, child eater…..the bottom of the barraell, indeed!!!!!!!!!!

    (The rest of this comment has been deleted)

      1. The sudden reappearance of twice-banned poster Gabreal Jones on our site, the day after he had been identified as the same mentally deranged troll as Gerhard Attali by three other sharp-witted posters, is all the proof we needed that


        What’s your problem, Gabreal? Didn’t Yogananda teach you anything?

  • Why are Jews so prominent in the porn industry ?
    Three reasons :

    1) They are themselves a most perverse people.
    2) They use pornography as a weapon against humanity, which they see as their enemy.
    3) They are always willing to earn money, by means fair or foul, but by preference by foul means.

    Of course they cry “blood libel” when caught in the production of snuff films, they did that too when their organ theft of murdered Palestinians became known.
    Claiming “victimhood” while committing crimes is part of the Jewish strategy.


  1. Agree.
    BUT FOR HEAVEN’S SAKE don’t repeat that in the west!! It’s so, so damn ANTI-SEMITE!


  • “Claiming ‘victimhood’ while committing crimes is part of the Jewish strategy.”

    Yes, “the Jew cries out in pain, as he strikes you.”

    This is a very important, very prominent feature of Jewish strategy. For example, some of us presently see the strategy being used with regard to consummate Jew puppet Chumpster fraudster (and some of us simply can’t – or won’t – see it).

  • The Jewish role in crime and filth of every color is an open secret. Apprehending the criminal is more important than putting a label on him. Whether he wants to call himself a Jew or Goy is irrelevant. If someone pushed a magic button and vaporized every living breathing Jew the World would definitely be a better place. 95% of all organized crime would suddenly disappear. But the World is much more complex. Not all is black and white. “Jews embrace the Judaic doctrine on different levels and for different reasons. Many Israelis immigrated from Russia for economic reason and have very dubious Jewish ancestry. There are also some very courageous Jews or ex-Jews such as Gilad Atzmon who disagree strongly with Jewish ideology. The only solution is to realize that the “Jewish Problem” is a myth. What we are dealing with is a “crime problem”. We neeeald strict and severe law enforcement for all criminals regardless of their reasons for commiting their crimes. If a Chabad-Lubavitcher wants to rape and murder a 3 year old girl in front of a camara…..fine. Give him a trial and convict him. A firing squad or a public hanging should go to work that same day. No bed-wetting, liberal appeales or insanity pleas allowed. With real and serious law enforcement and judicial systems…..problem solved. Chou.

    1. Too simple your reasoning. As you know/should kniw the judicial system is
      occupied by the jews. So nothing changes. Change is only possible if the jews are evicted out of their positions!
      Let them work in the mines .

  • Jew, as Devil’s devotee, finds innocence abhorrent, an insult to his infernal sensibilities, it reminds him powerfully of Jesus Christ as well as his own perdition.

    Thus, he seeks to destroy it at every turn, if he cannot corrupt its mental and moral purity, then at least annihilate it through physical desecration.

    During Purim, they hunt for Christian boys of young age to ensure their innocence and semblance to Christ.
    Their blood is mixed into kosher dough and baked into prized matzos to be devoured at Easter (Passover) for occult benefits.

    My guess …
    Through this intentional evil, inverse redemption, they seek to maximally ingratiate themselves with their Owner in hope of his protection come judgment day.
    Perhaps he can provide immunity of sorts by claiming they are demons rather than human and thus exempt from penalty.

  • Yeah that is why there are so many jews in american gaols for violent crimes. I think it is as high as .001 percent.

  • “The top six US erotica cities are Los Angeles, Las Vegas, New York, Chicago, San Francisco and Miami.”

    What a coincidence! Those are also the top six cities in which the (((tribe))) resides.


  1. Yep, Jewish population in US metropolitan areas :

    New York City : 2,028,200
    Los Angeles : 662,450
    South Florida : 535,450
    Chicago : 291,800
    San Francisco Bay Area : 228,000
    Las Vegas Valley : 80,000

    Of course Israel itself has a booming porn industry :


    Israelis love porn, especially local porn, and both professionals and amateurs are delving into the scene: ‘I used to work as a waitress, but I felt like a whore. Now that I work in the sex industry, I can allow myself to live.’

    read more:


      1. Once again I stress:
        if the whole of Russia was an American city, in terms of Jews, it would be in 6th spot.
        And at the turn of the 20th century, its Pale of Settlement (tragically inherited from Poland) harbored 7 million of them.

        What a loss (blame Putin, LOL).

        Gimme your huddled goy masses, yearning to breathe Judenfrei air …

  • The first reply above who responded to Franklin evokes the idea of a bright crimson face and cartoon-like steam blasting out of both ears.

  • I miss being able to tune-in to Dr. William Pierce on shortwave radio when he broadcast on National Vanguard, from Hillsboro, West Virginia! Not having been raised around all the stuff he warned about, it didn’t have the impact on me it should have had. Now, though, I readily see the progression of the manifestation of these woes upon America’s people. It is real – and it is destroying us. We must begin to shoot back with deadly aim, or it WILL get worse. Our youth will be sacrificed to Satan.


  1. I used to listen to dr.Pierce all the time . I lived close by less than 80 miles from Hillsboro where he was . As a Palestinian, I remember him saying one time : we should establish an alliance with the Palestinians since we have the same enemy . I thought that was interesting coming out of a person of his caliber .


  • When I was growing up in the West bank of Jordan river(Palestine now),we were subjected to all kinds of collective punishment and abuse . In my home town for example , they erected iron gates in the old city and left two exits in the east and the east , you would have to walk 3 to 4 miles to get to a destination that was only a few hundred feet . The soldiers were put on the roofs of the old houses , and when they left , families would clean a big mess of feces , condoms , and all kinds of trash . The next day the same process is repeated . At night ,when they get drunk , they would shoot and kill cats and dogs , sing aloud and joke around as if in a bar .Walkers – by would be subjected to verbal abuse and insults shouted at men and women alike.
    Fast forward to September 2000 when the Jews entered the Palestinian towns , the first thing they did was ceasing tv station and broadcasting porn movies 24 hrs.
    Palestinians have no rights , they can spit at you , curse you,beat you up and even shoot you and there is nothing you can do about it . People in the west , you are under the control of the Jews,you think it’s bad?wait until you are under their rule to see what happens to you .If you cannot wait,you can always ask the Russians and the Palestinians.


  1. That is a fair and decent warning, Al. I have been seriously considering joining-up with a certain political group to help bolster our defense against this madness, in a more proactive way. The timing and circumstances seem right to abandon all hesitations about ‘polite society’s’ consternation, and throttle-down! 🙂


  • I have written many times before, “To Jews, we are all Palestinians.”

    I have also written: “If ten percent of the masses knew what I know about the Jews, there would not be one left on the planet by the end of the week.” So I find it interesting to see this quote for the first time:

    The Jews are lucky they still control most of the television and other mass media in Russia—because if the Russian people ever are fully awakened to what the Jews are still doing to them, they will rise up and kill every Jew in Russia—every Jew—every Jew!—and they will be fully justified in doing so.

    Jewish officials then fired the executives responsible, claiming they were spreading “blood libel.”

    How true how true. Of course Jews would never consider the fact that Jews themsleves create the reason for spreading this so-called “liable.” With Jews, it’s always someone else’s fault and such finger pointing is usually directed at their victims.

    This subject, along with the sacred Hallowedhoax, need to be hammered on relentlessly. If anything will garner the attention of the masses, it will be stories about child sexual abuse and murder, subject matter in which Jews are outstanding. This uses the Jew’s classic “ve must do this to save the children” meme against them. It worked for “gun control,” it ought to work for Jewish child sacrifice.

  • Germany after WW I, is there a lesson here for Americans?

    6. The Jews in German culture: Film

    Before 1933 the Jews had taken possession of the film even more thoroughly than of the theatre. That was understandable, because in film artistic and financial elements are more closely connected than anywhere else. The earnings in filmindustry overshadows the earnings of any other artistic activity. And it was the possibility of gain that got Jewry interested in crowding into the German filmindustry, which was flourishing after the war. How large the number of Jews was is shown by the following example:

    In the year 1931 out of 67 German productionfilms 41 firms, i.e. 61 % Jewish, out of 28 rental firms 24, i.e. 86 %. At the same time out of in all 144 film manuscripts 119 or 82 % written by Jews. The production was in 77 cases, i.e. 53 % on Jewish hands. If one looks at the names of producers, stage managers and actors of these films, which were praised by the critics and turned into box office successes, one finds everywhere an overwhelming majority of Jews. Among producers and distribution agencies: Pressburger and Rabinowitsch (Cinema-alliance), Heymann, Fallner and Somló, Levy or Cohn. Under stage managers: Oswald-Ornstein, Zelnik, Meinert, Neufeld or Schönfelder. Under actors and actresses: Pallenberg, Siegfried Arno, Fritz Walburg, Felix Bressart, Kurt Gerron, Grete Moshein, Gitta Alpar, Rosa Valetti etc.

    The spirit of this Jewish film industry is characterized by the so-called „socially hygienic information films“ which Jews had brought out onto the market and which flooded Germany after the World War. They were allegedly supposed to scientifically inform the broad masses of the dangers of sexual excesses. But under the guise of science they speculated in the lust and lower instincts of the audience. Criminals, tarts and homosexuals were the centre of the story. A random choice of film titles may shed some light on the spirit of these films:

    “Moral und Sinnlichkeit” (Morals and sensuality), „Das Buch des Lasters” (The book of vices), „Was kostet Liebe?“ (What is the price of love?), “Sündige Mutter” (Sinnful Mama), “Prostitution” (Prostitution), “Wenn ein Weib den Weg verliert” (When a woman looses her way). The boosting titles correspond to the contents: They rummaged around in filth and showed with cynical openness the filthiest scenes of perversions. Even the government of that time, which was really magnanimous in such matters, found it necessary in 1920 to counteract the worst anomalities with legislation concerning comedy, however without being able to ward off the evil completely.

    But don’t think about the decline of our morals, be afraid of what the (((MSM))) tells you, be fearful of the Russians and North Korea. If you get too anxious, then rent one of their porn flicks to help you relax!



  • As long as Western allopathic medicine continues to avail itself of the deranged teachings of (((Sigmund Freud))) as the basis of its psychiatric and psychological practice, then their will be no cure for this pornographic plague sweeping the globe. Unfortunately the usual “treatment” for any mental ailment, nowadays, is therapy which nets vast sums of money for a horde of so-called mental health professionals. What’s wrong with good old fashioned prayer and meditation? Sexual Offenders, such as pedophiles a good old fashioned thrashing, ala Singapore style, plus a lengthy custodial sentence is a very effective cure. Ditto for anger management therapy. Grief counseling a spot of Maranasati (death meditation) works wonders. As for the makers of snuff videos, crucifixion, broken at wheel or being hanged with piano wire. After all one must be merciful towards these creatures and afford them every opportunity to erase their adverse karma.

  • Here in NY, as well as elsewhere, notably Thailand, certain responses by law enforcement persons evolve. In NY, once the jew began to corrupt and sodomize what once was a relatively workable (Not perfect) legal system, cops began to carry throwaways, handguns of untraceable provenance that could be left next to some perp who in many if not all cases, had it coming. Rooftop “jumps” ending in fatality became more frequent. This can lead to all kinds of abuses, particularly for profit, but essentially my view is if my partner and I busted a criminal enterprise like described above … you can figure out the rest I’m sure. One less threat to the most vulnerable and most innocent. Have you ever watched someone beg for their life? I have. I let him go. I’m glad I did. Almost as glad as I’d be if I participated in a rather different outcome for individuals involved in harming children. The more, the better. Never one in anger, however, like some things, best served cold.

  • al – we hear you. but here’s the difference – people in the usa have guns and as long as they never give them up they will never be subjected to the same slavery.
    apparently they have animal brothels working in germany now. bdsm on on dogs.
    all these abrahamic religions are pyramid power structures. stacked up like – god, witch doctors, owners, man, woman, children, animals, plants, dirt, gas, nothing.
    the abuse of women and children and animals is part of the ideological programming, to maintain the power structure..
    all forms of torture are reptilian power exercises.
    the whole commodificational methodology is about acquiring everybody and everything, imposing an ownership fiction and using force.
    of course there’s a connection to high porn use and suicide in south korea.
    desperately lonely and sexually unfulfilled people use porn to try to alleviate their suffering bodies and souls.
    porn does provide the illusion of a sexual experience, reaching toward real companionship, which remains eidolon nevertheless.
    man needs the female. at some point in the suffering porn is better than nothing, but the problem is porn sucks the life energy out of the observer.
    if there were not so much sexual starvation going on in the world under the rules of these judeo christian religions there would be no need for porn. ever think of that?
    legalization of prostitution as the worthy endeavor it once was would be a step in the right direction.
    but the real answer is the liberation of human sexuality, which, as long as it remains repressed, will continue to maintain the deprived conditions fostering the problem.
    also, maybe kiddie porn and snuff films are not really pornography.
    i think they’re power exercises, the same old sacrifices as tributes to the brand x power god.
    those without the mental defect, the weakness making them susceptible to religion generally, will never be attracted to kiddie porn or snuff flics, no matter how much regular porn they watch.
    communism didn’t ‘fall’ in russia. it was programmed out by the same banksters who programmed it in, when the time came to set russia up with the highly controlled, super surveilled jewish globalist bankster state..
    and speaking of pedophilia, in the usa the deep state is really sweating djt now, as evidenced by this totally phoney, absolutely hysterical russia-gate hacking media effort. he’s no pedophile.
    and all the clintons are terrified he’ll eventually expose, not just the clinton foundation and all the false flags but the whole podesta jimmy infants dnc pizza gate ring.
    he may go all the way bak through 9-11 even to the jfk hit.
    that’s the real reason they hate him so bad. after all, he does jack the pentagon. he jacks the pipelines. it’s not like he’s out to reform industry and save the planet.
    if trump can ever normalize relations with putin and russia, which he intends to do, and move the world beyond the traditional grip of the three cities empire – that would be the best shot we have at then wrecking the jew’s gangster program, including their kiddie porn.


  1. All the guns in the world won’t help people living under occupation tat refuse to get off their couches, away from their 55″ HDTV and use those guns to free themselves instead of lubing the gun with oil and rubbing it oh, so slowly.


      1. Greg –

        Very few good people will use them…. on other people… outside of directly defending their lives or homes.

        They are not trained killers… or thugs.

        Controlling their paychecks is enough to enslave them.

      2. Pat, that was a very short post that was very much to the point! Especially as an end to the conversation with the above two posts.

        Barking Deer, There is no sexual starvation going on in the world due to “judeo-Christian” religions. And this certainly does not justify pornography as an outlet. Porn has been a form of weaponry against souls and the Church since the Marquee De Sade. It wasn’t until Jew lawyers in America figured out ways against obscenity charges in cases against the Post Office, and others, that porn became prolific. And I will remind you that the Church held the Jews in check against blasphemy, nudity, and obscenity for over 30 years by making them stick to a production code. This code was broken in the movie The Pawnbroker. There was a gratuitous scene where a black prostitute exposes her breasts in this “Holocaust” themed film. Because it dealt with Holocaust themes the Catholics blinked and let it slip. So, in that since I suppose you could say the Church was culpable.

        Now this creates a nice segue, because a pawnbroker has no more honor in my eyes than a flesh peddler.

        Pornography and the vast, or should I say, endless supply of it is completely connected to usury. Instead of exacting a pound of flesh, the Jew makes sure all the shiksas take a pounding to their flesh. And lots of men love it not because they can’t get sex by other means, but more so because it is payback for women taking on roles that are not natural to their purpose in life. The paradox about porn is that it is actually honest. People really are engaging in sexual acts in these films. Much more honest than most media in existence today. No one has to worry about porn lying to him.

        When men can once again have wives who stay home, cook, clean, take care of the children, and fix themselves up before they come home the need for porn will cease. After all, there are girls at the office, like Frank Sinatra once sang not that long ago.

        Why don’t we have such women today? Because of the Pill, abortion, the Women’s Movement, women in the workforce as a rule that must be obeyed, Title IX, homosexual and transgender rights, etc., etc., etc.

        All of the above results from usury and debt and the need to find new ways to financially enslave people and keep that debt serviced. Growth in the stock market and derivatives may not depend on growth in pornography but I do believe there is a direct connection. It’s an escape valve and deceiver that makes men think they are free. Sure there free to choose in the consumption of it, but they are also a slave to that vice.

        So, at the end of the day, not only do we no longer have homemaking wives that adore us and let us run the household. No, we have a bunch of out of control bitches that not only tell men what to do, but will divorce them on the spot if it will work out for them financially. Porn is a way for these men to cope with that reality. That’s the main hook in my opinion. The actress in the porn movie may be a whore, but at least she’s an honest whore and worked for her money. The honest porn star certainly did sleep with a boss for a vice presidency wearing fancy suits, closed toe pumps, and elegant pearls on her necklace. Those are the dishonest ones. Kind of like fake news.

        As for those animal brothels being started in Germany, who could blame them? When people behave like animals why not just go for an animal and be done with it? Of course men are just as guilty. As was Adam guilty for Eve’s concupiscence. But the difference here is that women are the arbiters and set the rules. They allowed this mess we are in that is certainly worse than Sodom and Gommorah. All they had to do was say no, keep their knees together, and demand a ring. They have violated their vocation to the office given them by God.

        Seems all many of them need is a ring on their phone from hook-up sites like Tinder. So, successful as women are today, they have certainly paid a heavy price for their success.

        So either way, don’t go blaming the Church for pornography.

  • Thank you, Darkmoon, for exposing this horrifying reality. I live in the San Fernando Valley, and somehow the “Valley” gets through all the downturns in the economy without suffering in the least. I know that people around me are involved in the porn business. Sometimes at night a mansion on a hilltop is lit up like a commercial building far into the night; they are filming porn. In the last California election there was a ballet measure to force condom use on the porn industry, which does have an HIV problem. The measure failed because the porn industry is so powerful. We know that we live in the porn capital but the general understanding is that it’s innocent in that it is among consenting adults. No one has ever even whispered about smut films or child porn.

    Although about a year ago some people approached a friend of mine who is politically powerful in Los Angeles County. They wanted to talk to her about getting help for families who have suffered losing their children to child Child Protective Services. These children are taken from parents and put into foster care where they were vulnerable to being sold into child trafficking, or simply sexually abused. This friend asked me to go along with her to the meeting so I heard the whole story. Just recently a gang of bureaucrats and foster parents were rounded up for using children as sex slaves. Most of the kids are black or hispanic. Child Protective Services is a predatory agency that wants to take children from parents.

    Of course, Hillary Clinton gave incentive for CPS to take children from parents by providing monetary incentives for every child taken and placed outside the home, even though children are four times more likely to die without the safety of their families no matter how dysfunctional.

    Given this context I was ready to believe the John Pedestal e-mail scandal and pizza gate. Child porn and the kidnapping of children for porn and sexual trafficking is a sign of the disintegration our society. We are becoming open territory for sex slavery, smut films, and porn. California is the worst place in the nation, possibly the world. This state has been taken over by evil. My support for Trump, no matter how many flaws he has, comes from knowing how bad things can get under the Democrats–particularly the Neocrats (neocon + democrat). God help us…

  • To contrast and illuminate just how far western civilization has fallen since the “Good War” here is a rare PDF book about Adolf Hitler and children:

    And this is the most evil man in history? What does that make our world today?



  • Dave Chu,
    That’s because Stalin was in all probability a jew. At least he surrounded himself with them. The Bolshevik Revolution was a distinctly Jewish invention. So the MSM had to shift the eyes of the world away from the genuinely most evil man in history to point at someone else. They chose Adolf instead because he had effectively disarmed the Jewish money grabbers and returned Germany to self-rule. The rest, as they say……

  • Thanks for that, David Chu.
    Looking at the creepy politicians of today with their pedophile, pervert leanings in many cases, Joe Biden being one of the best examples, AH appears to be wholesome with a healthy attitude towards family. He awarded ‘Das Mutterkreuz’ to every woman with four children or more because he knew that the nuclear family is the mainstay of a flourishing nation.

    Compare that to Mutti Merkel today, opening the flood gates to a brown invasion, well, it doesn’t bode well for Germany.

    But then, who cares, there will only be muds eventually, according to my sister. And that’s a good thing in her mind. Because all life came out of Africa.
    Thanks again, David for putting things in perspective that should be perused by all.

    Of course, she has no clue about what is happening to children all over the world, especially in Hollywood. Pedophilia is a foreign word. It doesn’t even show up in my 1970s dictionary (Langenscheidt). So, it must not exist.

  • Gerhard Attalli
    Nonsense! Only a total imbecile would place any credence in that FBI report! An informant whom we don’t know reporting about something he allegedly heard from another person in Argentina, who would only provide that information provided he was given a visa for the US!
    Ooh! FBI must take them seriously! The standard of their investigation into 9/11 has earned them the contempt of professional police forces around the world. No forensic examination of the steel in the debris before shipping it off to China. Talk about Mickey Mouse! It’s tantamount to perverting the course of justice.
    Unfortunately, unlike some other countries, I believe the FBI are immune from civil lawsuits!

  • Good response, Felix! (The more I read of this brain-addled negro’s comments, the more I think “Total imbecile!”)

  • It’s not merely porn, as bad as porn is. Porn is a subset of a much larger problem, which can best be described as the radicalization of everything in opposite directions.

    For example, you might hate porn, but do you then sympathize with Islam, which veils and controls its women?

    Do you see my point. Everything in this world is moving in radical directions, towards some sort of mass conflagration. We can all feel it.

    The Jews for one will never, ever give up porn or their control of finance. They would rather destroy America.

  • @ Lasha

    Are you serious that women find watching “bonobo chimps” (pygmy chimpanzees) having sex interesting or does the term have another meaning? Call me sheltered, but that term is a new one for me.


  1. @ Ungenius

    TO LD: “Are you serious that women find watching “bonobo chimps” (pygmy chimpanzees) having sex interesting or does the term have another meaning? Call me sheltered, but that term is a new one for me.”

    The comment you object to (rightly imo) about women being turned on by watching bonobo chimps having sex wasn’t written by Lasha.
    So it would help if you didn’t misrepresent her viewpoint by ascribing words to LD that she never wrote!

    These are the words you object to and which you falsely ascribe to LD:

    “A 2008 study found that women showed signs of arousal watching pretty much anything: masturbation, straight sex, girl-on-girl, guy-on-guy, bonobo chimps, everything — everything except pictures of naked men, which did not float a woman’s boat.”

    A clearly marked LINK within the above quote (bold font above) would have taken you to THIS site where you will find the quote you object to:

    I happen to know that LD does NOT believe that women are turned on by watching chimps having sex! Also that LD believes that the woman who made this wild remark was exaggerating or “speaking figuratively”. She shot herself in the foot by saying that.

    The only reason LD quoted this woman was that the woman appeared to be making a valid general statement that women’s tastes in pornography were not as narrow as is commonly supposed. Many of the things that turn on men, in other words, also turn women on. I think you will agree that this is a reasonable supposition to make.

    LD’s views on porn are the same as my own. Let me assure you that neither of us would be turned on in the least by watching chimps having sex! The whole idea is too grotesque for words. 🙂

    (P.S. LD would have responded to your comment personally but she is resting her wrist because of a recent riding accident. She needs to take it easy.)


      1. Ungenius is one of the best commenters on this site, most informative and clued-up on all sorts of subjects, but I think he is wrong to misrepresent LD’s viewpoint by making out she is actually turned on by watching chimps having sex! 🙂

      2. Sister Monica
        You seems very knowledgeable ,sincere and decent person.
        believe me ,without your presence in this site ,it’s a madhouse .a mental asylum with all the trimmings.
        that one thing ,my good friend, Circassian , told me about this site ,the darmoon lady ,is sincere but she should close shop and call it a day. no need to host a mental asylum,she should stick to horses and farming.
        find true love ,start a family and be happy.

      3. @ Sister Monica

        No where in my comment did I ever suggest on insinuate that Lasha found pygmy monkeys having sex was interesting. To suggest that I did is totally incorrect on your part. I have been on Darkmoon long enough to know that Lasha abhors porn.

        No where in my post did I even say that I found the posted paragraph objectionable.

        I asked a question and I assumed that Lasha would know the answer to my question since she posted the paragraph. You provided the answer, “…LD believes that the woman who made this wild remark was exaggerating or “speaking figuratively” which I appreciate. Now I know.

        I find it rather insulting that you would assume that I think so little of Lasha as most of your post indicates.

      4. Sincere apologies for completely misunderstanding you, dear Ungenius. I really am an IDIOT for getting the wrong end of the stick! I can see that your indignation at my comment is 100 percent sincere and genuine and so I am all the more saddened at my own folly in misinterpreting you. For this I have have to do penance — and I will.

        Remember this, dear Ungenius. As a fellow Christian, you are dear to me. You and I are in the same boat. We share the same values and are surrounded by the same enemies. Never forget that.


        Sister Monica

      5. @ Sister Monica

        Thank you for your more than gracious apology. I accept it completely. There is no need for penance. As someone once said, “To err is human.” Those who correct an error are of noble quality. You are a noble lady.

        Although we may vary in some of our perceptions, yes, we are on the same team since we claim the same Savior. Rest assured that is not something that I would forget or lose sight of.

        All is well.

        Again, thank you.

  • I have been following the PizzaGate/PedoGate forms for over 6-months looking at what the citizens investigators were uncovering. I only observe the forms without posting. It did not take me long to notice that the culprits involved in the satanic ritual abuse of children involving rape, torture, killing, and cannibalism were mostly jewish. I wondered how long it would take the citizen investigators to realize the predominant jewish involvement. About 2-months ago, they started noticing. Now, jewish involvement is noted quite frequently and most of the jewish distractors/redirectors on the PizzaGate/PedoGate forums have distanced themselves from the investigations.

    This is what Jesus had to say about those who harm children. Luke 17:1-2 – “Then said he unto the disciples, It is impossible but that offences will come: but woe unto him, through whom they come!
    It were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and he cast into the sea, than that he should offend one of these little ones.”

    It should be noted that Jesus was referring to what would occur to them by people while still on earth before they die which is why I would have no problem being the millstone for a pedophile regardless of the perverted actions they take against children. Vertical burial next to an ant hill with only their head above the ground would be a just punishment consistent with what Jesus said being worst than a millstone in the sea. Just shooting the bastards would do if there were no shovels or ants around, plus it is less work. Unfortunately, jewish controlled governments via the jewish legal system and the police along with the Catholic Church hierarchy, including the Pope, protect this scum of the earth from their just rewards.


  1. Ung –

    Those considered as children then…. and those considered children today are different.

    There is no ‘age of consent’ in the bible. It was common sense when animals come into heat and when girls reach puberty… offspring would result. The sexual relations then… were wanted soon because childbirth death rates of baby and mother were very high. Needed the early start. More children were necessary to help the family back then… no electricity…. etc.

    The Bible makes mention the general age of girl allowed for “love-making”. The reference is found in a parable where God compares Israel to a baby girl and married her off…. later.

    Ezekiel 16:4 below:

    4 On the day you were born your cord was not cut, nor were you washed with water to make you clean, nor were you rubbed with salt or wrapped in cloths.
    5 No one looked on you with pity or had compassion enough to do any of these things for you. Rather, you were thrown out into the open field, for on the day you were born you were despised.
    6 “‘Then I passed by and saw you kicking about in your blood, and as you lay there in your blood I said to you, “Live!”
    7 I made you grow like a plant of the field. You grew and developed and entered puberty. Your breasts had formed and your hair had grown, yet you were stark naked.
    8 “‘Later I passed by, and when I looked at you and saw that you were old enough for love, I spread the corner of my garment over you and covered your naked body…

    As you read the passage, the girl attained the age for lovemaking after her breast had grown and pubic hairs, these are some signs of puberty. The Bible does not give explicit age for someone to have relations, but what it does give, reading the passage….
    ….. ‘puberty’ is the minimum age for relations to begin.

    Many states in the US and globally had no ‘age of consent’ 100 years ago. Eugenics and Planned Parenthood has changed that.

    Girls were allowed to be married at the age of 10 years old and sometimes times, as young as 7 years old…. legally. It was norm just over 100 years ago to see girls being married off at very young ages.

    In most cultures, the marriage would have been consummated at the onset of puberty.

    “In Medieval and early modern European societies, the age of marriage remained low, with documented cases of brides as young as seven years, although marriages were typically not consummated until the girl reached puberty (Bullough 2004). Shakespeare’s Juliet was just 13, and there is no hint in the play that this was considered to be exceptional. The situation was similar on the other side of the Atlantic; Bullough reports the case in 1689 of a nine-year-old bride in Virginia. At the start of the nineteenth century in England, it was legal to have sex with a 10 year-old girl.”

    “It needs to be remembered that many Medieval widows were not old, IMPORTANT HEIRESSES were often married between the ages of 5 and 10 and might find themselves widowed while still in their teens.”

    Birthing was tough back then. Early start was essential… especially for the elite:

    Queen Mary was the only child of King Henry VIII by his first wife, Catherine of Aragon, to survive infancy.
    Her mother had many miscarriages….
    Before Mary’s birth, four previous pregnancies had resulted in a stillborn daughter and three short-lived or stillborn sons.

    Musselmen give consent very early.
    Talmud allows at age 3…. which may be the reason for Pharisee-Jew involvement in kiddie porn…. etc.


      1. Pat

        It has taken over 2,000 years for an awakening to occur on this planet, and the rubber is starting to hit the road to “separate the wheat from the chaff”

        The corrupted detritus which has accumulated in all that time will be “sloughed off”

        Bet on it

  • I take issue with Pierce’s contention that _individualism_ is the cause of the high frequency of people who want sex with children. Here is my argument: The most individualistic of all men is Emerson’s “self-reliant Individual,” and this person is the least likely of all men to want sex with a child because his conscience would cry out against this. What we are dealing with in the case of men who want sex with children is a man who has lost contact with his conscience (which is the very opposite of Emerson’s “self-reliant individual”). It is the phenomenon whereby the conscience gets _turned off_ that is the problem. And I see this as being the essence of the Jewish influence. My theory is that a false morality, i.e., a false “ought,” arose with the emergence of civilization in the ancient Near East, and this false morality is the essence of the Jewish mind. There is a lack of contact with the inner voice of conscience that has arisen as a consequence of the Jewish influence, and that is the basic problem, I think.


  1. KB –

    “There is a lack of contact with the inner voice of conscience that has arisen as a consequence of the Jewish influence, and that is the basic problem, I think.”

    We KNOW the basic problem is the TALMUD..!!

    Talmud allows sexual relations at age 3…!!

    Musselmen are just as bad..!!

    Saudi wives can be not only pre-pubescent, but even babies, because Saudi Arabia has no minimum marriage age at all..!!

    For example, this 2008 “Times” article about forced child marriages in Nigeria, reveals that there is “fierce resistance” in its mostly Muslim states to a ban on child marriage, because they see such a ban as contrary to Sharia, which is why only one of them has agreed to a modified form of the ban (which outlaws marriage to pre-pubescent girls):

    So why do Nigerian Islamists support child marriage?

    Sharia is based on “The Koran”, and the “Sunnah” (the words and deeds of Mohammed), and according to Sahih al-Bukhari, who is regarded by Muslims as the most reliable early biographer of their prophet, the founder of Islam married one of his wives, ‘Aisha, when she was 6, and consummated that marriage when she was 9.


  • @ Kendra Blewitt

    Well said.

    “It is the phenomenon whereby the conscience gets _turned off_ that is the problem. And I see this as being the essence of the Jewish influence.”

    Yep, that leaves the door wide open for evil.

  • If one can separate one’s self from the creature comforts that have been acquired through effort or inherited by birthright or granted through kindness/generosity (or in other words a miracle); the conclusion that Planet Earth is Hell (not a metaphor) would be undeniable.


    The Way home or face The Fire


  1. NS –


    Because no matter where ya go…

    …..THERE YOU ARE..!! 🙂


      1. New Song’s comment is utterly brilliant, especially her perception that Planet Earth could be mistaken for Hell. But Pat’s comment is equally brilliant, though in a jokier way. New Song would make a great tragedian, Pat a great comedian.

      2. ‘WHY ARE YOU ALL HERE?’

        I could give you all a long lecture on teleology if I wished and point out the “fallacy” of “assuming” that one is “here” for a purpose . . . but I won’t!

        Was I born for a purpose? Was I put on Earth to take part in a play whose plot is known only to the Great Planner? Am I a fly in the web of the Universal Spider?

        Who is there wise enough here to answer my questions, let alone recognize their depth and significance?

      3. MB –

        “Who is there wise enough here to answer my questions,..?”


        That would be the same person who could answer my question, where I cannot:

        IS the LARGEST large thing larger than….

        ….the SMALLEST small thing is small..?? 🙂

      4. @ Madame Butterfly

        After contemplating the “Why am I here” question over many years, I came to the conclusion that it is a lot more simple than we have been led to believe.

        The Heavenly Father is not a cruel stage director that can be blamed for a miserable existence. He gave us all free will, the ability to chose for ourselves between good/love/power and evil/everything else/deception. It may be as simple as the Heavenly Father wanting us to love him because we want to rather than because we have to just as parents on earth desire that their children love them because they want to. Without choices, want to is not a possibility.

        I could be wrong, but my conclusion is as good as anyone else’s.


  1. Thank you, Homer. I will devote my full attention to this link when I have some time. The rare perfumes of the Orient are like soothing balms to my troubled mind. It’s so nice to have someone like you posting on this site. I hope you will consent to become my guru here? In any case, I now appoint you my spiritual adviser and mentor. 🙂


      1. Madame, that’s nice.
        Guru, (lol), I don’t even measure up to disciple status. I’m lazy, un-disciplined.
        But have no fear, the Karma link will take you to everything you always wanted to know about Oriental aromas and especially, flavors.

  • I always find it difficult to believe that anybody can be so evil, and then I recently read about Brady and Hindley, the British Moors murderers. They killed childen, and I am sure that there are still similar types around.

    The older I get the more I think there should be a death penalty for child and cop killers.




  1. Chicago Tribune July 22,1985 article about a Midwest pornography distributor (I was busy researching something else, then found this). Read further down for “Indictment shakes throne of Midwest porn Queen”. This article shows a much more conservative white America, not happy with this kind of sleaze. Also look further down at “The witless smut aimed at our kids”.

Leave a Reply

Ron Hubbard, Scientology and the Occult, Satanism, and Aleister Crowley

Hubbard and the Occult

– by Jon Atack

This article is the first in a series of articles based upon research into the roots of the Hubbardian philosophy that gave birth to the “Sacred Scriptures” of the Church of Scientology.

The Office of Special Affairs, the elite Secret Intelligence unit of the Church of Scientology, was well aware that this report was reaching its final stage and in the recent months they have launched lawsuits and a massive propaganda campaign to discredit FACTNET Director, Lawrence Wollersheim and the researcher, Jon Atack

Scientology is using many Hollywood celebrities to promote its agenda. But most Scientologists, celebrity and non-celebrity alike; as well as the general public , are ignorant of the Satanic/Black Magic background of its Founder, L. Ron Hubbard, and how he used these materials to form the core of his secret “Sacred Scriptures”

The ransacking of the FACTNET files and data base by the OSA Raid Team was not unexpected and the timing of the raid, not surprisingly, corresponded to the scheduled release date of this material. FACTNET Co-Director Arnie Lerma’s computers and personal files were also ransacked by OSA raiders.

FACTNET hopes these series of articles will create meaningful dialogue and that all readers will give this report, and future reports, the widest distribution on the Internet and other areas of Cyberspace, and amongst the general public.

Hubbard and the Occult

I stand before you having been accused in print by L. Ron Hubbard’s followers of having an avid interest in black magic. I would like to put firmly on record that whatever interest I have is related entirely to achieving a better understanding of the creator of Dianetics and Scientology. Hubbard’s followers have the right to be made aware that he had not only an avid interest, but that he was also a practitioner of black magic. Today I shall discuss these matters in depth, but I shall not repeat all of the proofs which already exist in my book A Piece of Blue Sky (001).

Scientology is a twisting together of many threads. Ron Hubbard’s first system, Dianetics, which emerged in 1950, owes much to early Freudian ideas (002). For example, Hubbard’s “Reactive Mind” obviously derives from Freud’s “Unconscious”. The notion that this mind thinks in identities comes from Korzybski’s General Semantics. Initially, before deciding that he was the sole source of Dianetics and Scientology (003), Hubbard acknowledged his debt to these thinkers (004). Dianetics bears marked similarities to work reported by American psychiatrists Grinker and Spiegel (005) and English psychiatrist William Sargant (006). The first edition of Hubbard’s 1950 text Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health (007) carried an advertisement for a book published a year earlier (008). Psychiatrist Nandor Fodor had been writing about his belief in the residual effects of the birth trauma for some years, following in the footsteps of Otto Rank. In lectures given in 1950, Hubbard also referred to works on hypnosis which had obviously influenced his techniques (009). The very name “Dianetics” probably owes something to the, at the time, highly popular subject of Cybernetics. (010)

By 1952, Hubbard had lost the rights to Dianetics, having bailed out just before the bankruptcy of the original Hubbard Dianetic Research Foundation. He had also managed to avoid the charges brought against that Foundation by the New Jersey Medical Association for teaching medicine without a license(011). In a matter of days in the early spring of 1952, Hubbard moved from his purported “science of mental health” into the territory of reincarnation and spirit possession. He called his new subject Scientology, claiming that the name derived from “scio” and “logos” and meant “knowing how to know”. However, Hubbard was notorious for his sly humour and “scio” might also refer to the Greek word for a “shade” or “ghost”. Scientology itself had already been used at the turn of the century to mean “pseudo-science” and in something close to Hubbard’s meaning in 1934 by one of the proponents of Aryan racial theory (012). Other possible links between Hubbard’s thought and that of the Nazis will be made clear later in this paper.

Scientology seems to be a hybrid of science-fiction and magic. Hubbard’s reflections on philosophy seem to derive largely from Will Durant’s Story of Philosophy (013) and the works of Aleister Crowley. Aleister Crowley is surely the most famous black magician of the twentieth-century. It is impossible to arrive at an understanding of Scientology without taking into account its creator’s extensive involvement with magic. The trail has been so well obscured in the past that even such a scholar as professor Gordon Melton has been deceived into the opinion that Hubbard was not a practitioner of ritual magic and that Scientology is not related to magical beliefs and practices. In the book A Piece of Blue Sky, I explored these connections in detail. The revelations surrounding Hubbard’s private papers in the 1984 Armstrong case in California makes any denial of the connections fatuous. The significanceof these connections is of course open to discussion.

The chapter in A Piece of Blue Sky that describes Hubbard’s involvement with the ideas of magic is calledHis Magickal Career. I hope I shall be excused for relying upon it. I shall also here describe further research, and comment particularly upon Hubbard’s use of magical symbols, and the inescapable view that many of the beliefs and practices of Scientology are a reformulation of ritual magic. (014)

In 1984, a former close colleague of Hubbard’s told me that thirty years before when asked how he had managed to write Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health in just three weeks, Hubbard had replied that it had been automatic writing. He said that the book had been dictated by “the Empress”. At the time, I had no idea who or what “the Empress” might be. Later, I noticed that in an article printed immediately prior to the book Dianetics, Hubbard had openly admitted to his use of “automatic writing, speaking and clairvoyance” (015). However, it took several years to understand this tantalizing reference to the Empress.

In the 1930s, Hubbard became friendly with fellow adventure writer Arthur J. Burks. Burks described an encounter with “the Redhead” in his book Monitors. The text makes it clear that “the Redhead” is none other than Ron Hubbard. Burks said that when the Redhead had been flying gliders he would be saved from trouble by a “smiling woman” who would appear on the aircraft’s wing (016). Burks put forward the view that this was the Redhead’s “monitor” or guardian angel.

In 1945, Hubbard became involved with Crowley’s acolyte, Jack Parsons. Parsons wrote to Crowley that Hubbard had “described his angel as a beautiful winged woman with red hair, whom he calls the Empress, and who has guided him through his life and saved him many times.” In the Crowleyite system, adherents seek contact with their “Holy Guardian Angel”.

John Whiteside Parsons, usually known as Jack, first met Hubbard at a party in August 1945. When his terminal leave from the US Navy began, on December 6th, 1945, Hubbard went straight to Parsons’ house in Pasadena, and took up residence in a trailer in the yard. Parsons was a young chemist who had helped to set up Jet Propulsion Laboratories and was one of the innovators of solid fuel for rockets. Parsons was besotted with Crowley’s Sex Magick, and had recently become head of the Agape Lodge of the Church of Thelema in Los Angeles. The Agape Lodge was an aspect of the Ordo Templi Orientis, the small international group headed by Aleister Crowley.

Parsons’ girlfriend soon transferred her affections to Hubbard. With her, Hubbard and Parsons formed a business partnership, as a consequence of which Parsons lost most of his money to Hubbard. However, before Hubbard ran away with the loot, he and Parsons participated in magical rituals which have received great attention among contemporary practitioners.

Parsons and Hubbard together performed their own version of the secret eighth degree ritual (017) of the Ordo Templi Orientis in January 1946. The ritual is called “concerning the secret marriages of gods with men” or “the magical masturbation” and is usually a homosexual ritual. The purpose of this ritual was to attract a woman willing to participate in the next stage of Hubbard and Parsons’ Sex Magick.

Hubbard and Parsons were attempting the most daring magical feat imaginable. They were trying to incarnate the Scarlet Woman described in the Book of Revelation as “Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and Abominations of the Earth … drunken with the blood of saints, and with the blood of the martyrs of Jesus.” (018) During the rituals, Parsons described Babalon as “mother of anarchy and abominations”. The woman who they believed had answered their call, Marjorie Cameron, joined in with their sexual rituals in March 1946.

Parsons used a recording machine to keep a record of his ceremonies. He also kept Crowley informed by letter.The correspondence still exists. Crowley wrote to his deputy in New York “I get fairly frantic when I contemplate the idiocy of these louts”.

Crowley was being disingenuous. His own novel The Moonchild describes a ritual with a similar purpose. Further, the secret IXth degree ritual of the Ordo Templi Orientis (019) contains “Of the Homunculus” in which the adept seeks to create a human embodiment of one of the energies of nature – a god or goddess. The ritual says “to it thou art Sole God and Lord, and it must serve thee.”

In fact, Hubbard and Parsons were committing sacrilege in Crowley’s terms. Crowley respelled “Babylon” as he respelled “magic”. His magick was entirely dedicated to Babalon, the Scarlet Woman. Crowley believed himself the servant and slave of Babalon, the antichrist, styling himself “the Beast, 666”. For anyone to try to incarnate and control the goddess must have been an impossible blasphemy to him. Crowley, after all, called Babalon “Our Lady” (020).

Hubbard and Parsons attempts did not end with the conception of a human child. However, just as Crowley said that “Gods are but names for the forces of Nature themselves” (021), so it might be speculated that Hubbard embodied Babalon not in human form, but through his organization.

Parsons sued Hubbard in Florida in July 1946, managing to regain a little of his money. The record of their rituals was later transcribed and has since been published as The Babalon Working (022). Parsons made a return to Magick, writing The Book of the Antichrist in 1949 (023). Parsons pronounced himself the Antichrist. In a Scientology text, Hubbard spoke favourably of Parsons, making no mention of their magical liaison (024). A Piece of Blue Sky covers Hubbard’s involvement with Parsons in much greater detail than I have given here.

Hubbard’s interest in the occult was kindled long before he met Parsons. It dates back at least to his membership of the Ancient and Mystical Order Rosae Crucis or AMORC, in 1940. Hubbard had completed the first two neophyte degrees before his membership lapsed, and later there were private complaints that he had incorporated some of the teachings he had promised to keep secret into Scientology (025).

Having stolen Parsons’ girl and his money, Hubbard carried on with magical practices of his own devising. Scientology attempted to reclaim documents which recorded these practices in its case against former Hubbard archivist Gerald Armstrong. Some $280,000 was paid to publishers Ralston Pilot to prevent publication of Omar Garrison’s authorized biography of Hubbard. However, Garrison retained copies of thousands of Hubbard documents and showed me one which had been referred to in the Armstrong trial. The Blood Ritual is an invocation of the Egyptian goddess Hathor, performed by Hubbard during the late 1940s. As the name suggests, the ritual involved the use of blood. Hubbard mingled his own blood with that of his then wife (the girlfriend he had stolen from Parsons and with whom Hubbard contracted a bigamous marriage).

In a 1952 Scientology lecture, Hubbard referred to “Aleister Crowley, my very good friend” (026). In fact, the two black magicians never met, and Crowley expressed a very low opinion of the man who he saw had tricked his disciple Jack Parsons. Even so, Hubbard had a very positive regard for Crowley, calling his work “fascinating” (027) and recommending one of his books to Scientologists. Having referred to Crowley as “The Beast 666”, Hubbard said that he had “picked a level of religious worship which is very interesting” (028). He also made it clear that he had read the fundamental text of the Crowley teaching, The Book of the Law (029).

In his 1952 lectures, Hubbard also referred to the Tarot cards, saying that they were not simply a system of divination but a “philosophical machine”. He gave particular mention to the Fool card, saying “The Fool of course is the wisest of all. The Fool who goes down the road with the alligators barking at his heels, and the dogs yapping at him, blindfolded on his way, he knows all there is to know and does nothing about it … nothing could touch him” (030).

The only Tarot pack which has an alligator on the Fool card is Crowley’s (031). When I interviewed Gerald Armstrong, Hubbard’s archivist, in 1984, he told me of a Hubbard “scale” dating from the 1940s. At the base of the scale was the word “animals”. It then ascended through “labourers, farmers, financiers, fanatics” and “the Fool” to “God”. Hubbard seems to have seen himself as the Fool and was perhaps trying to create a trampoline of fanatics through whom he could achieve divinity. Indeed, if Scientology could live up to its claims, then Hubbard would be a “godmaker”.

Of course, the Tarot pack also contains the Empress card and knowing this it is finally possible to understand what Hubbard believed his Guardian Angel to be.

Crowley examined the Tarot in The Book of Thoth (032). Of the Empress card he said “She combines the highest spiritual with the lowest material qualities” (033). Crowley identifies the Empress as the “Great Mother”, and indeed on her robe are bees (034), the traditional symbol of Cybele. Crowley is not alone in the belief that different cultures give different names to the same deities. The worship of Cybele goes back to at least 3,000 B.C. She entered Greek culture as Artemis and to the Romans was Diana, the huntress. Crowley also identified the Empress with the Hindu goddess Shakti (035), and the Egyptian goddesses Isis and Hathor. Crowley directly identified Isis with Diana (036). More usually, Crowley called the Empress by the name Babalon (037).

Contemporary New Age groups see the Great Mother in the aspect of Gaia the Earth Mother. This is far from Crowley’s view. Diana, the patroness of witchcraft (038) was seen by Hubbard rather through the eyes of Crowley than as a benevolent, loving mother. Hubbard made no reference for example to Robert Graves’ White Goddess, but only to Crowley and peripherally to Frazer’s Golden Bough and Gibbon’s Decline and Fall, both of which give reference to the cult of Diana. To Crowley the Great Mother, Babalon, is, of course, also the antichrist.

While Crowley’s path was submission to the Empress, Hubbard seems to have tried to dominate the same force, bringing it into being as a servile homunculus. Hubbard’s eldest son, although a questionable witness, was insistent that his father taught him magic and privately referred to the goddess as Hathor. The Blood Ritual confirms this assertion if nothing else.

Publicly, Hubbard was taken with the Roman name of the goddess, Diana, giving it to one of his daughters and also to one of his Scientology Sea Organization boats. Curiously, this boat had been renamed from The Enchanter and before Scientology he had owned another called The Magician. Hubbard had also used Jack Parsons’ money to buy a yacht called Diane (039). “Dianetics” may also be a reference to Diana. Shortly before its inception, another former US Navy officer and practitioner of the VIIIth degree of the Ordo Templi Orientis had formed a group called Dianism (040).

When The Blood Ritual was mentioned during the Armstrong trial in 1984, Scientology’s lawyer asserted that it was an invocation of an Egyptian goddess of love (041). Hathor is indeed popularly seen as a winged and spotted cow which feeds humanity. However, there is an important lesson about Scientology in the practice of magicians. The teachings of magic are considered by many practitioners to be powerful and potentially dangerous and therefore have to be kept secret. One of the easiest ways to conceal the true meaning of a teaching is to reverse it. By magicians Hathor is also seen as an aspect of Sekmet, the avenging lioness. One authority on ritual magic has revealed the identity of Hathor as “the destroyer of man.” (042) The important lesson is that Scientology has both a public and a hidden agenda. Publicly it is a Church, privately as the record of convictions shows, it is an Intelligence agency. Many public Hubbard works speak of helping people. In his largely secret Fair Game teachings, however, Hubbard is outspoken in his attack upon either critics of himself or of his work. For example, in What is Greatness? Hubbard says “The hardest task one can have is to continue to love one’s fellows despite all reasons he should not. And the true sign of sanity and greatness is so to continue.” In one statement of the Fair Game Law, however, Hubbard said that opponents “May be tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed” (043). Of practitioners unlicensed by him Hubbard said “Harass these persons in any possible way” (044). Nor did he exclude the possibility of murder against those who opposed him (045). The harassment of critics, may explain the dearth of academic research into Scientology. Hubbard’s use of contradiction to captivate and redirect his followers is worthy of a separate study (046), but it has its roots in his study of magic. Perhaps he related his “Dianetics” also to Janus, the two-faced god whose name is sometimes spelled “Dianus”.

While Hubbard was supposedly researching his Dianetics in the late 1940s, he was in fact engaging in magical rituals, and trying out hypnosis both on himself and others. During the 1984 Armstrong trial, extracts from Hubbard’s voluminous self-hypnotic affirmations were read into the record. The statements, hundreds of pages of them, are written in red ink and Hubbard frequently drew pictures of the male genitalia alongside the text (047). Among his suggestions to himself we find: “Men are my slaves”, “Elemental Spirits are my slaves” and “You can be merciless whenever your will is crossed and you have every right to be merciless” (048).

Black magic is distinguished from white in the desire of the practitioner to bring harm. “Maleficium” is the traditional word for such magic. The “Suppressive Person declare” and the “Fair Game Law” speak reams in terms of Hubbard’s intent.

Scientology is a neo-gnostic system, which is to say that it teaches the attainment of insight through a series of stages. These stages are called by Scientologists “the Bridge to Total Freedom”. The Bridge currently consists of some 27 levels. These levels might be compared to the initiations of magical systems. While the stages appear dissimilar to those of Crowley’s Ordo Templi Orientis, it is worth noting that both systems consist of stages, that both have secret levels and that both are numbered with Roman numerals. Hubbard also shared with Crowley a numbering system which begins at 0 rather than 1.

The Scientology Bridge has as its end the creation of an “Operating Thetan”. Hubbard used the word “thetan” to identify the self, the spirit which is the person. He claimed that the word derived from an earlier Greek usage of the letter theta for “spirit” (049). I have been unable to find such a usage, but can comment that the theta symbol is central to the Crowley system where it is found as an aspect of the sign used for Babalon. To Crowley, the theta sign represented the essential principle of his system – thelema or the will. (050)

By “Operating Thetan”, Hubbard meant an individual or “thetan” able to “operate” freely from the physical body, able to cause effects at a distance by will alone In Hubbard’s words “a thetan exterior who can have but doesn’t have to have a body in order to control or operate thought, life, matter, energy, space and time” (051). Hubbard used the term “intention” rather than “will” (052), but the goal of Scientology is clearly the same as that of the Crowley system. The Scientologist wishes to be able to control events and the minds of others by intention. This seems to be exactly what Crowley called “thelema”. In a 1952 lecture, Hubbard recommended a book which he called “The Master Therion”(053). This was in fact one of Crowley’s “magical” names. I have been advised by an officer of one of the Ordo Templi Orientis groups that the reference is most likely to Crowley’s magnum opus Magick in Theory and Practice. In that work, Crowley gave this definition “Magick is the Science and Art of causing Change to occur in conformity with Will” (054). So the aim of both Crowley and Hubbard seems to have been the same.

As a recovering Scientologist, I must raise an ethical objection to the desire to control the minds of others without their consent. This is the purpose of many Scientology procedures (055), and can be seen either as deliberate “mind control” or as the black magician’s contempt of others. Scientology is a curious hybrid of magic and psychology. After all, Hubbard boasted “we can brainwash faster than the Russians – 20 seconds to total amnesia” (056).

At the centre of Crowley’s teaching is the notion that we can each control our own destiny: “Postulate: Any required Change may be effected by the application of the proper kind and degree of Force in the proper manner through the proper medium to the proper object” (057); further “Every intentional act is a Magical Act” (058); “Every failure proves that one or more requirements of the postulate have not been fulfilled” (059). Hubbard taught that everything is down to the intention of the individual. He called such intentions “postulates”. The victim of any negative event is said to have “pulled it in”. Hubbard taught a contempt for “victims” and regarded sympathy as a low emotional condition (060). As Crowley put it “Man is ignorant of the nature of his own being and powers … He may thus subjugate the whole Universe of which he is conscious to his individual Will” (061).

Hubbard was to employ or parallel so many of Crowley’s ideas and approaches that it is impossible, especially with Hubbard’s references to Crowley, to avoid comparison. For example, in his Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health, Hubbard laid much emphasis on the recollection of birth. Crowley had earlier insisted that the magician must recall his birth (062). Crowley spoke of “A equals A” (063), where Hubbard, again in Dianetics spoke of “A equals A equals A”. Both men were noisy in their contempt for psychotherapists (064). Both Hubbard and Crowley spoke of “past lives” rather than “reincarnation” (065). Indeed, the notion of past lives and their recollection is essential to both systems, as Crowley wrote “There is no more important task than the exploration of one’s previous incarnations” (066). Scientology and Dianetics also rely upon the supposed recollection of previous incarnations. Crowley called this the “magical memory” (067).

Hubbard gave as the fundamental axiom of his system “Life is basically a static. A Life Static has no mass, no motion, no wavelength, no location in space or in time.” (068) Crowley was more succinct, calling the self “nothing” (069). Hubbard was to say that even an “Operating Thetan” could not “operate” alone, and Crowley said “Even in Magick we cannot get on without the help of others” (070).

The first essential teaching of Scientology is that “reality is basically agreement” (071) or “reality is the agreed-upon apparency of existence” (072), which Crowley expressed as “The universe is a projection of ourselves; an image as unreal as that of our faces in the mirror … not to be altered save as we alter ourselves” (073). The controlling power of thought, or will, is evident in both systems, Crowley has it “we can never affect anything outside ourselves save only as it is also within us. (074)

Both men believed that truth is unobtainable in the material world. Crowley expressed it thus “There is no such thing as truth in the perceptible universe” (075). Hubbard said “The ultimate truth … has no mass, meaning, mobility, no wavelength, no time, no location in space, no space.” (076)

Hubbard’s concept of the “thetan exterior” – operating apart from the body is found in Crowley’s “interior body of the Magician” which can “pass through ‘matter'” (077). Both systems seek to get the spirit “out of the body” (078).

Crowley said “Evil is only an appearance … like good”(079), where Hubbard said that “goodness and badness … are … considerations, and have no other basis than opinion” (080).

Each spoke of a personal “universe” (081). Hubbard also followed in Crowley’s footsteps with the insistence that the meaning of words should be clarified or “cleared” (082).

Crowley announced that Christ was “concocted” (083) which tallies exactly with Hubbard’s assertion that Christ was a hypnotic “implant” (084). Here the major difference between Crowley and Hubbard becomes apparent: Crowley was publicly outspoken about his views, Hubbard was careful to keep negative material secret. Scientology claims to be eclectic and non-denominational. Only in secret teachings is Hubbard’s contempt for Christianity apparent (085).

The long series of lectures in which Hubbard called Crowley his “very good friend” and recommended his writings, centres on a technique called “creative processing” by Hubbard. It is unsurprising that this technique is common to magicians. Nowadays it is more usually known as “visualization”.

Scientology surely has the distinction of containing the largest collection of teachings produced by one man. There are more than a hundred books and over 2,500 recorded lectures. But there are also thousands of registered trademarks, including many symbols.

Many of these symbols have possible magical significance. It seems highly unlikely given his study of the occult that Hubbard was unaware of the earlier use of these symbols. The Scientology cross which Hubbard claimed to have seen in an old Spanish church in Arizona (086) is markedly similar to the Rosicrucian cross (087) and also to Aleister Crowley’s OTO cross. Hubbard had been a member of the Rosicrucians. He had also commented on Crowley’s Tarot which carries the OTO cross on the back of every card. Hubbard cannot have been ignorant of these uses.

The Scientology cross could also be seen as a crossed out cross, with potentially Satanic implications. It seems strange that Hubbard who called Scientology a “better” activity than Christianity (088), called Christ an invention (089) and said that the “Creator of Heaven” would be found “with beetles under the rocks” (090), should have adopted the exclusively Christian word “church”, the garb of Christian ministers and the use of the cross as a symbol. But Scientology is based upon deceptions and contradictions.

The Rosicrucians and the Freemasons share a ritual called the “grave of fire” (091). A senior Rosicrucian who had also studied Scientology told me that the initiate lies on a carpet within a pattern of lapping flames. He claimed that Scientology’s Religious Technology Center – or RTC – symbol was very similar. (092)

The RTC symbol contains the Dianetics triangle, which is a common magical symbol, representing the door of the Cabala, the letter Daleth. Hubbard indeed assigned it to the Greek equivalent of Daleth, Delta. The triangle on its base is also the symbol of Set, the Egyptian god called by some “the destroyer of man”. The male equivalent of Babalon. Indeed, Crowley equates Set with Satan (093). The triangle is universally recognized as a sign of malign power. Alexandra David-Neel commented upon its use as such among the Tibetans. Her best-selling books of the 1930s contain many other possible comparisons with Hubbard’s work.

The “S and double triangle” is a major symbol found throughout Scientology. The “S” supposedly represents “Scientology” and the two triangles Affinity-Reality-Communication and Knowledge-Responsibility-Control. There is another possible interpretation. The “S” seen on its own can easily be seen as a snake. To Crowley, indeed, the “S” represented the tempting serpent, Satan. Perhaps Hubbard’s “thetan” is pronounced to match with a lisped “satan”? He was after all wry in his humour. The two triangles can be assembled differently to form the Star of David, called the Seal of Solomon by magicians (094) This symbol allegedly represents “tetragrammaton”, the holy name of God which must never be spoken. Perhaps breaking it apart is similar to hanging the Christian cross upside down.

Next we see the Sea Organization symbol. The five pointed star, or pentacle is the most commonly known symbol of magical power. It is held between two thirteen-leaved laurels. Armstrong told me in 1984 that judging by the papers in Hubbard’s archive the creator of Scientology was more interested in numerology than any other aspect of magic.

Among the more seemingly fanciful claims of Hubbard’s oldest son, L. Ron, junior, was that his father was the successor to the magicians who created Naziism. Naziism was certainly an authoritarian group, a prototypical destructive cult. Recent revelations about leading Scientologist Thomas Marcellus long-running direction of the Institute for Historical Review can only add to speculation (095). Dusty Sklar has said that had she known about Hubbard she would have used him in the last chapter of The Nazis and the Occult rather than Sun Myung Moon (096). L. Ron, junior, was sure that the teachings of the Germanen Orden and the Thule Society had passed directly to his father by courier. In this light, the white circle on a red square of Scientology’s International Management Organization (097) can be readily compared to the Nazi flag. The four lightning flashes or “sig runes” are also common to Naziism. No explanation is given for these sig runes by Scientology. They also appear on the RTC symbol. At the time that both of these symbols were introduced, Hubbard also created the International Finance Police, headed by the International Finance Dictator. An unusual choice of word.

Hitler too had been aware of the power of occult symbols and rituals. Speaking of the Freemasons, he said: “All the supposed abominations, the skeletons and death’s heads, the coffins and the mysteries, are mere bogeys for children. But there is one dangerous element and that is the element I have copied from them. They form a sort of priestly nobility. They have developed an esoteric doctrine not merely formulated, but imparted through the symbols and mysteries in degrees of initiation. The hierarchical organization and the initiation through symbolic rites, that is to say, without bothering the brain but by working on the imagination through magic and the symbols of a cult, all this has a dangerous element, and the element I have taken over. Don’t you see that our party must be of this character …? An Order, that is what it has to be – an Order, the hierarchical Order of a secular priesthood.” (098)

Having shown many comparisons between Crowley’s work and Hubbard’s, and having shown the common intent of both systems, I shall now move on to the secret rituals of Scientology. The attempt to obtain magical powers is certainly not unique to Hubbard and Crowley. Every culture seems to have had its own approach.

One common element to most cultures is the belief in disembodied spirits. Disembodied spirits can be found in the teachings of all of the major religions (099). Crowley shared with many the belief that such spirits can be used in the practice of magic (100). Most of the secret teachings of Scientology concern such disembodied spirits.

Towards the end of his life, Hubbard wrote some chirpy pop songs which were recorded under his direction (101). One of these songs, The Evil Purpose, begins “In olden days the populace was much afraid of demons / And paid an awful sky high price to buy some priestly begones”. The song goes on to explain that there are no demons, “just the easily erased evil purpose”. In fact, the Operating Thetan levels are concerned almost entirely with “body thetans” or indwelling spirits or demons.

Hubbard first floated the idea to his adherents in spring 1952, during his first Scientology lectures(102). He spoke of “theta” as the life-force and went on to describe “theta beings” and “theta bodies”. Mention was made again that June in the book What to Audit, which is still in print – minus a chapter – as Scientology: A History of Man. Here Hubbard said that we are all inhabited by seven foreign spirits, the leader of which he called the “crew chief”. The idea did not find favour, so it was abandoned for fourteen years.

In December 1966, in North Africa, Hubbard undertook “research” into an incident which he claimed had occurred 75 million years ago. In a tape recorded lecture given in September 1967, Hubbard announced his revelation to Scientologists. On the same tape he boasted about his wife Mary Sue Hubbard’s use of “professional Intelligence Agents” to steal files. His wife, the controller of all Scientology organizations subsequently went to prison. Scientology continues to claim that its creator knew nothing of the events that put his wife in prison, but also continue to sell this tape. Armstrong, Hubbard’s former archivist has said that the Hubbard archive contains letters written while he was creating Operating Thetan level three. In his lecture, Hubbard claimed to have broken his back while researching. Armstrong told me in 1984 that Hubbard had in fact got very drunk and fallen down in the gutter. A doctor had been called out to him to deal with a sprain. Hubbard also detailed his drug use in this correspondence. In February 1967, Hubbard flew to Los Palmas and the woman who attended him there has told me that he was taking an enormous quantity of drugs and was in a very debilitated state.

The result of Hubbard’s “research” was a mixture of science-fiction and old-fashioned magic. According to Hubbard, 75 million years ago, Xenu, the overlord of 76 planets, rounded up most of the people of his empire – some 178 billion per planet – and brought them to Earth. Here they were exploded in volcanoes using hydrogen bombs and the spirits or thetans collected on “electronic ribbons”. Disorientated from the massacre, the disembodied thetans were subjected to some 36 days of hypnotic “implanting” and clustered together. From seven indwelling spirits per person Hubbard’s estimate had gone into the thousands. The “implants” supposedly contained the blueprint for future civilizations, including the Christian teaching, 75 million years before Christ. Operating Thetan level three has to be kept secret, according to Hubbard, because the unprepared will die within two days of discovering its contents. The story has in fact been published in many newspapers without noticeable loss of life. Hubbard was so taken with his science fiction, that he finally wrote a screenplay calledRevolt in the Stars about the “OT 3” incident, ignoring his own warnings.

It is often the case with Hubbard’s work that he has simply taken other ideas and dressed them up in new expressions. Careful study shows that Dianetics is largely a rewording of existing work. The original language of Dianetics included such words as “operator”, “reverie” and “regression” common to hypnotic practitioners at the time. On leaving Scientology, most people cannot see that the “body thetans” of Operating Thetan levels three to seven are in fact the demons of Christian belief. The “OT levels” are factually the most expensive form of exorcism known to man. Unfortunately, such beliefs and practices can have a severe effect upon practitioners, who take Hubbard’s warnings to heart and come to believe themselves multiple personalities. I have been called in to help several times in such instances.

Indeed, the whole process of “auditing” can be seen as an update of magical ritual. Scientology is a mixture of occult ritual and 1950s style psychotherapy. The adherents travel through increasingly expensive initiations with the hope of attaining supernatural powers. There are badges, symbols and titles for almost every stage of the way.

Other links with ritual magic have emerged. A peculiar event occurred aboard Hubbard’s flagship, theApollo, in 1973. Those aboard ship responsible for overseeing the management of Scientology organizations were involved in a ceremony called the Kali ceremony after the Hindu goddess of destruction. The whole was staged very seriously, and the managers were led into a dimly lit hold of the ship and ordered to destroy models of their organizations. A few years before, a high-ranking Sea Organization officer claims to have been ordered to Los Angeles where he was meant to mount an armed attack on a magicians’ sabat. He did not mount the attack but claims that the meeting happened exactly where Hubbard had told him it would.

In 1976, Hubbard ordered a secret research project into the teachings of gnostic groups. He had already carried out a project to determine which of his ship’s crew members were “soldiers of light” and which “soldiers of darkness”. The latter group were apparently promoted. Jeff Jacobsen has provided insight into a possible connection between Hubbard’s OT levels and gnostic teachings (103). Jacobsen quotes from the third century Christian gnostic Valentinus: “For many spirits dwell in it [the body] and do not permit it to be pure; each of them brings to fruition its own works, and they treat it abusively by means of unseemly desires”. Jacobsen goes on to cite the gnostic Basilides, man “preserves the appearance of a wooden horse, according to the poetic myth, embracing as he does in one body a host of such different spirits.” Jacobsen points out that multiple possession seems to have been considered normal by these gnostics. Possession equates to madness in orthodox Christianity, and examples of multiple possession are rare (the Gadarene swine for example). Jacobsen draws other interesting parallels between gnosticism and Scientology.

Another former Sea Organization member affidavited a meeting in the 1970s with an old man whose description fitted Hubbard’s. She claimed to have been taken to the top floor of a Scientology building by high-ranking officials and left there with this man, who performed the sexual act with her, but very slowly (104). Indeed, in the way advocated by Crowley and called karezzo. No outside witness has corroborated this statement.

I have already said that the public and private faces of Scientology are very different. The vast majority of Hubbard’s followers are good people who genuinely believe that the techniques of Scientology can help the world. Most are ignorant of the hidden Fair Game teachings. Hubbard presented himself as a messiah, as Maitreya the last Buddha, but in fact he was privately a highly disturbed and frequently ill man. There are a number of reports of his drug abuse. He advocated the use of amphetamines (105). He admitted to barbiturate addiction (106) and was also at times a heavy drinker. His treatment of those around him was often deplorable. Although holding himself out as an authority on child-rearing, his relationship with his children was genuinely dreadful. He disowned his first son, barely saw his first daughter, denied paternity of his second daughter, and Quentin, the oldest son of his third marriage, committed suicide. Quentin had reached the highest level of Scientology twice. He was a Class XII auditor and a “cleared theta clear”, but he was also a homosexual. Hubbard was publicly homophobic – saying that all homosexuals are “covertly hostile” or backstabbers. I have received alarming reports of his sexual behaviour. I must emphasis that these reports are not corroborated, so can only stand as allegations. One Sea Organization officer claims to have witnessed a sexual encounter between Hubbard and a young boy in North Africa. Another claims that Hubbard admitted to a sexual relationship with one of his own children. It is impossible to substantiate such reports. But such behaviour would be in keeping with an extreme devotee of Aleister Crowley who said that in the training of a magician “Acts which are essentially dishonorable must be done.” (107)

In conclusion, I believe that Hubbard was a classic psychopath. Some trauma in infancy separated him from the world and made him untrusting of other people. This developed into a paranoia, a need to control others. He created a dissociated world, inhabited by the Empress. Bear in mind that he actuallysaw the Empress in full colour, and that she spoke to him (108). From his comments about automatic writing and speaking, it could be averred that Hubbard was in fact “channeling” the Empress. Hubbard separated off a compartment of himself calling it the Empress and gave in to its urgings. He lived a life of dreadful contradiction. He claimed expertise in all things, but factually was a failure at most. Some will see him as having a psychiatric complaint, others will believe that he invoked the very devil, or Babalon, and was possessed. Hubbard’s own belief lives on with all of its contradictions in his teachings. Ultimately, as Fritz Haack put it, Scientology is twentieth-century magic.


  1. Atack, Jon, Lyle Stuart Books, New Jersey, 1990.
  2. Sigmund Freud, Clarke Lectures 1-3, in Two Short Accounts of Psycho-Analysis, Penguin Books, London, 1962. Cf Hubbard, “Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health” and “The Dianetic Auditors Course”.
  3. Hubbard, HCO Policy Letter “Keeping Scientology Working”, 7 February 1965.
  4. e.g., acknowledgments lists in Hubbard’s “Science of Survival”, 1951, and “Scientology 8-8008”, 1952. Phoenix Lectures, p.264.
  5. Grinker and Speigel, “Men Under Stress”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1945.
  6. Sargant, “Battle for the Mind“, Heinemann, London, 1957. Hubbard had a copy of this book on his library shelf in Washington DC in 1958. It also has relevance to other aspects of Scientology.
  7. Hermitage House, 1950.
  8. Fodor, “The Search for the Beloved – a clinical investigation of birth and the trauma of prenatal conditioning“, Hermitage House, 1949.
  9. Wolfe & Rosenthal, Hypnotism Comes of Age, Blue Ribbon, NY, 1949; Young Twenty-Five Lessons in Hypnotism, Padell, NY, 1944. Both recommended by Hubbard inResearch & Discovery, volume 2, p.12, 1st edition.
  10. Jeff Jacobsen has written two interesting papers relevant to any discussion of the origins of Scientology. “Dianetics: From Out of the Blue,” The Skeptic, UK, March/April 1992, which discusses the origins of Dianetics and The Hubbard is Bare, 1992, a more general discussion including comments about Crowley and gnosticism. I have worked for some time on a set of papers which discuss Hubbard’s plagiarism, as yet these are unavailable.
  11. A Piece of Blue Sky, pp.119 & 125-126.
  12. A Piece of Blue Sky, p.128.
  13. See particularly the chapters on Bergson and Spencer.
  14. See also Jacobsen’s The Hubbard is Bare and Bent Corydon’s L.Ron Hubbard: Messiah or Madman? Corydon relied upon excellent research by Brian Ambry but also upon L. Ron Hubbard jr, whose credibility is questionable. See also L. Ron Hubbard, jr.,A Look Into Scientology or 1/10 of 1% of Scientology, manuscript, 1972.
  15. Hubbard, “Dianetics: the Evolution of a Science” originally printed in Astounding Science Fiction, May 1950. Republished by AOSH DK Publications Department, 1972, quotation from p.56, see also p.59.
  16. Burks, Monitors, CSA Press, Lakemount, Georgia, 1967.
  17. King, Francis, The Secret Rituals of the OTO, C.W.Daniel, London, 1973.
  18. Revelation, chapter 17.
  19. Secret Rituals of the OTO.
  20. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, Castle Books, New York, p.88.
  21. Magick in Theory and Practice, p.120.
  22. There is contention between the various OTO groups about the Book of Babalon. Its existence is sometimes denied, and the OTO New York have claimed that only a fragment exists (published in Parsons, Freedom is a Two-Edged Sword, Falcon, Las Vegas, 1989). I have read three versions of the manuscript, one the Yorke transcript, another is un-named. The third was published in vol .1, issue 3 ofStarfire, London, 1989.
  23. published by Isis Research, Edmonton, Alberta, 1980, ed. Plawiuk.
  24. Professional Auditors Bulletin no.110, 15 April 1957.
  25. Author’s interview with 15th degree Rosicrucian, 1984.
  26. Hubbard, Philadelphia Doctorate Course, lecture 18 “Conditions of Space-Time-Energy”.
  27. Philadelphia Doctorate Course, lecture 18.
  28. Philadelphia Doctorate Course, lecture 35.
  29. Philadelphia Doctorate Course, lecture 40.
  30. Hubbard, Philadelphia Doctorate Course, lecture 1, “Opening: What is to be done in the Course”.
  31. Thoth Tarot Deck, US Games Systems, NY, ISBN 0-913866-15-6.
  32. Crowley, The Book of Thoth, Samuel Weiser, Maine,1984. First edition 1944.
  33. Book of Thoth, p.75.
  34. Book of Thoth, p.76.
  35. Francis King, The Magical World of Aleister Crowley, Arrow Books, London, p.56.
  36. Crowley, Confessions, Bantam, New York, 1971, p.693.
  37. e.g., Book of Thoth, pp.136ff.
  38. Cavendish, The Magical Arts, Arkana, London, 1984, p.304.
  39. A Piece of Blue Sky, p.99.
  40. Francis King, Ritual Magic in England, Spearman, London, 1970, p.161.
  41. Litt, in Church of Scientology v Armstrong, vol. 26, p.4607.
  42. Hope, Practical Egyptian Magic, Aquarian, Northants, 1984, pp.39 & 47.
  43. HCO Policy Letter, Penalties for Lower Conditions, 18 October 1967, issue IV.
  44. HCO Executive Letter, Amprinistics, 27 September 1965.
  45. e.g. HCO Policy Letter, Ethics, Suppressive Acts, Suppression of Scientology and Scientologists, The Fair Game Law, 1 March 1965. The offending part of the text was read into an English court judgment (Hubbard v Vosper, November 1971, Court of Appeal). In USA v. Jane Kember & Morris Budlong, in 1980, Scientology lawyers admitted that despite public representations Fair Game had never truly been “abrogated” (sentencing memorandum, District Court, Washington DC, criminal no. 78.401 (2) & (3), p.16, footnote). The Policy Letter which did eventually cancel it, of 22 July 1980, was itself withdrawn on 8 September 1983. Unknown to mostof its adherents, Fair game is still a scripture, and according to Hubbard’s Standard Tech principle binding upon Scientologists. Hubbard issued a murder order in 1968 under the name “R2-45” (The Auditor issue 35). Thankfully, this order was not complied with.
  46. See for example the technique called False Data Stripping and Hubbard’s comments on controlling people through contradictory instructions.
  47. Interview with Robert Vaughn Young, former Hubbard archivist, Corona del Mar, April 1993.
  48. Affirmations, exhibits 500-4D, E, F & G. See Church of Scientology v Armstrong, transcript volume 11, p.1886.
  49. Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Dictionary, Church of Scientology of California, L.A., 1975, “theta”, definition 6.
  50. The Babalon sign with a theta at the centre of a 7-pointed star is found in many of Crowley’s works, e.g. The Book of Thoth. The winged sign of the OTO and the use of the theta sign can be found in various places, e.g. Equinox – Sex and Religion, Thelema Publishing Co, Nashville, 1981.
  51. Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary, definition of “Operating Thetan”.
  52. e.g., PAB 91, The Anatomy of Failure, 3 July 1956. See also definition of “Tone 40” in the Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary: “giving a command and just knowing that it will be executed despite any contrary appearances”..
  53. Philadelphia Doctorate Course, lecture 18.
  54. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.xii.
  55. e.g., Dissemination Drill, CCHs, Opening Procedure by Duplication, Mood TRs & Tone Scale drills, TRs 6-8 , TR-8Q , the FSM TR “How to control a conversation”.On the OTVII practi sed upto 1982, the student was expected to telepathically implant thoughts into others.
  56. Technical Bulletin of 22 July 1956.
  57. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.xiii.
  58. ibid, p.xiii.
  59. ibid, p.xiv.
  60. e.g. The Tone Scale. For a discussion of Scientology beliefs, see A Piece of Blue Sky, pp.378ff.
  61. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.xvi-xvii.
  62. ibid, p.419.
  63. ibid, p.9.
  64. e.g., Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.xxiv.
  65. e.g. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.228. Hubbard Have You Lived Before this Life?, Church of Scientology of California, L.A., 1977, p.3.
  66. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.50.
  67. ibid, pp.50 & 228.
  68. Hubbard, Phoenix Lectures, Church of Scientology of California, Edinburgh, 1968, Scientology Axiom 1, p.146.
  69. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.30.
  70. ibid, p.63.
  71. Phoenix lectures, p.175
  72. Phoenix Lectures, , pp.173ff, Scientology Axioms 26 & 27.
  73. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.110.
  74. ibid, p.121.
  75. ibid, p.143-144.
  76. Phoenix Lectures, p.180, Scientology Axiom 35.
  77. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.144.
  78. e.g., ibid, p.147.
  79. ibid, p.153.
  80. Phoenix Lectures, p.180, Scientology Axiom 31.
  81. Crowley, Magick in Theory and Practice, p.251. Hubbard, PAB 1, General Comments,10 May 1953.
  82. Crowley, Magick Without Tears, Falcon Press, Phoenix, Az, 1983, pp.xii, 26, 407 & 440. Hubbard, Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary, definitions of “word clearing”. Korzybski also advocated understanding of words.
  83. Crowley, Magick Without Tears, p.11.
  84. HCO Bulletin, Confidential – Resistive Cases – Former Therapies, 23 September 1968.
  85. e.g. Hubbard, HCO Policy Letter Routine three – Heaven, 11 May 1963 and the original preface to The Phoenix Lectures, Hubbard South African Association of Scientologists, Johannesburg, 1954: “God just happens to be the trick of this universe”, p.5. In HCO Bulletin Technically Speaking, of 8 July 1959, Hubbard said “The whole Christian movement is based on the victim … Christianity succeeded by making people into victims. We can succeed by making victims into people.”
  86. What is Scientology?, Church of Scientology of California, first edition, 1978, p.301.
  87. H. Spencer Lewis, Rosicrucian Manual, AMORC, San Jose, 1982.
  88. Modern Management Technology Defined, definition of Church of American Science.
  89. HCO Policy Letter, Former practices”, 1968.
  90. HCO Policy Letter, Heaven, 1963.
  91. cf Hubbard’s use of “wall of fire” to describe OT III & OT V. These may also be compared to gnostic ideas.
  92. The RTC symbol is frequently used, e.g., What is Scientology?, 2nd edition, 1992, p.92.
  93. Magick Without Tears, p.259.
  94. Cavendish, p.243.
  95. Paul Bracchi, The Cult and a Right-Winger, Evening Argus, Brighton, England, 4 April 1995.
  96. Letter to the author. Sklar’s book was published by Crowell, NY, 1977. It was originally released as Gods and Beasts. See also Gerald Suster Hitler and the Age of Horus, Sphere, London, 1981.
  97. This symbol is frequently used, e.g. What is Scientology?, 2nd edition, 1992, p.358.
  98. Suster, Hitler and the Age of Horus, p.138.
  99. Francoise Strachan, Casting out the Devils, Aquarian Press, London, 1972. See also Alexandra David-Neel Initiates and Initiations in Tibet, pp.168-169.
  100. e.g., Magick in Theory and Practice, p.16.
  101. The Road To Freedom, BPI records, L.A., 1986.
  102. The Hubbard College Lectures.
  103. The Hubbard is Bare.
  104. Affidavit of Ann Bailey, p.34.
  105. e.g., Dianetics: the Modern Science of Mental Health, Bridge, L.A., 1985, p.389 or AOSHDK, Denmark, 1973, p.363. See also the Research and Discovery Series.
  106. The Research and Discovery Series, vol.1, first edition 1980, Scientology Publications Org, p.124.
  107. Magick in Theory and Practice, p.339.
  108. Hubbard ordered that new dust sleeves should be put onto his books after he’d released OT3, in 1967. These book covers are supposedly meant to depict images from the 36 days of implanting and will supposedly compel people to buy the books. The cover for Hubbard’s Scientology 8-80, Publications Department, AOSH Denmark, 1973, shows a winged couple. The woman could well be the Empress. A similar design was used on the dust sleeve of Hubbard’s Scientology 8-8008 in the 1990 Bridge, L.A., edition.

Mind Pollution — The Promotion of Sexual Perversion on National TV: The Case of Jenji Kohan

Image result for bill bunting pervert

Related image

This article is dedicated BY ME…to sodomites and sexual perverts Bill Bunting and Karen Sue Andras who represent the filthiness of this truth…being THEY are demon possessed by the infamous Aleister Crowley…self proclaimed “Chief of Staff” for SATAN  and which their “way of life” is mirrored and lived in the fullness of sexual pervasion they bask in!

Mind Pollution — The Promotion of Sexual Perversion on National TV: The Case of Jenji Kohan

Dr. Lasha Darkmoon


Jewish TV writer JENJI KOHAN (left), flanked by sexual exhibitionist Miley Cyrus
“Fie, fie, fie, pah, pah! — Give me an ounce of civet, good apothecary, to sweeten my imagination.”
— King Lear, Act 4, Scene 6
Some would argue that this is not about the pollution of minds. They would maintain that there is no deliberate attempt to undermine the morals of a virtuous nation, still less the morals of its innocent minors. It’s more fundamental than that.

This is simply a question, they would point out, of a bunch of dirty-minded writers and degenerate TV executives getting together to produce buckets of sleaze for an increasingly debased public. Depravity, they would tell us, is not being systematically manufactured: it is the natural flatulence of filthy minds. It is the foul atmosphere around us, the very air we breathe. We are filthy, stewed and marinated in filth like dung flies, and filth is what we naturally produce.

Let’s examine this interesting thesis. 
—  §  — 

Jenji Kohan (b. 1969), a radical feminist and devout follower of Judaism, is  a popular American TV scriptwriter. What I find truly astonishing about this Jewish lady, who enjoys eating Shabbat dinner with her extended family every Friday at her house and attends two different synagogues, is that she has managed to combine religious piety with the promotion of sexual perversion.

She has openly stated on more than one occasion that sexual perversion is normal and healthy. Hence she has no problem promoting it on American TV. After all, if sexual perversion is “good clean fun”, why not spread the happiness around and help nice American families savor the joys of incest, bestiality and other assorted paraphilias?

In a riveting article for the Occidental Observer, Brenton Sanderson explains that Kohan echoes the Freudian argument that “a disposition to perversions is an original and universal disposition of the human sexual instinct.”

Translated into the simplest English: we’re all pervs. Au fond: at bottom, when you strip away all the frills and get down to the nitty-gritty. As for chastity, female modesty, sexual decency, these are all later accretions or artificial developments that violate our essential natures or primitive instincts. A million years ago—when Stone Age humans were grappling with saber-toothed tigers and committing arson by rubbing dry sticks together, and life, according to Thomas Hobbes, was “nasty, brutish and short”—in those long ago times, rape and murder, bestiality and incest, were thrilling everyday events. Ever since then alas, it’s been steadily downhill all the way, until now we have—horror of horrors!—Western civilization.

Thus, in a nutshell,  the philosophy of Freud and his kinky commissars.

In her scripts for American TV, Kohan has no inhibitions about dishing up generous portions of sexual perversion. Incest, for example, is openly (though subtly) promoted by the use of humor. In one episode of her show Weeds, the main character Nancy is shown tearing up nude photos of herself and flushing them down the toilet. This is because she has caught her son Shane masturbating over them. In a prurient 3-minute scene, Nancy is shown lecturing her son on the inadvisability of masturbating over her.

“It’s a little quirky to masturbate over pictures of your mother,” she chides him gently, her voice oozing with sanctimonious concern for his moral welfare. She suggests that it is “possibly” wrong that he should masturbate over his mother’s image, throwing in a trendy reference to the omniscient Freud.

Yes, Papa Sigmund would have understood and offered absolution for her son’s incestuous feelings that are (allegedly) universal. All part of the growing up process, you understand.

Nancy advises her son to continue masturbating by all means but to seek out a more appropriate object for his sexual ardor. Like the girl next door. Or a Playboy model. “It’s nothing terrible or unnatural! Sex is good, Freud said. Or Annie Sprinkle maybe” (re Sprinkle, see my “Sex and the Jews“). But hey, jerking off over his mom,  that’s a bit “quirky”, isn’t it? Mothers, after all, are “possibly” unsuitable objects for filial passion. This all too obvious tongue-in-cheek prurience tries to pass itself off as cutting-edge sociological comment. If you object, you are obviously a Victorian prude.

Hey, lighten up man!—where’s your goddamn sense of humor?

Right. So this is the point we’ve reached. Sons being given pep talks on incestuous masturbation by their mothers is now, on American TV at any rate, a normal, everyday episode in a healthy mother-son relationship.  This is something that would have been inconceivable to our Christian ancestors only fifty years ago; and it is still inconceivable in many parts of the world where moral standards have managed to survive and sexual decency is still valued. The scene is played for laughs, and the actress playing Nancy sounds pretty much like Jewish comedienne Sarah Silverman trying her best to keep a straight face as she does a comic skit involving “sexual abuse” of her pet dog, apparently licking her dog’s anus—much to the horror of some passer-by who witnesses the “hilarious scene” and reports it to the cops.

We are clearly expected to view the mother-son incest scene in Kohan’s Weeds in a similarly tolerant, laid-back light. This is meant to be seen as as a touchingly amusing vignette of family life in the early 21st century: an example of quirky, cutting-edge “Jewish humor” at its ribald, irreverent, life-enhancing best.

You don’t have to be a genius to know what is going on here. Sexual perversion is being normalized. And humor is being used as a corrupting agent to make it all seem palatable, trendy and cool. You are made to feel guilty if you don’t find incest funny. And if do find it funny and give way to mirth, you have taken the first step down the slippery slope into degeneracy by trivializing sexual deviance and minimizing its moral turpitude.

In case you don’t believe me, here is the 3-minute Weeds video:

Maybe you found that little scene amusing? Maybe you’re wondering why I’m kicking up such a fuss about what tens of thousands of Americans are likely to find perfectly innocuous.

If so, you are part of the problem. You are not using your imagination. Ask yourself: is this sort of thing fit for family viewing? Imagine a nice American family—father, mother, son, daughter—watching this incest scene after dinner. How do you think the teenage son is going to feel about his mother? I’m willing to bet the entire family will be squirming with embarrassment in their seats, doing their best to hide their blushes.

Two things I can tell you for sure. Firstly, if that family are not acutely embarrassed, they’re abnormal. They’ve already lost the plot. Secondly, if they continue to watch this disgusting filth and chuckle over it like morons, pretending it’s hilarious and groovy. they are past redemption. Hopeless cases. They might as well hang themselves.

As for the guys who run American TV and manufacture this moral halitosis for the masses, they already are dead. They are the Walking Dead. How these people ever got into the topmost echelons of the entertainment industry is a mystery to me.

I guess the devil rules the world and looks after his own.

—  §  —

In the estimation of the Jewish Journal, Kohan is a “provocative, controversial” writer  who has the guts to tackle dark themes and paddle bravely in foul waters. “No topic is too grim,” the Jewish Journal  notes matter-of-factly, “no character too depraved.”

Time magazine is equally complimentary, calling Kohan a “force of nature” and lauding her for her genius in being able to depict shady characters who are “a breathtaking riot of color and [diverse] sexual orientation … characters of all backgrounds who are three-dimensional, flawed and sometimes unpleasant, but always human.” The fact that these breathtakingly colorful characters are also twisted and perverted, infecting the minds of millions with the virus of their depraved values, does not appear to trouble the Time magazine reviewer. He is probably a fellow club member, supping at the same table of tainted meats.

Kohan’s malign influence on American TV can hardly be exaggerated. She is all over the place. She has written numerous TV dramas and comedies, including Sex and the CityGilmore GirlsMad About You, and The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air. Every show mentioned above is a product of the Jewish imagination: Jewish writers, Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors. For example, Sex and the City was created by Jewish writer, director and producer Darren Star; Gilmore Girls by Jewish writer, director and producer Andy Sherman; Mad About You by Jewish writer and actor Paul Reiser and Jewish writer and producer Danny Jacobson; and, finally, The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air by Jewish writer and actor Andy Borowitz and his wife Susan Borowitz. (See here.)

If this isn’t Jewish over-representation, what is it? Non-Jewish America is having Jewish values thrust down its collective throat, willy-nilly. It is being permeated, whether it likes it or not, by jüdischer Geist (the “Jewish spirit”).

Not all the shows mentioned above are as subversively kinky as the shows in which Jenji Kohan is personally involved, such as Weeds and Orange is the New Black. It is to be noted, however, that Kohan’s eldest brother David—whom she considers, incidentally, as rather “tame” compared to herself (see below)—has been the single most important influence in America for the promotion of homosexuality on TV. David Kohan was the co-creator and producer of the hugely influential gay-themed sitcom Will & Grace. It was none other than Vice President Joe Biden who in 2013 openly acknowledged David Kohan’s seminal influence in casting a veil of glamor over homosexuality:

It wasn’t anything we legislatively did,” Biden said. “It was Will & Grace. Literally. That’s what changed peoples’ attitudes. I bet you 85 percent of those changes are a consequence of Jewish leaders in the industry. The influence is immense, the influence is immense.

Commenting on the point made by Biden, liberal Jewish columnist Jonathan Chait alludes mysteriously to a “vast left-wing conspiracy on your screen,” without bothering to clarify what ethnic group is in the forefront of activating and promoting this “vast left-wing conspiracy.” Agreeing with Biden that Will & Grace was “the single most important driving force in transforming public opinion on the subject [of homosexual relationships]”, Chait adds significantly, driving home the point I am trying to make here:

“Think of it from the conservative point of view. Imagine that large chunks of your entertainment mocked your values and even transformed once-uncontroversial beliefs of yours into a kind of bigotry that might be greeted with revulsion. You’d probably be angry, too.”

Yes, so don’t blame me if I’m angry. Anger is the only possible reaction to this outrageous onslaught on the traditional values of my Christian ancestors, the values I cherish. For the concerted Jewish attempt to normalize homosexuality, turning what was once widely seen as a mental sickness into a trendy alternative lifestyle, see this excellent article by Brenton Sanderson: “The Indoctrination Game, Part 2: Jewish media influence as decisive in creating a positive culture of homosexuality.”

The ubiquity of Jews in the entertainment industry, as well as their “debauching” influence on the American psyche, has been freely admitted  even by Jewish writers. Thus Adam Garfinkle, Jewish author and founding editor of The American Interest, points out in his 1990 book Jewcentricity:

“It is striking, one has to admit, that the cultural influence of Jews and Jewishness is what it is, considering that fewer than 5 million American Jews are influencing more than 296 million other Americans.” Noting the “increasingly salacious content of mass media”, he adds significantly,“There are Jews at every turn, in marketing, in media, and, of course, in the entertainment business itself. It does not take a rocket scientist to connect the dots: liberals are responsible for the dangerous debauching of our society, not least through vapid entertainment-culture garbage, and a disproportionate number of liberals who are doing precisely that are Jews. (Emphasis added, quoted here)

It seems nonsensical to assert, in the context of this candid admission by a prominent American Jew that Jews are largely to blame for the corruption of America, that what America needs right now is a greater infusion of “Jewish values”—whatever that’s supposed to mean. And yet this is precisely what Rabbi Shmuley Boteach preaches: that what non-Jewish Americans badly need right now is to be “healed” by the adoption of “Jewish values.”

The rabbi, renowned for his bestselling sex books with flashy titles like The Jewish Guide to Adultery and Kosher Lust: Love Is Not the Answer is precisely the type of rabbi whom Jenji Kohan would enthusiastically endorse. But how their shared “Jewish values” would benefit the rest of non-Jewish America is not altogether clear.

Lust is the pinnacle of holiness,” Rabbi Shmuley pontificates absurdly in one of his popular sex manuals. “If you put love and lust together, love stands no chance.”


“Lust is the pinnacle of holiness.”

I am not aware that even the Talmud says that lust is the pinnacle of holiness. The Old Testament certainly does not. This “philosophy of lust”, if we can call it that, so familiar to readers of the Marquis de Sade, is Kohan’s philosophy too and informs all her thought. Lust runs rampant through her scripts, rearing its head everywhere—even in Christian churches where nuns achieve “the pinnacle of holiness” through fellatio.

In Kohan’s bizarro fantasy world, almost every female in American female prisons—as in Orange is the New Black—is involved in steamy lesbian affairs with other female inmates. Characters take bets to see which of them can seduce the largest number of non-lesbian inmates. Let the camera enter a Christian church, as in Californication, and pan to a nun in her modest clerical robes. In no time at all, this demure devotee of Jesus Christ is shown going down on her knees—not to pray as you might expect—but to dispense oral sex to a stranger who has just dropped into the church to seek help for his sex problems.

The good sister advises him that what he needs is a blowjob. That will cheer him up a bit.

The whole scene is apparently a “fantasy”—which is supposed to make it more acceptable, because it’s not really happening except in the writer’s mind. But why do Jewish writers insist on locating their sexual fantasies—or the sexual fantasies of their characters—in Christian churches rather than in synagogues? I am asking, basically: if you are a Jewish writer, why pick on a Catholic church for a blowjob scene? Why not locate your fantasy in a synagogue? Are we expected to believe that blowjob scenes never take place in synagogues, only in wicked Catholic churches?

This 3-minute video, “A Blowjob in Church”, will show you what is being done to Christian America and its culture by sexually perverted Jewish writers whose fame is out of all proportions to their talents.

Ask yourself: how many sons masturbate over their mother’s nude photos? How many nuns fellate men in Catholic churches? The fact that these images are allowed to fester like poisonous weeds in the rich soil of the mass mind must give us cause for concern. This is mind pollution on a staggering scale.

Here is the illiterate YouTube introduction to this nasty little scene set in a Catholic church: “Church is a holy place for christians (sic) when they confess of sin (sic) not commit sin but in this video you see how the christian actor and actress is (sic) making fun of their own religion. So first look at your own self then blame others ok.”

Beautiful. Talk about sly and sneaky disinformation! The fact that the actor playing the “sinful”  Christian in the scene is in fact a Jew, a debauched looking specimen called David Duchovny (pictured here), is conveniently concealed—apart from the fact that the entire series is a product of the sleazy Jewish imagination: Jewish directors, Jewish producers, Jewish actors, Jewish scriptwriters.

—  §  —

“I want fucking all the time,” Kohan gushes in an interview. “That’s one of my things. We’re all doing it. We’re all thinking about it. We don’t see it enough. It’s hot. I love the sex stuff, and I want more. I love graphic sex, the more sex the better.”  (For more details, see here)

Brenton Sanderson notes:

‘Orange is the New Black’ is an incredibly degenerate show that inverts traditional Western morality and glamorizes homosexuality. The main themes of the show are that committed heterosexual relationships are abnormal and that Christianity is an evil creed….Every woman in the prison, with the exception of the Christian villain, is in a lesbian relationship with one of their fellow inmates — even a nun. Hollywood’s Jewish movers and shakers love to debase Christianity and Catholicism by depicting nuns in sexual roles…. This pornographic debasement of Christian symbols by Jews is a blatant way of  defiling Christian culture. (Emphasis added)

Jewish pornographer Al Goldstein, deceased publisher of Screw magazine, uses almost identical words — see here — so Brenton Sanderson is not saying anything outrageously controversial. He is merely stating the facts. According to one source, Kohan has succeeded in normalizing sexual perversion.

For my part, I find all this kinky sex incomprehensible, given that Kohan claims to be a devout follower of Judaism.

We are told that she had toyed with the idea of becoming a rabbi at one time and now attends two separate synagogues, as I have already noted above. Every Friday Kohan and her extended family have Shabbat dinner together. Her elder brother David, co-creator and producer of the gay-themed NBC sitcom Will & Grace, often attends these semi-religious meals at her house. Kohan dismisses his brand of homosexual humor as too tame for her, explaining, “I was always a little darker.”

She says her pornographic scripts help her to get in touch with her Jewish identity. “For me, the essence of my Judaism is to ask questions. In a way, the show allows me to follow the path of Judaism.”


“I want fucking all the time.”

I confess I am at a complete loss to understand any of this. It is totally beyond my comprehension to understand how two allegedly pious Jews, brother and sister, are both regular synagogue attendees and yet earn their respective livings by writing salacious TV scripts that openly promote and seek to normalize sexual perversion.

I can’t help wondering if all this ostensible piety is genuine or just camouflage. Do we really have a nice, synagogue-going lady here, doing her best to access deeper levels of spirituality that allow her “to follow the path of Judaism”, or is all this just cant and sanctimonious twaddle put on for our benefit by a lady who wants “fucking all the time” — a rather pathetic, unattractive, sex-crazed sleazebucket?

It is not for me to judge.

Jenji Kohan and her kind are just the tip of a giant iceberg. They are a small part of a vast underground sewer of filth that befouls the air of American TV — a media empire that now exports its unsavory products to all other parts of the world, infecting the minds of millions in many lands.
Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
%d bloggers like this: